Astronomy & Astrophysics
manuscript no. Dust ̇Polarized ̇Cl ̇astro-ph
c
©
ESO 2014
September 22, 2014
Planck
intermediate results. XXX.
The angular power spectrum of polarized dust emission
at intermediate and high Galactic latitudes
Planck Collaboration: R. Adam
76
, P. A. R. Ade
86
, N. Aghanim
61
, M. Arnaud
74
, J. Aumont
61
∗
, C. Baccigalupi
85
, A. J. Banday
94
,
9
,
R. B. Barreiro
67
, J. G. Bartlett
1
,
68
, N. Bartolo
31
, E. Battaner
97
,
98
, K. Benabed
62
,
93
, A. Benoit-L
́
evy
23
,
62
,
93
, J.-P. Bernard
94
,
9
, M. Bersanelli
34
,
51
,
P. Bielewicz
94
,
9
,
85
, A. Bonaldi
69
, L. Bonavera
67
, J. R. Bond
8
, J. Borrill
14
,
89
, F. R. Bouchet
62
,
93
, F. Boulanger
61
, A. Bracco
61
, M. Bucher
1
,
C. Burigana
50
,
32
,
52
, R. C. Butler
50
, E. Calabrese
91
, J.-F. Cardoso
75
,
1
,
62
, A. Catalano
76
,
73
, A. Challinor
64
,
70
,
12
, A. Chamballu
74
,
16
,
61
, R.-R. Chary
59
,
H. C. Chiang
26
,
6
, P. R. Christensen
82
,
38
, D. L. Clements
58
, S. Colombi
62
,
93
, L. P. L. Colombo
22
,
68
, C. Combet
76
, F. Couchot
71
, A. Coulais
73
,
A. Curto
5
,
67
, F. Cuttaia
50
, L. Danese
85
, R. D. Davies
69
, R. J. Davis
69
, P. de Bernardis
33
, G. de Zotti
47
,
85
, J. Delabrouille
1
, J.-M. Delouis
62
,
93
,
F.-X. D
́
esert
56
, C. Dickinson
69
, J. M. Diego
67
, K. Dolag
96
,
79
, H. Dole
61
,
60
, S. Donzelli
51
, O. Dor
́
e
68
,
11
, M. Douspis
61
, A. Ducout
62
,
58
, J. Dunkley
91
,
X. Dupac
41
, G. Efstathiou
64
, F. Elsner
62
,
93
, T. A. Enßlin
79
, H. K. Eriksen
65
, E. Falgarone
73
, F. Finelli
50
,
52
, O. Forni
94
,
9
, M. Frailis
49
,
A. A. Fraisse
26
, E. Franceschi
50
, A. Frejsel
82
, S. Galeotta
49
, S. Galli
62
, K. Ganga
1
, T. Ghosh
61
, M. Giard
94
,
9
, Y. Giraud-H
́
eraud
1
, E. Gjerløw
65
,
J. Gonz
́
alez-Nuevo
67
,
85
, K. M. G
́
orski
68
,
99
, S. Gratton
70
,
64
, A. Gregorio
35
,
49
,
55
, A. Gruppuso
50
, V. Guillet
61
, F. K. Hansen
65
, D. Hanson
80
,
68
,
8
,
D. L. Harrison
64
,
70
, G. Helou
11
, S. Henrot-Versill
́
e
71
, C. Hern
́
andez-Monteagudo
13
,
79
, D. Herranz
67
, E. Hivon
62
,
93
, W. A. Holmes
68
,
K. M. Hu
ff
enberger
24
, G. Hurier
61
, A. H. Ja
ff
e
58
, T. R. Ja
ff
e
94
,
9
, J. Jewell
68
, W. C. Jones
26
, M. Juvela
25
, E. Keih
̈
anen
25
, R. Keskitalo
14
,
T. S. Kisner
78
, R. Kneissl
40
,
7
, J. Knoche
79
, L. Knox
28
, N. Krachmalnico
ff
34
, M. Kunz
18
,
61
,
2
, H. Kurki-Suonio
25
,
46
, G. Lagache
61
, J.-M. Lamarre
73
,
A. Lasenby
5
,
70
, M. Lattanzi
32
, C. R. Lawrence
68
, J. P. Leahy
69
, R. Leonardi
41
, J. Lesgourgues
92
,
84
,
72
, F. Levrier
73
, M. Liguori
31
, P. B. Lilje
65
,
M. Linden-Vørnle
17
, M. L
́
opez-Caniego
67
, P. M. Lubin
29
, J. F. Mac
́
ıas-P
́
erez
76
, B. Ma
ff
ei
69
, D. Maino
34
,
51
, N. Mandolesi
50
,
4
,
32
, A. Mangilli
62
,
M. Maris
49
, P. G. Martin
8
, E. Mart
́
ınez-Gonz
́
alez
67
, S. Masi
33
, S. Matarrese
31
, P. Mazzotta
36
, A. Melchiorri
33
,
53
, L. Mendes
41
, A. Mennella
34
,
51
,
M. Migliaccio
64
,
70
, S. Mitra
57
,
68
, M.-A. Miville-Desch
ˆ
enes
61
,
8
, A. Moneti
62
, L. Montier
94
,
9
, G. Morgante
50
, D. Mortlock
58
, A. Moss
87
,
D. Munshi
86
, J. A. Murphy
81
, P. Naselsky
82
,
38
, F. Nati
33
, P. Natoli
32
,
3
,
50
, C. B. Netterfield
19
, H. U. Nørgaard-Nielsen
17
, F. Noviello
69
,
D. Novikov
58
, I. Novikov
82
, L. Pagano
33
,
53
, F. Pajot
61
, R. Paladini
59
, D. Paoletti
50
,
52
, B. Partridge
45
, F. Pasian
49
, G. Patanchon
1
, T. J. Pearson
11
,
59
,
O. Perdereau
71
, L. Perotto
76
, F. Perrotta
85
, V. Pettorino
44
, F. Piacentini
33
, M. Piat
1
, E. Pierpaoli
22
, D. Pietrobon
68
, S. Plaszczynski
71
,
E. Pointecouteau
94
,
9
, G. Polenta
3
,
48
, N. Ponthieu
61
,
56
, L. Popa
63
, G. W. Pratt
74
, S. Prunet
62
,
93
, J.-L. Puget
61
, J. P. Rachen
20
,
79
, W. T. Reach
95
,
R. Rebolo
66
,
15
,
39
, M. Remazeilles
69
,
61
,
1
, C. Renault
76
, A. Renzi
37
,
54
, S. Ricciardi
50
, I. Ristorcelli
94
,
9
, G. Rocha
68
,
11
, C. Rosset
1
, M. Rossetti
34
,
51
,
G. Roudier
1
,
73
,
68
, B. Rouill
́
e d’Orfeuil
71
, J. A. Rubi
̃
no-Mart
́
ın
66
,
39
, B. Rusholme
59
, M. Sandri
50
, D. Santos
76
, M. Savelainen
25
,
46
, G. Savini
83
,
D. Scott
21
, J. D. Soler
61
, L. D. Spencer
86
, V. Stolyarov
5
,
70
,
90
, R. Stompor
1
, R. Sudiwala
86
, R. Sunyaev
79
,
88
, D. Sutton
64
,
70
, A.-S. Suur-Uski
25
,
46
,
J.-F. Sygnet
62
, J. A. Tauber
42
, L. Terenzi
43
,
50
, M. Tomasi
34
,
51
, M. Tristram
71
, M. Tucci
18
,
71
, J. Tuovinen
10
, L. Valenziano
50
, J. Valiviita
25
,
46
, B. Van
Tent
77
, L. Vibert
61
, P. Vielva
67
, F. Villa
50
, L. A. Wade
68
, B. D. Wandelt
62
,
93
,
30
, R. Watson
69
, I. K. Wehus
68
, M. White
27
, S. D. M. White
79
,
D. Yvon
16
, A. Zacchei
49
, and A. Zonca
29
(A
ffi
liations can be found after the references)
Preprint online version: 19 September 2014
ABSTRACT
The polarized thermal emission from di
ff
use Galactic dust is the main foreground present in measurements of the polarization of the cosmic
microwave background (CMB) at frequencies above 100 GHz. In this paper we exploit the uniqueness of the
Planck
HFI polarization data from 100
to 353 GHz to measure the polarized dust angular power spectra
C
EE
`
and
C
BB
`
over the multipole range 40
< ` <
600 well away from the Galactic
plane. These measurements will bring new insights into interstellar dust physics and allow a precise determination of the level of contamination for
CMB polarization experiments. Despite the non-Gaussian and anisotropic nature of Galactic dust, we show that general statistical properties of the
emission can be characterized accurately over large fractions of the sky using angular power spectra. The polarization power spectra of the dust are
well described by power laws in multipole,
C
`
∝
`
α
, with exponents
α
EE
,
BB
=
−
2
.
42
±
0
.
02. The amplitudes of the polarization power spectra vary
with the average brightness in a way similar to the intensity power spectra. The frequency dependence of the dust polarization spectra is consistent
with modified blackbody emission with
β
d
=
1
.
59 and
T
d
=
19
.
6 K down to the lowest
Planck
HFI frequencies. We find a systematic di
ff
erence
between the amplitudes of the Galactic
B
- and
E
-modes,
C
BB
`
/
C
EE
`
=
0
.
5. We verify that these general properties are preserved towards high
Galactic latitudes with low dust column densities. We show that even in the faintest dust-emitting regions there are no “clean” windows in the sky
where primordial CMB
B
-mode polarization measurements could be made without subtraction of foreground emission. Finally, we investigate the
level of dust polarization in the specific field recently targeted by the BICEP2 experiment. Extrapolation of the
Planck
353 GHz data to 150 GHz
gives a dust power
D
BB
`
≡
`
(
`
+
1)
C
BB
`
/
(2
π
) of 1
.
32
×
10
−
2
μ
K
2
CMB
over the multipole range of the primordial recombination bump (40
< ` <
120);
the statistical uncertainty is
±
0
.
29
×
10
−
2
μ
K
2
CMB
and there is an additional uncertainty (
+
0
.
28
,
−
0
.
24)
×
10
−
2
μ
K
2
CMB
from the extrapolation. This
level is the same magnitude as reported by BICEP2 over this
`
range, which highlights the need for assessment of the polarized dust signal even
in the cleanest windows of the sky. The present uncertainties are large and will be reduced through an ongoing, joint analysis of the
Planck
and
BICEP2 data sets.
Key words.
Submillimetre: ISM – Radio continuum: ISM – Polarization – ISM: dust, magnetic fields – cosmic background radiation
1
arXiv:1409.5738v1 [astro-ph.CO] 19 Sep 2014
1. Introduction
The sky at high Galactic latitude and frequencies above about
100 GHz is dominated by thermal emission from the Galactic
interstellar medium, specifically arising from dust grains of
size about 0.1
μ
m. Asymmetrical dust grains align with the
Galactic magnetic field to produce polarized emission. This po-
larized submillimetre emission has been measured from ground-
based and balloon-borne telescopes (e.g., Hildebrand et al. 1999;
Beno
ˆ
ıt et al. 2004; Ponthieu et al. 2005; Vaillancourt 2007;
Matthews et al. 2014). The observed polarization relates to the
nature, size and shape of dust grains and the mechanisms of
alignment, discussed for example by Draine (2004) and Martin
(2007). It also probes the structure of the Galactic magnetic field,
which is an essential component of models of Galactic dust po-
larization (Baccigalupi 2003; Fauvet et al. 2011, 2012; O’Dea
et al. 2012; Ja
ff
e et al. 2013; Delabrouille et al. 2013).
The polarized emission from dust is also of interest in the
context of foregrounds (Tucci et al. 2005; Dunkley et al. 2009a;
Gold et al. 2011) to the cosmic microwave background (CMB).
On angular scales between 10
′
and a few tens of degrees, cosmo-
logical
B
-mode polarization signals may be present that were im-
printed during the epoch of inflation. The discovery of a primor-
dial
B
-mode polarization signature is a major scientific goal of a
large number of CMB experiments. These include ground-based
experiments (ACTPol, Niemack et al. 2010; BICEP2, BICEP2
Collaboration 2014a; Keck-array, Staniszewski et al. 2012;
POLARBEAR, Arnold et al. 2010; QUBIC, Ghribi et al. 2014;
QUIJOTE, Rubi
̃
no-Mart
́
ın et al. 2010; and SPTpol, Austermann
et al. 2012), stratospheric balloon missions (EBEX, Grainger
et al. 2008; and SPIDER, Fraisse et al. 2013) and the ESA
Planck
1
satellite (Tauber et al. 2010). Accurate assessment, and
if necessary subtraction of foreground contamination is critical
to the measurement of CMB
E
- and
B
-mode polarization be-
cause the expected signals from inflation and late-time reioniza-
tion are expected to be small.
Planck
has measured the all-sky dust polarization at
353 GHz, where the dust emission dominates over other po-
larized signals. These data have been presented in a first set
of publications in which the focus was on the structure of the
Galactic magnetic field and the characterization of dust polar-
ization properties (Planck Collaboration Int. XIX 2014; Planck
Collaboration Int. XX 2014; Planck Collaboration Int. XXI
2014; Planck Collaboration Int. XXII 2014). Here, we use the
Planck
polarized data to compute the
C
EE
`
and
C
BB
`
power spec-
tra of dust polarization over the multipole range 40
< ` <
600,
on large fractions of the sky away from the Galactic plane. We
also investigate dust polarization in sky patches at high Galactic
latitude with sizes comparable to those surveyed by ground-
based CMB experiments. We derive statistical properties of dust
polarization from these spectra, characterizing the shape of the
spectra and their amplitude with respect to both the observing
frequency and the mean dust intensity of the sky region over
which they are computed. We verify that these properties hold
in low-column-density patches at high Galactic latitude and we
∗
Corresponding author: Jonathan Aumont, jonathan.aumont@ias.u-
psud.fr
1
Planck
(
http://www.esa.int/Planck
) is a project of the
European Space Agency (ESA) with instruments provided by two sci-
entific consortia funded by ESA member states (in particular the lead
countries France and Italy), with contributions from NASA (USA) and
telescope reflectors provided by a collaboration between ESA and a sci-
entific consortium led and funded by Denmark.
explore statistically the potential existence of “clean” patches on
the sky that might be suitable for cosmology.
Our analysis of dust polarization is relevant to the present
generation of CMB polarization observations, as well as the de-
sign of future experiments. It gives a statistical description of
Galactic dust polarization, providing input for the modelling of
Galactic dust as part of component separation methods and for
CMB polarization likelihood analysis parameterization.
The BICEP2 collaboration has recently reported a significant
detection of the
B
-mode power spectrum around the expected
angular scale of the recombination bump, namely a few degrees
(BICEP2 Collaboration 2014a,b). Their analysis was based on
dust polarization models that predicted subdominant contamina-
tion of their
B
-mode signal by dust polarization. We use infor-
mation from our detailed analysis of
Planck
polarization data at
353 GHz to assess the potential dust contamination.
The paper is organized as follows. In Sect. 2, we present the
Planck
HFI polarization data used in this work and describe the
general properties of the polarization maps in terms of emis-
sion components and systematic e
ff
ects. In Sect. 3, we describe
our method for computing the dust
C
EE
`
and
C
BB
`
angular power
spectra, including the selected science regions of interest on the
sky. We assess and compare the two methods we use to com-
pute the power spectra in Appendix A. In Sect. 4, we present
power spectra of dust polarization for multipoles
` >
40, com-
puted with high signal-to-noise ratio (S
/
N) on large fractions of
the sky, and characterize their shape and amplitude. We extend
this analysis to smaller sky patches at high Galactic latitude in
Sect. 5. In Appendix B we discuss some complementary aspects
of this analysis of patches. These results are used specifically
in Sect. 5.3 to build a map of the expected dust contamination
of the
C
BB
`
power spectrum at 150 GHz and
`
=
80. In Sect. 6
we present a study of the polarized dust emission in the vicinity
of the BICEP2 region. Systematic e
ff
ects relating to the
Planck
angular power spectrum estimates are assessed in Appendix C.
Section 7 summarizes the main conclusions and discusses the
implications of this work for future CMB experiments.
2
2.
Planck
polarization maps
2.1. Planck data
The
Planck
collaboration recently released the
Planck
satellite
nominal mission temperature data and published a set of papers
describing these data and their cosmological interpretation (e.g.,
Planck Collaboration I 2014; Planck Collaboration XVI 2014).
These results are based on the data from the two instruments on-
board the satellite (LFI, Low Frequency Instrument, Mennella
et al. 2011) and (HFI, High Frequency Instrument, Planck HFI
Core Team 2011). The data processing of the nominal mission
data (Surveys 1 and 2, 14 months) was summarized in Planck
Collaboration II (2014) and Planck Collaboration VI (2014).
Planck
HFI measures the linear polarization at 100, 143, 217,
and 353 GHz (Rosset et al. 2010). The properties of the detectors
(sensitivity, spectral response, noise properties, beams, etc.) are
described in detail in Lamarre et al. (2010) and their in-flight per-
formance is reported in Planck HFI Core Team (2011), Planck
Collaboration VII (2014), Planck Collaboration VIII (2014),
Planck Collaboration IX (2014), and Planck Collaboration X
2
While this paper was in preparation two papers have used publicly
available polarization information from
Planck
to infer potentially high
levels of dust contamination in the BICEP2 field (Mortonson & Seljak
2014; Flauger et al. 2014).
Planck Collaboration: Dust polarization at high latitudes
(2014), while Planck Collaboration VI (2014) describes the gen-
eral processing applied to the data to measure polarization. In
this paper, we make use of unreleased, full-mission (Surveys 1
to 5, 30 months, Planck Collaboration I 2014), polarization maps
of the
Planck
HFI (internal data release “DX11d”), projected
into the
HEALPix
pixelization scheme (G
́
orski et al. 2005). This
is one of the first publications to use these maps, which will be
described in the
Planck
cosmology 2014 release.
To compute polarization angular power spectra, we use
Q
and
U
maps at 100, 143, 217, and 353 GHz. Specifically, we
calculate power spectra using the so-called “Detector-Set” maps
(hereafter “DetSets”), constructed using two subsets of polar-
ization sensitive bolometers (PSBs) at a given frequency (see
table 3 of Planck Collaboration VI 2014). Each DetSet polariza-
tion map is constructed using data from two pairs of PSBs, with
the angle between the two PSBs in a pair being 90
◦
, and the an-
gle between pairs being 45
◦
. In this paper we concentrate on the
Q
and
U
maps at 353 GHz. The Stokes
Q
and
U
maps at lower
frequencies (100, 143, and 217 GHz) are only used to determine
the spectral energy distribution (SED) of the dust emission in
polarization.
To quantify systematic e
ff
ects, we additionally use maps
made from other data subsets (Planck Collaboration VI 2014).
We use the ring halves, (hereafter “HalfRing”), where the ap-
proximately 60 circles performed for each
Planck
telescope ring
(also called a stable pointing period) are divided into two inde-
pendent subsets of 30 circles. Additionally we use observational
years (hereafter “Years”), consisting of Surveys 1 and 2 on the
one hand and Surveys 3 and 4 on the other, to build two further
maps with independent noise.
The
Planck
maps we use are in thermodynamic units
(K
CMB
). To characterize the SED of the dust emission in polar-
ization we express the data as the specific intensity (such as
I
d
(
ν
)
for Stokes
I
dust emission) at the
Planck
reference frequencies,
using the conversion factors and colour corrections from Planck
Collaboration IX (2014).
3
For the average dust SED at interme-
diate Galactic latitudes, the colour correction factor is 1.12 at
353 GHz (see Table 3 in Planck Collaboration Int. XXII 2014).
As well as these basic products, a
Planck
CO map from
Planck Collaboration XIII (2014), the so-called “Type 3” map,
and the
Planck
857 GHz map, are also used in the selection of
the large intermediate latitude analysis regions (see Sect. 3.3.1).
2.2. Emission contributions to the Planck HFI polarization
maps
2.2.1. Polarized thermal dust emission
Thermal dust emission is partially linearly polarized (e.g.,
Hildebrand et al. 1999; Beno
ˆ
ıt et al. 2004; Ponthieu et al. 2005;
Vaillancourt 2007). It is the dominant polarized foreground sig-
nal in the high frequency
Planck
bands (Tucci et al. 2005;
3
The conversion factor from K
CMB
to MJy sr
−
1
is computed for
a specific intensity
I
ν
∝
ν
−
1
. The colour correction depends on the
dust SED; it is the scaling factor used to transform from the specific
intensity of the dust emission, at the reference frequency, to the
Planck
brightness in MJy sr
−
1
(see equation 19 in Planck Collaboration Int.
XXII 2014). The conversion factors and the colour corrections are
computed via equation (32) in Planck Collaboration IX (2014) using
the
Planck
HFI filters and the
Planck
UcCC
software available through
the
Planck
Explanatory Supplement (
http://www.sciops.esa.
int/wikiSI/planckpla/index.php?title=Unit_conversion_
and_Color_correction&instance=Planck_Public_PLA
); we use
the band-average values.
Dunkley et al. 2009b; Fraisse et al. 2009; Fauvet et al. 2011;
Planck Collaboration Int. XXII 2014).
Dust polarization arises from alignment of non-spherical
grains with the interstellar magnetic field (e.g., Hildebrand 1988;
Draine 2004; Martin 2007). The structure of the dust polarization
sky has already been described using maps of the polarization
fraction (
p
) and angle (
ψ
) derived from the
Planck
HFI 353 GHz
data (Planck Collaboration Int. XIX 2014; Planck Collaboration
Int. XX 2014). The map of
p
shows structure on all scales,
with polarization fractions ranging from low (less than 1 %) to
high values (greater than 18 %). Planck Collaboration Int. XIX
(2014) and Planck Collaboration Int. XX (2014) report an anti-
correlation between
p
and the local dispersion of
ψ
, which indi-
cates that variations in
p
arise mainly from depolarization asso-
ciated with changes in the magnetic field orientation within the
beam, rather than from changes in the e
ffi
ciency of grain align-
ment.
Planck Collaboration Int. XXII (2014) showed that the SED
of dust emission in polarization over the four
Planck
HFI fre-
quencies from 100 to 353 GHz is consistent with a modified
blackbody emission law of the type
I
d
(
ν
)
∝
ν
β
d
B
ν
(
T
d
), with
spectral index
β
d
=
1
.
59 for
T
d
=
19
.
6 K,
4
and where
B
ν
is the
Planck function. About 39 % of the sky at intermediate Galactic
latitudes was analysed.
5
Among 400 circular patches with 10
◦
radius (equivalent to a sky fraction
f
e
ff
sky
=
0
.
0076) the 1
σ
dis-
persion of
β
d
was 0.17 for constant
T
d
=
19
.
6 K. We scale
this uncertainty on
β
d
to larger sky areas by using the factor
(0
.
0076
/
f
e
ff
sky
)
0
.
5
. This is a conservative choice because this un-
certainty includes the e
ff
ects of noise in the data and so is an
upper limit to the true regional variations of
β
d
on this scale.
This polarization spectral index can be compared to variations
in the spectral index
β
I
d
,
mm
for the intensity SED. For that quan-
tity the S
/
N of the data is higher than for polarization and Planck
Collaboration Int. XXII (2014) report a dispersion of 0.07 (1
σ
)
over the same sized circular patches. Planck Collaboration Int.
XVII (2014) extend this analysis for intensity to high Galactic
latitudes in the southern Galactic cap, using the dust-H
i
correla-
tion to separate the faint emission of dust from the anisotropies
of the cosmic infrared background, and find a dispersion of about
0.10 in
β
I
d
,
mm
. We expect spectral variations to be correlated in
polarization and intensity, unless the dust emission has a signifi-
cant component that is unpolarized.
2.2.2. CMB
The CMB temperature anisotropies have been measured with
unprecedented accuracy by the
Planck
collaboration (Planck
Collaboration I 2014; Planck Collaboration XV 2014), and pre-
liminary
Planck
polarization results have been demonstrated to
be in very good agreement with the cosmology inferred from
temperature measurements (Planck Collaboration I 2014; Planck
Collaboration XVI 2014).
For
C
EE
`
, the
Λ
CDM concordance model has been shown to
be a very good fit to all the available data (including preliminary
Planck
results at
`
&
50; see Barkats et al. 2014 for a recent com-
pendium). For 353 GHz data at small angular scales (
`
&
400),
the
E
-mode CMB polarization is comparable to the power of
dust polarization at high Galactic latitudes.
4
This spectral index was called
β
p
d
,
mm
in that paper, but we adopt a
more compact notation here.
5
More specifically, for the latitude range 10
◦
<
|
b
|
<
60
◦
, with
patches contained within the region in Fig. 1 (below) defined by
f
sky
=
0
.
8 minus that with
f
sky
=
0
.
4.
3
Planck Collaboration: Dust polarization at high latitudes
The CMB
B
-mode power, even for the highest primordial
tensor perturbation models, is negligible with respect to the dust
polarization at 353 GHz. Since no reliable published CMB po-
larization maps are available, we have chosen not to remove
the CMB polarization from the
Planck
HFI
Q
and
U
maps.
Nevertheless, when studying the
Planck
HFI bands, because the
CMB
E
-mode polarization is significant with respect to the dust
at 353 GHz at high multipoles (and even at lower multipoles for
the lower frequencies), we subtract from the dust power spec-
tra the
Planck
best-fit
Λ
CDM
C
EE
`
model (column 2 of table 2
in Planck Collaboration XVII 2014), paying the price of an in-
creased error due to sample variance. No CMB is removed in
this work when computing the dust
C
BB
`
spectra.
2.2.3. Synchrotron emission
Synchrotron emission is known to be significantly polarized
(up to 75 % for typical relativistic electron spectra, Rybicki &
Lightman 1979). Since its specific intensity scaling with fre-
quency follows a power law with a spectral index close to
−
3
(Gold et al. 2011; Macellari et al. 2011; Fuskeland et al. 2014),
synchrotron polarized emission is expected to be subdominant
in the
Planck
HFI channels in general and negligible at 353 GHz
(Tucci et al. 2005; Dunkley et al. 2009a; Gold et al. 2011;
Fauvet et al. 2011; Fuskeland et al. 2014; Planck Collaboration
Int. XXII 2014). Hence, we neither subtract nor mask any syn-
chrotron contribution before estimating the angular power spec-
tra of dust polarization. The justification of this assumption will
be demonstrated below by studying the frequency dependence
of the polarized dust power between 100 and 353 GHz (but also
see Appendix C.4).
2.2.4. Polarized point sources
Radio sources have been shown to have a fractional polarization
of a few percent (e.g., Battye et al. 2011; Massardi et al. 2013).
Their contribution to the polarization angular power spectra in
the
Planck
HFI bands is expected to be negligible at low and
intermediate multipoles (Battye et al. 2011; Tucci & To
ff
olatti
2012). Upper limits have been set on the polarization of infrared
galaxies, and their contribution to the polarization power spec-
tra is also expected to be negligible (e.g., Sei
ff
ert et al. 2007).
However, the brightest of the polarized point sources can be re-
sponsible for ringing in the angular power spectra estimation,
and therefore need to be masked (see Sect. 3.3.1).
2.2.5. CO emission
The first three carbon monoxide (CO) Galactic emission lines
at 115 GHz (
J
=
1
→
0), 230 GHz (
J
=
2
→
1), and 345 GHz
(
J
=
3
→
2), contribute significantly to the power in the
Planck
HFI bands at 100, 217, and 353 GHz, respectively (Planck
Collaboration IX 2014). The
Planck
data were used to pro-
duce the first all-sky maps of Galactic CO emission (Planck
Collaboration XIII 2014). It is known that CO emission can be
intrinsically polarized (Goldreich & Kylafis 1982; Li & Henning
2011). Furthermore, CO emission can induce spurious polariza-
tion, due to the di
ff
erences in spectral transmission at the CO fre-
quencies between
Planck
HFI detectors (Planck Collaboration
IX 2014). For these reasons, we mask CO-emitting regions
(Sect. 3.3.1). Outside this mask, as has been shown in Planck
Collaboration XIII (2014) by comparing the
Planck
CO maps to
high Galactic latitude ground-based CO observations (Hartmann
et al. 1998; Magnani et al. 2000), the CO emission is negligible
in the
Planck
channels (lower than one fourth of each channel
noise rms at 95 % CL). We will check that our polarization anal-
ysis is not contaminated by CO by examining the frequency de-
pendence of the polarized angular power spectra of the dust (see
Sect. 4.5).
2.3. Systematics of the Planck HFI polarization maps
The first CMB polarization results from
Planck
were presented
in Planck Collaboration I (2014) and Planck Collaboration XVI
(2014). The
EE
power spectrum at
` >
200 was found to be con-
sistent with the cosmological model derived from temperature
anisotropies. Systematic e
ff
ects in the data have so far limited
the use of
Planck
HFI polarization data on large angular scales.
The polarization systematics in the 2013 data were discussed
and estimated in Planck Collaboration VI (2014) (see the power
spectra shown in their figure 27). The same data were used in
the
Planck
Galactic polarization papers (Planck Collaboration
Int. XIX 2014; Planck Collaboration Int. XX 2014; Planck
Collaboration Int. XXI 2014; Planck Collaboration Int. XXII
2014) and there the low brightness regions of the 353 GHz sky
were masked.
In this paper, we use a new set of
Planck
polarization maps
for which the systematic e
ff
ects have been significantly reduced.
Corrections will be fully described and applied in the
Planck
2014 cosmology release, as well as the remaining systematic ef-
fects that we describe briefly here.
Two main e
ff
ects have been corrected in the time-ordered
data prior to mapmaking. The correction for the nonlinearity of
the analogue-to-digital converters was improved, and we have
also corrected the data for very long time constants that were not
previously identified (see Planck Collaboration VI 2014; Planck
Collaboration X 2014). After these corrections, then over the
multipole range 40
< ` <
600 relevant to this analysis, the main
systematic e
ff
ects result from leakage of intensity into polariza-
tion maps. E
ff
ects arising from polarization angle and polariza-
tion e
ffi
ciency uncertainties have been shown to be second order
(Planck Collaboration VI 2014). The leakage e
ff
ect can be ex-
pressed as
∆
{
Q
,
U
}
ν
(
ˆ
n
)
=
∑
s
∑
b
γ
s
,
b
ν
Γ
b
,
I
→{
Q
,
U
}
ν
(
ˆ
n
)
I
s
ν
(
ˆ
n
)
,
(1)
where
ν
is the frequency, and
Γ
b
,
I
→{
Q
,
U
}
ν
, the leakage pattern for
bolometer
b
, is multiplied by the di
ff
erent
s
leakage source maps
I
s
ν
and their associated scaling coe
ffi
cients
γ
s
,
b
ν
. The leakage pat-
terns are fully determined by the scanning strategy. They repre-
sent the cumulative result of all the systematic e
ff
ects that lead to
a leakage of intensity to polarization. In the
Planck
HFI bands,
there are three main sources of intensity to polarization leakage:
(i) monopole di
ff
erences between detectors not corrected by data
destriping (the intensity source term is constant over the sky); (ii)
bolometer inter-calibration mismatch (the source term is the full
intensity map, including the CMB dipole and the Galactic emis-
sion); and (iii) a dust spectral mismatch term. The spectral band-
pass varies from one bolometer to another for a given band. As
the bolometer gain is calibrated on the CMB dipole, the di
ff
eren-
tial gains on the dust emission produce the bandpass mismatch
term (for which the source term is the dust intensity map).
Results from a global fit of the
Q
and
U
maps with these
three leakage terms
Γ
b
,
I
→{
Q
,
U
}
ν
I
s
ν
are used to quantify the leakage.
This fit yields estimates of the scaling coe
ffi
cients at each fre-
quency
ν
in Eq. (1), which allow us to compute angular power
4
Planck Collaboration: Dust polarization at high latitudes
spectra of the leakage terms in Sect. 4. We point out that the fit
captures any emission in the maps that has a pattern on the sky
similar to one of the leakage patterns. These global fit maps are
used to assess the level of systematics, but are not removed from
the data.
An independent and complementary estimate of systematic
e
ff
ects in the data is provided by the null tests that we can
build from the DetSets, HalfRings, and Years data subsets (see
Sect. 2.1). These null tests are a good way of determining the
level of any systematics other than intensity to polarization leak-
age. These are pursued in Sect. 4.1 and Appendices B.1 and C.3.
3. Computation of angular power spectra of
polarized dust emission
3.1. Methods
We can use the
Planck
data to compute the polarization angu-
lar power spectra (
C
EE
`
and
C
BB
`
) of the polarized dust emission
within selected sky regions. Even if the statistical properties of
the dust emission on the sky might not be entirely captured by a
2-point function estimator, because the scope of this paper is to
assess the level of dust in the framework of CMB data analysis,
we follow the approximation that is generally made when pro-
cessing such data, i.e., that a large fraction of the information is
contained in power spectra.
On an incomplete sky, a polarization field can be divided
into three classes of modes: pure
E
-modes; pure
B
-modes; and
“ambiguous” modes, which are a mixture of the true
E
- and
B
-
modes (Bunn et al. 2003).
The ambiguous modes represent a cross-talk between
E
and
B
, which is often referred to as “
E
-to-
B
leakage” for the CMB
(because for the CMB
C
EE
`
C
BB
`
). Methods used to estimate
the CMB angular power spectrum for polarization account and
correct analytically for the incomplete sky coverage. However,
the presence of the ambiguous modes yields a biased estimate of
the variance of the spectra, unless so-called “pure” power spec-
trum estimators are used (Smith 2006). For dust polarization, the
power in
E
- and
B
-modes are comparable, and we do not expect
a significant variance bias.
The two specific approaches we use are
Xpol
, our main
method, which we describe as a “classical” pseudo-
C
`
estima-
tor, and, for comparison,
Xpure
, a pure pseudo-
C
`
estimator.
Since (as we demonstrate below) they give similar results for
the present study, the former is chosen to be our main method
because it is less computationally expensive.
3.1.1.
Xpol
Xpol
is an extension to polarization of the
Xspect
method
(Tristram et al. 2005).
Xspect
computes the pseudo power spec-
tra and corrects them for incomplete sky coverage, filtering ef-
fects, and pixel and beam window functions. Correction for in-
complete sky coverage is performed using a
Master
-like al-
gorithm (Hivon et al. 2002), consisting of the inversion of the
mode-mode coupling matrix
M
``
′
that describes the e
ff
ect of the
partial sky coverage;
M
``
′
is computed directly from the power
spectrum of the mask that selects the data in the analysis re-
gion of interest (Sect. 3.3). The
HEALPix
pixel window functions
(G
́
orski et al. 2005) are used to correct for pixelization e
ff
ects.
For the beams we use the
Planck
HFI individual detector beam
transfer functions described in Planck Collaboration VII (2014).
Xpol
estimates the error bars analytically, without requiring
Monte Carlo simulations. Using simulated data comprising in-
homogeneous white noise and a Gaussian map with a dust power
spectrum, we have checked that this analytical estimate is not bi-
ased for multipoles
` >
40. The analytical error bars combine the
contributions from instrumental noise and sample variance. The
Gaussian approximation of the sample variance is
var
(
C
XX
`
bin
)
=
2
(2
`
+
1)
f
sky
∆
`
bin
(
C
XX
`
bin
)
2
,
(2)
where
X
=
{
E
,
B
}
,
f
sky
is the retained sky fraction (which can be
f
e
ff
sky
if the sky field is apodized), and
∆
`
bin
is the size of the mul-
tipole bin
`
bin
. To estimate the error relevant to the polarized dust
signal measured within a given region, we subtract quadratically
this estimate of the contribution from sample variance. The per-
formance of
Xpol
on Gaussian simulations that have
EE
and
BB
dust-like angular power spectra is presented in Appendix A.
3.1.2.
Xpure
Xpure
is a numerical implementation of the pure pseudo-
spectral approach described and validated in Grain et al. (2009).
The method is optimized for computing CMB
B
-mode power
spectra over small sky patches. It uses a suitably chosen sky
apodization that vanishes (along with its first derivative) at the
edges of the patch, in order to minimize the e
ff
ects of
E
-to-
B
leakage. For the estimation of the angular power spectra of the
Planck
data we compute the cross-correlation of two di
ff
erent
DetSets. Uncertainties are obtained by performing Monte Carlo
inhomogeneous white noise simulations, considering the diago-
nal terms of the pixel-pixel covariance for the two data sets.
We have applied this algorithm to
Planck
353 GHz maps
and simulations to estimate the
B
-mode power spectrum of the
Galactic thermal dust emission in regions ranging from 1 % to
30 % of the sky. We have used
Xpure
here as a cross-check for
the robustness of the
Xpol
method presented in the previous sec-
tion. Validation and comparison of the performance of the two
algorithms on simulations is presented in Appendix A and appli-
cation to the data in Appendix C.1.
3.2. Computing cross-spectra
To avoid a bias arising from the noise, we compute all the
Planck
power spectra from cross-correlations of DetSets maps
(see Sect. 2). The noise independence of the two DetSet maps
at a given frequency was quantified in Planck Collaboration XV
(2014) and the resulting level of noise bias in the cross-power
spectra between them has been shown to be negligible. The
cross-power spectrum at a given frequency
ν
is
C
`
(
ν
×
ν
)
≡
C
`
(
D
1
ν
×
D
2
ν
)
,
(3)
where
D
1
ν
and
D
2
ν
are the two independent DetSet 1 and DetSet 2
maps at the frequency
ν
. The
Planck
cross-band spectrum be-
tween the frequencies
ν
and
ν
′
is
C
`
(
ν
×
ν
′
)
≡
1
4
[
C
`
(
D
1
ν
×
D
1
ν
′
)
+
C
`
(
D
2
ν
×
D
2
ν
′
)
+
C
`
(
D
1
ν
×
D
2
ν
′
)
+
C
`
(
D
2
ν
×
D
1
ν
′
)
]
,
(4)
or equivalently the cross-spectrum between
ν
and
ν
′
of the aver-
aged frequency maps (
D
1
ν
+
D
2
ν
)
/
2.
We recall that from each computed
C
EE
`
spectrum we
subtract the
Planck
best-fit
Λ
CDM
C
EE
`
model (Planck
Collaboration XVI 2014), i.e., the theoretical
C
EE
`
model ob-
tained from the temperature data fit, while
C
BB
`
spectra are kept
unaltered.
5
Planck Collaboration: Dust polarization at high latitudes
Table 1: Properties of the large retained (LR) science regions described in Sect. 3.3.1. For each region,
f
sky
is the initial sky fraction,
f
e
ff
sky
its value after point source masking and apodization,
〈
I
353
〉
the mean specific intensity at 353 GHz within the region, in MJy sr
−
1
,
and
N
H
i
the mean H
i
column density, in units of 10
20
cm
−
2
(Kalberla et al. 2005). For the power-law fits in multipole
`
, we also list
the exponents
α
EE
and
α
BB
(Sect. 4.2), the
χ
2
of the fits with fixed exponents
α
EE
=
α
BB
=
−
2
.
42, the value
A
EE
of the fitted
D
EE
`
amplitude at
`
=
80 (in
μ
K
2
CMB
at 353 GHz, Sect. 4.3), and the mean of the amplitude ratio
〈
A
BB
/
A
EE
〉
(see Sect. 4.4).
LR24
LR33
LR42
LR53
LR63
LR72
f
sky
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
f
e
ff
sky
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0.24
0.33
0.42
0.53
0.63
0.72
〈
I
353
〉
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0.068
0.085
0.106
0.133
0.167
0.227
N
H
i
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.65
2.12
2.69
3.45
4.41
6.05
α
EE
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
−
2
.
40
±
0
.
09
−
2
.
38
±
0
.
07
−
2
.
34
±
0
.
04
−
2
.
36
±
0
.
03
−
2
.
42
±
0
.
02
−
2
.
43
±
0
.
02
α
BB
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
−
2
.
29
±
0
.
15
−
2
.
37
±
0
.
12
−
2
.
46
±
0
.
07
−
2
.
43
±
0
.
05
−
2
.
44
±
0
.
03
−
2
.
46
±
0
.
02
χ
2
EE
(
α
EE
=
−
2
.
42,
N
dof
=
21) . . .
26
.
3
28
.
1
31
.
8
38
.
3
32
.
7
44
.
8
χ
2
BB
(
α
BB
=
−
2
.
42
,
N
dof
=
21) . . .
18
.
9
14
.
0
21
.
1
22
.
1
15
.
4
21
.
9
A
EE
(
`
=
80) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
37
.
5
±
1
.
6
51
.
0
±
1
.
6
78
.
6
±
1
.
7
124
.
2
±
1
.
9
197
.
1
±
2
.
3
328
.
0
±
2
.
8
〈
A
BB
/
A
EE
〉
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0
.
49
±
0
.
04
0
.
48
±
0
.
03
0
.
53
±
0
.
02
0
.
54
±
0
.
02
0
.
53
±
0
.
01
0
.
53
±
0
.
01
Fig. 1: Masks and complementary selected large regions that re-
tain fractional coverage of the sky
f
sky
from 0.8 to 0.3 (see details
in Sect. 3.3.1). The darkest blue is the CO mask, whose com-
plement is a selected region with
f
sky
=
0
.
8. In increments of
f
sky
=
0
.
1, the retained regions can be identified by the colours
dark red (0.3) to dark blue (0.8), inclusively. Also shown is the
(unapodized) point source mask used.
3.3. Selection of regions
To measure the dust polarization power spectra with high S
/
N,
we select six large regions, the analysis regions of interest at
intermediate Galactic latitude, which have e
ff
ective coverage of
the sky from 24 to 72 % (see Sect. 3.3.1).
6
For statistical studies
at high Galactic latitude, we compute spectra on a complete set
of smaller regions or patches (Sect. 3.3.2), similar in size to the
patches observed in typical CMB experiments.
3.3.1. Large regions
For selection of all of the large regions, we used the
Planck
CO map from Planck Collaboration XIII (2014), smoothed to
a 5
◦
resolution, to mask the sky wherever the CO line brightness
6
Although the selection process is similar to that in Planck
Collaboration XV (2014), there are di
ff
erences in detail.
I
CO
≥
0
.
4 K km s
−
1
.
7
This mask is shown in Fig. 1. The com-
plement to this mask by itself defines a preliminary region that
retains a sky fraction
f
sky
=
0
.
8.
We then mask the sky above successively lower thresholds
of
I
857
in the
Planck
857 GHz intensity map, smoothed to a 5
◦
resolution, chosen such that together with the CO mask we select
five more preliminary regions that retain
f
sky
from 0.7 to 0.3 in
steps of 0.1. These six regions are displayed in Fig. 1.
To avoid power leakage, these six masks are then apodized
by convolving with a 5
◦
FWHM Gaussian which alters the win-
dow function by gradually reducing the signal towards the edges
of the retained regions and thus lowers the e
ff
ective retained sky
coverage. The
f
e
ff
sky
value is simply defined as the mean sky cov-
erage of the window function map.
Finally, we mask data within a radius 2
σ
beam
of point
sources selected from the PCCS catalogue (Planck Collaboration
XXVIII 2014) at 353 GHz. The selected sources have S
/
N
>
7
and a flux density above 400 mJy. Selection of spurious infra-
red sources in bright dust-emitting regions is avoided by using
contamination indicators of infrared cirrus listed in the PCCS
description (Planck Collaboration XXVIII 2014). This point-
source masking is done in order to prevent the brightest polar-
ized radio sources from producing ringing in the power spec-
trum estimation, while avoiding the removal of dust emitting re-
gions and their statistical contribution to the angular power spec-
tra. The details of this source selection will be presented in the
Planck
2014 release papers. The edges of the masks around point
sources were apodized with a 30
′
FWHM Gaussian, further re-
ducing the retained net e
ff
ective sky coverage.
In combination these masking and apodization procedures
result in six large retained (LR) regions, which we distinguish
hereafter using the percentage of the sky retained (the net e
ff
ec-
tive fractional sky coverages,
f
e
ff
sky
, are listed in Table 1), e.g.,
LR72 for the largest region and LR24 for the smallest.
Table 1 also lists other properties of the regions, including
〈
I
353
〉
, the mean specific intensity at 353 GHz within the region
7
We use the CO (
J
=
1
→
0) “Type 3” map, which has the highest
signal-to-noise ratio. At this resolution and for this map, the cut we
apply corresponds to
S
/
N
>
8.
6
Planck Collaboration: Dust polarization at high latitudes
in MJy sr
−
1
, and
N
H
i
, the mean H
i
column density in units of
10
20
cm
−
2
computed on the LAB H
i
survey data cube (Kalberla
et al. 2005).
3.3.2. Small patches at high Galactic latitude
To examine the statistics of the angular power spectra at
high Galactic latitude, we also analyse the
Planck
polariza-
tion maps within patches with a size similar to those of typ-
ical ground-based and balloon-borne CMB experiments (e.g.,
QUIET Collaboration et al. 2012; Hanson et al. 2013; BICEP2
Collaboration 2014b; Naess et al. 2014; Ade et al. 2014).
Specifically, we consider 400 deg
2
circular areas (radius 11.
◦
3)
centred on the central pixel positions of the
HEALPix
N
side
=
8
grid that have Galactic latitude
|
b
|
>
35
◦
. This results in 352
such patches. These are apodized with a 2
◦
FWHM Gaussian,
which reduces the retained sky fraction to
f
e
ff
sky
=
0
.
0080 for each
patch. For these small patches, we do not mask point sources as
was done in selecting the large regions, since we want to pre-
serve the same
f
e
ff
sky
for each mask, nor is the CO mask needed,
since we use these masks only on the 353 GHz high Galactic lat-
itude data. Note that for
N
side
=
8, pixels have an area of about
54 deg
2
and characteristic dimension about 7.
◦
4. Therefore, this
HEALPix
grid oversamples the sky relative to this patch size, so
that the patches overlap and are not independent.
4. Dust polarized angular power spectra at
intermediate Galactic latitude
In this section, we quantify the 353 GHz dust polarization in the
power spectrum domain, achieving a high S
/
N through the use
of LR regions. For convenience we present results for
D
EE
`
and
D
BB
`
, where
D
`
≡
`
(
`
+
1)
C
`
/
(2
π
).
4.1. Description of the spectra
Using
Xpol
we have computed
D
EE
`
and
D
BB
`
from the two
DetSets at 353 GHz, as a function of the multipole
`
in the range
40–600.
8
These represent the first measurements of the thermal
dust
D
EE
`
and
D
BB
`
power spectra on large fractions of the sky
for
` >
40 (see Ponthieu et al. 2005; Gold et al. 2011, for earlier
related studies).
In Fig. 2 we present the results for
f
sky
=
{
0
.
3
,
0
.
5
,
0
.
7
}
.
The amplitudes of the spectra increase with increasing
f
sky
be-
cause the polarized emission is brighter on average when more
sky is retained. We point out that the LR regions presented in
Sect. 3.3.1 overlap, since they form a nested set. However, the
power spectra derived from them are almost independent of each
other because each spectrum is dominated by the brightest ar-
eas in the corresponding region, namely the parts closest to the
Galactic plane and hence the areas in which each LR region dif-
fers from those nested inside it.
The
D
EE
`
and
D
BB
`
spectra are characterized by a power-law
dependence on multipole
`
over the range
`
=
40 to 600; further-
more, the slope is similar for di
ff
erent regions that retain from 24
to 63 % of the sky.
Fig. 2 also shows the
D
EE
`
power spectrum computed from
the
Planck
2013 best-fit
Λ
CDM model of the CMB tempera-
ture data (Planck Collaboration XVI 2014), and the much lower
expectation for
D
BB
`
from the CMB model with primordial grav-
itational waves with amplitude
r
=
0
.
2. At 353 GHz, the
D
EE
`
8
The spectra are in units of
μ
K
2
CMB
at 353 GHz.
angular power spectra of the dust are about 3–4 orders of mag-
nitude larger than the CMB model at
`
=
30, 1–2 orders of mag-
nitude larger at
`
=
100, and about the same order of magnitude
as the CMB at
` >
300. At 353 GHz, the
D
BB
`
angular power
spectra for dust are much greater than the CMB model power
spectrum for all
`
values in Fig. 2. The dust power spectra are
larger than the
r
=
0
.
2 CMB spectrum by 4–5 orders of magni-
tude at
`
=
30, and by 3–4 orders of magnitude at
`
=
100. At
`
=
500, where the lensing of CMB anisotropies is the dominant
contribution to the CMB model spectrum, the dust is still 2–3
orders of magnitude higher.
As discussed in Appendix A, we do not expect any sig-
nificant bias, or
E
-to-
B
leakage, from the computation of the
dust angular power spectra using
Xpol
. Fig. 2 also includes the
D
EE
`
and
D
BB
`
spectra at 353 GHz, computed from our estimate
of the leakage terms from intensity to polarization (discussed
in Sect. 2.3), for the same three LR regions. The dust spectra
are much higher than the corresponding spectra for the leakage,
which represent the main systematic e
ff
ects over the
`
range of
interest for this work. The largest contamination of the dust sig-
nal by leakage is about 3.5 % at
`
=
50, for both the
D
EE
`
and
D
BB
`
spectra. Because we consider that our estimate of the leak-
age maps is conservative, we conclude that contamination of the
dust
D
EE
`
and
D
BB
`
power spectra by systematic e
ff
ects amounts
to a maximum of 4 % at
`
=
50, and is less at higher multipoles.
Therefore, we have not corrected the
Planck
data for intensity-
to-polarization leakage in this work.
Finally, in Fig. 2 we present for the three LR regions the
absolute value of the null-test spectra anticipated in Sect. 2.3,
here computed from the cross-spectra of the HalfRing
/
DetSet
di
ff
erences, i.e., (353
DS1
,
HR1
−
353
DS1
,
HR2
)
/
2
×
(353
DS2
,
HR1
−
353
DS2
,
HR2
)
/
2. These
D
EE
`
and
D
BB
`
spectra show a behaviour
that is close to what is expected from a white-noise dominated
(thus
`
2
) spectrum. The amplitudes of these error estimates are
consistent with the noise expectations; there is no evidence for
any e
ff
ects of systematics.
4.2. Power-law fit
To assess the apparent power-law dependence
C
XX
`
∝
`
α
XX
quan-
titatively, we made a
χ
2
fit to the spectra at 353 GHz using the
form
D
XX
`
=
A
XX
(
`/
80)
α
XX
+
2
, where
X
∈ {
E
,
B
}
. For
D
EE
`
and
D
BB
`
we fit the 22 bandpowers in the range 40
< ` <
500. For
both power spectra we restricted the fit to
` >
40 to avoid a
possible bias from systematics e
ff
ects in the data, and also be-
cause the angular power spectra of the dust polarization exhibit
larger spatial variation, particularly on large angular scales, than
is expected for a Gaussian random field.
The exponents of the power-law fits,
α
XX
, are plotted in
Fig. 3 for each of the six LR regions identified with
f
sky
. All
exponents are consistent with constant values of
α
EE
=
−
2
.
41
±
0
.
02 and of
α
BB
=
−
2
.
45
±
0
.
03. While there is a slight indication
of a steeper slope for
D
BB
`
than for
D
EE
`
, hereafter we adopt the
mean exponent
−
2
.
42
±
0
.
02. This exponent is consistent with
the value
α
TT
fitted to the
Planck
353 GHz dust intensity power
spectra in this range of
`
(Planck Collaboration XV 2014; Planck
Collaboration Int. XXII 2014) on similar-sized regions at inter-
mediate Galactic latitude, but slightly flatter than the
α
TT
fitted
at higher
`
and higher frequency (Miville-Desch
ˆ
enes et al. 2007,
2010; Planck Collaboration XV 2014).
For the fits with fixed exponent
α
EE
,
BB
=
−
2
.
42, the values
of the
χ
2
(with number of degrees of freedom,
N
dof
=
21) are
displayed in Table 1 for the six LR regions. For the
D
EE
`
spectra,
7
Planck Collaboration: Dust polarization at high latitudes
Fig. 2:
Planck
HFI 353 GHz
D
EE
`
(red, top) and
D
BB
`
(blue, bottom) power spectra (in
μ
K
2
CMB
) computed on three of the selected LR analysis
regions that have
f
sky
=
0
.
3 (circles, lightest),
f
sky
=
0
.
5 (diamonds, medium) and
f
sky
=
0
.
7 (squares, darkest). The best-fit power laws in
`
are
displayed for each spectrum as a dashed line of the corresponding colour. The
Planck
2013 best-fit
Λ
CDM
D
EE
`
expectation (Planck Collaboration
XVI 2014) and the corresponding
r
=
0
.
2
D
BB
`
CMB model are displayed as solid black lines; the rise for
` >
200 is from the lensing contribution.
In the lower parts of each panel, the global estimates of the power spectra of the systematic e
ff
ects responsible for intensity-to-polarization
leakage (Sect. 2.3) are displayed in di
ff
erent shades of grey, with the same symbols to identify the three regions. Finally, absolute values of the
null-test spectra anticipated in Sect. 2.3, computed here from the cross-spectra of the HalfRing
/
DetSet di
ff
erences (see text), are represented as
dashed-dotted, dashed, and dotted grey lines for the three LR regions.
8
Planck Collaboration: Dust polarization at high latitudes
Fig. 3: Best-fit power-law exponents
α
EE
(red squares) and
α
BB
(blue circles) fitted to the 353 GHz dust
D
EE
`
and
D
BB
`
power
spectra for the di
ff
erent LR regions defined in Sect. 3.3.1, dis-
tinguished here with
f
sky
. Although the values in the regions are
not quite independent, simple means have been calculated and
are represented as red and blue dashed lines.
the
χ
2
values range from 26.3 (probability to exceed, PTE
=
0
.
2) to 44.8 (PTE
=
0
.
002), with a trend for a quality of fit that
degrades with increasing
f
sky
. For the
D
BB
`
spectra, the
χ
2
values
range from 14.0 (PTE
=
0
.
87) to 22.1 (PTE
=
0
.
39), with a trend
related to
f
sky
.
Possible explanations for this di
ff
erence between
D
EE
`
and
D
BB
`
spectrum shape descriptions, are: the chance correlation
between dust and CMB polarization, which is not taken into ac-
count in the subtraction of the CMB
D
EE
`
spectrum; and the in-
creasing S
/
N degrading the overall quality of the fit when going
from
D
BB
`
to
D
EE
`
and for
D
EE
`
from
f
sky
=
0
.
3 to
f
sky
=
0
.
8, as
the amplitude of the dust polarized signal increases. In any case,
we stress that while the power law in
`
is a good general de-
scription of the shape of the dust polarized power spectra, a full
characterization would have to consider the detailed features that
can be discerned in Fig. 2.
4.3. Amplitude dependence on
〈
I
353
〉
Similar to what has been done for intensity power spectra in e.g.,
Gautier et al. (1992) and Miville-Desch
ˆ
enes et al. (2007), we in-
vestigate how the amplitude of the dust polarization power spec-
trum scales with the dust intensity. To quantify the dust emis-
sion at 353 GHz, we use the model map derived from a modi-
fied blackbody fit to the
Planck
data at
ν
≥
353 GHz and
IRAS
at
λ
=
100
μ
m, presented in Planck Collaboration XI (2014).
This map is corrected for zodiacal emission and the brightest ex-
tragalactic point sources are subtracted. The Galactic reference
o
ff
sets of the underlying
IRAS
and
Planck
data were obtained
through a method based on correlation with 21-cm data from
the LAB H
i
survey (Kalberla et al. 2005) integrated in velocity,
e
ff
ectively removing the CIB monopole in the model map. The
mean dust intensity,
〈
I
353
〉
, listed for each LR region in Table 1,
ranges from 0
.
068 to 0
.
227 MJy sr
−
1
for increasing
f
e
ff
sky
. The
mean column density calculated from the LAB survey data is
also listed in Table 1, with values ranging from 1
.
65
×
10
20
cm
−
2
to 6
.
05
×
10
20
cm
−
2
.
For all of the LR regions, we fit the
D
EE
`
and
D
BB
`
spectra
with a power law in
`
, using the fixed exponent
α
EE
,
BB
=
−
2
.
42,
Fig. 4: Amplitude of the dust
A
EE
(red squares) and
A
BB
(blue
circles) power spectra, normalized with respect to the largest am-
plitude for each mode. These are plotted versus the mean dust in-
tensity
〈
I
353
〉
for the six LR regions (top panel). A power-law fit
of the form
A
XX
(
〈
I
353
〉
)
=
K
XX
〈
I
353
〉
1
.
9
,
X
∈ {
E
,
B
}
, is overplot-
ted as a dashed line of the corresponding colour (these almost
overlap). The bottom panel presents the ratio of the data and the
fitted
〈
I
353
〉
1
.
9
power law; the range associated with the
±
1
σ
un-
certainty in the power-law exponent of 1.9 is displayed in grey.
For details see Sect. 4.3.
over the
`
−
ranges defined in Sect. 4.2. The amplitudes
A
EE
de-
rived from these fits are listed in Table 1 (the
A
BB
amplitudes
can be retrieved from the
A
BB
/
A
EE
ratio), and plotted as a func-
tion of
〈
I
353
〉
in Fig. 4, after normalization by the maximum
value found for the largest region (LR72). We fit the empiri-
cal dependence of these amplitudes on
〈
I
353
〉
as a power law
of the form
A
XX
(
〈
I
353
〉
)
=
K
XX
〈
I
353
〉
XX
where
X
∈ {
E
,
B
}
. The
two fitted exponents are quite similar,
EE
=
1
.
88
±
0
.
02 and
BB
=
1
.
90
±
0
.
02. The exponent that we find for polarization
is close to the one observed in the di
ff
use interstellar medium
for the dust intensity, consistent with
A
TT
ν
∝
〈
I
ν
〉
2
, where
〈
I
ν
〉
is
the mean value of the dust specific intensity (Miville-Desch
ˆ
enes
et al. 2007). Values close to 2 are expected, because we compute
angular power spectra, which deal with squared quantities.
Although the data points roughly follow this
〈
I
353
〉
1
.
9
depen-
dence, the empirical law fails to fully describe individual dust
amplitudes (e.g., the estimate is o
ff
by about 20 % for
D
BB
`
on
LR33). The scaling can help to asses the order of magnitude of
the dust polarization level on a specific region, but is not a sub-
stitute for actually characterizing the polarized angular power
spectra.
4.4. Amplitude of
D
BB
`
relative to
D
EE
`
We examine the ratio of the amplitudes of the fitted power laws
found in Sect. 4.3. The
A
BB
/
A
EE
ratios are listed in Table 1,
and plotted for di
ff
erent values of
f
sky
in Fig. 5. For all of the
LR regions, we observe more power in the
D
EE
`
dust spec-
trum than in
D
BB
`
. All ratios are consistent with a value of
A
BB
/
A
EE
=
0
.
52
±
0
.
03, significantly di
ff
erent from unity, over
various large fractions of the intermediate latitude sky.
This result is not taken into account in existing models of po-
larized microwave dust emission that have been developed to test
component separation methods. For example, we have computed
the
D
EE
`
and
D
BB
`
spectra over the LR regions for the
Planck
9
Planck Collaboration: Dust polarization at high latitudes
Fig. 5: Ratio of the amplitudes of the
D
BB
`
and
D
EE
`
dust
power spectra at 353 GHz for the di
ff
erent LR regions defined
in Sect. 3.3.1, distinguished here with
f
sky
. The mean value
〈
A
BB
/
A
EE
〉
=
0
.
52 is plotted as a dashed line.
Sky Model (Delabrouille et al. 2013) and the model of O’Dea
et al. (2012); for both models and all LR regions we find a ratio
A
BB
/
A
EE
close to 1. Further insight into the structure of the dust
polarization sky is required to account for the observed ratio.
4.5. Amplitude dependence on frequency
Finally, we explore the frequency dependence of the amplitude
of the angular power spectra. We compute the
D
EE
`
and
D
BB
`
angular power spectra from the
Q
and
U
DetSet maps at 100,
143, 217, and 353 GHz (see Sect. 3.2). From these four sets of
polarization maps, we compute ten power spectra: 100
×
100;
100
×
143; 100
×
217; 100
×
353; 143
×
143; 143
×
217; 143
×
353;
217
×
217; 217
×
353; and 353
×
353.
The ten angular cross-power spectra are consistent with a
power law in
`
, with the exponent
α
EE
,
BB
=
−
2
.
42 measured at
353 GHz (Sect. 4.2). Therefore, to each of these spectra we fit
the amplitudes of a power-law function that has a fixed exponent
α
EE
,
BB
=
−
2
.
42, in the range 40
< ` <
500, for
D
EE
`
and
D
BB
`
.
As an illustration of the quality of the fit, for the smallest region
(LR24,
f
sky
=
0
.
3) the averages and dispersions of the
χ
2
(21
degrees of freedom) of the fits are
χ
2
EE
=
13
.
4
±
8
.
2 and
χ
2
BB
=
12
.
8
±
6
.
9 for the ten cross-frequency spectra.
To compare the frequency dependence of the results of the
fits to that expected from the SED for dust polarization from
Planck Collaboration Int. XXII (2014), we converted the fitted
amplitudes
A
EE
,
BB
from
μ
K
2
CMB
to units of (MJy sr
−
1
)
2
, taking
into account the
Planck
colour corrections.
9
For all regions, we
examined the frequency dependence by plotting the amplitudes
normalized to unity at 353 GHz, versus the e
ff
ective frequency.
10
A representative example is shown in Fig. 6 for the smallest re-
gion, LR24 (
f
sky
=
0
.
3).
For all of the LR regions the frequency dependence found
is in good agreement with the square of the adopted dust SED,
which is a modified blackbody spectrum having
β
d
=
1
.
59 and
9
Conversion factors were computed as described in Sect. 2.1, here
using colour corrections corresponding to a dust modified blackbody
spectrum with
β
d
=
1
.
59 and
T
d
=
19
.
6 K.
10
For a cross-spectrum between data at frequency
ν
1
and frequency
ν
2
the e
ff
ective frequency is taken for convenience as the geometric
mean,
ν
e
ff
≡
√
ν
1
ν
2
.
Fig. 6: Frequency dependence of the amplitudes
A
EE
,
BB
of
the angular power spectra, relative to 353 GHz (see details in
Sect. 4.5). Results for
D
EE
`
(red squares) and
D
BB
`
(blue circles)
for the smallest intermediate latitude region, LR24, are shown in
the top panel. These include evaluations from cross-spectra in-
volving polarization data at two frequencies, plotted at the geo-
metric mean frequency. The square of the adopted relative SED
for dust polarization, which is a modified blackbody spectrum
with
β
d
=
1
.
59 and
T
d
=
19
.
6 K, is displayed as a black dashed
line. The bottom panel shows the relative discrepancy with re-
spect to this model spectrum. The
±
1
σ
uncertainty area from
the expected dispersion of
β
d
for the size of LR24, as inferred
from Planck Collaboration Int. XXII (2014) (see Sect. 2.2.1), is
displayed in grey.
T
d
=
19
.
6 K (Planck Collaboration Int. XXII 2014). Note that no
fit was performed at this stage and that the square of the adopted
dust SED goes trough the 353 GHz data point. However, if we
fit the amplitude of the dust frequency dependence, with fixed
β
d
and
T
d
, the
χ
2
(
N
dof
=
9) is 13.1 for
EE
(PTE
=
0
.
16)
and 3.2 for
BB
(PTE
=
0
.
96). This good agreement supports
the assumption made in the present work about the faintness of
the synchrotron and CO emission at high Galactic latitude (see
Sect. 2.2). The residuals to the fit do not show any evidence for
an excess power at 100 GHz, which might arise from polarized
synchrotron emission. This result is consistent with the study of
synchrotron polarization at high Galactic latitudes by Fuskeland
et al. (2014), and confirmed in Appendix C.4. Furthermore, we
do not see any excess at either 100 or 217 GHz, such as could
arise from leakage, and
/
or polarization, associated with CO line
emission in these bands (Sect. 2.2.5).
5. Statistical study of the dust power spectra at
high Galactic latitudes
In Sect. 4, statistical properties of dust polarization were derived
from angular power spectra computed with the
Planck
353 GHz
data on large fractions of the sky (
f
e
ff
sky
from 24 % to 72 %). Most
of the CMB experiments target fields at high Galactic latitude
with a smaller size than this. So now we evaluate the dust
B
-
mode power in such patches.
We perform a statistical analysis computing the
D
EE
`
and
D
BB
`
power spectra of the 353 GHz
Planck
polarization data for
high Galactic latitude patches of size 400 deg
2
, similar to the size
of the fields observed in ground-based and balloon-borne CMB
polarization experiments (see Sect. 3.3.2). We verify that the em-
10
Planck Collaboration: Dust polarization at high latitudes
Fig. 7: Fitted dust
D
EE
`
(top panel) and
D
BB
`
(bottom panel) amplitudes (
A
EE
and
A
BB
) at
`
=
80, in
μ
K
2
for the 400 deg
2
patches
as a function of their mean
〈
I
353
〉
. The empirical scaling law,
A
EE
,
BB
∝
〈
I
353
〉
1
.
9
, adjusted in amplitude to the data points, is over-
plotted as a red line. The
±
3
σ
statistical error on this relation from Monte Carlo simulations of
Planck
inhomogeneous noise (see
Appendix B.1) is represented as a light-blue shaded area and the total
±
3
σ
error, including statistical noise plus Gaussian sample
variance, is represented as a light-red shaded area. Points are computed for all 352 patches, but note that, as described in Sect. 3.3.2,
the patches overlap and so their properties are not independent.
11