of 25
A&A 586, A133 (2016)
DOI: 10.1051
/
0004-6361
/
201425034
c
©
ESO 2016
Astronomy
&
Astrophysics
Planck
intermediate results
XXX. The angular power spectrum
of polarized dust emission at intermediate and high Galactic latitudes
Planck Collaboration: R. Adam
80
, P. A. R. Ade
91
, N. Aghanim
64
, M. Arnaud
78
, J. Aumont
64
,?
, C. Baccigalupi
90
, A. J. Banday
99
,
10
,
R. B. Barreiro
70
, J. G. Bartlett
1
,
72
, N. Bartolo
33
,
71
, E. Battaner
102
,
103
, K. Benabed
65
,
98
, A. Benoit-Lévy
25
,
65
,
98
, J.-P. Bernard
99
,
10
, M. Bersanelli
36
,
54
,
P. Bielewicz
99
,
10
,
90
, A. Bonaldi
73
, L. Bonavera
70
, J. R. Bond
9
, J. Borrill
15
,
94
, F. R. Bouchet
65
,
98
, F. Boulanger
64
, A. Bracco
64
, M. Bucher
1
,
C. Burigana
53
,
34
,
55
, R. C. Butler
53
, E. Calabrese
96
, J.-F. Cardoso
79
,
1
,
65
, A. Catalano
80
,
77
, A. Challinor
67
,
74
,
13
, A. Chamballu
78
,
17
,
64
, R.-R. Chary
62
,
H. C. Chiang
28
,
7
, P. R. Christensen
86
,
40
, D. L. Clements
61
, S. Colombi
65
,
98
, L. P. L. Colombo
24
,
72
, C. Combet
80
, F. Couchot
75
, A. Coulais
77
,
B. P. Crill
72
,
87
, A. Curto
6
,
70
, F. Cuttaia
53
, L. Danese
90
, R. D. Davies
73
, R. J. Davis
73
, P. de Bernardis
35
, G. de Zotti
50
,
90
, J. Delabrouille
1
,
J.-M. Delouis
65
,
98
, F.-X. Désert
59
, C. Dickinson
73
, J. M. Diego
70
, K. Dolag
101
,
83
, H. Dole
64
,
63
, S. Donzelli
54
, O. Doré
72
,
12
, M. Douspis
64
,
A. Ducout
65
,
61
, J. Dunkley
96
, X. Dupac
43
, G. Efstathiou
67
, F. Elsner
25
,
65
,
98
, T. A. Enßlin
83
, H. K. Eriksen
68
, E. Falgarone
77
, F. Finelli
53
,
55
,
O. Forni
99
,
10
, M. Frailis
52
, A. A. Fraisse
28
, E. Franceschi
53
, A. Frejsel
86
, S. Galeotta
52
, S. Galli
65
, K. Ganga
1
, T. Ghosh
64
, M. Giard
99
,
10
,
Y. Giraud-Héraud
1
, E. Gjerløw
68
, J. González-Nuevo
70
,
90
, K. M. Górski
72
,
104
, S. Gratton
74
,
67
, A. Gregorio
37
,
52
,
58
, A. Gruppuso
53
, V. Guillet
64
,
F. K. Hansen
68
, D. Hanson
84
,
72
,
9
, D. L. Harrison
67
,
74
, G. Helou
12
, S. Henrot-Versillé
75
, C. Hernández-Monteagudo
14
,
83
, D. Herranz
70
,
E. Hivon
65
,
98
, M. Hobson
6
, W. A. Holmes
72
, K. M. Hu
ff
enberger
26
, G. Hurier
64
, A. H. Ja
ff
e
61
, T. R. Ja
ff
e
99
,
10
, J. Jewell
72
, W. C. Jones
28
,
M. Juvela
27
, E. Keihänen
27
, R. Keskitalo
15
, T. S. Kisner
82
, R. Kneissl
42
,
8
, J. Knoche
83
, L. Knox
30
, N. Krachmalnico
ff
36
, M. Kunz
19
,
64
,
2
,
H. Kurki-Suonio
27
,
49
, G. Lagache
5
,
64
, J.-M. Lamarre
77
, A. Lasenby
6
,
74
, M. Lattanzi
34
, C. R. Lawrence
72
, J. P. Leahy
73
, R. Leonardi
43
,
J. Lesgourgues
97
,
89
,
76
, F. Levrier
77
, M. Liguori
33
, P. B. Lilje
68
, M. Linden-Vørnle
18
, M. López-Caniego
70
, P. M. Lubin
31
, J. F. Macías-Pérez
80
,
B. Ma
ff
ei
73
, D. Maino
36
,
54
, N. Mandolesi
53
,
4
,
34
, A. Mangilli
65
, M. Maris
52
, P. G. Martin
9
, E. Martínez-González
70
, S. Masi
35
, S. Matarrese
33
,
71
,
46
,
P. Mazzotta
38
, P. R. Meinhold
31
, A. Melchiorri
35
,
56
, L. Mendes
43
, A. Mennella
36
,
54
, M. Migliaccio
67
,
74
, S. Mitra
60
,
72
, M.-A. Miville-Deschênes
64
,
9
,
A. Moneti
65
, L. Montier
99
,
10
, G. Morgante
53
, D. Mortlock
61
, A. Moss
92
, D. Munshi
91
, J. A. Murphy
85
, P. Naselsky
86
,
40
, F. Nati
35
, P. Natoli
34
,
3
,
53
,
C. B. Netterfield
21
, H. U. Nørgaard-Nielsen
18
, F. Noviello
73
, D. Novikov
61
, I. Novikov
86
, L. Pagano
35
,
56
, F. Pajot
64
, R. Paladini
62
, D. Paoletti
53
,
55
,
B. Partridge
48
, F. Pasian
52
, G. Patanchon
1
, T. J. Pearson
12
,
62
, O. Perdereau
75
, L. Perotto
80
, F. Perrotta
90
, V. Pettorino
47
, F. Piacentini
35
, M. Piat
1
,
E. Pierpaoli
24
, D. Pietrobon
72
, S. Plaszczynski
75
, E. Pointecouteau
99
,
10
, G. Polenta
3
,
51
, N. Ponthieu
64
,
59
, L. Popa
66
, G. W. Pratt
78
, S. Prunet
65
,
98
,
J.-L. Puget
64
, J. P. Rachen
22
,
83
, W. T. Reach
100
, R. Rebolo
69
,
16
,
41
, M. Remazeilles
73
,
64
,
1
, C. Renault
80
, A. Renzi
39
,
57
, S. Ricciardi
53
,
I. Ristorcelli
99
,
10
, G. Rocha
72
,
12
, C. Rosset
1
, M. Rossetti
36
,
54
, G. Roudier
1
,
77
,
72
, B. Rouillé d’Orfeuil
75
, J. A. Rubiño-Martín
69
,
41
, B. Rusholme
62
,
M. Sandri
53
, D. Santos
80
, M. Savelainen
27
,
49
, G. Savini
88
, D. Scott
23
, J. D. Soler
64
, L. D. Spencer
91
, V. Stolyarov
6
,
74
,
95
, R. Stompor
1
,
R. Sudiwala
91
, R. Sunyaev
83
,
93
, D. Sutton
67
,
74
, A.-S. Suur-Uski
27
,
49
, J.-F. Sygnet
65
, J. A. Tauber
44
, L. Terenzi
45
,
53
, L. To
ff
olatti
20
,
70
,
53
,
M. Tomasi
36
,
54
, M. Tristram
75
, M. Tucci
19
, J. Tuovinen
11
, L. Valenziano
53
, J. Valiviita
27
,
49
, B. Van Tent
81
, L. Vibert
64
, P. Vielva
70
, F. Villa
53
,
L. A. Wade
72
, B. D. Wandelt
65
,
98
,
32
, R. Watson
73
, I. K. Wehus
72
, M. White
29
, S. D. M. White
83
, D. Yvon
17
, A. Zacchei
52
, and A. Zonca
31
(A
ffi
liations can be found after the references)
Received 19 September 2014
/
Accepted 1 December 2014
ABSTRACT
The polarized thermal emission from di
ff
use Galactic dust is the main foreground present in measurements of the polarization of the cosmic
microwave background (CMB) at frequencies above 100 GHz. In this paper we exploit the uniqueness of the
Planck
HFI polarization data from 100
to 353 GHz to measure the polarized dust angular power spectra
C
EE
`
and
C
BB
`
over the multipole range 40
< ` <
600 well away from the Galactic
plane. These measurements will bring new insights into interstellar dust physics and allow a precise determination of the level of contamination for
CMB polarization experiments. Despite the non-Gaussian and anisotropic nature of Galactic dust, we show that general statistical properties of the
emission can be characterized accurately over large fractions of the sky using angular power spectra. The polarization power spectra of the dust are
well described by power laws in multipole,
C
`
`
α
, with exponents
α
EE
,
BB
=
2
.
42
±
0
.
02. The amplitudes of the polarization power spectra vary
with the average brightness in a way similar to the intensity power spectra. The frequency dependence of the dust polarization spectra is consistent
with modified blackbody emission with
β
d
=
1
.
59 and
T
d
=
19
.
6 K down to the lowest
Planck
HFI frequencies. We find a systematic di
ff
erence
between the amplitudes of the Galactic
B
- and
E
-modes,
C
BB
`
/
C
EE
`
=
0
.
5. We verify that these general properties are preserved towards high
Galactic latitudes with low dust column densities. We show that even in the faintest dust-emitting regions there are no “clean” windows in the sky
where primordial CMB
B
-mode polarization measurements could be made without subtraction of foreground emission. Finally, we investigate the
level of dust polarization in the specific field recently targeted by the BICEP2 experiment. Extrapolation of the
Planck
353 GHz data to 150 GHz
gives a dust power
D
BB
`
`
(
`
+
1)
C
BB
`
/
(2
π
) of 1
.
32
×
10
2
μ
K
2
CMB
over the multipole range of the primordial recombination bump (40
< ` <
120);
the statistical uncertainty is
±
0
.
29
×
10
2
μ
K
2
CMB
and there is an additional uncertainty (
+
0
.
28
,
0
.
24)
×
10
2
μ
K
2
CMB
from the extrapolation. This
level is the same magnitude as reported by BICEP2 over this
`
range, which highlights the need for assessment of the polarized dust signal even in
the cleanest windows of the sky.
Key words.
cosmic background radiation – cosmology: observations – ISM: structure – ISM: magnetic fields – polarization
?
Corresponding author: J. Aumont,
e-mail:
jonathan.aumont@ias.u-psud.fr
Article published by EDP Sciences
A133, page 1 of 25
A&A 586, A133 (2016)
1. Introduction
The sky at high Galactic latitude and frequencies above about
100 GHz is dominated by thermal emission from the Galactic
interstellar medium, specifically arising from dust grains of
about 0.1
μ
m in size. Asymmetrical dust grains align with the
Galactic magnetic field to produce polarized emission. This po-
larized submillimetre emission has been measured from ground-
based and balloon-borne telescopes (e.g., Hildebrand et al. 1999;
Benoît et al. 2004; Ponthieu et al. 2005; Vaillancourt 2007;
Matthews et al. 2014). The observed polarization relates to the
nature, size, and shape of dust grains and the mechanisms of
alignment, discussed for example by Draine (2004) and Martin
(2007). It also probes the structure of the Galactic magnetic field,
which is an essential component of models of Galactic dust po-
larization (Baccigalupi 2003; Fauvet et al. 2011, 2012; O’Dea
et al. 2012; Ja
ff
e et al. 2013; Delabrouille et al. 2013).
The polarized emission from dust is also of interest in the
context of foregrounds (Tucci et al. 2005; Dunkley et al. 2009a;
Gold et al. 2011) to the cosmic microwave background (CMB).
On angular scales between 10
and a few tens of degrees, cos-
mological
B
-mode polarization signals may be present that were
imprinted during the epoch of inflation. The discovery of a pri-
mordial
B
-mode polarization signature is a major scientific goal
of many CMB experiments. These include ground-based ex-
periments (ACTPol, Niemack et al. 2010; BICEP2, BICEP2
Collaboration 2014a; Keck-array, Staniszewski et al. 2012;
POLARBEAR, Arnold et al. 2010; QUBIC, Ghribi et al. 2014;
QUIJOTE, Rubiño-Martín et al. 2010; and SPTpol, Austermann
et al. 2012), stratospheric balloon missions (EBEX, Grainger
et al. 2008; and SPIDER, Fraisse et al. 2013), and the ESA
Planck
1
satellite (Tauber et al. 2010). Accurate assessment and,
if necessary, subtraction of foreground contamination is critical
to the measurement of CMB
E
- and
B
-mode polarization be-
cause the expected signals from inflation and late-time reioniza-
tion are expected to be small.
Planck
has measured the all-sky dust polarization at
353 GHz, where the dust emission dominates over other po-
larized signals. These data have been presented in a first set
of publications in which the focus was on the structure of the
Galactic magnetic field and the characterization of dust polar-
ization properties (Planck Collaboration Int. XIX 2015; Planck
Collaboration Int. XX 2015; Planck Collaboration Int. XXI
2015; Planck Collaboration Int. XXII 2015). Here, we use the
Planck
polarized data to compute the
C
EE
`
and
C
BB
`
power spec-
tra of dust polarization over the multipole range 40
< ` <
600,
on large fractions of the sky away from the Galactic plane. We
also investigate dust polarization in sky patches at high Galactic
latitude with sizes comparable to those surveyed by ground-
based CMB experiments. We derive statistical properties of dust
polarization from these spectra, characterizing the shape of the
spectra and their amplitude with respect to both the observing
frequency and the mean dust intensity of the sky region over
which they are computed. We verify that these properties hold
in low-column-density patches at high Galactic latitude and we
explore statistically the potential existence of “clean” patches on
the sky that might be suitable for cosmology.
1
Planck
(
http://www.esa.int/Planck
) is a project of the
European Space Agency (ESA) with instruments provided by two sci-
entific consortia funded by ESA member states (in particular the lead
countries France and Italy), with contributions from NASA (USA) and
telescope reflectors provided by a collaboration between ESA and a sci-
entific consortium led and funded by Denmark.
Our analysis of dust polarization is relevant to the present
generation of CMB polarization observations, and to the design
of future experiments. It gives a statistical description of Galactic
dust polarization, providing input for the modelling of Galactic
dust as part of component separation methods and for CMB po-
larization likelihood analysis parameterization.
The BICEP2 collaboration has recently reported a significant
detection of the
B
-mode power spectrum around the expected
angular scale of the recombination bump, namely a few degrees
(BICEP2 Collaboration 2014a,b). Their analysis was based on
dust polarization models that predicted subdominant contamina-
tion of their
B
-mode signal by dust polarization. We use infor-
mation from our detailed analysis of
Planck
polarization data at
353 GHz to assess the potential dust contamination.
The paper is organized as follows. In Sect. 2, we present
the
Planck
HFI polarization data used in this work and de-
scribe the general properties of the polarization maps in terms
of emission components and systematic e
ff
ects. In Sect. 3, we
describe our method for computing the dust
C
EE
`
and
C
BB
`
an-
gular power spectra, including the selected science regions of
interest on the sky. We assess and compare the two methods we
use to compute the power spectra in Appendix A. In Sect. 4,
we present power spectra of dust polarization for multipoles
` >
40, computed with high signal-to-noise ratio (S
/
N) on large
fractions of the sky, and characterize their shape and ampli-
tude. Complementary angular power spectra involving temper-
ature and polarization,
C
TE
`
and
C
T B
`
, and cross-polarization,
C
EB
`
are given in Appendix B. We extend this analysis to smaller sky
patches at high Galactic latitude in Sect. 5. In Appendix C we
discuss some complementary aspects of this analysis of patches.
These results are used specifically in Sect. 5.3 to build a map
of the expected dust contamination of the
C
BB
`
power spectrum
at 150 GHz and
`
=
80. In Sect. 6 we present a study of the
polarized dust emission in the vicinity of the BICEP2 region.
Systematic e
ff
ects relating to the
Planck
angular power spectrum
estimates are assessed in Appendix D and we discuss the decor-
relation of the dust signal between frequencies in Appendix E.
Section 7 summarizes the main conclusions and discusses the
implications of this work for future CMB experiments
2
.
2.
Planck
polarization maps
2.1. Planck data
The Planck Collaboration recently released the
Planck
satellite
nominal mission temperature data and published a set of papers
describing these data and their cosmological interpretation (e.g.,
Planck Collaboration I 2014; Planck Collaboration XVI 2014).
These results are based on the data from the two instruments on
board the satellite (Low Frequency Instrument, LFI, Mennella
et al. 2011, and High Frequency Instrument, HFI, Planck HFI
Core Team 2011). The data processing of the nominal mission
data (Surveys 1 and 2, 14 months) was summarized in Planck
Collaboration II (2014) and Planck Collaboration VI (2014).
Planck
HFI measures the linear polarization at 100, 143, 217,
and 353 GHz (Rosset et al. 2010). The properties of the detectors
(sensitivity, spectral response, noise properties, beams, etc.) are
described in detail in Lamarre et al. (2010) and their in-flight per-
formance is reported in Planck HFI Core Team (2011), Planck
Collaboration VII (2014), Planck Collaboration VIII (2014),
2
While this paper was in preparation three papers have used publicly
available polarization information from
Planck
to infer potentially high
levels of dust contamination in the BICEP2 field (Flauger et al. 2014;
Mortonson & Seljak 2014; Colley & Gott 2015).
A133, page 2 of 25
Planck Collaboration: Dust polarization at high latitudes
Planck Collaboration IX (2014), and Planck Collaboration X
(2014), while Planck Collaboration VI (2014) describes the
general processing applied to the data to measure polarization.
In this paper, we make use of full-mission (Surveys 1 to 5,
30 months, Planck Collaboration I 2014) polarization maps of
Planck
HFI (internal data release “DX11d”), projected into the
HEALPix
pixelization scheme (Górski et al. 2005). This is one of
the first publications to use these maps, which will be described
in the
Planck
cosmology 2015 release.
To compute polarization angular power spectra, we use
Q
and
U
maps at 100, 143, 217, and 353 GHz. Specifically, we
calculate power spectra using the so-called “Detector-Set” maps
(hereafter “DetSets”), constructed using two subsets of polar-
ization sensitive bolometers (PSBs) at a given frequency (see
Table 3 in Planck Collaboration VI 2014). Each DetSet polariza-
tion map is constructed using data from two pairs of PSBs, with
the angle between the two PSBs in a pair being 90
, and the an-
gle between pairs being 45
. In this paper we concentrate on the
Q
and
U
maps at 353 GHz. The Stokes
Q
and
U
maps at lower
frequencies (100, 143, and 217 GHz) are only used to determine
the spectral energy distribution (SED) of the dust emission in
polarization.
To quantify systematic e
ff
ects, we also use maps made from
other data subsets (Planck Collaboration VI 2014). We use the
ring halves (hereafter “HalfRing”), where the approximately
60 circles performed for each
Planck
telescope ring (also called a
stable pointing period) are divided into two independent subsets
of 30 circles. We use observational years (hereafter “Years”),
consisting of Surveys 1 and 2 on the one hand and Surveys 3 and
4 on the other, to build two additional maps with independent
noise.
The
Planck
maps we use are in thermodynamic units
(K
CMB
). To characterize the SED of the dust emission in po-
larization we express the data as the specific intensity (such as
that for Stokes
I
dust emission,
I
d
(
ν
)) at the
Planck
reference
frequencies, using the conversion factors and colour corrections
from Planck Collaboration IX (2014)
3
. For the average dust SED
at intermediate Galactic latitudes, the colour correction factor is
1.12 at 353 GHz (see Table 3 in Planck Collaboration Int. XXII
2015).
In addition to these basic products, a
Planck
CO map from
Planck Collaboration XIII (2014), the so-called “type 3” map,
and the
Planck
857 GHz map, are also used in the selection of
the large intermediate latitude analysis regions (see Sect. 3.3.1).
2.2. Emission contributions to the Planck HFI polarization
maps
2.2.1. Polarized thermal dust emission
Thermal dust emission is partially linearly polarized (e.g.,
Hildebrand et al. 1999; Benoît et al. 2004; Ponthieu et al. 2005;
Vaillancourt 2007). It is the dominant polarized foreground
3
The conversion factor from K
CMB
to MJy sr
1
is computed for a
standard specific intensity
I
ν
ν
1
. The colour correction depends on
the actual dust SED; it is the scaling factor used to transform from the
specific intensity of the dust emission, at the reference frequency, to
the
Planck
brightness in MJy sr
1
(see Eq. (19) in Planck Collaboration
Int. XXII 2015). The conversion factors and the colour corrections are
computed via Eq. (32) in Planck Collaboration IX (2014) using the
Planck
HFI filters and the
Planck
UcCC
software available through the
Planck
Explanatory Supplement (
http://www.sciops.esa.int/
wikiSI/planckpla/index.php?title=Unit_conversion_and_
Color_correction&instance=Planck_Public_PLA
); we use the
band-average values.
signal in the high frequency
Planck
bands (Tucci et al. 2005;
Dunkley et al. 2009b; Fraisse et al. 2009; Fauvet et al. 2011;
Planck Collaboration Int. XXII 2015).
Dust polarization arises from alignment of non-spherical
grains with the interstellar magnetic field (e.g., Hildebrand 1988;
Draine 2004; Martin 2007). The structure of the dust polarization
sky has already been described using maps of the polarization
fraction (
p
) and angle (
ψ
) derived from the
Planck
HFI 353 GHz
data (Planck Collaboration Int. XIX 2015; Planck Collaboration
Int. XX 2015). The map of
p
shows structure on all scales,
with polarization fractions ranging from low (less than 1%) to
high values (greater than 18%). Planck Collaboration Int. XIX
(2015) and Planck Collaboration Int. XX (2015) report an anti-
correlation between
p
and the local dispersion of
ψ
, which in-
dicates that variations in
p
arise mainly from depolarization as-
sociated with changes in the magnetic field orientation within
the beam, rather than from changes in the e
ffi
ciency of grain
alignment.
Planck Collaboration Int. XXII (2015) showed that the SED
of polarized dust emission over the four
Planck
HFI frequencies
from 100 to 353 GHz is consistent with a modified blackbody
emission law of the type
I
d
(
ν
)
ν
β
d
B
ν
(
T
d
), with spectral index
β
d
=
1
.
59 for
T
d
=
19
.
6 K
4
, and where
B
ν
is the Planck func-
tion. About 39% of the sky at intermediate Galactic latitudes was
analysed
5
. Among 400 circular patches with 10
radius (equiv-
alent to a sky fraction
f
e
ff
sky
=
0
.
0076) the 1
σ
dispersion of
β
d
was 0.17 for constant
T
d
=
19
.
6 K. We scale this uncertainty on
β
d
to larger sky areas by using the factor (0
.
0076
/
f
e
ff
sky
)
0
.
5
. This
is a conservative choice because this uncertainty includes the ef-
fects of noise in the data and so is an upper limit to the true
regional variations of
β
d
on this scale. This polarization spectral
index can be compared to variations in the spectral index
β
I
d
,
mm
for the intensity SED. For that quantity the S
/
N of the data is
higher than for polarization and Planck Collaboration Int. XXII
(2015) report a dispersion of 0.07 (1
σ
) over the same sized cir-
cular patches. Planck Collaboration Int. XVII (2014) extend this
analysis for intensity to high Galactic latitudes in the southern
Galactic cap, using the dust-H
correlation to separate the faint
emission of dust from the anisotropies of the cosmic infrared
background, and find a dispersion of about 0.10 in
β
I
d
,
mm
. We
expect spectral variations to be correlated in polarization and in-
tensity, unless the dust emission has a significant component that
is unpolarized.
2.2.2. CMB
The CMB temperature anisotropies have been measured with
unprecedented accuracy by the Planck Collaboration (Planck
Collaboration I 2014; Planck Collaboration XV 2014), and pre-
liminary
Planck
polarization results have been demonstrated to
be in very good agreement with the cosmology inferred from
temperature measurements (Planck Collaboration I 2014; Planck
Collaboration XVI 2014).
For
C
EE
`
, the
Λ
CDM concordance model has been shown to
be a very good fit to all the available data (including prelimi-
nary
Planck
results at
`
&
50; see Barkats et al. 2014, for a
recent compendium). For 353 GHz data at small angular scales
4
This spectral index was called
β
p
d
,
mm
in that paper, but we adopt a
more compact notation here.
5
More specifically, for the latitude range 10
<
|
b
|
<
60
, with patches
contained within the region in Fig. 1 (below) defined by including that
with
f
sky
=
0
.
8 and then removing that with
f
sky
=
0
.
4.
A133, page 3 of 25
A&A 586, A133 (2016)
(
`
&
400), the
E
-mode CMB polarization is comparable to the
power of dust polarization at high Galactic latitudes.
The CMB
B
-mode power, even for the highest primordial
tensor perturbation models, is negligible with respect to the dust
polarization at 353 GHz. Since no reliable published CMB po-
larization maps are available, we have chosen not to remove
the CMB polarization from the
Planck
HFI
Q
and
U
maps.
Nevertheless, because the CMB
E
-mode polarization is signif-
icant with respect to the dust at 353 GHz at high multipoles
(and even at lower multipoles for the lower frequencies), when
studying the
Planck
HFI bands we subtract the
Planck
best-fit
Λ
CDM
C
EE
`
model (Col. 2 of Table 2 in Planck Collaboration
XVII 2014) from the dust power spectra, paying the price of an
increased error due to sample variance. No CMB is removed in
this work when computing the dust
C
BB
`
spectra.
2.2.3. Synchrotron emission
Synchrotron emission is known to be significantly polarized
(up to 75% for typical relativistic electron spectra, Rybicki &
Lightman 1979). Since its specific intensity scaling with fre-
quency follows a power law with a spectral index close to
3
(Gold et al. 2011; Macellari et al. 2011; Fuskeland et al. 2014),
synchrotron polarized emission is expected to be subdominant
in the
Planck
HFI channels in general and negligible at 353 GHz
(Tucci et al. 2005; Dunkley et al. 2009a; Gold et al. 2011;
Fauvet et al. 2011; Fuskeland et al. 2014; Planck Collaboration
Int. XXII 2015). Hence, we neither subtract nor mask any syn-
chrotron contribution before estimating the angular power spec-
tra of dust polarization. The justification of this assumption will
be demonstrated below by studying the frequency dependence
of the polarized dust power between 100 and 353 GHz (but see
also Appendix D.4).
2.2.4. Polarized point sources
Radio sources have been shown to have a fractional polarization
of a few percent (e.g., Battye et al. 2011; Massardi et al. 2013).
Their contribution to the polarization angular power spectra in
the
Planck
HFI bands is expected to be negligible at low and
intermediate multipoles (Battye et al. 2011; Tucci & To
ff
olatti
2012). Upper limits have been set on the polarization of infrared
galaxies, and their contribution to the polarization power spec-
tra is also expected to be negligible (e.g., Sei
ff
ert et al. 2007).
However, the brightest of the polarized point sources can be re-
sponsible for ringing in the angular power spectra estimation,
and therefore need to be masked (see Sect. 3.3.1).
2.2.5. CO emission
The first three carbon monoxide (CO) Galactic emission lines
at 115 GHz (
J
=
1
0), 230 GHz (
J
=
2
1), and 345 GHz
(
J
=
3
2), contribute significantly to the power in the
Planck
HFI bands at 100, 217, and 353 GHz, respectively (Planck
Collaboration IX 2014). The
Planck
data were used to pro-
duce the first all-sky maps of Galactic CO emission (Planck
Collaboration XIII 2014). It is known that CO emission can
be intrinsically polarized (Goldreich & Kylafis 1982; Li &
Henning 2011). Furthermore, CO emission can induce spuri-
ous polarization because of the di
ff
erences in spectral trans-
mission at the CO frequencies between
Planck
HFI detectors
(Planck Collaboration IX 2014). For these reasons, we mask
CO-emitting regions (Sect. 3.3.1). Outside this mask, as has been
shown in Planck Collaboration XIII (2014) by comparing the
Planck
CO maps to high Galactic latitude ground-based CO ob-
servations (Hartmann et al. 1998; Magnani et al. 2000), the CO
emission is negligible in the
Planck
channels (lower than one
fourth of each channel noise rms at 95% CL). We will check that
our polarization analysis is not contaminated by CO by examin-
ing the frequency dependence of the polarized angular power
spectra of the dust (see Sect. 4.5).
2.3. Systematics of the Planck HFI polarization maps
The first CMB polarization results from
Planck
were presented
in Planck Collaboration I (2014) and Planck Collaboration XVI
(2014). The
EE
power spectrum at
` >
200 was found to be
consistent with the cosmological model derived from tempera-
ture anisotropies. Systematic e
ff
ects in the data have so far lim-
ited the use of
Planck
HFI polarization data on large angular
scales. The polarization systematics in the 2013 data were dis-
cussed and estimated in Planck Collaboration VI (2014; see the
power spectra shown in their Fig. 27). The same data were used
in the
Planck
Galactic polarization papers (Planck Collaboration
Int. XIX 2015; Planck Collaboration Int. XX 2015; Planck
Collaboration Int. XXI 2015; Planck Collaboration Int. XXII
2015) and there the low brightness regions of the 353 GHz sky
were masked.
In this paper, we use a new set of
Planck
polarization maps
for which the systematic e
ff
ects have been significantly reduced.
Corrections will be fully described and applied in the
Planck
2015 cosmology release, as well as the remaining systematic ef-
fects that we describe briefly here.
Two main e
ff
ects have been corrected in the time-ordered
data prior to mapmaking. The correction for the nonlinearity of
the analogue-to-digital converters was improved, and we have
also corrected the data for very long time constants that were not
previously identified (see Planck Collaboration VI 2014; Planck
Collaboration X 2014). After these corrections, the main sys-
tematic e
ff
ects over the multipole range 40
< ` <
600 relevant
to this analysis result from leakage of intensity into polariza-
tion maps. E
ff
ects arising from polarization angle and polariza-
tion e
ffi
ciency uncertainties have been shown to be second order
(Planck Collaboration VI 2014). The leakage e
ff
ect can be ex-
pressed as
{
Q
,
U
}
ν
(
ˆ
n
)
=
s
b
γ
s
,
b
ν
Γ
b
,
I
→{
Q
,
U
}
ν
(
ˆ
n
)
I
s
ν
(
ˆ
n
)
,
(1)
where
ν
is the frequency, and
Γ
b
,
I
→{
Q
,
U
}
ν
, the leakage pattern
for bolometer
b
, is multiplied by the di
ff
erent
s
leakage source
maps
I
s
ν
and their associated scaling coe
ffi
cients
γ
s
,
b
ν
. The leak-
age patterns are fully determined by the scanning strategy. They
represent the cumulative result of all the systematic e
ff
ects that
lead to a leakage of intensity to polarization. In the
Planck
HFI bands, there are three main sources of intensity to polar-
ization leakage: (i) monopole di
ff
erences between detectors not
corrected by data destriping (the intensity source term is con-
stant over the sky); (ii) bolometer inter-calibration mismatch (the
source term is the full intensity map, including the CMB dipole
and the Galactic emission); and (iii) a dust spectral mismatch
term. The spectral bandpass varies from one bolometer to an-
other for a given band. As the bolometer gain is calibrated on
the CMB dipole, the di
ff
erential gains on the dust emission pro-
duce the bandpass mismatch term (for which the source term is
the dust intensity map).
A133, page 4 of 25
Planck Collaboration: Dust polarization at high latitudes
Results from a global fit of the
Q
and
U
maps with these
three leakage terms
Γ
b
,
I
→{
Q
,
U
}
ν
I
s
ν
are used to quantify the leakage.
This fit yields estimates of the scaling coe
ffi
cients at each fre-
quency
ν
in Eq. (1), which allows us to compute angular power
spectra of the leakage terms in Sect. 4. We point out that the fit
captures any emission in the maps that has a pattern on the sky
similar to one of the leakage patterns. These global fit maps are
used to assess the level of systematics, but are not removed from
the data.
An independent and complementary estimate of systematic
e
ff
ects in the data is provided by the null tests that we can
build from the DetSets, HalfRings, and Years data subsets (see
Sect. 2.1). These null tests are a good way of determining the
level of any systematics other than intensity to polarization leak-
age. These are pursued in Sect. 4.1 and Appendices C.1 and D.3.
3. Computation of angular power spectra
of polarized dust emission
3.1. Methods
We can use the
Planck
data to compute the polarization angu-
lar power spectra (
C
EE
`
and
C
BB
`
) of the polarized dust emission
within selected sky regions. Even if the statistical properties of
the dust emission on the sky might not be entirely captured by a
two-point function estimator, because the scope of this paper is
to assess the level of dust in the framework of CMB data anal-
ysis, we follow the approximation that is generally made when
processing such data, i.e., that a large fraction of the information
is contained in power spectra.
On an incomplete sky, a polarization field can be divided into
three classes of modes: pure
E
-modes; pure
B
-modes; and “am-
biguous” modes, which are a mixture of the true
E
- and
B
-modes
(Bunn et al. 2003).
The ambiguous modes represent a cross-talk between
E
and
B
, which is often referred to as “
E
-to-
B
leakage” for the
CMB (because for the CMB
C
EE
`

C
BB
`
). Methods used to
estimate the CMB angular power spectrum for polarization ac-
count for and correct analytically for the incomplete sky cov-
erage. However, the presence of the ambiguous modes yields a
biased estimate of the variance of the spectra, unless so-called
“pure” power spectrum estimators are used (Smith 2006). For
dust polarization, the power in
E
- and
B
-modes are comparable,
and we do not expect a significant variance bias.
The two specific approaches we use are
Xpol
, our main
method, which we describe as a “classical” pseudo-
C
`
estimator
6
and, for comparison,
Xpure
, a pure pseudo-
C
`
estimator. Since
they give similar results for the present study, as we demonstrate
below, the former is chosen as our main method because it is
computationally less expensive.
3.1.1. Xpol
Xpol
is an extension of the
Xspect
method (Tristram et al.
2005) to polarization.
Xspect
computes the pseudo power
spectra and corrects them for incomplete sky coverage, filter-
ing e
ff
ects, and pixel and beam window functions. Correction
for incomplete sky coverage is performed using a
Master
-like
algorithm (Hivon et al. 2002), consisting of the inversion of the
mode-mode coupling matrix
M
``
that describes the e
ff
ect of the
6
Pseudo-
C
`
estimators compute an estimate of the angular power
spectra directly from the data (denoted the “pseudo-power spectrum”)
and then correct for sky coverage, beam smoothing, data filtering, etc.
partial sky coverage;
M
``
is computed directly from the power
spectrum of the mask that selects the data in the analysis re-
gion of interest (Sect. 3.3). The
HEALPix
pixel window functions
(Górski et al. 2005) are used to correct for pixelization e
ff
ects.
For the beams we use the
Planck
HFI individual detector beam
transfer functions described in Planck Collaboration VII (2014).
Xpol
estimates the error bars analytically, without requiring
Monte Carlo simulations. Using simulated data comprising in-
homogeneous white noise and a Gaussian map with a dust power
spectrum, we have checked that this analytical estimate is not bi-
ased for multipoles
` >
40. The analytical error bars combine the
contributions from instrumental noise and sample variance. The
Gaussian approximation of the sample variance is
var
(
C
XX
`
bin
)
=
2
(2
`
bin
+
1)
f
sky
`
bin
(
C
XX
`
bin
)
2
,
(2)
where
X
=
{
E
,
B
}
,
f
sky
is the retained sky fraction (which can be
f
e
ff
sky
if the sky field is apodized), and
`
bin
is the size of the mul-
tipole bin
`
bin
. To estimate the error relevant to the polarized dust
signal measured within a given region, we subtract quadratically
this estimate of the contribution from sample variance. The per-
formance of
Xpol
on Gaussian simulations that have
EE
and
BB
dust-like angular power spectra is presented in Appendix A.
3.1.2. Xpure
Xpure
is a numerical implementation of the pure pseudo-
spectral approach described and validated in Grain et al. (2009).
The method is optimized for computing CMB
B
-mode power
spectra over small sky patches. It uses a suitably chosen sky
apodization that vanishes (along with its first derivative) at the
edges of the patch in order to minimize the e
ff
ects of
E
-to-
B
leakage. For the estimation of the angular power spectra of the
Planck
data we compute the cross-correlation of two di
ff
erent
DetSets. Uncertainties are obtained by performing Monte Carlo
inhomogeneous white noise simulations, considering the diago-
nal terms of the pixel-pixel covariance for the two data sets.
We have applied this algorithm to
Planck
353 GHz maps
and simulations to estimate the
B
-mode power spectrum of the
Galactic thermal dust emission in regions ranging from 1% to
30% of the sky. We have used
Xpure
here as a cross-check for
the robustness of the
Xpol
method presented in the previous sec-
tion. Validation and comparison of the performance of the two
algorithms is presented in Appendix A on simulations and in
Appendix D.1 on application to the data.
3.2. Computing cross-spectra
To avoid a bias arising from the noise, we compute all the
Planck
power spectra from cross-correlations of DetSets maps
(see Sect. 2). The noise independence of the two DetSet maps
at a given frequency was quantified in Planck Collaboration XV
(2014) and the resulting level of noise bias in the cross-power
spectra between them has been shown to be negligible. The
cross-power spectrum at a given frequency
ν
is
C
`
(
ν
×
ν
)
C
`
(
D
1
ν
×
D
2
ν
)
,
(3)
where
D
1
ν
and
D
2
ν
are the two independent DetSet 1 and DetSet 2
maps at the frequency
ν
. The
Planck
cross-band spectrum
A133, page 5 of 25
A&A 586, A133 (2016)
Fig. 1.
Masks and complementary selected large regions that retain frac-
tional coverage of the sky
f
sky
from 0.8 to 0.3 (see details in Sect. 3.3.1).
The grey is the CO mask, whose complement is a selected region with
f
sky
=
0
.
8. In increments of
f
sky
=
0
.
1, the retained regions can be iden-
tified by the colours yellow (0.3) to black (0.8), inclusively. Also shown
is the (unapodized) point source mask used.
between the frequencies
ν
and
ν
is
C
`
(
ν
×
ν
)
1
4
[
C
`
(
D
1
ν
×
D
1
ν
)
+
C
`
(
D
2
ν
×
D
2
ν
)
+
C
`
(
D
1
ν
×
D
2
ν
)
+
C
`
(
D
2
ν
×
D
1
ν
)]
,
(4)
or equivalently the cross-spectrum between
ν
and
ν
of the aver-
aged frequency maps (
D
1
ν
+
D
2
ν
)
/
2.
As we noted in Sect. 2.2.2, from each computed
C
EE
`
spec-
trum we subtract the
Planck
best-fit
Λ
CDM
C
EE
`
model (Planck
Collaboration XVI 2014), i.e., the theoretical
C
EE
`
model ob-
tained from the temperature data fit, while
C
BB
`
spectra are kept
unaltered.
3.3. Selection of regions
To measure the dust polarization power spectra with high S
/
N,
we select six large regions, the analysis regions of interest at
intermediate Galactic latitude, which have e
ff
ective coverage of
the sky from 24 to 72% (see Sect. 3.3.1)
7
. For statistical studies
at high Galactic latitude, we compute spectra on a complete set
of smaller regions or patches (Sect. 3.3.2), similar in size to the
patches observed in typical CMB experiments.
3.3.1. Large regions
For selection of all of the large regions, we used the
Planck
CO map from Planck Collaboration XIII (2014), smoothed to
a 5
resolution, to mask the sky wherever the CO line brightness
I
CO
0
.
4 K km s
1 8
. This mask is shown in Fig. 1. The com-
plement to this mask by itself defines a preliminary region that
retains a sky fraction
f
sky
=
0
.
8.
We then mask the sky above successively lower thresholds of
I
857
in the
Planck
857 GHz intensity map, smoothed to a 5
res-
olution, chosen such that together with the CO mask we select
five more preliminary regions that retain
f
sky
from 0.7 to 0.3 in
steps of 0.1. These six regions are shown in Fig. 1.
7
Although the selection process is similar to that in Planck
Collaboration XV (2014), there are di
ff
erences in detail.
8
We use the CO (
J
=
1
0) type 3 map, which has the highest S
/
N.
At this resolution and for this map, the cut we apply corresponds to
S
/
N
>
8.
To avoid power leakage, these six masks are then apodized
by convolving with a 5
FWHM Gaussian which alters the win-
dow function by gradually reducing the signal towards the edges
of the retained regions and thus lowers the e
ff
ective retained sky
coverage. The
f
e
ff
sky
value is simply defined as the mean sky cov-
erage of the window function map.
Finally, we mask data within a radius 2
σ
beam
of point sources
selected from the
Planck
Catalogue of Compact Sources (PCCS,
Planck Collaboration XXVIII 2014) at 353 GHz. The selected
sources have
S
/
N
>
7 and a flux density above 400 mJy
9
.
Selection of spurious infrared sources in bright dust-emitting re-
gions is avoided by using contamination indicators of infrared
cirrus listed in the PCCS description (Planck Collaboration
XXVIII 2014). This point-source masking is done to prevent
the brightest polarized sources from producing ringing in the
power spectrum estimation, while avoiding the removal of dust
emitting regions and their statistical contribution to the an-
gular power spectra. The details of this source selection will
be presented in the
Planck
2014 release papers. The edges
of the masks around point sources were apodized with a 30
FWHM Gaussian, further reducing the retained net e
ff
ective sky
coverage.
In combination these masking and apodization procedures
result in six large retained (LR) regions, which we label using
the percentage of the sky retained (the net e
ff
ective fractional
sky coverages,
f
e
ff
sky
, are listed in Table 1), e.g., LR72 for the
largest region and LR24 for the smallest.
Table 1 also lists other properties of the regions, including
I
353
, the mean specific intensity at 353 GHz within the region
in MJy sr
1
, and
N
H
, the mean H
column density in units of
10
20
cm
2
computed on the LAB H
survey data cube (Kalberla
et al. 2005).
3.3.2. Small patches at high Galactic latitude
To examine the statistics of the angular power spectra at
high Galactic latitude, we also analyse the
Planck
polariza-
tion maps within patches with a size similar to those of typ-
ical ground-based and balloon-borne CMB experiments (e.g.,
QUIET Collaboration et al. 2012; Hanson et al. 2013; BICEP2
Collaboration 2014b; Ade et al. 2014; Naess et al. 2014).
Specifically, we consider 400 deg
2
circular areas (radius 11.
3)
centred on the central pixel positions of the
HEALPix
N
side
=
8
grid that have Galactic latitude
|
b
|
>
35
. This results in 352 such
patches. These are apodized with a 2
FWHM Gaussian, which
reduces the retained sky fraction to
f
e
ff
sky
=
0
.
0080 for each patch.
For these small patches, we do not mask point sources as was
done in selecting the large regions, since we want to preserve
the same
f
e
ff
sky
for each mask, nor is the CO mask needed, since
we use these masks only on the 353 GHz high Galactic latitude
data. We note that for
N
side
=
8, pixels have an area of about
54 deg
2
and characteristic centre-to-centre spacing of about 7.
4.
Therefore, this
HEALPix
grid oversamples the sky relative to this
patch size, so that the patches overlap and are not independent.
9
This included the brightest point sources in the Large and Small
Magellanic Clouds (LMC and SMC). We tested that masking the en-
tirety of the LMC and SMC has no significant e
ff
ect on the spectra or
on the conclusions that we derive from them.
A133, page 6 of 25
Planck Collaboration: Dust polarization at high latitudes
Table 1.
Properties of the large retained (LR) science regions described in Sect. 3.3.1.
LR24
LR33
LR42
LR53
LR63
LR72
f
sky
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
f
e
ff
sky
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0.24
0.33
0.42
0.53
0.63
0.72
I
353
/
MJy sr
1
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0.068
0.085
0.106
0.133
0.167
0.227
N
H
/
10
20
cm
2
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.65
2.12
2.69
3.45
4.41
6.05
α
EE
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2
.
40
±
0
.
09
2
.
38
±
0
.
07
2
.
34
±
0
.
04
2
.
36
±
0
.
03
2
.
42
±
0
.
02
2
.
43
±
0
.
02
α
BB
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2
.
29
±
0
.
15
2
.
37
±
0
.
12
2
.
46
±
0
.
07
2
.
43
±
0
.
05
2
.
44
±
0
.
03
2
.
46
±
0
.
02
χ
2
EE
(
α
EE
=
2
.
42,
N
d
.
o
.
f
.
=
21) . .
26
.
3
28
.
1
31
.
8
38
.
3
32
.
7
44
.
8
χ
2
BB
(
α
BB
=
2
.
42
,
N
d
.
o
.
f
.
=
21) . .
18
.
9
14
.
0
21
.
1
22
.
1
15
.
4
21
.
9
A
EE
(
`
=
80) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
37
.
5
±
1
.
6
51
.
0
±
1
.
6
78
.
6
±
1
.
7
124
.
2
±
1
.
9
197
.
1
±
2
.
3
328
.
0
±
2
.
8
A
BB
/
A
EE
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0
.
49
±
0
.
04
0
.
48
±
0
.
03
0
.
53
±
0
.
02
0
.
54
±
0
.
02
0
.
53
±
0
.
01
0
.
53
±
0
.
01
Notes.
For each region,
f
sky
is the initial sky fraction,
f
e
ff
sky
its value after point source masking and apodization,
I
353
the mean specific intensity at
353 GHz within the region, in MJy sr
1
, and
N
H
the mean H
column density, in units of 10
20
cm
2
(Kalberla et al. 2005). For the power-law fits
in multipole
`
, we also list the exponents
α
EE
and
α
BB
(Sect. 4.2), the
χ
2
of the fits with fixed exponents
α
EE
=
α
BB
=
2
.
42, the value
A
EE
of the
fitted
D
EE
`
amplitude at
`
=
80 (in
μ
K
2
CMB
at 353 GHz, Sect. 4.3), and the mean of the amplitude ratio
A
BB
/
A
EE
(see Sect. 4.4).
4. Dust polarized angular power spectra
at intermediate Galactic latitude
In this section, we quantify the 353 GHz dust polarization in the
power spectrum domain, achieving a high S
/
N through the use
of LR regions. For convenience we present results for
D
EE
`
and
D
BB
`
, where
D
`
`
(
`
+
1)
C
`
/
(2
π
).
4.1. Description of the spectra
Using
Xpol
we have computed
D
EE
`
and
D
BB
`
from the two
DetSets at 353 GHz, as a function of the multipole
`
in the range
40–600
10
. These represent the first measurements of the thermal
dust
D
EE
`
and
D
BB
`
power spectra on large fractions of the sky
for
` >
40 (see Ponthieu et al. 2005; Gold et al. 2011, for earlier
related studies).
In Fig. 2 we present the results for
f
sky
=
{
0
.
3
,
0
.
5
,
0
.
7
}
.
The amplitudes of the spectra increase with increasing
f
sky
be-
cause the polarized emission is brighter on average when more
sky is retained. We point out that the LR regions presented in
Sect. 3.3.1 overlap because they form a nested set. However, the
power spectra derived from them are almost independent of each
other because each spectrum is dominated by the brightest ar-
eas in the corresponding region, namely the parts closest to the
Galactic plane and hence the areas in which each LR region dif-
fers from those nested inside it.
The
D
EE
`
and
D
BB
`
spectra are characterized by a power-law
dependence on multipole
`
over the range
`
=
40 to 600; further-
more, the slope is similar for di
ff
erent regions that retain from 24
to 63% of the sky.
Figure 2 also shows the
D
EE
`
power spectrum computed from
the
Planck
2013 best-fit
Λ
CDM model of the CMB temperature
data (Planck Collaboration XVI 2014), and the much lower ex-
pectation for
D
BB
`
from the CMB model with primordial gravita-
tional waves with amplitude
r
=
0
.
2. At 353 GHz, the
D
EE
`
angu-
lar power spectra of the dust are about 3
4 orders of magnitude
larger than the CMB model at
`
=
30, 1
2 orders of magnitude
10
The spectra are in units of
μ
K
2
CMB
at 353 GHz.
larger at
`
=
100, and about the same order of magnitude as the
CMB at
` >
300. At 353 GHz, the
D
BB
`
angular power spectra for
dust are much greater than the CMB model power spectrum for
all
`
values in Fig. 2. The dust power spectra are larger than the
r
=
0
.
2 CMB spectrum by 4
5 orders of magnitude at
`
=
30,
and by 3
4 orders of magnitude at
`
=
100. At
`
=
500, where
the lensing of CMB anisotropies is the dominant contribution to
the CMB model spectrum, the dust is still 2
3 orders of magni-
tude higher.
As discussed in Appendix A, we do not expect any signifi-
cant bias, or
E
-to-
B
leakage, from the computation of the dust
angular power spectra using
Xpol
. Figure 2 also includes the
D
EE
`
and
D
BB
`
spectra at 353 GHz, computed from our estimate
of the leakage terms from intensity to polarization (discussed
in Sect. 2.3), for the same three LR regions. The dust spectra
are much higher than the corresponding spectra for the leakage,
which represent the main systematic e
ff
ects over the
`
range of
interest for this work. The largest contamination of the dust sig-
nal by leakage is about 3.5% at
`
=
50, for both the
D
EE
`
and
D
BB
`
spectra. Because we consider that our estimate of the leak-
age maps is conservative, we conclude that contamination of the
dust
D
EE
`
and
D
BB
`
power spectra by systematic e
ff
ects amounts
to a maximum of 4% at
`
=
50, and is less at higher multipoles.
Therefore, we have not corrected the
Planck
data for intensity-
to-polarization leakage in this work.
Finally, in Fig. 2 we present for the three LR re-
gions the absolute value of the null-test spectra anticipated
in Sect. 2.3, here computed from the cross-spectra of the
HalfRing
/
DetSet di
ff
erences, i.e., (353
DS1
,
HR1
353
DS1
,
HR2
)
/
2
×
(353
DS2
,
HR1
353
DS2
,
HR2
)
/
2. These
D
EE
`
and
D
BB
`
spectra show a
behaviour that is close to what is expected from a white-noise
dominated (thus
`
2
) spectrum. The amplitudes of these error es-
timates are consistent with the noise expectations; there is no
evidence for any e
ff
ects of systematics.
For completeness, in Appendix B we present a further quan-
tification of the power spectrum of thermal dust emission at
353 GHz via the spectra involving temperature and polarization,
D
TE
`
and
D
T B
`
, and the polarization cross-spectrum,
D
EB
`
.
A133, page 7 of 25
A&A 586, A133 (2016)
Fig. 2.
Planck
HFI 353 GHz
D
EE
`
(red,
top
) and
D
BB
`
(blue,
bottom
) power spectra (in
μ
K
2
CMB
) computed on three of the selected LR analysis
regions that have
f
sky
=
0
.
3 (circles, lightest),
f
sky
=
0
.
5 (diamonds, medium) and
f
sky
=
0
.
7 (squares, darkest). The uncertainties shown are
±
1
σ
.
The best-fit power laws in
`
are given for each spectrum as a dashed line of the corresponding colour. The
Planck
2013 best-fit
Λ
CDM
D
EE
`
expectation (Planck Collaboration XVI 2014) and the corresponding
r
=
0
.
2
D
BB
`
CMB model are shown as solid black lines; the rise for
` >
200
is from the lensing contribution. In the lower parts of each panel, the global estimates of the power spectra of the systematic e
ff
ects responsible
for intensity-to-polarization leakage (Sect. 2.3) are shown in di
ff
erent shades of grey, with the same symbols to identify the three regions. Finally,
absolute values of the null-test spectra anticipated in Sect. 2.3, computed here from the cross-spectra of the HalfRing
/
DetSet di
ff
erences (see text),
are represented as dashed-dotted, dashed, and dotted grey lines for the three LR regions.
A133, page 8 of 25
Planck Collaboration: Dust polarization at high latitudes
Fig. 3.
Best-fit power-law exponents
α
EE
(red squares) and
α
BB
(blue
circles) fitted to the 353 GHz dust
D
EE
`
and
D
BB
`
power spectra for the
di
ff
erent LR regions defined in Sect. 3.3.1, distinguished here with
f
sky
.
Although the values in the regions are not quite independent, simple
means have been calculated and are represented as red and blue dashed
lines.
4.2. Power-law fit
To assess the apparent power-law dependence
C
XX
`
`
α
XX
quan-
titatively, we made a
χ
2
fit to the spectra at 353 GHz using the
form
D
XX
`
=
A
XX
(
`/
80)
α
XX
+
2
, where
X
∈ {
E
,
B
}
. For
D
EE
`
and
D
BB
`
we fit the 22 band-powers in the range 60
< ` <
500. For
both power spectra we restricted the fit to
` >
60 to avoid a pos-
sible bias from systematic e
ff
ects in the data, and also because
the angular power spectra of the dust polarization exhibit more
spatial variation than is expected for a Gaussian random field,
particularly on large angular scales.
The exponents of the power-law fits,
α
XX
, are plotted in
Fig. 3 for each of the six LR regions identified with
f
sky
. All
exponents are consistent with constant values of
α
EE
=
2
.
41
±
0
.
02 and of
α
BB
=
2
.
45
±
0
.
03. While there is a slight indication
of a steeper slope for
D
BB
`
than for
D
EE
`
, hereafter we adopt the
mean exponent
2
.
42
±
0
.
02. This exponent is consistent with
the value
α
TT
fitted to the
Planck
353 GHz dust intensity power
spectra in this range of
`
(Planck Collaboration XV 2014; Planck
Collaboration Int. XXII 2015) on similar-sized regions at inter-
mediate Galactic latitude, but slightly flatter than the
α
TT
fitted
at higher
`
and higher frequency (Miville-Deschênes et al. 2007,
2010; Planck Collaboration XV 2014).
For the fits with fixed exponent
α
EE
,
BB
=
2
.
42, the values
of the
χ
2
(with number of degrees of freedom,
N
d
.
o
.
f
.
=
21) are
listed in Table 1 for the six LR regions. For the
D
EE
`
spectra, the
χ
2
values range from 26.3 (probability to exceed, PTE
=
0
.
2) to
44.8 (PTE
=
0
.
002), with a trend for a quality of fit that degrades
with increasing
f
sky
. For the
D
BB
`
spectra, the
χ
2
values range
from 14.0 (PTE
=
0
.
87) to 22.1 (PTE
=
0
.
39), with a trend
related to
f
sky
.
Possible explanations for this di
ff
erence between
D
EE
`
and
D
BB
`
spectrum shape descriptions, are the chance correlation be-
tween dust and CMB polarization, which is not taken into ac-
count in the subtraction of the CMB
D
EE
`
spectrum, and the in-
creasing S
/
N degrading the overall quality of the fit when going
from
D
BB
`
to
D
EE
`
and for
D
EE
`
from
f
sky
=
0
.
3 to
f
sky
=
0
.
8 as
the amplitude of the dust polarized signal increases. We stress
that while the power law in
`
is a good general description of the
shape of the dust polarized power spectra, a full characterization
would have to consider the detailed features that can be seen in
Fig. 2.
Fig. 4.
Amplitude of the dust
A
EE
(red squares) and
A
BB
(blue circles)
power spectra, normalized with respect to the largest amplitude for each
mode. These are plotted versus the mean dust intensity
I
353
for the
six LR regions (
top panel
). A power-law fit of the form
A
XX
(
I
353
)
=
K
XX
I
353
1
.
9
,
X
∈ {
E
,
B
}
, is overplotted as a dashed line of the corre-
sponding colour (these almost overlap). The
bottom panel
presents the
ratio of the data and the fitted
I
353
1
.
9
power law; the range associated
with the
±
1
σ
uncertainty in the power-law exponent of 1.9 is shown in
grey. For details see Sect. 4.3.
4.3. Amplitude dependence on
I
353
Similarly to what has been done for intensity power spectra in,
e.g., Gautier et al. (1992) and Miville-Deschênes et al. (2007),
we investigate how the amplitude of the dust polarization power
spectrum scales with the dust intensity. To quantify the dust
emission at 353 GHz, we use the model map derived from a mod-
ified blackbody fit to the
Planck
data at
ν
353 GHz and IRAS
at
λ
=
100
μ
m, presented in Planck Collaboration XI (2014).
This map is corrected for zodiacal emission and the brightest ex-
tragalactic point sources are subtracted. The Galactic reference
o
ff
sets of the underlying IRAS and
Planck
data were obtained
through a method based on correlation with 21 cm data from
the LAB H
survey (Kalberla et al. 2005) integrated in velocity,
e
ff
ectively removing the CIB monopole in the model map. The
mean dust intensity,
I
353
, listed for each LR region in Table 1,
ranges from 0
.
068 to 0
.
227 MJy sr
1
for increasing
f
e
ff
sky
. The
mean column density calculated from the LAB survey data is
also listed in Table 1, with values ranging from 1
.
65
×
10
20
cm
2
to 6
.
05
×
10
20
cm
2
.
For all of the LR regions, we fit the
D
EE
`
and
D
BB
`
spectra
with a power law in
`
, using the fixed exponent
α
EE
,
BB
=
2
.
42,
over the
`
-ranges defined in Sect. 4.2. The amplitudes
A
EE
de-
rived from these fits are listed in Table 1; the
A
BB
amplitudes
can be retrieved from the
A
BB
/
A
EE
ratio. These amplitudes are
plotted as a function of
I
353
in Fig. 4 after normalization by the
maximum value found for the largest region (LR72). We fit the
empirical dependence of these amplitudes on
I
353
as a power
law of the form
A
XX
(
I
353
)
=
K
XX
I
353

XX
where
X
∈ {
E
,
B
}
.
The two fitted exponents are quite similar,

EE
=
1
.
88
±
0
.
02 and

BB
=
1
.
90
±
0
.
02. The exponent that we find for polarization
is close to the one observed in the di
ff
use interstellar medium
for the dust intensity, consistent with
A
TT
ν
I
ν
2
, where
I
ν
is
the mean value of the dust specific intensity (Miville-Deschênes
et al. 2007). Values close to 2 are expected, because we compute
angular power spectra, which deal with squared quantities.
Although the data points roughly follow this
I
353
1
.
9
depen-
dence, the empirical law fails to fully describe individual dust
amplitudes (e.g., the estimate is o
ff
by about 20% for
D
BB
`
on
A133, page 9 of 25
A&A 586, A133 (2016)
Fig. 5.
Ratio of the amplitudes of the
D
BB
`
and
D
EE
`
dust power spectra
at 353 GHz for the di
ff
erent LR regions defined in Sect. 3.3.1, distin-
guished here with
f
sky
. The mean value
A
BB
/
A
EE
=
0
.
52 is plotted as
a dashed line.
LR33). The scaling can help to asses the order of magnitude of
the dust polarization level on a specific region, but is not a sub-
stitute for actually characterizing the polarized angular power
spectra.
4.4. Amplitude of
D
BB
`
relative to
D
EE
`
We examine the ratio of the amplitudes of the fitted power laws
found in Sect. 4.3. The
A
BB
/
A
EE
ratios are listed in Table 1, and
are plotted for di
ff
erent values of
f
sky
in Fig. 5. For all of the
LR regions, we observe more power in the
D
EE
`
dust spectrum
than in
D
BB
`
. All ratios are consistent with a value of
A
BB
/
A
EE
=
0
.
52
±
0
.
03, significantly di
ff
erent from unity, over various large
fractions of the intermediate latitude sky.
This result is not taken into account in existing models of po-
larized microwave dust emission that have been developed to test
component separation methods. For example, we have computed
the
D
EE
`
and
D
BB
`
spectra over the LR regions for the
Planck
Sky Model (Delabrouille et al. 2013) and the model of O’Dea
et al. (2012); for both models and all LR regions we find a ratio
A
BB
/
A
EE
close to 1. However, these two models are based on a
very simplified picture of the Galactic magnetic field geometry
and assumptions on how the polarized emission depends on it.
Further insight into the structure of the dust polarization sky is
required to account for the observed ratio.
4.5. Amplitude dependence on frequency
Finally, we explore the frequency dependence of the amplitude
of the angular power spectra. We compute the
D
EE
`
and
D
BB
`
angular power spectra from the
Q
and
U
DetSet maps at 100,
143, 217, and 353 GHz (see Sect. 3.2). From these four sets of
polarization maps, we compute ten power spectra: 100
×
100;
100
×
143; 100
×
217; 100
×
353; 143
×
143; 143
×
217; 143
×
353;
217
×
217; 217
×
353; and 353
×
353.
The ten angular cross-power spectra are consistent with a
power law in
`
, with the exponent
α
EE
,
BB
=
2
.
42 measured at
353 GHz (Sect. 4.2). Therefore, to each of these spectra we fit
the amplitudes of a power-law function that has a fixed expo-
nent
α
EE
,
BB
=
2
.
42, in the range 40
< ` <
500, for
D
EE
`
and
D
BB
`
. As an illustration of the quality of the fit, for the small-
est region (LR24,
f
sky
=
0
.
3) the averages and dispersions of
Fig. 6.
Frequency dependence of the amplitudes
A
EE
,
BB
of the angular
power spectra, relative to 353 GHz (see details in Sect. 4.5). Results
for
D
EE
`
(red squares) and
D
BB
`
(blue circles) for the smallest region,
LR24. These include evaluations from cross-spectra involving polariza-
tion data at two frequencies, plotted at the geometric mean frequency.
The square of the adopted relative SED for dust polarization, which
is a modified blackbody spectrum with
β
d
=
1
.
59 and
T
d
=
19
.
6 K,
is shown as a black dashed line. The
±
1
σ
uncertainty area from the
expected dispersion of
β
d
, 0.03 for the size of LR24 as inferred from
Planck Collaboration Int. XXII (2015) (see Sect. 2.2.1), is shown in
grey.
the
χ
2
(21 degrees of freedom) of the fits are
χ
2
EE
=
13
.
4
±
8
.
2
and
χ
2
BB
=
12
.
8
±
6
.
9 for the ten cross-frequency spectra.
To compare the frequency dependence of the results of the
fits to that expected from the SED for dust polarization from
Planck Collaboration Int. XXII (2015), we converted the fitted
amplitudes
A
EE
,
BB
from
μ
K
2
CMB
to units of (MJy sr
1
)
2
, taking
into account the
Planck
colour corrections
11
. For all regions, we
examined the frequency dependence by plotting the amplitudes
normalized to unity at 353 GHz versus the e
ff
ective frequency
12
.
A representative example is shown in Fig. 6 for the smallest re-
gion, LR24 (
f
sky
=
0
.
3).
For all of the LR regions the frequency dependence found
is in good agreement with the square of the adopted dust SED,
which is a modified blackbody spectrum having
β
d
=
1
.
59 and
T
d
=
19
.
6 K (Planck Collaboration Int. XXII 2015). We note
that no fit was performed at this stage and that the square of
the adopted dust SED goes through the 353 GHz data point.
However, if we fit the amplitude of the dust frequency depen-
dence, with fixed
β
d
and
T
d
, the
χ
2
(
N
d
.
o
.
f
.
=
9) is 13.1 for
EE
(PTE
=
0
.
16) and 3.2 for
BB
(PTE
=
0
.
96). This good
agreement supports the assumption made in the present work
about the faintness of the synchrotron and CO emission at high
Galactic latitude (see Sect. 2.2). The residuals to the fit do
not show any evidence for excess power at 100 GHz, which
might arise from polarized synchrotron emission. This result
is consistent with the study of synchrotron polarization at high
Galactic latitudes by Fuskeland et al. (2014), and confirmed in
Appendix D.4. Furthermore, we do not see any excess at ei-
ther 100 or 217 GHz, such as could arise from leakage and
/
or
11
Conversion factors were computed as described in Sect. 2.1, here
using colour corrections corresponding to a dust modified blackbody
spectrum with
β
d
=
1
.
59 and
T
d
=
19
.
6 K.
12
For a cross-spectrum between data at frequency
ν
1
and frequency
ν
2
,
the e
ff
ective frequency is taken for convenience as the geometric mean
ν
e
ff
ν
1
ν
2
.
A133, page 10 of 25