crystallization communications
1106
doi:10.1107/S174430911203271X
ActaCryst.
(2012). F
68
, 1106–1108
Acta Crystallographica Section F
Structural Biology
and Crystallization
Communications
ISSN 1744-3091
Crystallization and preliminary crystallographic
studies of FoxE from
Rhodobacter ferrooxidans
SW2, an Fe
II
oxidoreductase involved in
photoferrotrophy
L. Pereira,
a
I. H. Saraiva,
a
R. Coelho,
a
D. K. Newman,
b
R. O. Louro
a
and C. Fraza
̃
o
a
*
a
Instituto de Tecnologia Quı
́
mica e Biolo
́
gica,
Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Apartado 127,
2781-901 Oeiras, Portugal, and
b
California
Institute of Technology/Howard Hughes Medical
Institute, 1200 East California Boulevard, Mail
Code 147-75, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
Correspondence e-mail: frazao@itqb.unl.pt
Received 22 June 2012
Accepted 18 July 2012
FoxE is a protein encoded by the
foxEYZ
operon of
Rhodobacter ferrooxidans
SW2 that is involved in Fe
II
-based anoxygenic photosynthesis (‘photoferro-
trophy’). It is thought to reside in the periplasm, where it stimulates light-
dependent Fe
II
oxidation. It contains 259 residues, including two haem
c
-binding
motifs. As no three-dimensional model is available and there is no structure with
a similar sequence, crystals of FoxE were produced. They diffracted to 2.44 A
̊
resolution using synchrotron radiation at the Fe edge. The phase problem was
solved by SAD using
SHELXC
/
D
/
E
and the experimental maps confirmed the
presence of two haems per molecule.
1. Introduction
FoxE is a di-haem
c
-type cytochrome encoded by the
foxEYZ
operon
from the bacterium
Rhodobacter ferrooxidans
SW2, a bacterium that
is capable of photoferrotrophy. This is a metabolic strategy that is
characterized by the utilization of ferrous iron (Fe
II
) oxidation as the
sole source of electrons for photosynthesis (Widdel
et al.
, 1993). The
ferric iron (Fe
III
) resulting from this metabolism precipitates as ferric
(hydr)oxides at the neutral pH at which this organism grows. This
ancient form of photosynthesis (Xiong
et al.
, 2000) is hypothesized to
have catalyzed the deposition of ancient sedimentary deposits known
as banded iron formations in early phases of the history of the Earth
(Kappler
et al.
, 2005).
Heterologous expression of the
fox
operon in the bacterium
R. capsulatus
SB1003 resulted in enhanced photosynthetic Fe
II
-
oxidation activity, which suggested that the products of this operon
are required for photoferrotrophy (Croal
et al.
, 2007). That the
expression of
foxE
alone is enough to enhance photosynthetic Fe
II
oxidation indicates that this cytochrome is responsible for the
Fe
II
-oxidation step in this metabolism. Previous functional char-
acterization of FoxE (Saraiva
et al.
, 2012) demonstrated that it is
thermodynamically and kinetically capable of oxidizing Fe
II
in vitro
.
In-depth characterization of the proteins involved in photoferro-
trophy is required in order to understand this ancient form of
photosynthesis which is likely to have had a profound impact on the
geochemical evolution of the Earth in the past.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Protein expression and purification
FoxE was cloned, expressed and purified as described by Saraiva
et al.
(2012). The protein purity was checked by SDS–PAGE and the
pure protein was concentrated using Vivaspin concentrators with a
30 kDa cutoff membrane, leading to a final protein solution consisting
of 15–18 mg ml
1
FoxE in 5 m
M
potassium phosphate buffer pH 7.0.
2.2. Protein crystallization
Initial FoxE crystallization screens were performed at room
temperature (293 K) by the vapour-diffusion method with commer-
cially available solution kits in a Mini-Bee MicroSys 4000XL
Cartesian Dispensing Systems robot (Genomic Solutions, USA).
Drops were produced by dispensing 100 nl protein solution plus
100 nl precipitant solution and were equilibrated against 100
m
l
#
2012 International Union of Crystallography
All rights reserved
precipitant solution; they were examined under a magnifying glass to
detect possible crystallization hints. These were then further opti-
mized in microlitre-scale drops by variation of the initial conditions,
by the use of crystallization additives and by attempting seeding
experiments.
Two crystallization screens, Structure Screen 1 and Structure
Screen 2 from Molecular Dimensions Ltd (Suffolk, England), were
initially tried. No crystallization hits were detected among those 2
48 trials, but precipitation was observed in
50% of the drops with
solutions containing PEG and in
60% of the drops with pH below
6.5. MacroSol, JCSG-plus and Stura Footprints screens from Mole-
cular Dimensions were then tried. Three distinct crystal shapes were
obtained from these 192 conditions: needle-like crystals were
obtained using solution 2.16 of MacroSol [0.1
M
HEPES pH 7.5,
2.0
M
ammonium sulfate, 5%(
v
/
v
) PEG 400], polyhedral crystals with
similar shapes were obtained using four solutions from JCSG-plus
that contained PEG, namely solution 1.2 [0.1
M
sodium citrate pH
5.5, 20%(
w
/
v
) PEG 3K], solution 1.45 [0.17
M
ammonium sulfate,
25.5%(
w
/
v
) PEG 4K, 15% glycerol], solution 1.21 [0.1
M
citrate pH 5,
20%(
w
/
v
) PEG 6K] and solution 2.45 [0.2
M
lithium sulfate, 0.1
M
bis-Tris pH 5.5, 25%(
w
/
v
) PEG 3350], and agglomerated polycrystals
were obtained using Stura Footprints solution B6 (1.32
M
sodium/
potassium phosphate pH 7). The conditions that delivered the best-
looking crystals were optimized on the microlitre scale, aiming to
control nucleation and to increase the crystal size. However, the use
of JCSG-plus solution 1.2 could not be reproduced and solution 1.45
only produced crystals at 303 K. The use of PEGs of sizes 2–6K at
5–20%, the addition of 5 or 15% glycerol, the removal of sodium
citrate, the use of drops with different volumes of protein and
precipitant (2:1.5, 2:1, 2.2:0.8 and 2.3:0.7), the addition of silicone,
paraffin or PEG 400 to control vapour diffusion and the use of macro-
seeding were attempted. These attempts revealed that the crystals
were often not reproducible and showed a gel-like consistency within
4–7 d, therefore not being amenable to X-ray diffraction.
We proceeded with the non-PEG lead, Stura Footprints solution
B6 based on phosphate precipitant. Although its microlitre scale-up
was reproducible at all temperatures tested (277, 293 and 303 K),
diffraction experiments showed that the crystals were disordered.
Crystallization conditions at 293 K were then varied using PEGs of
sizes 2–6K, 10–36%(
v
/
v
) PEG concentration, 0.1–1.4
M
phosphate
concentration, pH values in the range 5–7.2 and different (1:2, 1:1 and
2:1) dispensing ratios. Better crystals grew in 0.2
M
sodium/potassium
phosphate pH 5, 20%(
v
/
v
) PEG 5K, but degraded over time and did
not produce usable diffraction. In order to sample wider crystal-
lization conditions using phosphate precipitant, the Additive Screen
from Hampton Research (Aliso Viejo, USA) was also used, restricted
to its 80 nonvolatile conditions. The best crystals were obtained at
293 K in sitting drops consisting of 1
m
l15mgml
1
protein solution
plus 1
m
l precipitant solution (1.2
M
sodium/potassium phosphate
pH 7, 50 m
M
copper chloride) equilibrated against 500
m
l precipitant
solution in the well. Red polyhedral crystals reached dimensions of
up to approximately 0.1
0.1
0.02 mm (Fig. 1). Crystal cryo-
protection was accomplished by soaking the crystals in mother liquor
complemented with 25%(
v
/
v
) glycerol.
2.3. X-ray diffraction data collection and crystal phase-problem
solution
The diffraction of a cryostabilized crystal was measured near the
iron absorption edge using an ADSC Q315R detector at station
ID23-1 of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF),
Grenoble, France. Diffraction images from two 360
crystal rotations,
interleaved by a crystal translation in order to start each diffraction
run from an unexposed crystal region, were integrated and scaled
with
XDS
(Kabsch, 2010) and the resulting two sets of intensities
were merged together with
XPREP
(Bruker).
The phase problem was solved by single-wavelength anomalous
diffraction (SAD) using the
HKL
2
MAP
GUI (Pape & Schneider,
2004; Sheldrick, 2008), which (i) relies on
SHELXC
to analyse the
data, estimate anomalous difference factors and produce initial phase
shifts for reflections corresponding to the largest normalized anom-
alous differences, (ii) uses
SHELXD
to determined the anomalous
heavy-atom substructure and (iii) uses
SHELXE
to produce iterative
phase improvement by density modification, including automated
poly-Ala chain tracing (Sheldrick, 2010).
3. Results and discussion
Despite several attempts to optimize the initial FoxE crystallization
conditions from PEG- or phosphate-containing solutions, the crystals
were not always reproducible; their diffraction indicated disordered
crystal packing and showed severe intensity reduction within a few
days, when the crystals became gel-like red polyhedra. The addition
of copper chloride as an additive to the mother liquor, however, led
to increased crystal stability and to increased diffraction capability.
crystallization communications
ActaCryst.
(2012). F
68
, 1106–1108
Pereira
etal.
FoxE
1107
Figure 1
Crystallization drop of FoxE showing red well shaped polyhedral crystals with
approximate dimensions of 0.1
0.1
0.02 mm.
Table 1
Crystallographic and diffraction data statistics.
Values in parentheses are for the highest resolution shell.
ESRF beamline
ID23-1
Wavelength (A
̊
)
1.73925
Resolution (A
̊
)
57.83–2.44 (2.54–2.44)
Space group
P
3
1
21
Unit-cell parameters (A
̊
)
a
=
b
= 112.77,
c
= 143.54
No. of measured reflections
1293342
No. of unique reflections
38526 (3591)
Multiplicity
32.2 (6.3)
Mean
I
/
(
I
)
28.3 (1.9)
R
p.i.m.
† (%)
2.2 (25.0)
R
merge
‡ (%)
13.6 (70.7)
Completeness (%)
96.1 (77.1)
Solvent content (%)
52.3
Wilson
B
factor (A
̊
2
)
49.1
†
R
p.i.m.
=
P
hkl
f
1
=
½
N
ð
hkl
Þ
1
g
1
=
2
P
i
j
I
i
ð
hkl
Þh
I
ð
hkl
Þij
=
P
hkl
P
i
I
i
ð
hkl
Þ
, where
N
is the
data multiplicity,
I
i
(
hkl
) is the observed intensity and
h
I
(
hkl
)
i
is the average intensity of
multiple observations from symmetry-related reflections. It is an indicator of the
precision of the final merged and averaged data set (Weiss, 2001).
‡
R
merge
=
P
hkl
P
i
j
I
i
ð
hkl
Þh
I
ð
hkl
Þij
=
P
hkl
P
i
I
i
ð
hkl
Þ
, where
I
i
(
hkl
) is the observed intensity and
h
I
(
hkl
)
i
is the average intensity of multiple observations from symmetry-related
reflections.
FoxE crystallized in space group
P
3
1
21 or
P
3
2
21, with unit-cell
parameters
a
=
b
= 112.77,
c
= 143.54 A
̊
, and the crystals diffracted to
2.44 A
̊
resolution (see Table 1 for further crystallographic details and
diffraction data statistics).
The diffraction data measured using X-rays at the Fe absorption
edge contained significant anomalous signal up to 3.7 A
̊
resolution,
where the self-anomalous correlation coefficient remained above
30%. The probability distribution of the Matthews coefficient for
2.5 A
̊
resolution indicated a 74% probability of four FoxE molecules
in the asymmetric unit, in contrast to a 17% probability of an
asymmetric unit containing only three molecules (Kantardjieff &
Rupp, 2003). As the FoxE sequence contains two haem
c
cytochrome
C
XX
CH motifs (Croal
et al.
, 2007),
SHELXD
was set to search for
eight Fe atoms. However, only six anomalous atoms were found with
occupancies in the range 0.8–1.0; further hypothetical sites refined to
occupancies below 0.2 and were discarded. Accordingly, the FoxE
crystal contained three molecules in the asymmetric unit, corre-
sponding to a calculated crystal solvent content of 52% (Matthews,
1968).
SHELXE
was run twice. The first run, using phase information
from the six-Fe-atom substructure, solved the space-group hand
ambiguity, produced initial experimental maps, traced a 641 poly-Ala
residue model in 35 chains and listed a set of further anomalous sites.
These were examined with
Coot
(Emsley
et al.
, 2010) to determine the
12 thioether sites that attach the six haems to the three FoxE mole-
cules. A second
SHELXE
run was thus performed including the
phases from a further 12 S atoms and produced the final experimental
maps (Fig. 2), in which 678 poly-Ala residues of the expected 777
were traced in a model with 18 chains and a correlation coefficient of
35%.
Three-dimensional structure determination and refinement of
FoxE is in progress in order to unravel the molecular arrangement of
this
c
-type cytochrome with unprecedented primary structure that is
capable of oxidizing iron
in vitro
in a pH-dependent manner that
appears to be designed to prevent incrustation of the cells by ferric
iron.
The authors gratefully acknowledge the ESRF, Grenoble, France
for provision of synchrotron radiation and thank Susana Gonc
̧ alves,
ITQB–UNL, Portugal for diffraction data collection. G. M. Sheldrick
is thanked for valuable discussions and for providing the
SHELXE
program. This work was funded by projects MIT-Pt/BS-BB/1014/2008
from the MIT-Portugal Program and PTDC/EBB-BIO/098352/2008
from FCT, Portugal. IHS is the recipient of a PhD grant from FCT
(SFRH/BD/36582/2007). DKN is an HHMI Investigator.
References
Croal, L. R., Jiao, Y. & Newman, D. K. (2007).
J. Bacteriol.
189
, 1774–1782.
DeLano, W. L. (2002).
PyMOL
. http://www.pymol.org.
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. (2010).
Acta Cryst.
D
66
,
486–501.
Kabsch, W. (2010).
Acta Cryst.
D
66
, 125–132.
Kantardjieff, K. A. & Rupp, B. (2003).
Protein Sci.
12
, 1865–1871.
Kappler, A., Pasquero, C., Konhauser, K. O. & Newman, D. K. (2005).
Geology
,
33
, 865–868.
Matthews, B. W. (1968).
J. Mol. Biol.
33
, 491–497.
Pape, T. & Schneider, T. R. (2004).
J. Appl. Cryst.
37
, 843–844.
Saraiva, I. H., Newman, D. K. & Louro, R. O. (2012).
J. Biol. Chem.
287
,
25541–25548
Sheldrick, G. M. (2008).
Acta Cryst.
A
64
, 112–122.
Sheldrick, G. M. (2010).
Acta Cryst.
D
66
, 479–485.
Weiss, M. S. (2001).
J. Appl. Cryst.
34
, 130–135.
Widdel, F., Schnell, S., Heising, S., Ehrenreich, A., Assmus, B. & Schink, B.
(1993).
Nature (London)
,
362
, 834–836.
Xiong, J., Fischer, W. M., Inoue, K., Nakahara, M. & Bauer, C. E. (2000).
Science
,
289
, 1724–1730.
crystallization communications
1108
Pereira
etal.
FoxE
ActaCryst.
(2012). F
68
, 1106–1108
Figure 2
Experimental SAD electron density (blue mesh, 0.7
) and anomalous density (red
mesh, 5
) of a representative region of FoxE showing a haem and its ligands. (
a
)
and (
b
) show views with the haem plane perpendicular and parallel to the paper,
respectively. The Fe-atom localization is recognisable in the anomalous map at the
haem centre and the thioether S atoms are recognisable at the haem periphery.
The maps were produced with
SHELXE
(Sheldrick, 2010) and the figures were
produced with
PyMOL
(DeLano, 2002).