Performance and structure of single-mode bosonic codes
Abstract
The early Gottesman, Kitaev, and Preskill (GKP) proposal for encoding a qubit in an oscillator has recently been followed by cat- and binomial-code proposals. Numerically optimized codes have also been proposed, and we introduce codes of this type here. These codes have yet to be compared using the same error model; we provide such a comparison by determining the entanglement fidelity of all codes with respect to the bosonic pure-loss channel (i.e., photon loss) after the optimal recovery operation. We then compare achievable communication rates of the combined encoding-error-recovery channel by calculating the channel's hashing bound for each code. Cat and binomial codes perform similarly, with binomial codes outperforming cat codes at small loss rates. Despite not being designed to protect against the pure-loss channel, GKP codes significantly outperform all other codes for most values of the loss rate. We show that the performance of GKP and some binomial codes increases monotonically with increasing average photon number of the codes. In order to corroborate our numerical evidence of the cat-binomial-GKP order of performance occurring at small loss rates, we analytically evaluate the quantum error-correction conditions of those codes. For GKP codes, we find an essential singularity in the entanglement fidelity in the limit of vanishing loss rate. In addition to comparing the codes, we draw parallels between binomial codes and discrete-variable systems. First, we characterize one- and two-mode binomial as well as multiqubit permutation-invariant codes in terms of spin-coherent states. Such a characterization allows us to introduce check operators and error-correction procedures for binomial codes. Second, we introduce a generalization of spin-coherent states, extending our characterization to qudit binomial codes and yielding a multiqudit code.
Additional Information
© 2018 American Physical Society. Received 16 September 2017; published 30 March 2018. The authors acknowledge Steven T. Flammia, David Poulin, Saikat Guha, Richard Kueng, Mazyar Mirrahimi, John Preskill, R. J. Schoelkopf, Matti Silveri, Murphy Yuezhen Niu, and Bei Zeng for enlightening discussions. V.V.A. thanks Misha Guy and the Yale Center for Research Computing for resources and support and acknowledges support from the Walter Burke Institute for Theoretical Physics at Caltech. V.V.A., K.N., C.S., L.L., and L.J. acknowledge support through the ARL-CDQI, ARO (Grants No. W911NF-14-1-0011 and No. W911NF-14-1-0563), ARO MURI (W911NF-16-1-0349), NSF (EFMA-1640959), AFOSR MURI (FA9550-14-1-0052 and FA9550-15-1-0015), the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (BR2013-049), and the Packard Foundation (2013-39273). K.D., C.V., and B.M.T. acknowledge support through ERC Consolidator Grant No. 682726. S.M.G. acknowledges support through the NSF (DMR-1609326) and ARO (W911NF1410011).Attached Files
Published - PhysRevA.97.032346.pdf
Submitted - 1708.05010.pdf
Supplemental Material - num_codes.nb
Files
Additional details
- Eprint ID
- 85523
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20180330-091105009
- Walter Burke Institute for Theoretical Physics, Caltech
- Army Research Laboratory
- Army Research Office (ARO)
- W911NF-14-1-0011
- Army Research Office (ARO)
- W911NF-14-1-0563
- Army Research Office (ARO)
- W911NF-16-1-0349
- NSF
- EFMA-1640959
- Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR)
- FA9550-14-1-0052
- Air Force Office of Scientific Research (AFOSR)
- FA9550-15-1-0015
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
- BR2013-049
- David and Lucile Packard Foundation
- 2013-39273
- European Research Council (ERC)
- 682726
- NSF
- DMR-1609326
- Created
-
2018-03-30Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2021-11-15Created from EPrint's last_modified field
- Caltech groups
- Institute for Quantum Information and Matter, Walter Burke Institute for Theoretical Physics