Published June 8, 2010 | Version Published
Journal Article Open

Perceiving a discontinuity in motion

  • 1. ROR icon California Institute of Technology
  • 2. ROR icon University of Rochester
  • 3. ROR icon University of Houston
  • 4. ROR icon NTT (Japan)

Abstract

Studies have shown that the position of a target stimulus is misperceived owing to ongoing motion. Although static forces (fixation, landmarks) affect perceived position, motion remains the overwhelming force driving estimates of position. Motion endpoint estimates biased in the direction of motion are perceptual signatures of motion's dominant role in localization. We sought conditions in which static forces exert the predominant influence over perceived position: stimulus displays for which target position is perceived backward relative to motion. We used a target that moved diagonally with constant speed, abruptly turned 90° and continued at constant speed; observers localized the discontinuity. This yielded a previously undescribed effect, "turn-point shift," the tendency of observers to estimate the position of orthogonal direction change backward relative to subsequent motion direction. Display and mislocalization direction differ from past studies. Static forces (foveal attraction, repulsion by subsequently occupied spatial positions) were found to be responsible. Delayed turn-point estimates, reconstructed from probing the entire trajectory, shifted the horizontal coordinate forward in the direction of motion. This implies more than one percept of turn-point position. As various estimates of turn-point position arise at different times, under different task demands, the perceptual system does not necessarily resolve conflicts between them.

Additional Information

© 2010 ARVO. Received May 7, 2009; published June 8, 2010. We are indebted to the volunteers who participated in our experiments. Ritik Tiwari helped conducted several experiments for which we are especially grateful. We would like to thank Saumil Patel for a careful review of an earlier version of the manuscript. We thank Rick Cai and an anonymous reviewer for their detailed and thought-provoking criticisms. Author contributions: DN and BRS contributed equally to the work.

Attached Files

Published - Nieman2010p11116J_Vis.pdf

Files

Nieman2010p11116J_Vis.pdf

Files (1.2 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:bf4f3be7f0b53fad77adbbb82c20da78
1.2 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

Eprint ID
19593
Resolver ID
CaltechAUTHORS:20100823-113403146

Dates

Created
2010-08-23
Created from EPrint's datestamp field
Updated
2021-11-08
Created from EPrint's last_modified field