Published December 2025 | Version Published
Journal Article Embargoed

Implications of Shallow-Shell Models for Topographic Relaxation on Icy Satellites

  • 1. ROR icon Dartmouth College
  • 2. ROR icon Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center
  • 3. ROR icon Goddard Space Flight Center
  • 4. ROR icon Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • 5. ROR icon University of Leeds
  • 6. ROR icon California Institute of Technology

Abstract

Icy satellites host topography at many length scales, from rifts and craters on the small end to equatorial‐pole shell thickness differences that are comparable to these bodies' circumference. The current paradigm is that icy satellites should not host stable small‐scale topography. This idea comes from previous work using a "shallow"‐shell model (i.e., ice shell circumference much larger than shell thickness) with a rigid outer crust. In this limit, large‐scale topography relaxes over a longer time scale than small‐scale features. Here we revisit this paradigm and analyze relaxation of topography starting from the Stokes equations for viscous fluid flow. For a shell with a viscosity that decreases exponentially with depth, we show numerically that there is a regime where the larger viscosity outer crust acts as a nearly rigid boundary. In this case, the relaxation time scale depends on the wavelength. For the largest spatial scales, however, the time scale becomes independent of wavelength and the value is set by the average shell viscosity. However, the spatial scale that this transition occurs at becomes larger as the viscosity contrast increases, limiting the applicability of the scale‐independent relaxation rate. These results for the relaxation of topography have implications for interpreting relaxed crater profiles, inferences of ice shell thickness from topography, and upcoming observations from missions to the outer solar system.

Copyright and License

© 2025. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.

Acknowledgement

Thanks to Sam Birch, Bill McKinnon, Francis Nimmo, and Georgia Peterson for insightful conversations at AGU. CRM, JJB, and TCT were supported by NASA (80NSSC21M0329, 80NSSC21K1804); CRM and AS acknowledge NSF (2012958); and CRM was also funded by ARO (78811EG). ACB was supported by NASA (80NSSC22K1318). Thanks also to the W.M. Keck Institute for Space Studies for organizing the “Digital Twins for Solar System Exploration: Enceladus” workshop where CRM and ACB collaborated on this paper.

Data Availability

We did not use any observational data in this paper. The finite element code is publicly available at http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8171998 (Stubblefield, 2023). The code to produce the timescale plots is avaiable at http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17689055 (Meyer, 2025).

Files

Embargoed

The files will be made publicly available on May 27, 2026.

Additional details

Related works

Is new version of
Discussion Paper: arXiv:2504.20095 (arXiv)
Is supplemented by
Software: 10.5281/zenodo.8171998 (DOI)
Software: 10.5281/zenodo.17689055 (DOI)

Funding

National Aeronautics and Space Administration
80NSSC21M0329
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
80NSSC21K1804
National Science Foundation
2012958
United States Army Research Office
78811EG
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
80NSSC22K1318

Dates

Submitted
2025-07-04
Accepted
2025-11-12
Available
2025-11-27
Version of record online

Caltech Custom Metadata

Caltech groups
Seismological Laboratory, Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences (GPS)
Publication Status
Published