Published July 1988 | Version public
Journal Article

R^2

Creators

Abstract

Even with hindsight, the ability to explain stock price changes is modest. R²s were calculated for the returns of large stocks as explained by systematic economic influences, by the returns on other stocks in the same industry, and by public firm‐specific news events. The average adjusted R² is only about .35 with monthly data and .20 with daily data. There is little relation between explanatory power and either the firm's size or its industry. There is little improvement in R² from eliminating all dates surrounding news reports in the financial press. However, the sample kurtosis is quite different when such news events are eliminated, thereby revealing a mixture of return distributions. Non‐news dates also indicate the presence of a distributional mixture, perhaps due to traders acting on private information.

Additional Information

© 1988 the American Finance Association.

Additional details

Identifiers

Eprint ID
95045
Resolver ID
CaltechAUTHORS:20190426-145910927

Dates

Created
2019-04-29
Created from EPrint's datestamp field
Updated
2023-09-28
Created from EPrint's last_modified field