Published March 2026 | Version Published
Journal Article Open

Inequitable efficiency: Unravelling the social and built environment drivers of London's housing energy performance

  • 1. ROR icon University of Cambridge
  • 2. ROR icon University of Oxford
  • 3. ROR icon California Institute of Technology
  • 4. ROR icon Cornell University

Abstract

This study analyses the relationships between sociodemographic factors, building characteristics, energy efficiency and environmental impact in London's residential stock (2011–2021), using 2 million Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs) and sociodemographic data. Employing generalised linear models (GLMs) and machine learning techniques, we identify three key findings. First, building age and heating system efficiency are the dominant predictors of energy performance. Second, sociodemographic factors, including household size, income and age, significantly affect retrofitting outcomes, with low-income and elderly households facing the greatest barriers. Third, longitudinal analysis shows a shift in vulnerability drivers, from neighbourhood-level deprivation in 2011 to household-level income deprivation in 2021. Model comparisons reveal stronger accuracy for GLMs than XGBoost in predicting energy grades, highlighting the potential of data-driven interpretable methods for local authorities. The policy recommendations emphasise the integration of dynamic social support with technical regulations such as Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards (MEES) to address carbon emissions while protecting vulnerable groups.

Copyright and License

© 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Funding

CC and RMA acknowledge funding support from the Caltech Linde Center for Science, Society, and Policy. RD acknowledges funding from the Keynes Fund [JHVH], the Cambridge Humanities Research Grant (CHRG), and CRASSH for supporting the climaTRACES lab.

Contributions

Cuicheng Zhang: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Software, Methodology, Formal analysis, Data curation, Conceptualization. Cong Cao: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Conceptualization. Pengyu Zhang: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Validation, Methodology, Formal analysis, Data curation. R. Michael Alvarez: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Funding acquisition. Ramit Debnath: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Validation, Supervision, Project administration, Methodology, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Data Availability

The replication code is available from https://github.com/CZhang929/Code-for-EPCs-Paper.
 
In this study, publicly available secondary data are used. To acquire the integrated datasets, send a request to Cuicheng Zhang (cuicheng.zhang@eng.ox.ac.uk).

Files

1-s2.0-S0301421525005646-main.pdf

Files (16.1 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:4fe95258b6097119f7322cbf1bd64c22
16.1 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is supplemented by
Software: https://github.com/CZhang929/Code-for-EPCs-Paper (URL)

Funding

California Institute of Technology
Caltech Linde Center for Science, Society, and Policy -
University of Cambridge

Dates

Submitted
2025-03-12
Accepted
2025-12-23
Available
2025-12-29
Version of record

Caltech Custom Metadata

Caltech groups
Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences (HSS)
Publication Status
Published