The CryoEM Method MicroED as a Powerful Tool for Small Molecule
Structure Determination
Christopher G. Jones,
†
,
#
Michael W. Martynowycz,
‡
,
#
Johan Hattne,
‡
Tyler J. Fulton,
§
Brian M. Stoltz,
*
,
§
Jose A. Rodriguez,
*
,
†
,
∥
Hosea M. Nelson,
*
,
†
and Tamir Gonen
*
,
‡
†
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry,
‡
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, David Ge
ff
en School of Medicine, Departments of
Biological Chemistry and Physiology, and
∥
UCLA-DOE Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, United
States
§
The Warren and Katharine Schlinger Laboratory of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology,
Pasadena, California 91125, United States
*
S
Supporting Information
ABSTRACT:
In the many scienti
fi
c endeavors that are driven
by organic chemistry, unambiguous identi
fi
cation of small
molecules is of paramount importance. Over the past 50 years,
NMR and other powerful spectroscopic techniques have been
developed to address this challenge. While almost all of these
techniques rely on inference of connectivity, the unambiguous
determination of a small molecule
’
s structure requires X-ray
and/or neutron di
ff
raction studies. In practice, however, X-ray
crystallography is rarely applied in routine organic chemistry
due to intrinsic limitations of both the analytes and the
technique. Here we report the use of the electron cryo-microscopy (cryoEM) method microcrystal electron di
ff
raction
(MicroED) to provide routine and unambiguous structural determination of small organic molecules. From simple powders,
with minimal sample preparation, we could collect high-quality MicroED data from nanocrystals (
∼
100 nm,
∼
10
−
15
g) resulting
in atomic resolution (<1 Å) crystal structures in minutes.
T
he history of organic chemistry closely parallels the
development of new methods for structural character-
ization. The earliest studies were driven by melting point
determination, and over the past 175 years more complex
methods for interrogation of structure have been developed.
Techniques such as polarimetry,
1
UV
−
vis,
2
and infrared
spectroscopy,
3
coupled with electron paramagnetic resonance,
4
vibrational circular dichroism,
5
circular dichroism,
6
and mass
spectrometry
7
have been commonly employed over the years,
dramatically expanding our ability to assign structures. In the
past 50 years, however, the explosion of NMR spectroscopy
8
and the accompanying abun
dance of individual NMR
experiments have produced a wealth of detailed structural
information for organic chemists. Indeed, NMR is a mainstay
in chemistry and the most predominant method employed in
both routine synthetic chemistry experiments and in advanced
structural elucidation of complex small molecules. In the
current state of the art, only single crystal X-ray di
ff
raction
holds a higher place in terms of precision, producing
unequivocal structural infor
mation about the position,
orientation, connectivity, and placement of individual atoms
and bonds within a given molecule.
For decades, small molecule X-ray analysis has been the
de
fi
nitive tool for structural analysis.
9
This technique, however,
is not without limitations. The process is considered by many
an
art
, where the production of high-quality crystals suitable
for X-ray di
ff
raction requires uncodi
fi
ed
“
tricks of the trade
”
as
well as a certain amount of luck! Additionally, even after a
substance has been successfully crystallized, there is no
guarantee that the particular crystal form will be amenable to
X-ray di
ff
raction. Since crystal growth is both a slow and
arduous process, X-ray di
ff
raction has not been an e
ff
ective
tool for rapid, on-the-
fl
y structural determination of small
molecules. For this reason, X-ray di
ff
raction is generally not
implemented as a routine analytical tool for the practicing
organic chemist, despite the fact that the structural data
provided are far superior to any other characterization method
to date.
■
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Herein, we employ the recently developed electron cryo-
microscopy (CryoEM) method microcrystal electron di
ff
rac-
tion (MicroED)
10
to address the long-standing need for fast
and reliable structure determination in organic chemistry.
Recently, electron di
ff
raction was used to solve the structure of
a methylene blue derivative, although no scope studies were
undertaken to allow the reader to assess the applicability of the
methodology.
11
Moreover, a specialized detector was used for
their experiments, limiting the broad adaptability of their
Received:
October 17, 2018
Published:
November 2, 2018
Research Article
http://pubs.acs.org/journal/acscii
Cite This:
ACS Cent. Sci.
2018, 4, 1587
−
1592
© 2018 American Chemical Society
1587
DOI:
10.1021/acscentsci.8b00760
ACS Cent. Sci.
2018, 4, 1587
−
1592
This is an open access article published under an ACS AuthorChoice License, which permits
copying and redistribution of the article or any adaptations for non-commercial purposes.
Downloaded via CALIFORNIA INST OF TECHNOLOGY on November 29, 2018 at 16:31:00 (UTC).
See https://pubs.acs.org/sharingguidelines for options on how to legitimately share published articles.
approach to the wider synthetic community.
11
We demonstrate
that with minimal sample preparation and experiment time,
simple powders and seemingly amorphous materials (in some
cases, solids isolated via silica gel chromatography and rotary
evaporation) could be directly used in MicroED studies,
leading to rapid, high-quality structural elucidation of several
classes of complex molecules with atomic resolution, in many
cases better than 1 Å. Moreover, we utilize a commercially
available microscope that is already in use at universities
around the world. MicroED has the potential to dramatically
accelerate and impact the
fi
elds of synthetic chemistry, natural
product chemistry, drug discovery, and many others by
delivering rapid, high-resolution atomic structures of complex,
small molecules with minimal sample preparation or formal
crystallization procedures.
The applicability of MicroED was initially tested on the
naturally occurring steroid progesterone (
1
) as a model system
(
Figure 1
). The sample was obtained as a powder from
chemical supplier Preparations Laboratories Inc. (we estimate
the bottle to be more than 20 years old). Small quantities of
the seemingly amorphous solid were transferred directly from
the bottle onto glass cover slides and ground between another
slide to produce a
fi
ne powder. The powder was then
deposited on a holey carbon
−
copper grid, cooled to liquid
nitrogen temperatures, and transferred to a cryoelectron
microscope operating at an acceleration voltage of 200 kV
(Thermo Fisher Talos Arctica). An overview of the preparation
is shown in
Figure 1
. Upon imaging, thousands of nanocrystals
were easily discernible on the grid surface providing ample
nanocrystals to investigate for di
ff
raction. Typically, for
samples such as these, the vast majority of nanocrystals
di
ff
racted to
∼
1 Å resolution or better (
Figure 1
). Through
continuous rotation of the sample stage, 140 degrees of
di
ff
raction data could be collected from a single nanocrystal,
12
while the improved autoloader and piezo stage of the Talos
Arctica allowed us to travel through the zero degree point
without introducing errors in crystal position. Typically, the
stage was rotated at approximately 0.6 deg/s, and an entire
data set was collected in less than 3 min as a movie (
Video 1
)
using a bottom mount CetaD CMOS detector (Thermo
Fisher)
fi
tted with a thick scintillator for di
ff
raction studies.
Software adapted from previous studies
13
was used to convert
the di
ff
raction movie frames into SMV format for expeditious
processing in the readily available XDS software package
commonly used for X-ray crystallography.
13
By collecting data
from just a single nanocrystal, the structure of steroid
1
was
resolved to an impressive 1 Å resolution. The entire process,
from bottle to structure, was easily accomplished in less than
30 min.
Encouraged by these results, we wanted to investigate a wide
range of natural products to fully explore the scope and
applicability of this powerful structural determination method
for small molecules (
Figure 2
A). The Talos Arctica was
particularly amenable to our studies as it is capable of storing
up to 12 di
ff
erent grids at once, providing e
ff
ortless swapping
of sample grids for rapid investigation of multiple compounds.
Once a reliable sample prep routine had been established,
over-the-counter medications were purchased from local
pharmacies for investigation. Tablets of CVS-branded acet-
aminophen and Kroger-branded ibuprofen were crushed using
a mortar and pestle, and the ground powder was placed on
electron microscopy grids as described above. Despite the
heterogeneity of such pharmaceuticals, which typically include
a multitude of coatings, binders, and other formulation agents,
we were astonished to obtain such clearly resolved atomic
resolution structures of both acetaminophen (
2
) and ibuprofen
(
3
) in rapid succession. Just as impressively, structures of the
sodium channel blocker carbamazepine (
4
) and the macro-
cyclic polypeptide antibiotic thiostrepton (
5
) were also
determined from seemingly amorphous powders used as
received from Sigma-Aldrich. We went on to further study
several commercially available natural products and derivatives.
Once again, compounds were used as received, without any
crystallization, to yield atomic resolution structures of biotin
(
6
), ethisterone (
7
), cinchonine (
8
), and brucine (
9
). Of the
11 di
ff
erent commercial bioactives examined, all 11 yielded
processable MicroED data. Of those 11 compounds, 10 were
amenable to rapid structure determination by direct
methods,
14
while one was determined by molecular replace-
ment.
15
As mentioned previously, all structures were obtained
without any crystallization attempts or chemical modi
fi
cations
to compounds examined. While these pharmaceutical and
commercial natural products were likely recrystallized for
puri
fi
cation purposes by the manufacturer, the powders
examined by MicroED possessed nanocrystals a billionth the
size (
∼
100 nm) of crystals typically needed for X-ray
crystallography. This was powder to structure.
Figure 1.
Process of applying MicroED to small molecule structural analysis. Here commercial progesterone (
1
) was analyzed, and an atomic
resolution structure was determined at 1 Å resolution. Grid holes are 1
μ
m in diameter.
ACS Central Science
Research Article
DOI:
10.1021/acscentsci.8b00760
ACS Cent. Sci.
2018, 4, 1587
−
1592
1588
Next we decided to investigate compounds that were never
crystallized, but instead were puri
fi
ed by
fl
ash column
chromatography. Since silica gel chromatography is the most
common method of puri
fi
cation in early stage research for
complex molecules in drug discovery, natural product isolation
e
ff
orts, and synthesis e
ff
orts in general, we were interested to
see whether solid samples prepared in such a way would be
amenable to analysis by MicroED. Four compounds, puri
fi
ed
by chromatographic methods, were collected from our
laboratories, and samples of these seemingly amorphous solids
were analyzed. Here, two of four compounds di
ff
racted,
yielding atomic resolution structures at or below 1 Å (
10
and
11
,
Figure 2
A,B). While the success rate for these compounds
was 50%, it is worthy to note that no crystallization procedures
were employed in the isolation of these materials. Notably,
(+)-limaspermidine (
10
), an alkaloid natural product synthe-
sized by our laboratories,
16
was resolved from a residue of only
milligram quantities of material following
fl
ash chromatog-
Figure 2.
Di
ff
erent types of small molecules solved by MicroED. (A) Several pharmaceuticals, vitamins, commercial natural products, and synthetic
samples resolved through MicroED. (B) Example of an amorphous
fi
lm utilized in this study leading to 1 Å resolution data. (C) Protons could be
observed for several compounds through MicroED. Green density are
F
o
−
F
c
maps showing positive density belonging to hydrogen atoms of the
molecule.
ACS Central Science
Research Article
DOI:
10.1021/acscentsci.8b00760
ACS Cent. Sci.
2018, 4, 1587
−
1592
1589
raphy and rotary evaporation from a scintillation vial (
Figure
2
B). Furthermore, while it is extremely challenging to observe
protons in X-ray structures, electrons interact with matter more
strongly than X-rays and are a
ff
ected by charge, making them
relatively common to observe in MicroED data.
17
−
21
For all
structures resolved from our samples, at least some, if not
most, protons could be observed on the molecule. In
particular, the density maps obtained for limaspermidine
(
10
) and carbamazepine (
4
) after re
fi
nement showed protons
associated with almost all atoms in these molecules (
Figure
2
C).
Astounded by the ease with which such high-quality data
were obtained and the apparent generality of MicroED to small
molecules, we undertook studies to examine heterogeneous
samples (mixtures of compounds). In the case of heteroge-
neous samples, single crystal X-ray di
ff
raction precludes the
study of mixtures, and NMR is poorly suited for this task. For
this experiment, mixtures of four compounds (
4
,
6
,
8
and
9
, cf.
Figure 3
) were crushed together and deposited on a holey
copper
−
carbon. Several crystal forms belonging to the
di
ff
erent compounds in the mixture were visually identi
fi
ed
on the grids (
Figure 3
). MicroED data were collected from
several nanocrystals, and the identity of each species was
resolved within minutes by con
fi
rmation of unit cell
parameters. After compound identi
fi
cation, atomic resolution
structures could be rapidly determined for all small molecules
present in the mixture (
Figure 3
). (Note: no unexpected or
unusually high safety hazards were encountered.)
The results described here introduce a powerful new
characterization tool into the organic chemist
’
s toolbox.
While MicroED was initially developed for structure
determination of biological materials such as proteins in a
frozen, hydrated state,
22
,
23
we demonstrate that cross
pollination of macromolecular structural methods of CryoEM
are powerful tools for chemical synthesis, drug character-
ization, and drug discovery. Prior to this work, MicroED has
allowed for the structural characterization of several proteins
from crystals which had generally been unsuitable for X-ray
crystallography due to their small size or morphologies.
22
−
24
Despite this success, the MicroED method has largely gone
unnoticed in the small molecule communities. On the basis of
our
fi
ndings, we anticipate that MicroED will be enthusiasti-
cally received by many types of small molecule chemists in
both academia and industry. Here we have shown that a variety
of seemingly amorphous solid materials can lead to rapid
atomic resolution structure determination by MicroED with
little or no additional sample preparation or crystallization.
The fact that a solid
fi
lm in a
fl
ask, following solvent removal
from a
fl
ash chromatography puri
fi
cation, can lead to an
atomic resolution molecular structure, is evidence that
MicroED will likely have a profound e
ff
ect on the structural
characterization work-
fl
ow of organic chemists. Although the
past 50 years have seen huge advances in the state of the art,
no completely new techniques have been introduced that alter
the routine structural interrogation of organic substances.
NMR,
8
IR,
3
UV
−
vis,
2
and X-ray di
ff
raction
9
have been
routinely in place since the 1960s and are still utilized today
as the most common methods for structure determination in
chemistry. We believe that electron di
ff
raction is potentially
the next big advance in the
fi
eld and are enthusiastic about the
prospects of expanding its utility as a routine analytical
technique for chemists.
25
,
26
■
POST PREPRINT ADDENDUM AND BACKGROUND
MicroED was developed for the determination of atomic
resolution protein structures from submicron thick, frozen-
hydrated crystals that are typically too small for X-ray
di
ff
raction.
22
,
23
In MicroED, crystals are illuminated by an
extremely low dose (typically <0.01 e
−
/Å
2
/s) electron beam,
while the crystals are continuously rotated and di
ff
raction is
collected on a fast camera as a movie.
13
MicroED data are then
processed using broadly available software for X-ray crystallog-
raphy without the need for specialized software for structure
analysis and re
fi
nement.
12
Figure 3.
Identi
fi
cation of compounds from heterogeneous mixtures. An EM grid was prepared as above with biotin, brucine, carbamazepine, and
cinchonine powders mixed together. All four compounds identi
fi
ed by unit cell parameters using MicroED data from within the same grid square.
All structures were solved to
∼
1 Å resolution. Grid holes are 2
μ
m in diameter.
ACS Central Science
Research Article
DOI:
10.1021/acscentsci.8b00760
ACS Cent. Sci.
2018, 4, 1587
−
1592
1590
Other electron di
ff
raction methods include automated
di
ff
raction tomography
27
(ADT) and rotation electron
di
ff
raction
28
(RED). These methods di
ff
er from MicroED in
the sampling of di
ff
raction space, through tilt series and/or
precession. The broad applicability of MicroED has been
demonstrated since its conception
10
,
12
as structures of large
globular proteins,
23
small proteins,
22
peptides,
19
membrane
proteins,
29
and inorganic compounds
18
have been successfully
determined. In many of these examples, hydrogens were
observed and reported with the
fi
rst example in 2015
19
followed by an independent report from Palatinus and co
workers two years later.
30
Most recently, the structure of a
small organic molecule, carbamezapine, was determined by
MicroED to sub-Angstrom resolution.
24
■
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
*
S
Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the
ACS Publications website
at DOI:
10.1021/acscents-
ci.8b00760
.
Movie of continuous rotation MicroED data from a
carbamazepine nanocrystal with corresponding resolu-
tion rings (
AVI
)
Procedures, chemical suppliers, and crystallographic data
(
PDF
)
Accession Codes
Data and materials availability: MicroED density maps have
been deposited to the PDB (thiostrepton, 6MXF), EMDB
(EMD-9282, EMD-9284, EMD-9285, EMD-9286, EMD-9287,
EMD-9288, EMD-9289, EMD-9290, EMD-9291, EMD-9292),
and CCDC (1876036, 1876037, 1876038, 1876039, 1876040,
1876041, 1876042, 1876043, 1876044, 1876045).
■
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Authors
*
(B.M.S.) E-mail:
stoltz@caltech.edu
.
*
(J.A.R.) E-mail:
jrodriguez@chem.ucla.edu
.
*
(H.M.N.) E-mail:
hosea@chem.ucla.edu
.
*
(T.G.) E-mail:
tgonen@ucla.edu
.
ORCID
Brian M. Stoltz:
0000-0001-9837-1528
Author Contributions
#
C.G.J. and M.W.M. contributed equally. C.G.J. performed
experiments, developed the sample preparation techniques,
re
fi
ned structural data, prepared
fi
gures, and assisted with
manuscript preparation. M.
W.M performed experiments,
developed the sample preparation techniques, collected data,
re
fi
ned structural data, prepared
fi
gures, and assisted with
manuscript preparation. T.F. performed experiments. J.H.
wrote the software for image conversion, participated in data
analysis, re
fi
nement, and structure determination. J.A.R.
performed experiments, developed the sample preparation
techniques, and assisted with manuscript preparation. B.M.S.
conceived of the project, designed experiments, and assisted
with manuscript preparation. H.M.N. conceived of the project,
designed experiments, performed experiments, developed the
sample preparation techniques, and assisted with manuscript
and
fi
gure preparation. T.G. performed experiments, collected
data, developed the sample p
rep techniques, developed
microscope data collection parameters, provided the micro-
scope and expertise, and assisted in manuscript and
fi
gure
preparation.
Funding
C.G.J. would like to acknowledge the National Science
Foundation for a predoctoral fellowship (DGE-1650604).
B.M.S. acknowledges the NIH-NIGMS for generous funding
(R01GM080269). J.A.R. is supported by DOE Grant DE-
FC02-02ER63421, NIH-NIGMS Grant R35GM128867, and
as a Beckman Young Investigator, a Searle Scholar, and a Pew
Scholar. H.M.N. thanks The Packard Foundation, The Sloan
Foundation, Pew Charitable Trusts, and the NIH-NIGMS
(R35 GM128936) for generous funding. The Gonen
laboratory is supported by funds from the Howard Hughes
Medical Institute.
Notes
The authors declare no competing
fi
nancial interest.
■
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Profesor Doug Rees (Caltech), Professor Bil
Clemons (Caltech), and Dr. Michael Sawaya (UCLA) for
useful discussions. We thank Byungkuk Yoo and Michael
Takase (Caltech) for technical assistance with data analysis.
We thank Beau Pritchett and Hendrik Klare for providing
synthetic samples.
■
REFERENCES
(1) Schreier, P.; Bernreuther, A.; Hu
ff
er, M.
Analysis of Chiral
Organic Molecules: Methodology and Applications
; Walter de Gruyter:
Berlin, 2011.
(2) Scott, A. I.
Interpretation of the Ultraviolet Spectra of Natural
Products: International Series of Monographs on Organic Chemistry
;
Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2013; Vol.
7
.
(3) Coates, J. Interpretation of infrared spectra, a practical approach.
In
Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry: Applications, Theory and
Instrumentation
; Meyers, R. A., Ed.; Wiley: New York, 2000; Vol.
12
,
pp 10815
−
10837.
(4) Dougherty, D. A. Spin control in organic molecules.
Acc. Chem.
Res.
1991
,
24
,88
−
94.
(5) Stephens, P. J.; Devlin, F. J.; Pan, J. J. The determination of the
absolute configurations of chiral molecules using vibrational circular
dichroism (VCD) spectroscopy.
Chirality
2008
,
20
, 643
−
663.
(6) Berova, N.; Bari, L. D.; Pescitelli, G. Application of electronic
circular dichroism in configurational and conformational analysis of
organic compounds.
Chem. Soc. Rev.
2007
,
36
, 914
−
931.
(7) De Ho
ff
mann, E. Mass spectrometry. In
Kirk Othmer
Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology
; John Wiley & Sons: New
York, 2000.
(8) Gu
̈
nther, H.
NMR Spectroscopy: Basic Principles, Concepts and
Applications in Chemistry
; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 2013.
(9) Dunitz, J. D.
X-ray Analysis and the Structure of Organic Molecules
;
Verlag Helvetica Chimica Acta: Zu
̈
rich, 1995.
(10) Shi, D.; Nannenga, B. L.; Iadanza, M. G.; Gonen, T. Three-
dimensional electron crystallography of protein microcrystals.
eLife
2013
,
2
, e01345.
(11) Gruene, T.; Wennmacher, J. T. C.; Zaubitzer, C.; Holstein, J. J.;
Heidler, J.; Fecteau-Lefebvre, A.; De Carlo, S.; Mu
̈
ller, E.; Goldie, K.
N.; Regeni, I.; Li, T.; Santiso-Quinones, G.; Steinfeld, G.; Handschin,
S.; van Genderen, E.; van Bokhoven, J. A.; Clever, G. H.; Pantelic, R.
Rapid structure determination of microcrystalline molecular com-
pounds using electron diffraction.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2018
,
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201811318
.
(12) Nannenga, B. L.; Shi, D.; Leslie, A. G. W.; Gonen, T. High-
resolution structure determinati
on by continuous-rotation data
collection in MicroED.
Nat. Methods
2014
,
11
, 927
−
930.
ACS Central Science
Research Article
DOI:
10.1021/acscentsci.8b00760
ACS Cent. Sci.
2018, 4, 1587
−
1592
1591
(13) Hattne, J.; Reyes, F. E.; Nannenga, B. L.; Shi, D.; de la Cruz, M.
J.; Leslie, A. G. W.; Gonen, T. MicroED data collection and
processing.
Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A: Found. Adv.
2015
,
71
, 353
−
360.
(14) Sheldrick, G. SHELXT - Integrated space-group and crystal-
structure determination.
Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A: Found. Adv.
2015
,
71
,3
−
8.
(15) Vagin, A.; Teplyakov, A. MOLREP : an Automated Program for
Molecular Replacement.
J. Appl. Crystallogr.
1997
,
30
, 1022
−
1025.
(16) Pritchett, B. P.; Donckele, E. J.; Stoltz, B. M. Enantioselective
Catalysis Coupled with Stereodivergent Cyclization Strategies Enables
Rapid Syntheses of (+)-Limaspermidine and (+)-Kopsihainanine A.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2017
,
56
, 12624
−
12627.
(17) Henderson, R. The potential and limitations of neutrons,
electrons and X-rays for atomic resolution microscopy of unstained
biological molecules.
Q. Rev. Biophys.
1995
,
28
, 171
−
193.
(18) Vergara, S.; Lukes, D. A.; Martynowycz, M. W.; Santiago, U.;
Plascencia-Villa, G.; Weiss, S. C.; de la Cruz, M. J.; Black, D. M.;
Alvarez, M. M.; Lo
́
pez-Lozano, X.; Barnes, C. O.; Lin, G.; Weissker,
H.-C.; Whetten, R. L.; Gonen, T.; Yacaman, M. J.; Calero, G.
MicroED Structure of Au146(p-MBA)57 at Subatomic Resolution
Reveals a Twinned FCC Cluster.
J. Phys. Chem. Lett.
2017
,
8
, 5523
−
5530.
(19) Rodriguez, J. A.; Ivanova, M. I.; Sawaya, M. R.; Cascio, D.;
Reyes, F. E.; Shi, D.; Sangwan, S.; Guenther, E. L.; Johnson, L. M.;
Zhang, M.; Jiang, L.; Arbing, M. A.; Nannenga, B. L.; Hattne, J.;
Whitelegge, J.; Brewster, A. S.; Messerschmidt, M.; Boutet, S.; Sauter,
N. K.; Gonen, T.; Eisenberg, D. S. Structure of the toxic core of alpha-
synuclein from invisible crystals.
Nature
2015
,
525
, 486
−
490.
(20) Sawaya, M. R.; Rodriguez, J.; Cascio, D.; Collazo, M. J.; Shi, D.;
Reyes, F. E.; Hattne, J.; Gonen, T.; Eisenberg, D. S. Ab initio structure
determination from prion nanocrystals at atomic resolution by
MicroED.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.
2016
,
113
, 11232
−
11236.
(21) Hattne, J.; Shi, D.; Glynn, C.; Zee, C.-T.; Gallagher-Jones, M.;
Martynowycz, M. W.; Rodriguez, J. A.; Gonen, T. Analysis of Global
and Site-Specific Radiation Damage in Cryo-EM.
Structure
2018
,
26
,
759
−
766.
(22) de la Cruz, M. J.; Hattne, J.; Shi, D.; Seidler, P.; Rodriguez, J.;
Reyes, F. E.; Sawaya, M. R.; Cascio, D.; Weiss, S. C.; Kim, S. K.;
Hinck, C. S.; Hinck, A. P.; Calero, G.; Eisenberg, D.; Gonen, T.
Atomic resolution structures from fragmented protein crystals by the
cryoEM method MicroED.
Nat. Methods
2017
,
14
, 399
−
402.
(23) Nannenga, B. L.; Shi, D.; Hattne, J.; Reyes, F. E.; Gonen, T.
Structure of catalase determined by MicroED.
eLife
2014
,
3
, e03600.
(24) Gallagher-Jones, M.; Glynn, C.; Boyer, D. R.; Martynowycz, M.
W.; Hernandez, E.; Miao, J.; Zee, C.-T.; Novikova, I. V.; Goldschmidt,
L.; McFarlane, H. T.; Helguera, G. F.; Evans, J. E.; Sawaya, M. R.;
Cascio, D.; Eisenberg, D. S.; Gonen, T.; Rodriguez, J. A. Sub-
a
̊
ngstro
̈
m cryo-EM structure of a prion protofibril reveals a polar
clasp.
Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.
2018
,
25
, 131
−
134.
(25) Martynowycz, M. W.; Gonen, T. From electron crystallography
of 2D crystals to MicroED of 3D crystals.
Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface
Sci.
2018
,
34
,9
−
16.
(26) Nannenga, B. L.; Gonen, T. Protein structure determination by
MicroED.
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
2014
,
27
,24
−
31.
(27) Kolb, U.; Mugnaioli, E.; Gorelik, T. E. Automated electron
diffraction tomography
−
a new tool for nano crystal structure
analysis.
Cryst. Res. Technol.
2011
,
46
, 542
−
554.
(28) Wan, W.; Sun, J.; Su, J.; Hovmoller, S.; Zou, X. Three-
dimensional rotation electron diffraction: software RED for
automated data collection and data processing.
J. Appl. Crystallogr.
2013
,
46
, 1863
−
1873.
(29) Liu, S.; Gonen, T. MicroED structure of the NaK ion channel
reveals a Na
+
partition process into the selectivity filter.
Commun. Biol.
2018
,
38
,1
−
36.
(30) Palatinus, L.; Bra
́
zda, P.; Boullay, P.; Perez, O.; Klementova
́
,
M.; Petit, S.; Eigner, V.; Zaarour, M.; Mintova, S. Hydrogen positions
in single nanocrystals revealed by electron diffraction.
Science
2017
,
355
, 166
−
169.
ACS Central Science
Research Article
DOI:
10.1021/acscentsci.8b00760
ACS Cent. Sci.
2018, 4, 1587
−
1592
1592