Published February 1987 | Version Submitted
Discussion Paper Open

Invisible-Hand Explanations Reconsidered

Abstract

Edna Ullmann-Margalit introduced the notion of an invisible hand explanation (I-H explanation) to the philosophical literature in 1978, and made a distinction between "aggregate" and "functional-evolutionary" (F-E) forms of I-H explanations. The present paper produces a substantially refined analysis of the forms and functions of I-H explanations. Sections (1) and (2) introduce the ideas of I-H and aggregate I-H explanation, respectively. Section (J) argues that no one form of explanation can serve the explanatory functions Ullmanri-Margalit attributes to aggregate explanations, and divides those explanatory functions between genetic and "systematic-dispositional" explanations. Section (4) identifies difficulties with the idea of F-E explanation in the social realm, and shows that any I-H explanations fitting the F-E mold would constitute simply a special class of "aggregate" explanation.

Additional Information

I owe thanks to Edna Ullmann-Margalit, Merrilee Salmon, Sandra Mitchell, and especially Carl G. Hempel and Joseph Camp, for their encouragement and useful comments on earlier drafts of this paper. Paper was also put out as Humanities Working Paper 120.

Attached Files

Submitted - sswp621.pdf

Files

sswp621.pdf

Files (469.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:582afd02e31ec8dd4bcffc8d57083e1d
469.9 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

Eprint ID
81369
Resolver ID
CaltechAUTHORS:20170912-135330205

Dates

Created
2017-09-12
Created from EPrint's datestamp field
Updated
2019-10-03
Created from EPrint's last_modified field

Caltech Custom Metadata

Caltech groups
Social Science Working Papers
Series Name
Social Science Working Paper
Series Volume or Issue Number
621