Published October 7, 2021 | Version Supplemental Material + Published
Journal Article Open

Isotope data from amino acids indicate Darwin's ground sloth was not an herbivore

  • 1. ROR icon Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution de Montpellier
  • 2. ROR icon American Museum of Natural History
  • 3. ROR icon Columbia University
  • 4. ROR icon National University of San Marcos
  • 5. ROR icon University of Cambridge
  • 6. ROR icon University of Utah
  • 7. ROR icon University of Hawaii at Manoa

Abstract

Fossil sloths are regarded as obligate herbivores for reasons including peculiarities of their craniodental morphology and that all living sloths feed exclusively on plants. We challenge this view based on isotopic analyses of nitrogen of specific amino acids, which show that Darwin's ground sloth Mylodon darwinii was an opportunistic omnivore. This direct evidence of omnivory in an ancient sloth requires reevaluation of the ecological structure of South American Cenozoic mammalian communities, as sloths represented a major component of these ecosystems across the past 34 Myr. Furthermore, by analyzing modern mammals with known diets, we provide a basis for reliable interpretation of nitrogen isotopes of amino acids of fossils. We argue that a widely used equation to determine trophic position is unnecessary, and that the relative isotopic values of the amino acids glutamate and phenylalanine alone permit reliable reconstructions of trophic positions of extant and extinct mammals.

Additional Information

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. We are indebted to Enrique Cabrejo and all the Huachipa Zoo staff for help during sample collection, C. Mehling, A. Gishlick, and N. Duncan at the American Museum of Natural History, and J. Reichelderfer for support during research in residence in Hawaii. We thank the handling editor, Przemyslaw Gorzelak, and two anonymous reviewers. This is the School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology contribution number 11392. Contributions. J.V.T. and B.N.P. designed research and interpreted data. J.V.T., B.N.P., and N.W. conducted analyses. R.M., T.C., L.B. and C.C. provided samples and/or data. J.V.T., J.J.F., and B.N.P. provided financial support. J.V.T., B.N.P., J.J.F., R.M., and T.O.C. discussed the results. J.V.T. wrote the paper with contributions from co-authors. The authors declare no competing interests.

Attached Files

Published - 41598_2021_Article_97996.pdf

Supplemental Material - 41598_2021_97996_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx

Supplemental Material - 41598_2021_97996_MOESM2_ESM.docx

Files

41598_2021_Article_97996.pdf

Files (3.3 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:b61f6c7532032f82fd02fc91ba23949d
25.3 kB Download
md5:58315716d58ce82eb94b5e0cccee22df
1.5 MB Download
md5:150fbd2e983925260fa4ba110e4c73c6
1.8 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

PMCID
PMC8494799
Eprint ID
119969
Resolver ID
CaltechAUTHORS:20230313-433548000.19

Dates

Created
2023-03-14
Created from EPrint's datestamp field
Updated
2023-03-16
Created from EPrint's last_modified field