of 16
Original Article
Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 growth in the lungs
of mice by a peptide-conjugated morpholino
oligomer targeting viral RNA
Alexandra Sakai,
1
,
15
Gagandeep Singh,
2
,
3
,
15
Mahsa Khoshbakht,
4
Scott Bittner,
4
Christiane V. Löhr,
4
Randy Diaz-Tapia,
2
,
3
Prajakta Warang,
2
,
3
Kris White,
2
,
3
Luke Le Luo,
5
Blanton Tolbert,
5
Mario Blanco,
6
Amy Chow,
6
Mitchell Guttman,
6
Cuiping Li,
7
Yiming Bao,
7
,
8
Joses Ho,
9
Sebastian Maurer-Stroh,
9
Arnab Chatterjee,
1
Sumit Chanda,
1
Adolfo García-Sastre,
2
,
3
,
10
,
11
,
12
,
13
Michael Schotsaert,
2
,
3
,
13
,
14
John R. Teijaro,
1
Hong M. Moulton,
4
and David A. Stein
4
1
Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA;
2
Department of Microbiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA;
3
Global Health
and Emerging Pathogens Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA;
4
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Carlson College of Veterinary
Medicine, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA;
5
Department of Chemistry, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA;
6
Division of
Biology, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA;
7
National Genomics Data Center, China National Center for Bioinformation, Beijing 100101,
China;
8
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
9
GISAID @ A
*STAR Bioinformatics Institute, Singapore 138632, Singapore;
10
Department
of Pathology, Molecular, and Cell-Based Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA;
11
Division of Infectious Diseases,
Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA;
12
Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai,
New York, NY 10029, USA;
13
The Icahn Genomics Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA;
14
Marc and Jennifer Lipschultz
Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA
Further development of direct-acting antiviral agents against
human SARS-CoV-2 infections remains a public health prior-
ity. Here, we report that an antisense peptide-conjugated mor-
pholino oligomer (PPMO) named 5
0
END-2, targeting a highly
conserved sequence in the 5
0
UTR of SARS-CoV-2 genomic
RNA, potently suppressed SARS-CoV-2 growth
in vitro
and
in vivo
. In HeLa-ACE 2 cells, 5
0
END-2 produced IC
50
values
of between 40 nM and 1.15
m
M in challenges using six geneti-
cally disparate strains of SARS-CoV-2, including JN.1.
In vivo
,
using K18-hACE2 mice and the WA-1/2020 virus isolate, two
doses of 5
0
END-2 at 10 mg/kg, administered intranasally on
the day before and the day after infection, produced approxi-
mately 1.4 log10 virus titer reduction in lung tissue at 3 days
post-infection. Under a similar dosing schedule, intratracheal
administration of 1.0
2.0 mg/kg 5
0
END-2 produced over 3.5
log10 virus growth suppression in mouse lungs. Electropho-
retic mobility shift assays characterized speci
fi
c binding of
5
0
END-2 to its complementary target RNA. Furthermore, us-
ing reporter constructs containing SARS-CoV-2 5
0
UTR leader
sequence, in an in-cell system, we observed that 5
0
END-2 could
interfere with translation in a sequence-speci
fi
c manner.
The results demonstrate that direct pulmonary delivery of
5
0
END-2 PPMO is a promising antiviral strategy against
SARS-CoV-2 infections and warrants further development.
INTRODUCTION
COVID-19 is caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coro-
navirus 2 SARS-CoV-2 virus,
1
,
2
and as of Feburary 2024, it has been
the cause of over 7 million human deaths worldwide. As of December
2023, over 1 million new cases and 9,000 deaths were being reported
monthly from the World Health Organization
s (WHO
s) six regions.
Furthermore, at least two major epidemiologic studies conclude that
mortality caused by COVID-19 has been underestimated.
3
,
4
Despite US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval or Emer-
gency Use Authorization of several therapeutics for the treatment of
COVID-19, the need for the development of additional compounds
to address SARS-CoV-2 infections continues to be a public health
priority.
5
,
6
Direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) target a physical
component of the virus directly and are typically designed to interfere
with the virus replication cycle. Several DAAs, including nucleotide
(nt) analogs (e.g., remdesivir and molnupiravir), protease inhibitors
(e.g., Paxlovid), and numerous monoclonal antibodies, when admin-
istered soon after diagnosis, can dramatically reduce the hospitaliza-
tion rate of COVID-19 patients. However, drawbacks to current
Received 6 March 2024; accepted 5 September 2024;
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omtn.2024.102331
.
15
These authors contributed equally
Correspondence:
David A. Stein, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Carlson
College of Veterinary Medicine, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331,
USA.
E-mail:
dave.stein@oregonstate.edu
Correspondence:
Hong M. Moulton, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Carlson
College of Veterinary Medicine, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331,
USA.
E-mail:
hong.moulton@oregonstate.edu
Molecular Therapy: Nucleic Acids Vol. 35 December 2024
ª
2024 The Author(s).
Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Gene and Cell Therapy.
1
This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
).
DAAs include, variously, the requirement for intravenous adminis-
tration in a healthcare setting, side effects, interactions with other
medications, cost, and the selection over time of drug-resistant virus
variants.
7
10
The development of additional DAAs, especially those
that can be administered orally or by inhalation, is needed to improve
medicinal strategies and to decrease global production of the virus
and the generation of SARS-CoV-2 variants. The results observed
to date with current DAAs suggest that the several-day overlap be-
tween the appearance of disease symptoms and the replication of
SARS-CoV-2 in the respiratory tract of humans represents a period
of time in which a pharmaceutical capable of direct interference in
viral replication can be effective at reducing disease severity. Further-
more, combination treatments consisting of two or more DAAs may
reduce the frequency of escape variant generation and improve clin-
ical outcomes.
11
,
12
Over the past few years, a number of sequence-speci
fi
c RNA-targeted
therapeutic compounds have been FDA approved and commercial-
ized, including at least seven single-stranded oligonucleotide-
type agents.
13
16
Strategies targeting SARS-CoV-2 RNA, including
small interfering RNA siRNA
17
19
and antisense oligonucleotide
mixmers,
20
,
21
have demonstrated
in vivo
antiviral ef
fi
cacy in mouse
models of SARS-CoV-2 infection. A SARS-CoV-2-speci
fi
c siRNA-
peptide dendrimer formulation was evaluated in a single clinical trial
in Russia in 2021 (this study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov
[NCT05184127]). The compound was reported as safe and produced
clinical improvement in patients hospitalized with moderate
COVID-19.
22
However, there have been no further human clinical
trials with this composition or any other compounds designed to
target SARS-CoV-2 RNA in a sequence-speci
fi
c manner.
Phosphorodiamidate morpholino oligomers (PMOs), also known as
morpholinos, are single-stranded nucleic acid analogs containing
the same bases as DNA, but having a non-natural backbone in place
of the sugar-phosphate backbone of nucleic acids.
23
PMOs feature
high sequence speci
fi
city and biological compatibility and exert their
antisense activity through steric blockade, as their hybridization to
complementary single-stranded RNA does not form a substrate
for RNase H activity.
24
,
25
Four PMOs have been FDA approved
for treatment of Duchenne
s muscular dystrophy.
16
,
26
28
To
improve entry into cells and subsequent intracellular distribution,
PMOs can be conjugated to a cell-penetrating peptide to produce
peptide-conjugated PMOs (PPMOs).
29
32
PPMOs are water soluble,
nuclease resistant, and non-toxic at effective concentrations across
a range of
in vitro
and
in vivo
applications.
33
,
34
At least three
PPMOs are currently in human clinical trials (
ClinicalTrials.gov
:
NCT06204809, NCT06079736, and NCT06185764). PPMOs have
been documented to readily enter numerous cell types
in vitro
and
in vivo
, including primary airway epithelial, without toxicity.
35
38
In studies designed to evaluate antiviral ef
fi
cacy and speci
fi
city,
PPMOs targeting viral sequences have demonstrated a considerable
ability to suppress the growth of an array of RNA and DNA viruses
in cell cultures and animal models (reviewed by Stein, Nan and
Zhang, and Warren et al.
39-41
).
The SARS-CoV-2 genome comprises an approximately 29.9-kb sin-
gle-stranded RNA of positive polarity featuring a 5
0
m
7
G cap and 3
0
polyadenylation.
42
44
The genomic 5
0
and 3
0
UTRs are approximately
265 and 228 nt long, respectively.
45
,
46
The antiviral ef
fi
cacy and spec-
i
fi
city of PPMO targeting the distal region of ancestral SARS-CoV-2
(strain WA-1/2020) 5
0
UTR RNA have been demonstrated in Vero
cell cultures.
47
Here, we extend those observations by evaluating
PPMO antiviral ef
fi
cacy
in vitro
, using a human-derived cell line in-
fected with several different strains of SARS-CoV-2, and
in vivo
, using
a mouse model to compare the antiviral activity of PPMO delivered
by two different routes of administration, intranasal (IN) and intra-
tracheal (IT).
In this study, we evaluated sequence conservation across the SARS-
CoV-2 virome in the region of 5
0
UTR targeted by an antiviral
PPMO,named 5
0
END-2,andfoundittobehighlyconserved.We report
here that 5
0
END-2 was potently effective against several virus strains in
cell cultures and was able to suppress virus growth in the lungs of mice,
using moderate dosing. We also observed that IT administration of a
low dose of PPMO suppressed the growth of SARS-CoV-2 in the lungs
of mice more effectively than a higher dose administered IN under
similar conditions. Furthermore, we demonstrate direct evidence of
PPMO hybridization to its RNA target sequence and its ability to inter-
fere with the process of viral RNA translation.
RESULTS
PPMO design
SARS-CoV-2 is a member of the
Coronaviridae
family, within the or-
der Nidovirales. Considerations in the design of the virus-RNA-tar-
geted PMO sequence, constituting the antisense component of the vi-
rus-targeted PPMO in this study, included historical results that
identi
fi
ed the 5
0
-terminal region of the 5
0
UTR in the nidoviruses
mouse hepatitis virus, equine arteritis virus, and porcine reproductive
and respiratory syndrome virus as a highly sensitive site for PPMO
intervention.
48
54
In addition, the 5
0
-terminal region of the 5
0
UTR
of the genomes of other non-nidovirus positive-strand RNA viruses
that utilize cap-dependent translation has been a productive antiviral
PPMO target region in numerous studies.
30
,
55
59
PPMO design for
this study was speci
fi
cally informed by a previous study in which
PPMO produced multi-log reductions in the titer of SARS-CoV-2
strain WA-1/2020 in Vero-E6 cell cultures.
47
In that study, four
PPMO, with two targeting the 5
0
-terminal region (named 5
0
END-1
and 5
0
END-2) and two targeting the transcription regulatory site
leader sequence (TRS-L) region (named TRS-1 and TRS-2) of
SARS-CoV-2 genomic RNA, had high activity, whereas a PPMO tar-
geting the AUG translation start site region of ORF1a/b (AUG-1,
targeting nt 251
275) had only moderate antiviral activity. Another
speci
fi
c consideration in the choice of the PPMO target in the
SARS-CoV-2 genome for this study involved reports published dur-
ing the early stages of the pandemic, indicating that the
fi
rst four nt
of the SARS-CoV-2 genome were more variable than nt 5
30.
60
,
61
Considering the various studies and reports above, we focused the
PPMO targeting for this study on sequences in the 5
0
-terminal region
of the 5
0
UTR of SARS-CoV-2 genome RNA, speci
fi
cally nt 5
29
Molecular Therapy: Nucleic Acids
2 Molecular Therapy: Nucleic Acids Vol. 35 December 2024
(PPMO 5
0
END-2). This region includes a majority of the nt
that comprise stem-loop 1 (SL1), a secondary-structure feature
comprising nt 7
33 (of the SARS-CoV-2 GenBank Reference
Sequence NC_045512.2).
60
,
62
The PPMOs used in this study are
de
fi
ned in
Table 1
. The 5
0
END-2 PPMO was designed with the inten-
tion of interfering with events of the virus life cycle which involve the
5
0
-terminal region of the genome 5
0
UTR, including pre-initiation of
the translation of genomic and most subgenomic mRNAs, as well as
regulation of translation by viral protein NSP1.
61
,
63
65
Along with the
5
0
END-2 PPMO, we produced a negative control PPMO (NC705)
which contains the same peptide ((RXR)
4
XB) as is present in the
5
0
END-2 PPMO, but conjugated to a nonsense PMO sequence having
little agreement with any RNA virus or human or mouse transcript
sequences, as determined by BLASTn. Thus, NC705 PPMO is de-
signed to serve as a test for antisense speci
fi
city. The peptide compo-
nent of the PPMO used in this study was chosen based on previous
studies demonstrating its ability as a PMO transporter,
32
,
66
68
along
with the typically high aqueous solubility and low toxicity of PPMO
made with this arginine-rich peptide.
33
,
34
,
69
PPMO target in the SARS-CoV-2 5
0
UTR has high sequence
conservation
Another major factor in PPMO design for this study was PMO target-
site sequence conservation across the SARS-CoV-2 virome. We eval-
uated sequence conservation in the 5
0
-terminal region (nt 1
30) of the
5
0
UTR across virus strains representing the SARS-CoV-2 viromic
spectrum. We carried out a comprehensive bioinformatic mutational
analysis of the 5
0
-terminal region of the 5
0
UTR to de
fi
ne the degree of
complementary sequence agreement between the 5
0
END-2 PPMO
and its target across the breadth of the SARS-CoV-2 virome. Nearly
8 million high-quality SARS-CoV-2 sequences, collected from
January 2020 through January 2024 and representing an in-depth
sampling of all lineages in the SARS-CoV-2 virome, were analyzed
for mutations in the 5
0
END-2 PPMO target sequence region. At least
98.8% of all strains analyzed have perfect agreement between the
5
0
END-2 PPMO and its target site in the SARS-CoV-2 genome (nt
5
29) (
Figure 1
), with less than 0.3% having more than a single
base mismatch between 5
0
END-2 and its target (
Table 2
). Interest-
ingly, our analysis revealed that the SARS-CoV-2 Beta lineage
(B.1.351) has overall around 1% less sequence conservation at nt
1
30 in relation to the ancestral Wuhan-Hu-1 lineage, compared to
other SARS-CoV-2 lineages, including numerous lineages that did
not appear until after Beta in the pandemic. Nevertheless, 5
0
END-2
PPMO has antisense sequence agreement with at least 98% of each
of the 9,095 isolates of Beta SARS-CoV-2 analyzed at each target res-
idue (
Figure 1
).
Since mid-2022, strains of the Omicron lineage have become the
dominant circulating SARS-CoV-2 worldwide. We therefore also car-
ried out an Omicron-focused sequence conservation analysis on full-
length high-quality sequences available through the Global Initiative
on Sharing All In
fl
uenza Data (GISAID) from an 18-month period
from April 2022 to October 2023. The mutational pro
fi
les in separate
but contiguous 6-month windows appear in
Table S1
. We analyzed
over 330,000 genomic sequences of Omicron SARS-CoV-2 in total
and determined that for this 18-month period, over 97% of the se-
quences exhibit perfect agreement between the 5
0
END-2 PPMO
and its target site in the SARS-CoV-2 genome, while approximately
2% have a single mispair of disagreement between 5
0
END-2 PPMO
and its complementary target. Less than 0.2% of the sequences
analyzed have more than 1 base of disagreement between 5
0
END-2
and its target.
Together, these analyses provide extensive validation of high
sequence conservation at the 5
0
END-2 PPMO target site across the
SARS-CoV-2 virome, and they suggest that this region of SARS-
CoV-2 genomic sequence is not substantially increasing in variability
over time.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays confirm that 5
0
END-2 PMO
and PPMO bind to target RNA specifically and with high affinity
We wished to characterize the sequence-speci
fi
c hybridization
behavior of the PMO antisense portion of 5
0
END-2 PPMO with its
RNA target (nt 5
29 of SARS-CoV-2 genomic RNA) and to validate
that duplexing of 5
0
END-2 PPMO with its target RNA occurs in a
sequence-speci
fi
c manner, through Watson-Crick complementary
base pairing. Furthermore, we sought to investigate whether the pres-
ence of the P7 peptide in the 5
0
END-2 PPMO had an effect on direct
binding of the 5
0
END-2 PMO to its target RNA. We performed elec-
trophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs), using the 5
0
END-2 PMO
or PPMO and an RNA analyte comprising nt 1
36 of SARS-CoV-2
RNA (named SL1 RNA). As a control, we also ran identical assays
but replaced the 5
0
END-2 PMO or PPMO with the NC705 PMO or
PPMO. For these assays, the concentration of SL1 RNA was
fi
xed
at 2
m
M per sample while the PMO or PPMO was titrated from
0to16
m
M in serial reactions (
Figure 2
). On the gels running these
reactions, the SL1 RNA (
Figure 2
A) is visualized as the lower band,
whereas SL1 RNA duplexed with PMO or PPMO appears as a discrete
upper band. Because PMO itself has little ionic charge, it does not
appear as a discrete band on the gels. We observed that 5
0
END-2
PMO or PPMO behaved similarly (
Figures 2
B and 2D), producing
a noticeable shift, as evidenced by the appearance of the higher-mo-
lecular-weight species (the discrete upper band) in a gradual
Table 1. PPMO used in this study
PPMO name
PPMO sequence (5
0
-3
0
)
PPMO target location in SARS-CoV-2 genome
a
5
0
END-2
TGTTACCTGGGAAGGTATAAACCTT
nt 5-29
NC705
CCTCTTACCTCAGTTACAATTTATA
N/A
a
Based on Wuhan-Hu-1, GenBank: NC_045512.
www.moleculartherapy.org
Molecular Therapy: Nucleic Acids Vol. 35 December 2024 3
concentration-dependent manner. The upper band becomes initially
visible when the 5
0
END2 PMO or PPMO is present at only a 0.1

concentration in relation to its SL1 target RNA (lane 2 of
Figures 2
B and 2D). As the concentration of 5
0
END-2 PMO or
PPMO increases, a gradual increase in the intensity of the upper
band (duplexed material) and decrease in the intensity of the lower
band (free SL1 RNA) is evident. Nearly complete duplexing is
apparent when 5
0
END-2 PMO/PPMO was present at 2

the concen-
tration of the target RNA, and apparently complete duplexing when
present at a 4

concentration to that of the target RNA (lane 8 of
Figures 2
B and 2D). The NC705 PMO (
Figure 2
C) did not produce
any speci
fi
c electrophoretic shift. The reactions containing increasing
amounts of NC705 PPMO exhibited increasing intensity of non-
distinct higher-molecular-weight bands (
Figure 2
E), which migrate
well above the SL1 duplexed species. Since PPMO is positively
charged, due mostly to the presence of arginine residues in the P7
peptide, we speculate that these bands represent non-duplexed
PPMO. In addition, a series of non-distinct high-molecular-weight
bands, likely representing unduplexed PPMO, are also apparent in
lane 8 of the 5
0
END-2 PPMO gel (
Figure 2
D). These results demon-
strate that 5
0
END-2 PPMO is capable of annealing speci
fi
cally and
avidly to its RNA target sequence and that the presence of the peptide
portion of the 5
0
END-2 PPMO does not alter fundamental antisense
duplexing behavior.
5
0
END-2 PPMO inhibits the growth of several SARS-CoV-2
variants
in vitro
To evaluate antiviral activity, we
fi
rst sought to determine whether
PPMO 5
0
END-2, which had been identi
fi
ed as potently antiviral
against the ancestral Wuhan-Hu-1-like human SARS-CoV-2
Figure 1. Heatmap of reference allele frequency in the 5
0
END-2 PPMO target region of different SARS-CoV-2 lineages
The reference allele (GenBank: NC_045512) frequency at nt positions 1–30 of the SARS-CoV-2 genome was calculated from a dataset of complete and high-
quality human-
origin genome sequences, and visually represented in a heatmap. The reference allele sequence for nt 1–30 is shown in the top horizontal row. This term
inal region of the viral
5
0
UTR includes the target of the 5
0
END-2 PPMO, located from nt 5–29. As of January 8, 2024, the WHO has defined 27 variants of concern, variants of interest, and variants
under monitoring. The vertical axis labels are indicative of the lineage names, which appear in order of their chronological appearance during the pa
ndemic, with the
accompanying numbers in parentheses representing the tally of genome sequences that were analyzed for each specific lineage.
Molecular Therapy: Nucleic Acids
4 Molecular Therapy: Nucleic Acids Vol. 35 December 2024
(WA-1/2020) in Vero-E6 cells, also had substantial antiviral activity
against other SARS-CoV-2 strains, including representative variants
of concern, in HeLa-ACE2 cells.
70
In these antiviral and cytotoxicity
assays, we included a positive control compound, nirmatelvir (Pax-
lovid), known to have potent antiviral activity against coronaviruses
in vitro
.
71
To test the level of antiviral activity, each compound was
applied in a 6- or 8-point dose response, using 3-fold serial dilutions
from the highest concentration of 50 or 80
m
M PPMO or 5
m
Mnir-
matelvir. The compounds were added for 5 h, after which the drug-
containing medium was removed before an infection period. The
presence of the drug was omitted during the infection period to pre-
clude possible direct extracellular interaction between the drug and
the inoculating viral particles. After infection, the cells were incu-
bated in the absence of the test compound for 24 h before virus
quanti
fi
cation assays. The two PPMOs and the positive control nir-
matelvir were tested against six strains of virus: the ancestral
Wuhan-Hu-1-like USA WA/2020 (
fi
rst isolated in the United States
in January 2020), a strain from the Delta (B.1.617.2) lineage, and
four strains representing disparate sublineages within the Omicron
clade (BA.1, BA.5, XBB1.5, and JN.1). To evaluate the cytotoxicity
of the PPMO, we used an MTT-based assay and a similar experi-
mental format as above, but we omitted virus infection. The results
of both assays are shown in the charts of
Figure S1
,and
Table 3
summarizes the results from these experiments, showing the cyto-
toxic concentration 50% (CC
50
), the half-maximal inhibitory con-
centration (IC
50
), and the 90% inhibition concentration (IC
90
) for
A
C
E
NC PPMO
B
D
-2 PPMO
-2 PMO
NC PMO
SARS-CoV-2
nt 1-36,
-2
PMO/PPMO
target sequence
(nt 5-29) in red
Figure 2. 5
0
END-2 PMO and PPMO duplex specifically and efficiently with target RNA
(A) Schematic diagram of nt 1–36 of SARS-CoV-2 genome. This RNA (SL1) was produced by
in vitro
transcription and served as the analyte for the experiments of (B)–(E). The
secondary structure of the diagram was produced by “RNAStructure” and the residues representing the 5
0
END-2 PMO or PPMO target site are shown in red. (B–E) EMSA
gels of reactions containing SL1 and PMO/PPMO. A fixed concentration of SL1 RNA (2
m
M) was used with titrations of the indicated PMO (B and C) or PPMO (D and E) from
0to16
m
M, as described in detail in
materials and methods
. The reactions were run on native PAGE comprising 8% acylamide. A table indicating the overall lane-by-lane
composition of the reactions is present below the gels. NC, negative control.
Table 2. Bioinformatic analysis of sequence agreement between 5
0
END-2 PPMO and its target in a wide array of SARS-CoV-2-genomes (January 2020–
January 2024)
No. of SARS-CoV-2 genome
sequences analyzed
% With perfect
agreement between
5
0
END-2 and SARS-CoV-2
% With 1 mismatch
between 5
0
END-2 and
SARS-CoV-2
% With 2 mismatches
between 5
0
END-2 and
SARS-CoV-2
% With 3 mismatches
between 5
0
END-2 and
SARS-CoV-2
% With 4 or more mismatches
between 5
0
END-2 and
SARS-CoV-2
7,950,404
98.31
1.41
0.07
0.02
0.19
www.moleculartherapy.org
Molecular Therapy: Nucleic Acids Vol. 35 December 2024 5
each compound against each virus. It was not possible to calculate
meaningful selectivity index values for the compounds, as the CC
50
values were almost all in excess of the highest concentration of the
compounds used in this set of experiments. None of the PPMO pro-
duced signi
fi
cant cytotoxicity at any of the concentrations tested.
Likewise, the positive control compound, as assessed by CC
50
,
was benign even at its highest concentration. The 5
0
END-2
PPMO generated IC
50
values from approximately 0.040
1.14
m
M.
The data indicate that the 5
0
END-2 PPMO had high antiviral ef
fi
-
cacy against all the virus strains and that the activity was sequence
speci
fi
c and noncytotoxic. Overall, these results suggest that 5
0
END-
2 PPMO has the potential to suppress the growth of a spectrum of
SARS-CoV-2 strains. The favorable pro
fi
le of the considerable anti-
viral ef
fi
cacy of 5
0
END-2 PPMO against a genetic diversity of
SARS-CoV-2 strains, with minimal impact on cell viability in a hu-
man cell line, provided rationale for further evaluation in an
in vivo
setting.
IN administration of 5
0
END-2 PPMO moderately inhibits SARS-
CoV-2 growth in the lungs of K18-hACE2 mice
Dose regimen determination
In vitro
and
in vivo
dose-dependent toxicity from P7-PMO is generally
a function of the concentration of the P7 peptide component.
30
,
72
In re-
gard to the potential generic toxicity to mice from IN administration of
the structural type of PPMO used in this study (P7-PMO), several pre-
vious studies using P7-PMO and a similar IN dosing regimen to that
used here reported no apparent toxicity to uninfected animals.
36
,
73
75
We limited the number of doses administered to the mice to two,
occurring 1 day before and 1 day after infection. This regimen intro-
duced minimal stress to the mice, as handling and anesthetization
were limited to a total of three events. Furthermore, our dosing
regimen, with PPMO administrations temporally separate from the vi-
rus infection event, precluded direct interactions between inoculation
virus and drug in the airways on the day of virus inoculation.
IN delivery of treatments and viral titer determination
K18-hACE2 (human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2) mice are
transgenic for hACE2 expression in epithelial cells and can grow
SARS-CoV-2 to high titers in the lungs.
76
,
77
To determine the effect
of intranasal dosing of PPMO on SARS-CoV-2 growth, we dosed
each group of
fi
ve mice twice, with 10 mg/kg of PPMO or vehicle so-
lution only (PBS) at 24 h before and 18 h after infection. The treat-
ments were delivered via IN administration, as was the infection inoc-
ulum of 5,000 focus-forming units (ffu) of WA-1/2020 SARS-CoV-2.
Along with the two PPMO tested, and a PBS-only (vehicle-control)
group, we also included a positive control, the small-molecule anti-
viral compound MK-4482 (molnupiravir, an orally bioavailable
nucleoside analog
70
), which was administered to the mice orally at
a dose of 150 mg/kg, twice per day, starting at 1 day before infection
and continuing through day 2 post-infection. At 3 days post-infec-
tion, all mice were euthanized and lung tissue collected, homogenized,
and subject to viral titer determination by focus-forming assay. We
observed that NC705 PPMO treatment produced virus titer of
approximately 0.2 log10 ffu/g lung tissue below the PBS-treated con-
trol mice. The average titer reduction of 5
0
END-2 PPMO dosed at
10 mg/kg per dose was

1.4 log10 ffu/g tissue less than PBS-only-
treated mice (
Figure 3
). Notably, the positive control compound
MK448 lowered lung virus titer by approximately 3 log10 ffu/g tissue,
thereby setting an existent standard of high activity in this model.
IT administration of PPMO results in a greater amount of PPMO
translocation to the lungs than IN administration
Results from previous studies using
fl
uorescein-labeled P7-PMO
(Fl-PPMO) administered via IN administration to uninfected mice
suggested a distribution of signal having an overall gradated manner
from upper to lower lung.
36
,
37
In those studies, Fl-PPMO signal was
most intense along the major bronchi, but signal was also detected in
minor bronchial branches and was observed to enter epithelial cells
surrounding alveoli.
36
We hypothesized that IN administration of PPMO in the SARS-
CoV-2 experiment described above may have resulted in loss of
PPMO material in the upper respiratory tract, thus limiting antiviral
ef
fi
cacy against SARS-CoV-2 in the lungs. To gain insight into the
relative ef
fi
ciency with which IN and IT administration are able to
deliver PPMO to the lungs, we compared the two routes of delivery
with a lissamine-labeled 5
0
END-2 PPMO (PPMO-liss) in uninfected
K18-hACE2 mice. The experiment had two arms, with one arm uti-
lizing IN and the other arm utilizing IT administration. Each arm had
two groups (
n
= 5) corresponding to dose levels of 0 and 10 mg/kg of
PPMO-liss. A single dose was administered to the mice in the same
Table 3. Cytotoxicity (CC) and antiviral (IC) values of nirmatrelvir and PPMO
against six strains of SARS-CoV-2 in HeLa-ACE2 cell culture assays
Drug
Virus
CC
50
,
m
MIC
50
,
m
MIC
90
,
m
M
Nirmatrelvir
WA-1/2020
>5
0.11
0.21
Nirmatrelvir
DELTA
>5
0.04
0.17
Nirmatrelvir
BA.1
>5
0.03
0.08
Nirmatrelvir
BA.5
>5
0.05
0.14
Nirmatrelvir
XBB1.5
>5
0.02
0.05
Nirmatrelvir
JN.1
>5
0.06
0.15
NC705
WA-1/2020
>50
>50
>50
NC705
DELTA
>50
>50
>50
NC705
BA.1
>50
>50
>50
NC705
BA.5
>50
>50
>50
NC705
XBB1.5
>50
>50
>50
NC705
JN.1
>50
24.38
>50
5
0
END-2
WA-1/2020
>50
0.17
2.23
5
0
END-2
DELTA
>50
0.10
3.51
5
0
END-2
BA.1
>50
0.34
3.27
5
0
END-2
BA.5
>50
0.04
0.18
5
0
END-2
XBB1.5
>50
0.39
13.31
5
0
END-2
JN.1
>50
1.14
17.27
For methodologic details, see
materials and methods
section.
Molecular Therapy: Nucleic Acids
6 Molecular Therapy: Nucleic Acids Vol. 35 December 2024
manner as described for each delivery method in the antiviral exper-
iments and the lungs collected 24 h later and bisected into upper and
lower sections. Fluorescence of lung lysates was used for comparison
between routes of administration and between upper and lower lung.
Fluorescence was near background levels for the 0 mg/kg PPMO-liss
samples (data not shown). While there was considerable variability
within this experiment and differences between conditions were not
statistically signi
fi
cant, results suggest a trend toward moderately
higher PPMO concentrations in the lung following IT administration
than with IN administration (
Figures S2
A and S2B). Furthermore,
although this experiment did not address PPMO presence in speci
fi
c
cell types, the results indicate little difference between the amount of
material found in the upper compared to the lower lung for each de-
livery method (
Figures S2
C and S2D), suggesting widespread PPMO
distribution in the lungs with either route of administration.
IT administration of 5
0
END-2 PPMO potently inhibits virus
growth in the lungs of K18-hACE2 mice infected with WA-1/2020
To promote greater PPMO delivery into the lungs, we chose to
employ IT delivery of PPMOs. To evaluate virus titer in the lungs,
we performed three experiments using IT administration of PPMO
under similar conditions as described above for the evaluation of virus
growth in the lungs after IN administration of PPMO. Our
fi
rst exper-
iment consisted of only three groups, with the mice treated with either
PBS, a positive control (MK4482, described and administered as
above), or 5
0
END-2 PPMO (
Figure 4
A). A second independent
experiment included the same three groups and two additional
groups, NC705 PPMO at a dose of 10 mg/kg and 5
0
END-2 PPMO
at 2 mg/kg (
Figure 4
B). Overall, the second experiment was intended
to serve as a bio-repeat of the
fi
rst experiment, yet also include a nega-
tive control PPMO. The third independent experiment was a dose
titration study with 5
0
END-2 PPMO at 2, 1, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, and
0 mg/kg. All three experiments were performed under the same con-
ditions and yielded the same central result: that 5
0
END-2 PPMO
markedly suppressed virus growth in the lungs by over 3 log10
ffu/g of lung tissue. In the
fi
rst two experiments, the level of virus
reduction produced by 5
0
END-2 PPMO at 10 mg/kg was slightly
greater than that observed with the positive control compound
MK-4482. In the second experiment (
Figure 4
B), NC705 did not
cause a reduction in virus growth, indicating that the antiviral effect
of 5
0
END-2 was a function of sequence-speci
fi
c binding of the
PMO portion of the PPMO to viral RNA, and that the overall struc-
tural chemistry of P7-PMO was not a factor in the antiviral effect
of 5
0
END-2 PPMO. In the third experiment, the antiviral effect of
5
0
END-2 was shown to be potent and dose responsive, as treatment
with 1, 0.5, 0.25, and 0.125 mg/kg dosing produced approximately
4.2, 3.2, 1.2, and 1.0 log10 mean suppression of virus growth (
Fig-
ure 4
C), respectively. Under the conditions of this study, the mini-
mum dose necessary to produce robust antiviral ef
fi
cacy of at least
3 log10 ffu/g of lung tissue was 0.5 mg/kg. Overall, we observed a mi-
nor amount of experiment-to-experiment variation in the levels of vi-
rus growth inhibition by the various individual treatments.
The moderately low dosing regimen of two treatments of 0.5
2.0 mg/kg of 5
0
END-2 PPMO delivered directly to the lungs via IT
administration generated similar protection to eight doses of
150 mg/kg MK-4482 given orally. It is further noteworthy that while
MK-4482 dosing included two doses on the day of infection, PPMO
dosing did not occur on the same day as virus inoculation. In this
study, we used the measurement of virus titer in the lungs as a pri-
mary indicator of the ability to limit virus replication. In addition,
to investigate the ability of 5
0
END-2 PPMO to protect from virus-
associated pathogenesis, we measured the ability of the PPMOs to
protect mice from virus-induced weight loss, using the same experi-
mental conditions as the virus-replication evaluations above. The
mice were weighed daily for 10 days. Mice treated with NC-705
PPMO or PBS suffered 20%
35% body weight loss by days 5
6 and
did not recover, whereas MK-4482 and 5
0
END-2 PPMO treatments
completely protected the mice from body weight loss (
Figure 4
D).
We note that the NC705 PPMO appeared to provide a minor protec-
tive effect against weight loss for several days, although it was not sig-
ni
fi
cant, and all of the mice in that group were moribund by day 9.
These results demonstrate that IT-delivered 5
0
END-2 PPMO sup-
pressed virus growth in the lungs and protected against virus-induced
weight loss. Furthermore, the lack of weight loss in mice treated with
5
0
END-2 PPMO indicates that the dosing regimen did not cause
PPMO-associated overt toxicity to the mice.
5
0
END-2 PPMO is capable of interfering with the process of
translation
Finally, we sought to gain insight into which aspect of the virus repli-
cative cycle the 5
0
END-2 PPMO was affecting, to exert its considerable
inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 growth. To investigate whether 5
0
END-2
PPMO could speci
fi
cally interfere with protein expression in a
cellular milieu, we utilized two plasmid constructs, each containing
different
fl
uorescent-reporter coding sequences. In one construct
Figure 3. 5
0
END-2 PPMO administered IN limits virus growth
K18-hACE2 mice were treated with PBS, 5
0
END-2 PPMO, and NC705 (negative
control) PPMO as indicated, via IN instillation at 24 h before and 18 h after IN
administration of 5,000 ffu of WA-1/2020. MK-4482 (molnupravir), used as a pos-
itive control compound, was administered orally twice per day from 1 day before
infection until 2 days post-infection. Viral load in the lungs was measured at 3 days
post-infection by focus-forming assay, as described in
materials and methods
.
Mean
±
SD is shown (
n
= 5) and was analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s
multiple comparisons (*
p
< 0.05; ****
p
< 0.0001).
www.moleculartherapy.org
Molecular Therapy: Nucleic Acids Vol. 35 December 2024 7
(pSARS2-75/mCherry), the 5
0
-most 75 nt of the SARS-CoV-2 genome
is followed by the mCherry coding sequence. A second construct
(pRNDM-75/GFP) contains 75 nt of nonsense sequence followed by
the GFP coding sequence (
Figure 5
A). HEK293 cells were treated
with PPMO (5
0
END-2 or NC705) or PBS for 2.5 h and then were
co-transfected with both plasmids. The contents of the cells were har-
vested 24 h later for reporter-speci
fi
c
fl
uorescence quanti
fi
cation by
fl
ow cytometry. The experiment was conducted twice, with similar re-
sults (
Figures 5
B and 5C). For the viral leader construct, the 5
0
END-2
PPMO interfered with the process of mCherry expression in a dose-
dependent manner, while the NC705 PPMO generated little if any
inhibitory effect on protein expression. The results from the non-viral
leader/GFP construct, in which neither PPMO affected expression of
the GFP reporter RNA in a signi
fi
cant manner, further validates the
conclusion that 5
0
END-2 acted in a sequence-speci
fi
c manner in its
inhibitory effect on the translation of viral leader/mCherry RNA.
DISCUSSION
Despite signi
fi
cant advances in the development of drugs to treat in-
fections with SARS-CoV-2, the magnitude and impact of the ongoing
COVID19 public health threat necessitates continued efforts to
develop additional DAAs against current and future virus variants.
The study here provides a proof-of-principle demonstration that
PPMOs, when administered IT, can generate the suppression of
SARS-CoV-2 growth of over 99.9% in the lungs of mice. The level
of antiviral activity by PPMO using IT delivery is comparable or su-
perior to that reported for current drugs having FDA approval for the
treatment of COVID-19 when those current drugs were tested in
similar murine models using IN or oral administration.
78
80
In vivo
targeting of the 5
0
-terminal region of SARS-CoV-2 with anti-
sense oligomers delivered IN has been reported in at least two other
studies.
20
,
21
Those two studies demonstrated that antisense oligomers
delivered IN can markedly limit SARS-CoV-2 growth in the lungs of
experimental animals. Furthermore, those studies helped characterize
how the relationship between SL1 RNA and NSP1 protein regulates
the translation of viral and cellular mRNAs in the infected cell. It is
noteworthy (and remarkable) that the antisense oligomers in those
studies, and in the present study, are apparently able to navigate
the consortium of proteins typically associated with the 5
0
terminal
Figure 4. 5
0
END-2 PPMO administered via IT injection markedly limits virus growth in the lungs of K18-hACE2 mice and protects from weight loss
(A–C) K18-hACE2 mice were treated with PBS or the indicated PPMO via IT administration at 24 h before and 18 h after IN administration of 5,000 ffu of SARS
-CoV-2 (strain
WA-1/2020). MK-4482 (molnupravir), used as a positive control compound, was administered orally twice per day from 1 day before infection until 2 day
s post-infection. Virus
load in the lungs was measured at 3 days post-infection by focus-forming assay, as described in
materials and methods
, and charted. The experiments represented by the
graphs in (A)–(C) were carried out under the same conditions (see
materials and methods
), but at independent times. The limit of virus detection (LOD) in the focus-forming
assay was 100 ffu/g tissue, as represented by a dotted line.
n
= 5, except the experiment of (C), which tested 5’END-2 at various concentrations, where each group contained
3 mice. (D) Mice were treated with PBS, MK-4482, or PPMO, as indicated, under the same experimental conditions as described above. Body weights were me
asured daily
for 10 days post-infection and represented as a percentage of the animal weight on the day of infection. By 8 days post-infection, all the animals in the
NC705 had lost greater
than 35% of their original body weight and were considered moribund.
n
= 5/group. Data shown as mean
±
SD and analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s multiple
comparisons (***
p
< 0.001; ****
p
< 0.0001).
Molecular Therapy: Nucleic Acids
8 Molecular Therapy: Nucleic Acids Vol. 35 December 2024