Dopaminergic dysfunction in neurodevelopmental disorders: recent advances and synergistic technologies to aid basic research

Dopaminergic dysfunction in neurodevelopmental disorders:

recent advances and synergistic technologies to aid basic

research

J. Elliott Robinson

and

Viviana Gradinaru

Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA,

USA

Abstract

Neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) represent a diverse group of syndromes characterized by

abnormal development of the central nervous system and whose symptomatology includes

cognitive, emotional, sensory, and motor impairments. The identification of causative genetic

defects has allowed for creation of transgenic NDD mouse models that have revealed

pathophysiological mechanisms of disease phenotypes in a neural circuit- and cell type-specific

manner. Mouse models of several syndromes, including Rett syndrome, Fragile X syndrome,

Angelman syndrome, Neurofibromatosis type 1, etc., exhibit abnormalities in the structure and

function of dopaminergic circuitry, which regulates motivation, motor behavior, sociability,

attention, and executive function. Recent advances in technologies for functional circuit mapping,

including tissue clearing, viral vector-based tracing methods, and optical readouts of neural

activity, have refined our knowledge of dopaminergic circuits in unperturbed states, yet these tools

have not been widely applied to NDD research. Here, we will review recent findings exploring

dopaminergic function in NDD models and discuss the promise of new tools to probe NDD

pathophysiology in these circuits.

Graphical abstract

Corresponding Author:

Viviana Gradinaru, viviana@caltech.edu.

Publisher's Disclaimer:

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our

customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of

the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be

discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Conflicts of Interest: None

HHS Public Access

Author manuscript

Curr Opin Neurobiol

. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 February 01.

Published in final edited form as:

Curr Opin Neurobiol

. 2018 February ; 48: 17–29. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2017.08.003.

Author Manuscript

Introduction

In the last decade, the widespread adoption of technologies for functional circuit mapping in

animal models has greatly enhanced our ability to understand the input-output relationships

between populations of neurons and determine their function

in vivo

. These include

techniques for the visualization, reconstruction, and analysis of intact circuits across micro-

and macroscales. Examples include serial section electron microscopy [

], the Brainbow

toolkit [

] and intersectional labelling strategies [

], improved neuroinformatic tools for

neurite tracing [

], tissue clearing [

], light sheet microscopy [

], and serial two-

photon tomography [

]. Additionally, optogenetic [

] and chemogenetic [

] actuators,

genetically encoded indicators of neuronal activity [

], and advanced

in vivo

imaging

modalities [

–

] have allowed for the functional deconstruction of genetically defined

circuits in order to probe their contributions to complex behaviors. The development of viral

vectors that can deliver transgenes in a pathway- and cell type-specific manner [

–

] or

broadly transduce neurons across the CNS [

] have greatly facilitated efforts to

anatomically and functionally characterize complex neurobiological systems in both basal

and disease states.

New tools for ‘connectomic’ or circuit-centered research that can survey large scale

functional connectivity patterns are particularly well suited to the study of

neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD), where

diverse genetic and environmental insults during neurodevelopment can vastly perturb

circuit architecture and physiology across brain areas [

]. While the neural substrates of

ASD symptomatology are multifaceted, mesencephalic dopamine systems, consisting of A8

retrorubral, A9 nigrostriatal, and A10 mesocorticolimbic projections [

], represent circuits

of interest given their potential contribution to several common ASD symptoms, including

perseverant interests, stereotyped movements, impaired attention and executive function, and

difficulty with social interactions [

]. Several recent studies implicate these circuits in

behavioral phenotypes observed in rodent NDD disease models, including Angelman

syndrome (AS), Rett syndrome (RS), fragile X syndrome (FXS), neurofibromatosis type 1

(NF1), etc. (Table 1), yet widespread adoption of new tools for functional circuit mapping

has yet to occur in these models. In this review, we will highlight common patterns of

Robinson and Gradinaru

Page 2

Curr Opin Neurobiol

. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 February 01.

Author Manuscript

cellular and circuit level phenotypic variation across NDD mouse models and discuss the

promise of recent neurotechnological advances such as whole brain tissue clearing and gene

delivery by systemic viral vectors to further elucidate NDD pathophysiology in

dopaminergic circuits.

Elucidating abnormal patterns of dopaminergic connectivity in NDD models

Dopaminergic projection neurons are a heterogenous population whose function, activity,

neurotransmitter content, and pattern of connectivity varies with brain region and connection

target [

–

]. For example, efferents arising from the midbrain ventral tegmental area

(VTA) project throughout the extended amygdala [including the nucleus accumbens (NAc)],

hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex (the mesocorticolimbic pathway) and have been widely

studied for their role in cognition, reinforcement, and motivation [

], while

dopaminergic populations in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) project primarily to

the dorsal striatum (nigrostriatal pathway) and are critical for the selection and execution of

motor programs and habitual behavior [

]. Other populations outside the mesencephalon

include those in the dorsal raphe nucleus (DRN)/ventral periaqueductal gray area (vPAG)

that affect social behavior, nociception, and arousal [

–

] and tuberoinfundibular

projections from the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus to the median eminence that regulate

prolactin release [

Mesencephalic dopaminergic neurons in mice arise from a pool of progenitors in the

midbrain floor plate under the control of numerous signaling molecules, including sonic

hedgehog, WNT1, engrailed 1 and 2, fibroblast growth factor-8, etc., undergo radial

migration to their final positions in either the VTA or SNc by embryonic day 13.5, and

exhibit extensive axonal outgrowth along the anteroposterior and dorsoventral axes with

synaptogenesis in downstream targets continuing into postnatal development [

Consequently loss of NDD-associated genes, such as

EN2

MECP2

CNTNAP2

, and

NF1

produce hypo- or hyperdopaminergic behavioral phenotypes, such as abnormal motor,

cognitive, or social behavior, in mouse models by perturbing neuronal maturation,

migration, or neurite outgrowth [

–

]. Efforts to understand these phenotypes would

benefit from a comprehensive ultrastructural understanding of how specific NDD-associated

genetic changes alter dopaminergic circuit architecture and function and inform new

therapeutic strategies, such as whole brain gene therapy or genome editing, to help

ameliorate NDD symptomatology.

Several recent viral vector-based labeling methods are likely to greatly enhance our

understanding of the input-output relationship between dopaminergic efferent and afferent

connections in NDD models (Table 2A). This toolkit includes a new adenoassociated viral

(AAV) vector for retrograde labeling (AAV2-retro) [

] (in addition to existing retrograde

labeling vectors [

]), intersectional strategies to target individual neuronal

projections and their inputs (INTERSECT [

], TRIO [

]), mGRASP for fluorescent labeling

of connections between synaptic partners [

], and a single cell projection mapping via

RNA barcoding (MAP-seq [

]). The recently developed brain-penetrant AAV PHP.eB can

efficiently deliver viral transgenes to the CNS after peripheral administration (Figure 1A–B)

[

], including Brainbow reagents [

] for multicolor labeling via stochastic expression

Robinson and Gradinaru

Page 3

Curr Opin Neurobiol

. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 February 01.

Author Manuscript

of fluorescent proteins (XFPs) [

] and genetically encoded calcium indicators (GECIs;

[

]). This tool should also prove useful for non-invasive delivery of optogenetic [

] or

chemogenetic [

] tools, AAV-optimized CRISPR-Cas9 effectors for genome editing (e.g.

[

–

]), and therapeutic transgenes across large brain volumes. Additionally, PHP.eB can

deliver the cargo of interest co-administered with a titratable inducer vector for controlled

sparseness while maintaining high viral transgene copy number [

], which is beneficial for

effective neurite tracing with methods such as mGRASP [

] or Brainbow [

] (Figure 1C–

D). This method is also likely to benefit sensors that need sparse expression to reduce

background fluorescence [

–

The utility of viral vector-based mapping tools has been improved by microscopic

techniques for rapid imaging of large samples, such as light sheet microscopy [

] or

high-speed volumetric serial two-photon (STP) tomography [

] (Table 2B), and tissue

clearing protocols that render biological samples optically transparent for analysis of intact

circuits in whole brains or thick slices (Figure 2) [

]. Several tissue clearing strategies have

been recently described or refined (Table 2C); these include immersion clearing with high

refractive index (RI) solutions (SeeDB [

], FRUIT [

], RIMS [

]), clearing via

hyperhydration (Sca/eS [

], CUBIC [

]), hydrogel embedding followed by detergent

delipidation (CLARITY [

], PARS [

], PACT [

]), and solvent-based clearing

methods (uDISCO [

]). Clearing methods that build upon water-absorbent CLARITY

hydrogels to create hyperabsorbant hydrogels have also been implemented to facilitate high

resolution imaging of small structures, such as individual dendrites or neurites (ExM [

–

], ePACT [

], and MAP [

]). Hydrogel-based methods preserve endogenous

fluorescence while maintaining compatibility with tools for proteomic analysis [

–

], RNA profiling (smFISH or smHCR probes [

]), and time-stamped

fluorescent readouts of neuronal activity (e.g. ArcTRAP [

]).

Several recent studies have successfully integrated these technologies to probe the structure

of dopaminergic and related circuits in healthy mice. For example, retrograde labeling, tissue

clearing, and LSM have been used to parse SNc subcircuit connectivity and function [

identify an anatomically distinct projection to the posterior striatum [

] that preferentially

encodes novel cue information rather than reward prediction errors [

], and refine our

knowledge of cholinergic inputs to the SNc and VTA [

]. An input-output analysis of VTA

connections using TRIO uncovered a novel projection from the anterior cingulate cortex to

the lateral NAc that produces behavioral reinforcement using an optogenetic intracranial

self-stimulation paradigm [

Bridging the gap between synaptic function and neural circuit dynamics in

NDD models

One common feature amongst NDDs is that the causative genes (e.g.

FMR1

in FXS,

UBE3A

in AS,

MECP2

in RS,

NF1

in NF1,

EN1

and

EN2

SHANK

genes, etc.) affect

synapse formation, maintenance, and plasticity in rodent models [

]. As such, there

have been considerable efforts to characterize synapse function in dopaminergic circuits in

these mice. For example, reduction in SHANK-3, an excitatory synapse scaffolding protein

Robinson and Gradinaru

Page 4

Curr Opin Neurobiol

. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 February 01.

Author Manuscript

whose loss of function is associated with Phelan McDermid Syndrome (also called 22q13

deletion syndrome; see [

] for a review) and some non-syndromic ASD cases [

], via

delivery of a short hairpin RNA (shRNA) into the VTA impairs maturation of excitatory

synapses and reduces dopaminergic neuron excitability and social preference via increased

inhibitory tone [

]. Mice modeling 15q11–13 Duplication Syndrome (where Ube3A

protein levels are increased three-fold) exhibit a loss of sociability due to downregulation of

the glutamatergic synapse organizer CBLN1 in the VTA [

]. Altered neurotransmitter

content or release from VTA or SNc neurons in downstream targets has been reported in

mouse models of AS [

100

101

], NF1 [

], and RS [

102

] and in

Cntnap2

knockout

mice [

]. While there is a large body of research delineating the role of synaptic or

microcircuit deficits in NDD models [

103

–

106

], less is known about how those changes

alter population dynamics or neuron ensemble activity to produce behavioral phenotypes;

improvements in optical tools to monitor neural activity across multiple spatial scales

[

107

–

109

] should help bridge this divide.

Understanding how networks of interconnected neurons encode and translate relevant

environmental stimuli into a motivated behavior requires a high throughput readout of

neuron firing with single-cell resolution. Metal electrodes or electrode arrays are a robust

tool to measure spiking with high temporal precision and can be coupled with optogenetic

tools to manipulate activity or infer cell identity (i.e. opto-tagging, [

110

]). Opto-tagging has

been used to monitor diverse populations across the CNS (e.g. cortical interneurons

[

111

112

], AgRP neurons in the arcuate nucleus [

113

], dopaminergic neurons in the VTA

[

114

], etc.), yet this technique is limited in the number of neurons it can sample and may not

be suitable for all populations due to the challenges in efficiently and accurately opto-

tagging (e.g. cortical pyramidal neurons), as well as genetically similar populations that are

too sparse or dense to be reliably identified. In contrast, optogenetic stimulation of

dopaminergic circuitry during blood oxygen level dependent contrast (BOLD) fMRI

imaging can approximate mesocorticolimbic or nigrostriatal network activity in rodents

[

115

–

117

], yet this technique lacks both cellular resolution and temporally precise

neurophysiological readouts.

Alternatively, genetically encoded calcium indicators (GECIs; e.g. the GCaMP6 family of

proteins [

]) provide cell type-specific fluorescent readouts of neuron activity during

behavior that is stable over months of testing and is scalable [

]. Using two-photon

mesoscopes with wide field of view objectives [

108

] or random access scanning strategies

[

107

] to image through large cranial windows in head-fixed mice, researchers can record the

calcium dynamics of hundreds to thousands of neurons at once. Bulk calcium signals can

also be measured across superficial cortical areas using a wide field fluorescence

macroscope featuring a 12 mm field of view, which has been used to assess global

representations of motivated behavior in multiple cell types [

]. While these tools have

been optimized for relatively superficial (< 1mm deep) structures, several tools should help

extend the depth of non-invasive optical access, such as three-photon microscopy [

118

], the

implementation of axially elongated Bessel foci [

119

], photoacoustic tomography [

120

], and

guidestar-assisted wavefront engineering techniques to limit optical scattering [

121

], such as

time reversal of ultrasound encoded light (TRUE) [

122

123

Robinson and Gradinaru

Page 5

Curr Opin Neurobiol

. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 February 01.

Author Manuscript

Several recent technologies have provided optical access to deep brain areas in behaving

mice for activity measurements in bulk or with single-cell resolution. For bulk

measurements, fiber photometry [

124

] and TEMPO [

125

] allow for quantification of

calcium or voltage sensor dynamics, respectively, using implanted optical fibers in order to

correlate activity of genetically defined populations with behavioral events. Calcium

imaging via implanted gradient index microendoscopes (GRIN lenses) provides single cell

resolution at depths >4mm below the skull surface [

126

]. While two-photon GRIN lens

imaging is most commonly performed in head-fixed mice [

127

], several strategies such as 2-

photon fiberscopes [

128

129

] and miniaturized head-mounted 2-photon microscopes

[

130

131

] have been developed for freely moving behavior. Head-mounted miniaturized

epifluorescence microscopes [

132

] are also available and have been more widely adopted for

use in behaving animals. Single cell calcium dynamics have been imaged via GRIN lens in

the VTA [

133

], SNc [

134

], and interconnected regions, including the dorsal striatum [

134

lateral hypothalamus [

134

135

], medial preoptic area [

136

], medial prefrontal cortex

[

137

138

], bed nucleus of the stria terminalis [

133

], hippocampus [

139

140

], etc.

Additionally, chronic imaging windows have permitted monitoring of sparsely labelled SNc

axons in the dorsal striatum, which revealed distinct temporal and spatial encoding of reward

and motor signals [

]. While several groups employ cortical two-photon calcium imaging

in NDD models, including RS [

141

] and FXS [

142

] mice, analysis of deeper structures has

not been reported to date.

Considerations and future outlook

The identification of causative genetic defects in neurodevelopmental syndromes and

subsequent creation of transgenic mouse models has greatly enhanced our understanding of

the developmental perturbations that produce synaptic, cellular, and behavioral phenotypes

in these mice. While several recent studies examining dopaminergic circuitry have

uncovered pathophysiological mechanisms underlying aberrant social interactions, positive

reinforcement, stereotyped behavior, etc., few studies have employed new technologies for

functional circuit mapping in NDD models. This may be due to several factors; first, given

that phenotype expression is dependent on genetic background in many mouse models, such

as NF1 [

143

], it will be important to continue identifying and developing minimal gene

regulatory elements (promoters, enhancers, miRNA binding sites) that can be

accommodated within well-tolerated viral capsids for cell type-specific targeting without the

need to cross mice to Cre or Flp driver lines. Several cell type-specific promoters have been

developed to target different cell populations in the CNS, including catecholaminergic

(tyrosine hydroxylase promoter), serotonergic (FEV), Purkinje (PCP2) [

144

], and forebrain

GABAergic (mDlx5/6) neurons [

145

], although they vary in leakiness and promoter size,

which can limit packageable transgene size due to AAV carrying capacity of 4.7 kb [

146

Second, many of these techniques require specialized equipment, reagents, or expertise that

makes implementation challenging. Several helpful imaging, tissue clearing, and data

analysis protocols have recently been published [

133

147

–

149

] that can help guide

potential users.

To effectively integrate measures of neural activity with comprehensive dopaminergic

connectomes in mouse models obtained with such tools for precise structural and functional

Robinson and Gradinaru

Page 6

Curr Opin Neurobiol

. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 February 01.

Author Manuscript

analysis of intact circuits, several advances will be required. First, we will need better

computational methods for automated detection, segmentation, and tracing of individual

fluorescently labelled neurons in whole cleared brains. This task is currently labor intensive

and works poorly for neurons with complex morphology, such as catecholaminergic neurons

with large axonal arbors that traverse several mm of brain tissue. Recent successes in

overcoming these challenges include the reconstruction of single projection neurons in the

claustrum, which branch extensively throughout the entire cerebrum [

150

]. Second, we will

need improved tools for converting neural activity states into fluorescent labels that can be

superimposed upon neuronal reconstructions. Several technologies show promise, such as

CaMPARI [

151

] and iTANGO [

152

], which provide light timestamped indicators of

intracellular calcium or dopaminergic neurotransmission, respectively. Hybridization chain

reaction (HCR) probes for single-cell, multiplexed RNA detection have been validated for

hydrogel-based clearing methods [

153

] and could allow for medium throughput

identification of projection- or activity-dependent changes in gene activity in mutant and

wildtype mice. At this time, only PACT/PARS [

], EDC-CLARITY [

], and Ex-FISH

[

] have been demonstrated to be compatible with RNA profiling, yet clearing methods are

advancing rapidly and will likely be useful for a broader range of applications in the future.

When examining the role of functional circuit mapping technologies in elucidating

dopaminergic connectivity in NDD models, one cannot neglect the ontogeny of these

circuits. Several methods have been used to clear mouse embryos at various stages of

development (reviewed by [

154

]), yet it is difficult to employ viral vector-based tracing and

labeling techniques in the developing mouse. It is thus of great interest to identify AAVs that

cross the blood-placenta barrier and selectively target the developing embryonic nervous

system. AAV selection platforms, such as CREATE (Cre recombination–based AAV

targeted evolution), which has been used to develop vectors that efficiently target the central

(PHP.B/PHP.eB) or peripheral (PHP.S) nervous systems [

] when given systemically,

could yield new vectors for

in utero

transgene delivery. Additionally, tools for large volume

functional imaging of developing organisms, such as a two-beam light sheet microscope

with adaptive optics and automated cell tracking [

], have been applied to early embryonic

mice [

155

156

], yet new methods to maintain optical access within the amnion will be

necessary to image and track post-implantation fetal cells.

Going forward, we anticipate that continued technological advances can yield progressively

more precise and comprehensive functional and connectomic maps of dopaminergic

circuitry across development. As these tools become more widely adopted by NDD

researchers, we will likely gain newfound understanding of how functional and structural

abnormalities synergize to produce behavioral and cognitive phenotypes in mouse models

and reveal putative mechanisms of disease symptomatology in human populations.

Ultimately these discoveries can inform the creation of behavioral and pharmacological

therapies that target circuit- or cell-type specific mechanisms of disease in order to benefit

the health of affected children and adults.

Robinson and Gradinaru

Page 7

Curr Opin Neurobiol

. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 February 01.

Author Manuscript

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge support from the Children’s Tumor Foundation (Young Investigator Award

2016-01-006 to JER), as well as the Heritage Medical Research Institute (VG) and the Tianqiao and Chrissy Chen

Institute for Neuroscience at Caltech. We would like to thank Jennifer Treweek, Benjamin Deverman, Ken Chan,

Min Jang, Alon Greenbaum, and Ryan Cho for histological images used in the manuscript figures.

References

1. Joesch M, Mankus D, Yamagata M, Shahbazi A, Schalek R, Suissa-Peleg A, Meister M, Lichtman

JW, Scheirer WJ, Sanes JR. Reconstruction of genetically identified neurons imaged by serial-

section electron microscopy. Elife. 2016:5.

2. Kasthuri N, Hayworth KJ, Berger DR, Schalek RL, Conchello JA, Knowles-Barley S, Lee D,

Vazquez-Reina A, Kaynig V, Jones TR, Roberts M, et al. Saturated reconstruction of a volume of

neocortex. Cell. 2015; 162(3):648–661. [PubMed: 26232230]

3. Weissman TA, Pan YA. Brainbow: New resources and emerging biological applications for

multicolor genetic labeling and analysis. Genetics. 2015; 199(2):293–306. [PubMed: 25657347]

4. Tsuriel S, Gudes S, Draft RW, Binshtok AM, Lichtman JW. Multispectral labeling technique to map

many neighboring axonal projections in the same tissue. Nat Methods. 2015; 12(6):547–552.

[PubMed: 25915122]

⋆

. Fenno LE, Mattis J, Ramakrishnan C, Hyun M, Lee SY, He M, Tucciarone J, Selimbeyoglu A,

Berndt A, Grosenick L, Zalocusky KA, et al. Targeting cells with single vectors using multiple-

feature boolean logic. Nat Methods. 2014; 11(7):763–772. This study introduced Flp- and Dre-

dependent DIO constructs to enable intersectional viral targeting strategies. The resulting

technology, INTERSECT, allows for pathway specific targeting via Cre-dependent retrograde

delivery (with HSV vectors) of Flp-dependent constructs. Exclusion targeting is also possible

depending on the starting orientation of the exons. [PubMed: 24908100]

⋆⋆

. Schwarz LA, Miyamichi K, Gao XJ, Beier KT, Weissbourd B, DeLoach KE, Ren J, Ibanes S,

Malenka RC, Kremer EJ, Luo L. Viral-genetic tracing of the input-output organization of a

central noradrenaline circuit. Nature. 2015; 524(7563):88–92. Schwarz and colleagues introduced

TRIO (‘tracing the relationship between input and output’) and cTRIO (‘cell-type-specific

TRIO’) methods for input-output mapping of inputs to a population of neurons that project to a

starter area. Using this method, starter cells are selected based on a known projection target (in

this case, the olfactory bulb, auditory cortex, hippocampus, cerebellum, and medulla) of a region

of interest (the locus coeruleus, LC). A Cre-dependent retrograde canine adenovirus vector

expressing Cre-dependent Flp recombinase was injected into each starter location in DBH-Cre

mice, which express Cre recombinase in noradrenergic neurons Flp-dependent RVDg vectors

were then used to map inputs to the LC based on starter location. [PubMed: 26131933]

7. Acciai L, Soda P, Iannello G. Automated neuron tracing methods: An updated account.

Neuroinformatics. 2016; 14(4):353–367. [PubMed: 27447185]

8. Treweek JB, Gradinaru V. Extracting structural and functional features of widely distributed

biological circuits with single cell resolution via tissue clearing and delivery vectors. Curr Opin

Biotechnol. 2016; 40:193–207. [PubMed: 27393829]

9. Richardson DS, Lichtman JW. Clarifying tissue clearing. Cell. 2015; 162(2):246–257. [PubMed:

26186186]

10. Chhetri RK, Amat F, Wan Y, Hockendorf B, Lemon WC, Keller PJ. Whole-animal functional and

developmental imaging with isotropic spatial resolution. Nat Methods. 2015; 12(12):1171–1178.

[PubMed: 26501515]

⋆

. Royer LA, Lemon WC, Chhetri RK, Wan Y, Coleman M, Myers EW, Keller PJ. Adaptive light-

sheet microscopy for long-term, high-resolution imaging in living organisms. Nat Biotechnol.

2016; 34(12):1267–1278. The authors developed an adaptive light sheet microscope to address

challenges caused by the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of live specimens. Improvements

include the development of a multi-view imaging method that employs four orthogonally placed

optical arms (two for light sheet illumination and two for detection) with 10 digitally adjustable

degrees of freedom and new software (AutoPilot) for real-time image quality monitoring and

Robinson and Gradinaru

Page 8

Curr Opin Neurobiol

. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 February 01.

Author Manuscript

autonomous microscope adjustment to improve spatial resolution and image quality. [PubMed:

27798562]

12. Economo MN, Clack NG, Lavis LD, Gerfen CR, Svoboda K, Myers EW, Chandrashekar J. A

platform for brain-wide imaging and reconstruction of individual neurons. Elife. 2016; 5:e10566.

[PubMed: 26796534]

13. Ragan T, Kadiri LR, Venkataraju KU, Bahlmann K, Sutin J, Taranda J, Arganda-Carreras I, Kim Y,

Seung HS, Osten P. Serial two-photon tomography for automated ex vivo mouse brain imaging.

Nat Methods. 2012; 9(3):255–258. [PubMed: 22245809]

14. Deisseroth K. Optogenetics: 10 years of microbial opsins in neuroscience. Nat Neurosci. 2015;

18(9):1213–1225. [PubMed: 26308982]

15. Roth BL. Dreadds for neuroscientists. Neuron. 2016; 89(4):683–694. [PubMed: 26889809]

16. Chen TW, Wardill TJ, Sun Y, Pulver SR, Renninger SL, Baohan A, Schreiter ER, Kerr RA, Orger

MB, Jayaraman V, Looger LL, et al. Ultrasensitive fluorescent proteins for imaging neuronal

activity. Nature. 2013; 499(7458):295–300. [PubMed: 23868258]

17. Lin MZ, Schnitzer MJ. Genetically encoded indicators of neuronal activity. Nat Neurosci. 2016;

19(9):1142–1153. [PubMed: 27571193]

18. Girven KS, Sparta DR. Probing deep brain circuitry: New advances in in vivo calcium

measurement strategies. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2017; 8(2):243–251. [PubMed: 27984692]

19. Peron S, Chen TW, Svoboda K. Comprehensive imaging of cortical networks. Curr Opin

Neurobiol. 2015; 32:115–123. [PubMed: 25880117]

20. Yang W, Yuste R. In vivo imaging of neural activity. Nat Methods. 2017; 14(4):349–359. [PubMed:

28362436]

21. Ji N, Freeman J, Smith SL. Technologies for imaging neural activity in large volumes. Nat

Neurosci. 2016; 19(9):1154–1164. [PubMed: 27571194]

22. Wu D, Xu J, McMahon MT, van Zijl PC, Mori S, Northington FJ, Zhang J. In vivo high-resolution

diffusion tensor imaging of the mouse brain. Neuroimage. 2013; 83:18–26. [PubMed: 23769916]

23. Gozzi A, Schwarz AJ. Large-scale functional connectivity networks in the rodent brain.

Neuroimage. 2016; 127:496–509. [PubMed: 26706448]

24. Callaway EM, Luo L. Monosynaptic circuit tracing with glycoprotein-deleted rabies viruses. J

Neurosci. 2015; 35(24):8979–8985. [PubMed: 26085623]

25. Junyent F, Kremer EJ. Cav-2–why a canine virus is a neurobiologist’s best friend. Curr Opin

Pharmacol. 2015; 24:86–93. [PubMed: 26298516]

⋆

. Tervo DG, Hwang BY, Viswanathan S, Gaj T, Lavzin M, Ritola KD, Lindo S, Michael S,

Kuleshova E, Ojala D, Huang CC, et al. A designer aav variant permits efficient retrograde access

to projection neurons. Neuron. 2016; 92(2):372–382. The authors performed several rounds of

selection to identify AAV-2 capsids that provided retrograde transduction in projections from the

striatum to the substantia nigra pars reticulata and projections from deep cerebellar nuclei to the

cerebellar cortex. The resulting AAV2-retro virus was shown to provide efficient, Cre-dependent

retrograde transduction several loci, including cortical and subcortical structures. [PubMed:

27720486]

27. Fraefel C, Marconi P, Epstein AL. Herpes simplex virus type 1 (hsv-1)-derived amplicon vectors

for gene transfer and gene therapy. Methods Mol Biol. 2015; 1254:295–316. [PubMed: 25431073]

28. Salganik M, Hirsch ML, Samulski RJ. Adeno-associated virus as a mammalian DNA vector.

Microbiol Spectr. 2015; 3(4)

⋆⋆

. Deverman BE, Pravdo PL, Simpson BP, Kumar SR, Chan KY, Banerjee A, Wu WL, Yang B,

Huber N, Pasca SP, Gradinaru V. Cre-dependent selection yields aav variants for widespread gene

transfer to the adult brain. Nat Biotechnol. 2016; 34(2):204–209. Deverman and colleagues

developed a platform for AAV capsid selection (Cre recombination-based AAV targeted

evolution or CREATE) that they used to discover AAV9 variants that broadly transduced the CNS

after peripheral (intravenous or retro-orbital) injection. The resulting PHP.B vector transduced

cells in multiple brain regions, including the motor and visual cortices, striatum, thalamus,

hippocampus, and cerebellum, better than AAV9 with reduced gene transfer to the liver.

Additionally, PHP.B was also able to transduce human differentiated cortical neurons and

astrocytes derived from induced pluripotent stem cells. [PubMed: 26829320]

Robinson and Gradinaru

Page 9

Curr Opin Neurobiol

. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 February 01.

Author Manuscript

30. Lin YC, Frei JA, Kilander MB, Shen W, Blatt GJ. A subset of autism-associated genes regulate the

structural stability of neurons. Front Cell Neurosci. 2016; 10:263. [PubMed: 27909399]

31. Nomi JS, Uddin LQ. Developmental changes in large-scale network connectivity in autism.

Neuroimage Clin. 2015; 7:732–741. [PubMed: 25844325]

32. Kizer JS, Palkovits M, Brownstein MJ. The projections of the a8, a9 and a10 dopaminergic cell

bodies: Evidence for a nigral-hypothalamic-median eminence dopaminergic pathway. Brain Res.

1976; 108(2):363–370. [PubMed: 1276901]

33. Fuccillo MV. Striatal circuits as a common node for autism pathophysiology. Front Neurosci. 2016;

10:27. [PubMed: 26903795]

34. Cardozo Pinto DF, Lammel S. Viral vector strategies for investigating midbrain dopamine circuits

underlying motivated behaviors. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2017

35. Poulin JF, Zou J, Drouin-Ouellet J, Kim KY, Cicchetti F, Awatramani RB. Defining midbrain

dopaminergic neuron diversity by single-cell gene expression profiling. Cell Rep. 2014; 9(3):930–

943. [PubMed: 25437550]

36. Vogt Weisenhorn DM, Giesert F, Wurst W. Diversity matters - heterogeneity of dopaminergic

neurons in the ventral mesencephalon and its relation to parkinson’s disease. J Neurochem. 2016;

139(Suppl 1):8–26. [PubMed: 27206718]

37. Nasser HM, Calu DJ, Schoenbaum G, Sharpe MJ. The dopamine prediction error: Contributions to

associative models of reward learning. Front Psychol. 2017; 8:244. [PubMed: 28275359]

38. Wise RA. Forebrain substrates of reward and motivation. J Comp Neurol. 2005; 493(1):115–121.

[PubMed: 16254990]

39. Howe MW, Dombeck DA. Rapid signalling in distinct dopaminergic axons during locomotion and

reward. Nature. 2016; 535(7613):505–510. [PubMed: 27398617]

40. Gremel CM, Lovinger DM. Associative and sensorimotor corticobasal ganglia circuit roles in

effects of abused drugs. Genes Brain Behav. 2017; 16(1):71–85. [PubMed: 27457495]

41. Matthews GA, Nieh EH, Vander Weele CM, Halbert SA, Pradhan RV, Yosafat AS, Glober GF,

Izadmehr EM, Thomas RE, Lacy GD, Wildes CP, et al. Dorsal raphe dopamine neurons represent

the experience of social isolation. Cell. 2016; 164(4):617–631. [PubMed: 26871628]

42. Li C, Sugam JA, Lowery-Gionta EG, McElligott ZA, McCall NM, Lopez AJ, McKlveen JM, Pleil

KE, Kash TL. Mu opioid receptor modulation of dopamine neurons in the periaqueductal gray/

dorsal raphe: A role in regulation of pain. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016; 41(8):2122–2132.

[PubMed: 26792442]

43. Cho JR, Treweek JB, Robinson JE, Xiao C, Bremner LR, Greenbaum A, Gradinaru V. Dorsal

raphe dopamine neurons modulate arousal and promote wakefulness by salient stimuli. Neuron.

2017 in press.

44. Grattan DR. 60 years of neuroendocrinology: The hypothalamo-prolactin axis. J Endocrinol. 2015;

226(2):T101–122. [PubMed: 26101377]

45. Bodea GO, Blaess S. Establishing diversity in the dopaminergic system. FEBS Lett. 2015; 589(24

Pt A):3773–3785. [PubMed: 26431946]

46. Anastasaki C, Woo AS, Messiaen LM, Gutmann DH. Elucidating the impact of

neurofibromatosis-1 germline mutations on neurofibromin function and dopamine-based learning.

Hum Mol Genet. 2015; 24(12):3518–3528. [PubMed: 25788518]

47. Brown JA, Emnett RJ, White CR, Yuede CM, Conyers SB, O’Malley KL, Wozniak DF, Gutmann

DH. Reduced striatal dopamine underlies the attention system dysfunction in neurofibromatosis-1

mutant mice. Hum Mol Genet. 2010; 19(22):4515–4528. [PubMed: 20826448]

48. Genestine M, Lin L, Durens M, Yan Y, Jiang Y, Prem S, Bailoor K, Kelly B, Sonsalla PK,

Matteson PG, Silverman J, et al. Engrailed-2 (en2) deletion produces multiple neurodevelopmental

defects in monoamine systems, forebrain structures and neurogenesis and behavior. Hum Mol

Genet. 2015; 24(20):5805–5827. [PubMed: 26220976]

49. Brielmaier J, Matteson PG, Silverman JL, Senerth JM, Kelly S, Genestine M, Millonig JH,

DiCicco-Bloom E, Crawley JN. Autism-relevant social abnormalities and cognitive deficits in

engrailed-2 knockout mice. PLoS One. 2012; 7(7):e40914. [PubMed: 22829897]

Robinson and Gradinaru

Page 10

Curr Opin Neurobiol

. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 February 01.

Author Manuscript

50. Kouwenhoven WM, Veenvliet JV, van Hooft JA, van der Heide LP, Smidt MP. Engrailed 1 shapes

the dopaminergic and serotonergic landscape through proper isthmic organizer maintenance and

function. Biol Open. 2016; 5(3):279–288. [PubMed: 26879466]

51. Brown JA, Diggs-Andrews KA, Gianino SM, Gutmann DH. Neurofibromatosis-1 heterozygosity

impairs cns neuronal morphology in a camp/pka/rock-dependent manner. Mol Cell Neurosci.

2012; 49(1):13–22. [PubMed: 21903164]

52. Gantz SC, Ford CP, Neve KA, Williams JT. Loss of mecp2 in substantia nigra dopamine neurons

compromises the nigrostriatal pathway. J Neurosci. 2011; 31(35):12629–12637. [PubMed:

21880923]

53. Karayannis T, Au E, Patel JC, Kruglikov I, Markx S, Delorme R, Heron D, Salomon D, Glessner J,

Restituito S, Gordon A, et al. Cntnap4 differentially contributes to gabaergic and dopaminergic

synaptic transmission. Nature. 2014; 511(7508):236–240. [PubMed: 24870235]

54. Feng L, Kwon O, Lee B, Oh WC, Kim J. Using mammalian gfp reconstitution across synaptic

partners (mgrasp) to map synaptic connectivity in the mouse brain. Nat Protoc. 2014; 9(10):2425–

2437. [PubMed: 25232938]

55. Kim J, Zhao T, Petralia RS, Yu Y, Peng H, Myers E, Magee JC. Mgrasp enables mapping

mammalian synaptic connectivity with light microscopy. Nat Methods. 2011; 9(1):96–102.

[PubMed: 22138823]

56. Kebschull JM, Garcia da Silva P, Reid AP, Peikon ID, Albeanu DF, Zador AM. High-throughput

mapping of single-neuron projections by sequencing of barcoded rna. Neuron. 2016; 91(5):975–

987. [PubMed: 27545715]

57. Chan KY, Jang MJ, Yoo BB, Greenbaum A, Ravi N, Wu W, Sánchez-Guardado L, Lois C,

Mazmanian SK, Deverman BE, Gradinaru V. Engineered aavs for efficient noninvasive gene

delivery to the central and peripheral nervous systems. Nat Neurosci. 2017 in press).

⋆⋆

The

authors used the CREATE platform to further select two new PHP.B variants for gene delivery

after systemic exposure: PHP.eB, an enhanced capsid with 1.8–2.5 fold improved CNS targeting

when compared to PHP.B, and PHP.S, which has high peripheral nervous system tropism without

crossing the blood brain barrier. They also created a two-component tTA-TRE system that allows

for dose-dependent reduction in transduced cell density when a co-administered tTA vector is

titrated downward. This approach does not diminish copy number, allowing for high transgene

expression in a sparse population of cells. Existing and new cell type-specific promoters for

transgene targeting were also tested with PHP.eB, allowing for effective transduction of diverse

cell types.

58. Cai D, Cohen KB, Luo T, Lichtman JW, Sanes JR. Improved tools for the brainbow toolbox. Nat

Methods. 2013; 10(6):540–547.

⋆

. Allen WE, Kauvar IV, Chen MZ, Richman EB, Yang SJ, Chan K, Gradinaru V, Deverman BE,

Luo L, Deisseroth K. Global representations of goal-directed behavior in distinct cell types of

mouse neocortex. Neuron. 2017; 94(4):891–907. e896. The authors developed a wide field

fluorescence microscope (field of view: 12mm) for large scale cortical imaging of different cell

types during motivated behavior. This is the first published study in which a broadly transducing,

brain penetrant AAV vector (PHP.eB) was used to express GCaMP across a large cortical volume

after peripheral administration. [PubMed: 28521139]

60. Hillier D, Fiscella M, Drinnenberg A, Trenholm S, Rompani SB, Raics Z, Katona G, Juettner J,

Hierlemann A, Rozsa B, Roska B. Causal evidence for retina-dependent and -independent visual

motion computations in mouse cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2017

61. Chew WL, Tabebordbar M, Cheng JK, Mali P, Wu EY, Ng AH, Zhu K, Wagers AJ, Church GM. A

multifunctional aav-crispr-cas9 and its host response. Nat Methods. 2016; 13(10):868–874.

[PubMed: 27595405]

62. Swiech L, Heidenreich M, Banerjee A, Habib N, Li Y, Trombetta J, Sur M, Zhang F. In vivo

interrogation of gene function in the mammalian brain using crispr-cas9. Nat Biotechnol. 2015;

33(1):102–106. [PubMed: 25326897]

63. Fine EJ, Appleton CM, White DE, Brown MT, Deshmukh H, Kemp ML, Bao G. Trans-spliced

cas9 allows cleavage of hbb and ccr5 genes in human cells using compact expression cassettes. Sci

Rep. 2015; 5:10777. [PubMed: 26126518]

Robinson and Gradinaru

Page 11

Curr Opin Neurobiol

. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 February 01.

Author Manuscript

64. Hochbaum DR, Zhao Y, Farhi SL, Klapoetke N, Werley CA, Kapoor V, Zou P, Kralj JM,

Maclaurin D, Smedemark-Margulies N, Saulnier JL, et al. All-optical electrophysiology in

mammalian neurons using engineered microbial rhodopsins. Nat Methods. 2014; 11(8):825–833.

[PubMed: 24952910]

65. Gong Y, Huang C, Li JZ, Grewe BF, Zhang Y, Eismann S, Schnitzer MJ. High-speed recording of

neural spikes in awake mice and flies with a fluorescent voltage sensor. Science. 2015; 350(6266):

1361–1366. [PubMed: 26586188]

66. Flytzanis NC, Bedbrook CN, Chiu H, Engqvist MK, Xiao C, Chan KY, Sternberg PW, Arnold FH,

Gradinaru V. Archaerhodopsin variants with enhanced voltage-sensitive fluorescence in

mammalian and caenorhabditis elegans neurons. Nat Commun. 2014; 5:4894. [PubMed:

25222271]

67. Osten P, Margrie TW. Mapping brain circuitry with a light microscope. Nat Methods. 2013; 10(6):

515–523. [PubMed: 23722211]

68. Tomer R, Lovett-Barron M, Kauvar I, Andalman A, Burns VM, Sankaran S, Grosenick L, Broxton

M, Yang S, Deisseroth K. Sped light sheet microscopy: Fast mapping of biological system

structure and function. Cell. 2015; 163(7):1796–1806. [PubMed: 26687363]

69. Ke MT, Fujimoto S, Imai T. Seedb: A simple and morphology-preserving optical clearing agent for

neuronal circuit reconstruction. Nat Neurosci. 2013; 16(8):1154–1161. [PubMed: 23792946]

70. Hou B, Zhang D, Zhao S, Wei M, Yang Z, Wang S, Wang J, Zhang X, Liu B, Fan L, Li Y, et al.

Scalable and dii-compatible optical clearance of the mammalian brain. Front Neuroanat. 2015;

9:19. [PubMed: 25759641]

71. Yang B, Treweek JB, Kulkarni RP, Deverman BE, Chen CK, Lubeck E, Shah S, Cai L, Gradinaru

V. Single-cell phenotyping within transparent intact tissue through whole-body clearing. Cell.

2014; 158(4):945–958. [PubMed: 25088144]

72. Hama H, Hioki H, Namiki K, Hoshida T, Kurokawa H, Ishidate F, Kaneko T, Akagi T, Saito T,

Saido T, Miyawaki A. Scales: An optical clearing palette for biological imaging. Nat Neurosci.

2015; 18(10):1518–1529. [PubMed: 26368944]

73. Tainaka K, Kubota SI, Suyama TQ, Susaki EA, Perrin D, Ukai-Tadenuma M, Ukai H, Ueda HR.

Whole-body imaging with single-cell resolution by tissue decolorization. Cell. 2014; 159(4):911–

924. [PubMed: 25417165]

74. Susaki EA, Tainaka K, Perrin D, Kishino F, Tawara T, Watanabe TM, Yokoyama C, Onoe H,

Eguchi M, Yamaguchi S, Abe T, et al. Whole-brain imaging with single-cell resolution using

chemical cocktails and computational analysis. Cell. 2014; 157(3):726–739. [PubMed: 24746791]

75. Chung K, Wallace J, Kim SY, Kalyanasundaram S, Andalman AS, Davidson TJ, Mirzabekov JJ,

Zalocusky KA, Mattis J, Denisin AK, Pak S, et al. Structural and molecular interrogation of intact

biological systems. Nature. 2013; 497(7449):332–337. [PubMed: 23575631]

76. Tomer R, Ye L, Hsueh B, Deisseroth K. Advanced clarity for rapid and high-resolution imaging of

intact tissues. Nat Protoc. 2014; 9(7):1682–1697. [PubMed: 24945384]

77. Yang HH, St-Pierre F, Sun X, Ding X, Lin MZ, Clandinin TR. Subcellular imaging of voltage and

calcium signals reveals neural processing in vivo. Cell. 2016; 166(1):245–257. [PubMed:

27264607]

78. Treweek JB, Chan KY, Flytzanis NC, Yang B, Deverman BE, Greenbaum A, Lignell A, Xiao C,

Cai L, Ladinsky MS, Bjorkman PJ, et al. Whole-body tissue stabilization and selective extractions

via tissue-hydrogel hybrids for high-resolution intact circuit mapping and phenotyping. Nat

Protoc. 2015; 10(11):1860–1896. [PubMed: 26492141]

79. Pan C, Cai R, Quacquarelli FP, Ghasemigharagoz A, Lourbopoulos A, Matryba P, Plesnila N,

Dichgans M, Hellal F, Erturk A. Shrinkage-mediated imaging of entire organs and organisms using

udisco. Nat Methods. 2016; 13(10):859–867. [PubMed: 27548807]

80. Chen F, Tillberg PW, Boyden ES. Optical imaging. Expansion microscopy. Science. 2015;

347(6221):543–548. [PubMed: 25592419]

81. Chen F, Wassie AT, Cote AJ, Sinha A, Alon S, Asano S, Daugharthy ER, Chang JB, Marblestone

A, Church GM, Raj A, et al. Nanoscale imaging of rna with expansion microscopy. Nat Methods.

2016; 13(8):679–684. [PubMed: 27376770]

Robinson and Gradinaru

Page 12

Curr Opin Neurobiol

. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 February 01.

Author Manuscript

82. Tillberg PW, Chen F, Piatkevich KD, Zhao Y, Yu CC, English BP, Gao L, Martorell A, Suk HJ,

Yoshida F, DeGennaro EM, et al. Protein-retention expansion microscopy of cells and tissues

labeled using standard fluorescent proteins and antibodies. Nat Biotechnol. 2016; 34(9):987–992.

[PubMed: 27376584]

83. Ku T, Swaney J, Park JY, Albanese A, Murray E, Cho JH, Park YG, Mangena V, Chen J, Chung K.

Multiplexed and scalable super-resolution imaging of three-dimensional protein localization in

size-adjustable tissues. Nat Biotechnol. 2016; 34(9):973–981. [PubMed: 27454740]

84. Murray E, Cho JH, Goodwin D, Ku T, Swaney J, Kim SY, Choi H, Park YG, Park JY, Hubbert A,

McCue M, et al. Simple, scalable proteomic imaging for high-dimensional profiling of intact

systems. Cell. 2015; 163(6):1500–1514. [PubMed: 26638076]

85. Shah S, Lubeck E, Schwarzkopf M, He TF, Greenbaum A, Sohn CH, Lignell A, Choi HM,

Gradinaru V, Pierce NA, Cai L. Single-molecule rna detection at depth by hybridization chain

reaction and tissue hydrogel embedding and clearing. Development. 2016; 143(15):2862–2867.

[PubMed: 27342713]

86. Sylwestrak EL, Rajasethupathy P, Wright MA, Jaffe A, Deisseroth K. Multiplexed intact-tissue

transcriptional analysis at cellular resolution. Cell. 2016; 164(4):792–804. [PubMed: 26871636]

⋆

. Ye L, Allen WE, Thompson KR, Tian Q, Hsueh B, Ramakrishnan C, Wang AC, Jennings JH,

Adhikari A, Halpern CH, Witten IB, et al. Wiring and molecular features of prefrontal ensembles

representing distinct experiences. Cell. 2016; 165(7):1776–1788. These studies integrated

ArcTRAP and CLARITY technologies, which allowed for identification of behavioral ensembles

associated with rewarding (cocaine) or aversive (footshock) stimuli using a fast-acting

formulation of tamoxifen (4-hydroxytamoxifen) to induce labeling of recently activated neurons.

The paper also introduced a data processing workflow of cleared samples for image registration

to an anatomical atlas, cell identification, annotation, and quantification. [PubMed: 27238022]

88. Guenthner CJ, Miyamichi K, Yang HH, Heller HC, Luo L. Permanent genetic access to transiently

active neurons via trap: Targeted recombination in active populations. Neuron. 2013; 78(5):773–

784. [PubMed: 23764283]

⋆

. Lerner TN, Shilyansky C, Davidson TJ, Evans KE, Beier KT, Zalocusky KA, Crow AK, Malenka

RC, Luo L, Tomer R, Deisseroth K. Intact-brain analyses reveal distinct information carried by

snc dopamine subcircuits. Cell. 2015; 162(3):635–647. Lerner and colleagues used TRIO in

combination with CLARITY and CLARITY-optimized light sheet microscopy (COLM) to

characterize inputs to dorsomedial and dorsolateral striatum-projecting dopaminergic neurons in

the SNc and found evidence for parallel nigrostriatal circuits along the mediolateral axis. These

findings were supported by qualitative differences in electrophysiological properties of each

projection type and bulk calcium responses via fiber photometry during appetitive and aversive

stimuli. [PubMed: 26232229]

⋆

. Menegas W, Bergan JF, Ogawa SK, Isogai Y, Umadevi Venkataraju K, Osten P, Uchida N,

Watabe-Uchida M. Dopamine neurons projecting to the posterior striatum form an anatomically

distinct subclass. Elife. 2015; 4:e10032. The authors used RVDg tracing, clearing with

CLARITY, and whole brain light-sheet microscopy to map inputs to VTA and SNc neurons

projecting to different projection sites. Projection-dependent rabies tracing was achieved via

retrograde expression of the rabies cognate receptor (TVA) through the retrograde activity of

AAV5. The authors found that most starter sites produced similar patterns of inputs from the

ventral striatum, except for the posterior striatum; this region produced relatively more inputs

from the globus pallidus, subthalamic nucleus, and zona incerta. Additionally, the authors created

an automated workflow for image acquisition, atlas registration, neuron segmentation, and

quantification of labelled cells in cleared brains. [PubMed: 26322384]

⋆

. Menegas W, Babayan BM, Uchida N, Watabe-Uchida M. Opposite initialization to novel cues in

dopamine signaling in ventral and posterior striatum in mice. Elife. 2017:6. Menengas et al.

compared bulk calcium activity across striatal subclasses using fiber photometry during a

classical conditioning task. While ventral striatal neurons showed activation only in response to

rewards and reward-predictive cues, the posterior tail of the striatum, a region their group had

previously demonstrated to be an anatomically distinct subclass via rabies mapping in

CLARITY-cleared brains, showed strong activation to novel cues regardless or reward state, as

well as responses to aversive and neutral stimuli.

Robinson and Gradinaru

Page 13

Curr Opin Neurobiol

. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 February 01.

Author Manuscript

92. Xiao C, Cho JR, Zhou C, Treweek JB, Chan K, McKinney SL, Yang B, Gradinaru V. Cholinergic

mesopontine signals govern locomotion and reward through dissociable midbrain pathways.

Neuron. 2016; 90(2):333–347. [PubMed: 27100197]

⋆⋆

. Beier KT, Steinberg EE, DeLoach KE, Xie S, Miyamichi K, Schwarz L, Gao XJ, Kremer EJ,

Malenka RC, Luo L. Circuit architecture of vta dopamine neurons revealed by systematic input-

output mapping. Cell. 2015; 162(3):622–634. This study features cTRIO mapping of inputs to

VTA dopaminergic (with DAT-Cre mice) and GABAergic (with GAD2-Cre mice). While inputs

to the medial NAc-projecting dopaminergic neurons were biased towards the medial NAc shell,

lateral NAc-projecting neurons received more inputs from the dorsal striatum, NAc core, and

anterior cingulate cortex. The authors also performed cTRIO using membrane tethered GFP in

the VTA and noticed similar medial-to-lateral differences in dopaminergic neuron axonal

arborization. [PubMed: 26232228]

94. Kwan V, Unda BK, Singh KK. Wnt signaling networks in autism spectrum disorder and

intellectual disability. J Neurodev Disord. 2016; 8:45. [PubMed: 27980692]

95. Zoghbi HY, Bear MF. Synaptic dysfunction in neurodevelopmental disorders associated with

autism and intellectual disabilities. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2012; 4:3.

96. Harony-Nicolas H, De Rubeis S, Kolevzon A, Buxbaum JD. Phelan mcdermid syndrome: From

genetic discoveries to animal models and treatment. J Child Neurol. 2015; 30(14):1861–1870.

[PubMed: 26350728]

97. Boccuto L, Lauri M, Sarasua SM, Skinner CD, Buccella D, Dwivedi A, Orteschi D, Collins JS,

Zollino M, Visconti P, Dupont B, et al. Prevalence of shank3 variants in patients with different

subtypes of autism spectrum disorders. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013; 21(3):310–316. [PubMed:

22892527]

98. Bariselli S, Tzanoulinou S, Glangetas C, Prevost-Solie C, Pucci L, Viguie J, Bezzi P, O’Connor

EC, Georges F, Luscher C, Bellone C. Shank3 controls maturation of social reward circuits in the

vta. Nat Neurosci. 2016; 19(7):926–934. [PubMed: 27273769]

99. Krishnan V, Stoppel DC, Nong Y, Johnson MA, Nadler MJ, Ozkaynak E, Teng BL, Nagakura I,

Mohammad F, Silva MA, Peterson S, et al. Autism gene ube3a and seizures impair sociability by

repressing vta cbln1. Nature. 2017

100. Riday TT, Dankoski EC, Krouse MC, Fish EW, Walsh PL, Han JE, Hodge CW, Wightman RM,

Philpot BD, Malanga CJ. Pathway-specific dopaminergic deficits in a mouse model of angelman

syndrome. J Clin Invest. 2012; 122(12):4544–4554. [PubMed: 23143301]

101. Berrios J, Stamatakis AM, Kantak PA, McElligott ZA, Judson MC, Aita M, Rougie M, Stuber

GD, Philpot BD. Loss of ube3a from th-expressing neurons suppresses gaba co-release and

enhances vta-nac optical self-stimulation. Nat Commun. 2016; 7:10702. [PubMed: 26869263]

102. Kao FC, Su SH, Carlson GC, Liao W. Mecp2-mediated alterations of striatal features accompany

psychomotor deficits in a mouse model of rett syndrome. Brain Struct Funct. 2015; 220(1):419–

434. [PubMed: 24218106]

103. Sudhof TC. Neuroligins and neurexins link synaptic function to cognitive disease. Nature. 2008;

455(7215):903–911. [PubMed: 18923512]

104. Monteiro P, Feng G. Shank proteins: Roles at the synapse and in autism spectrum disorder. Nat

Rev Neurosci. 2017; 18(3):147–157. [PubMed: 28179641]

105. Piochon C, Kano M, Hansel C. Ltd-like molecular pathways in developmental synaptic pruning.

Nat Neurosci. 2016; 19(10):1299–1310. [PubMed: 27669991]

106. Mullins C, Fishell G, Tsien RW. Unifying views of autism spectrum disorders: A consideration of

autoregulatory feedback loops. Neuron. 2016; 89(6):1131–1156. [PubMed: 26985722]

107. Sofroniew NJ, Flickinger D, King J, Svoboda K. A large field of view two-photon mesoscope

with subcellular resolution for in vivo imaging. Elife. 2016:5.

108. Stirman JN, Smith IT, Kudenov MW, Smith SL. Wide field-of-view, multi-region, two-photon

imaging of neuronal activity in the mammalian brain. Nat Biotechnol. 2016; 34(8):857–862.

[PubMed: 27347754]

109. Chen JL, Voigt FF, Javadzadeh M, Krueppel R, Helmchen F. Long-range population dynamics of

anatomically defined neocortical networks. Elife. 2016:5.

Robinson and Gradinaru

Page 14

Curr Opin Neurobiol

. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 February 01.

Author Manuscript

110. Anikeeva P, Andalman AS, Witten I, Warden M, Goshen I, Grosenick L, Gunaydin LA, Frank

LM, Deisseroth K. Optetrode: A multichannel readout for optogenetic control in freely moving

mice. Nat Neurosci. 2011; 15(1):163–170. [PubMed: 22138641]

111. Kim H, Ahrlund-Richter S, Wang X, Deisseroth K, Carlen M. Prefrontal parvalbumin neurons in

control of attention. Cell. 2016; 164(1–2):208–218. [PubMed: 26771492]

112. Kvitsiani D, Ranade S, Hangya B, Taniguchi H, Huang JZ, Kepecs A. Distinct behavioural and

network correlates of two interneuron types in prefrontal cortex. Nature. 2013; 498(7454):363–

366. [PubMed: 23708967]

113. Mandelblat-Cerf Y, Ramesh RN, Burgess CR, Patella P, Yang Z, Lowell BB, Andermann ML.

Arcuate hypothalamic agrp and putative pomc neurons show opposite changes in spiking across

multiple timescales. Elife. 2015:4.

114. Adamantidis AR, Tsai HC, Boutrel B, Zhang F, Stuber GD, Budygin EA, Tourino C, Bonci A,

Deisseroth K, de Lecea L. Optogenetic interrogation of dopaminergic modulation of the multiple

phases of reward-seeking behavior. J Neurosci. 2011; 31(30):10829–10835. [PubMed: 21795535]

115. Van Den Berge N, Albaugh DL, Salzwedel A, Vanhove C, Van Holen R, Gao W, Stuber GD, Ian

Shih YY. Functional circuit mapping of striatal output nuclei using simultaneous deep brain

stimulation and fmri. Neuroimage. 2017; 146:1050–1061. [PubMed: 27825979]

116. Decot HK, Namboodiri VM, Gao W, McHenry JA, Jennings JH, Lee SH, Kantak PA, Jill Kao

YC, Das M, Witten IB, Deisseroth K, et al. Coordination of brain-wide activity dynamics by

dopaminergic neurons. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2017; 42(3):615–627. [PubMed: 27515791]

117. Ferenczi EA, Zalocusky KA, Liston C, Grosenick L, Warden MR, Amatya D, Katovich K, Mehta

H, Patenaude B, Ramakrishnan C, Kalanithi P, et al. Prefrontal cortical regulation of brainwide

circuit dynamics and reward-related behavior. Science. 2016; 351(6268):aac9698. [PubMed:

26722001]

118. Ouzounov DG, Wang T, Wang M, Feng DD, Horton NG, Cruz-Hernandez JC, Cheng YT, Reimer

J, Tolias AS, Nishimura N, Xu C. In vivo three-photon imaging of activity of gcamp6-labeled

neurons deep in intact mouse brain. Nat Methods. 2017; 14(4):388–390. [PubMed: 28218900]

119. Lu R, Sun W, Liang Y, Kerlin A, Bierfeld J, Seelig JD, Wilson DE, Scholl B, Mohar B, Tanimoto

M, Koyama M, et al. Video-rate volumetric functional imaging of the brain at synaptic resolution.

Nat Neurosci. 2017; 20(4):620–628. [PubMed: 28250408]

120. Wang LV, Yao J. A practical guide to photoacoustic tomography in the life sciences. Nat Methods.

2016; 13(8):627–638. [PubMed: 27467726]

121. Horstmeyer R, Ruan H, Yang C. Guidestar-assisted wavefront-shaping methods for focusing light

into biological tissue. Nat Photonics. 2015; 9:563–571. [PubMed: 27293480]

122. Ruan H, Jang M, Yang C. Optical focusing inside scattering media with time-reversed ultrasound

microbubble encoded light. Nat Commun. 2015; 6:8968. [PubMed: 26597439]

123. Liu Y, Lai P, Ma C, Xu X, Grabar AA, Wang LV. Optical focusing deep inside dynamic scattering

media with near-infrared time-reversed ultrasonically encoded (true) light. Nat Commun. 2015;

6:5904. [PubMed: 25556918]

124. Gunaydin LA, Grosenick L, Finkelstein JC, Kauvar IV, Fenno LE, Adhikari A, Lammel S,

Mirzabekov JJ, Airan RD, Zalocusky KA, Tye KM, et al. Natural neural projection dynamics

underlying social behavior. Cell. 2014; 157(7):1535–1551. [PubMed: 24949967]

125. Marshall JD, Li JZ, Zhang Y, Gong Y, St-Pierre F, Lin MZ, Schnitzer MJ. Cell-type-specific

optical recording of membrane voltage dynamics in freely moving mice. Cell. 2016; 167(6):

1650–1662 e1615. [PubMed: 27912066]

126. Barretto RP, Schnitzer MJ. In vivo optical microendoscopy for imaging cells lying deep within

live tissue. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2012; 2012(10):1029–1034. [PubMed: 23028071]

127. Jung JC, Mehta AD, Aksay E, Stepnoski R, Schnitzer MJ. In vivo mammalian brain imaging

using one- and two-photon fluorescence microendoscopy. J Neurophysiol. 2004; 92(5):3121–

3133. [PubMed: 15128753]

128. Myaing MT, MacDonald DJ, Li X. Fiber-optic scanning two-photon fluorescence endoscope. Opt

Lett. 2006; 31(8):1076–1078. [PubMed: 16625908]

Robinson and Gradinaru

Page 15

Curr Opin Neurobiol

. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 February 01.

Author Manuscript

129. Gobel W, Kerr JN, Nimmerjahn A, Helmchen F. Miniaturized two-photon microscope based on a

flexible coherent fiber bundle and a gradient-index lens objective. Opt Lett. 2004; 29(21):2521–

2523. [PubMed: 15584281]

130. Helmchen F, Fee MS, Tank DW, Denk W. A miniature head-mounted two-photon microscope.

High-resolution brain imaging in freely moving animals. Neuron. 2001; 31(6):903–912.

[PubMed: 11580892]

131

⋆⋆

. Zong W, Wu R, Li M, Hu Y, Li Y, Li J, Rong H, Wu H, Xu Y, Lu Y, Jia H, et al. Fast high-

resolution miniature two-photon microscopy for brain imaging in freely behaving mice. Nat

Methods. 2017 Zong et al. report a new miniaturized head-mounted 2-photon microscope for use

in behaving mice. The microscope employs a miniature collimator, scan lens, and custom MEMS

(microelectromechanical system) scanning mirror within the head-mounted microscope body to

achieve resonant scanning frequencies up to 40 Hz with a maximal field of view of 130 × 130

μm

. Fluorescent signals are relayed from the microscope to the photomultiplier tube detectors

via a custom supple fiber bundle. The microscope was able to efficiently detect GCaMP signals

in multiple cortical regions.

132. Ghosh KK, Burns LD, Cocker ED, Nimmerjahn A, Ziv Y, Gamal AE, Schnitzer MJ. Miniaturized

integration of a fluorescence microscope. Nat Methods. 2011; 8(10):871–878. [PubMed:

21909102]

133. Resendez SL, Jennings JH, Ung RL, Namboodiri VM, Zhou ZC, Otis JM, Nomura H, McHenry

JA, Kosyk O, Stuber GD. Visualization of cortical, subcortical and deep brain neural circuit

dynamics during naturalistic mammalian behavior with head-mounted microscopes and

chronically implanted lenses. Nat Protoc. 2016; 11(3):566–597. [PubMed: 26914316]

134. Bocarsly ME, Jiang WC, Wang C, Dudman JT, Ji N, Aponte Y. Minimally invasive

microendoscopy system for in vivo functional imaging of deep nuclei in the mouse brain.

Biomed Opt Express. 2015; 6(11):4546–4556. [PubMed: 26601017]

135. Jennings JH, Ung RL, Resendez SL, Stamatakis AM, Taylor JG, Huang J, Veleta K, Kantak PA,

Aita M, Shilling-Scrivo K, Ramakrishnan C, et al. Visualizing hypothalamic network dynamics

for appetitive and consummatory behaviors. Cell. 2015; 160(3):516–527. [PubMed: 25635459]

136. McHenry JA, Otis JM, Rossi MA, Robinson JE, Kosyk O, Miller NW, McElligott ZA, Budygin

EA, Rubinow DR, Stuber GD. Hormonal gain control of a medial preoptic area social reward

circuit. Nat Neurosci. 2017; 20(3):449–458. [PubMed: 28135243]

137. Otis JM, Namboodiri VM, Matan AM, Voets ES, Mohorn EP, Kosyk O, McHenry JA, Robinson

JE, Resendez SL, Rossi MA, Stuber GD. Prefrontal cortex output circuits guide reward seeking

through divergent cue encoding. Nature. 2017; 543(7643):103–107. [PubMed: 28225752]

138. Pinto L, Dan Y. Cell-type-specific activity in prefrontal cortex during goal-directed behavior.

Neuron. 2015; 87(2):437–450. [PubMed: 26143660]

139. Ziv Y, Burns LD, Cocker ED, Hamel EO, Ghosh KK, Kitch LJ, El Gamal A, Schnitzer MJ. Long-

term dynamics of ca1 hippocampal place codes. Nat Neurosci. 2013; 16(3):264–266. [PubMed:

23396101]

140. Cai DJ, Aharoni D, Shuman T, Shobe J, Biane J, Song W, Wei B, Veshkini M, La-Vu M, Lou J,

Flores SE, et al. A shared neural ensemble links distinct contextual memories encoded close in

time. Nature. 2016; 534(7605):115–118. [PubMed: 27251287]

141. Banerjee A, Rikhye RV, Breton-Provencher V, Tang X, Li C, Li K, Runyan CA, Fu Z, Jaenisch R,

Sur M. Jointly reduced inhibition and excitation underlies circuit-wide changes in cortical

processing in rett syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016; 113(46):E7287–E7296. [PubMed:

27803317]

142. Goncalves JT, Anstey JE, Golshani P, Portera-Cailliau C. Circuit level defects in the developing

neocortex of fragile x mice. Nat Neurosci. 2013; 16(7):903–909. [PubMed: 23727819]

143. Diggs-Andrews KA, Gutmann DH. Modeling cognitive dysfunction in neurofibromatosis-1.

Trends Neurosci. 2013; 36(4):237–247. [PubMed: 23312374]

144. de Leeuw CN, Korecki AJ, Berry GE, Hickmott JW, Lam SL, Lengyell TC, Bonaguro RJ,

Borretta LJ, Chopra V, Chou AY, D’Souza CA, et al. Raav-compatible minipromoters for

restricted expression in the brain and eye. Mol Brain. 2016; 9(1):52. [PubMed: 27164903]

Robinson and Gradinaru

Page 16

Curr Opin Neurobiol

. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2019 February 01.

Author Manuscript