PHYSICAL REVIEW MATERIALS
7
, 093801 (2023)
Editors’ Suggestion
Combining electron-phonon and dynamical mean-field theory calculations of correlated materials:
Transport in the correlated metal Sr
2
RuO
4
David J. Abramovitch,
1
,
*
Jin-Jian Zhou
,
2
,
*
Jernej Mravlje,
3
Antoine Georges,
4
,
5
and Marco Bernardi
1
,
6
,
†
1
Department of Applied Physics and Materials Science, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
2
School of Physics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
3
Jožef Stefan Institute, Jamova 39, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
4
Collège de France, Paris, France
5
CCQ-Flatiron Institute, New York, New York 10010, USA
6
Department of Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA
(Received 14 April 2023; accepted 1 August 2023; published 1 September 2023)
Electron-electron (
e
-
e
) and electron-phonon (
e
-ph) interactions are challenging to describe in correlated
materials, where their joint effects govern unconventional transport, phase transitions, and superconductivity.
Here we combine first-principles
e
-ph calculations with dynamical mean-field theory (DMFT) as a step toward
a unified description of
e
-
e
and
e
-ph interactions in correlated materials. We compute the
e
-ph self-energy
using the DMFT electron Green’s function and combine it with the
e
-
e
self-energy from DMFT to obtain
a Green’s function including both interactions. This approach captures the renormalization of quasiparticle
dispersion and spectral weight on equal footing. Using our method, we study the
e
-ph and
e
-
e
contributions
to the resistivity and spectral functions in the correlated metal Sr
2
RuO
4
. In this material, our results show that
e
-
e
interactions dominate transport and spectral broadening in the temperature range we study (50–310 K),
while
e
-ph interactions are relatively weak and account for only
∼
10% of the experimental resistivity. We also
compute effective scattering rates and find that the
e
-
e
interactions result in scattering several times greater
than the Planckian value
k
B
T
, whereas
e
-ph interactions are associated with scattering rates lower than
k
B
T
.Our
work demonstrates a first-principles approach to combine electron dynamical correlations from DMFT with
e
-ph
interactions in a consistent way, advancing quantitative studies of correlated materials.
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.7.093801
I. INTRODUCTION
In strongly correlated materials, characteristic behaviors
such as high-temperature superconductivity [
1
,
2
], phase tran-
sitions [
3
,
4
], multiferroicity [
5
], and unconventional transport
[
6
,
7
] involve a subtle interplay of charge and lattice de-
grees of freedom. The atomic vibrations (phonons) couple
with the strongly interacting
d
or
f
electrons, resulting in
electron-electron (
e
-
e
) and electron-phonon (
e
-ph) interac-
tions with nontrivial dependence on orbital, spin, and crystal
symmetry [
8
,
9
]. Although heuristic models can address this
rich phenomenology [
10
–
15
], deriving generic quantitative
frameworks to combine
e
-
e
and
e
-ph interactions remains
challenging [
16
,
17
], especially in correlated materials.
First-principles calculations based on density functional
theory (DFT) and its linear-response extension, density func-
tional perturbation theory (DFPT), can address the electronic
structure [
18
], lattice dynamics [
19
], and
e
-ph interactions
[
20
] in many materials. Yet these methods often fail to
describe important features of correlated systems [
21
], pre-
dicting incorrect ground states, lattice vibrations, and
e
-ph
coupling [
22
,
23
]. Recent work has focused on two directions
*
These authors contributed equally to this work.
†
bmarco@caltech.edu
to improve the description of
e
-ph interactions in correlated
materials: Hubbard-corrected DFT (DFT
+
U
), which has en-
abled calculations of
e
-ph interactions in a Mott insulator [
23
],
and DFPT with improved electronic correlations (from
GW
or
hybrid functionals) which has revealed correlation-enhanced
e
-ph interactions in metallic systems [
24
–
27
].
However, while
GW
and DFT
+
U
can renormalize the
band structure and
e
-ph coupling, both methods describe
the electronic states in the quasiparticle (QP) picture, map-
ping them to noninteracting bands. The QP approximation
is typically used as a starting point in studies of equilibrium
properties and nonequilibrium dynamics [
23
,
27
]. Developing
first-principles calculations of
e
-ph interactions beyond the
QP picture remains challenging [
20
,
28
]. Ideally, one would
use the full electron Green’s function renormalized by
e
-
e
interactions, which includes the renormalization of both QP
weight and band dispersion, as a starting point to study
e
-ph
interactions in correlated materials [
29
,
30
].
Dynamical mean-field theory (DMFT) and its
ab initio
variant, DFT
+
DMFT, can capture dynamical electronic cor-
relations by mapping the solid to an embedded atomic site
with a self-energy local in the atomic orbital basis [
31
–
33
].
These methods have been successful in describing the ground
state and transport properties in materials with strongly in-
teracting
d
or
f
electrons, including both correlated metals
and insulators [
6
,
34
–
37
]. A key question addressed in this
2475-9953/2023/7(9)/093801(10)
093801-1
©2023 American Physical Society
DAVID J. ABRAMOVITCH
et al.
PHYSICAL REVIEW MATERIALS
7
, 093801 (2023)
work is how one can combine first-principles DMFT and
e
-ph calculations to explicitly treat
e
-
e
and
e
-ph interactions
together in correlated materials.
Here we show first-principles calculations combining
e
-ph
and DMFT
e
-
e
interactions using a Green’s function approach.
We compare two treatments of the
e
-ph interactions—the
Fan-Migdal self-energy with standard approximations [
20
]
(using DFT or DMFT-renormalized band structures) and the
same self-energy computed as a convolution integral of the
DMFT Green’s function. As a proof of principle, we ap-
ply this method to Sr
2
RuO
4
(SRO) in the normal state, a
prototypical correlated metal [
8
,
37
–
51
] (and unconventional
superconductor below 1 K [
52
–
54
]) requiring treatment of
strong
e
-
e
interactions between
d
orbitals [
48
–
51
]. In SRO,
we find that the
e
-ph interactions are relatively weak and
momentum dependent, in contrast with the strong local
e
-
e
interactions. From Green-Kubo calculations, we find that
e
-
e
interactions account for
∼
50%, and
e
-ph interactions
∼
10%,
of the experimental resistivity. In the
e
-ph calculation using
the DMFT Green’s function the resistivity equals the sum of
the
e
-ph and
e
-
e
contributions; in contrast, the standard
e
-ph
calculation with renormalized QP bands leads to an artificial
enhancement of
e
-ph interactions and nonadditive resistivities.
The origin of these trends is discussed in detail, together with
possible improvements for resistivity calculations in corre-
lated materials and future extensions of our method.
II. NUMERICAL METHODS
We compute the electron Green’s function by combining
the DMFT and
e
-ph self-energies:
G
n
k
(
ω,
T
)
=
[
ω
+
μ
(
T
)
−
ε
n
k
−
e
-
e
n
k
(
ω,
T
)
−
e
-ph
n
k
(
ω,
T
)
]
−
1
,
(1)
where
T
is temperature,
ε
n
k
are electronic band energies,
ω
is
the electron energy,
n
is a band index,
k
is crystal momentum,
and
μ
is a temperature dependent chemical potential obtained
from DMFT. This Green’s function includes the DMFT
e
-
e
self-energy in the band basis,
e
-
e
n
k
(
ω,
T
), which is computed
starting from DFT, and the
e
-ph self-energy
e
-ph
n
k
(
ω,
T
),
which we compute using different approximations as dis-
cussed below.
Our calculations in SRO use a DMFT self-energy taken
from recent work [
48
] and transformed from the Wannier
orbital to the band basis using [
55
]
e
-
e
,
b
k
=
U
†
k
e
-
e
,
w
U
k
,
(2)
where
U
k
are unitary matrices made up by eigenvectors of the
Wannier Hamiltonian, while
e
-
e
,
w
and
e
-
e
,
b
k
are respectively
the self-energies in the Wannier and band basis; the former
is calculated directly from DMFT and is therefore
k
indepen-
dent. As in the DMFT calculation, both the Wannier and band
basis self-energies are taken to be diagonal [
56
].
These DMFT calculations use a three-orbital correlated
subspace with
t
2
g
symmetry resulting from the hybridization
of Ru 4
d
(
d
xy
,
d
yz
,
d
xz
) and O 2
p
orbitals; the orbitals in-
teract with Hubbard and Hund type Coulomb repulsion and
exchange [
48
]. The DMFT impurity problem is solved on
the imaginary-time axis with the TRIQS
/
CTHYB quantum
Monte Carlo solver [
57
,
58
] and analytically continued to
the real-frequency axis using Padé approximants [
59
]. These
methods are discussed and validated in greater detail in recent
work [
48
]. Previous studies have clarified the role of spin-orbit
coupling (SOC) in SRO [
46
,
48
,
51
,
60
–
62
], which is relevant
primarily near band crossings. Because such crossings occur
away from the Fermi surface in the majority of the Brillouin
zone, we neglect SOC in our calculations.
Our DFT and DFPT calculations are carried out using
Q
UANTUM
E
SPRESSO
[
63
] with 10
×
10
×
10
k
-point and
5
×
5
×
5
q
-point grids, and then projected onto Wannier or-
bitals using the W
ANNIER
90 code [
64
]. We use the P
ERTURBO
code for Wannier interpolation of the electronic structure,
phonon modes, and
e
-ph coupling and for computing the
e
-ph
self-energy, spectral functions, and transport properties [
65
].
The transport calculations use a 60
×
60
×
60 fine
k
-point
grid and 10
5
q
points randomly sampled in the Brillouin zone.
Transport results were converged with respect to the
k
-point
grid density, number of
q
points sampled, the energy window
in which the
k
points were chosen, and the frequency grid of
the self-energy and spectral functions.
III. RESULTS
A. Electronic structure and
e
-ph coupling
The electronic structure of SRO is strongly renormalized
by electron correlations. The DFT band structure near the
Fermi energy consists of relatively narrow
d
bands [Fig.
1(a)
].
The
e
-
e
interactions significantly decrease the
d
-band Fermi
velocity relative to DFT, as captured by the DMFT electronic
spectral functions [Fig.
1(b)
]. In the 50–310 K temperature
range studied here, the
e
-
e
interactions also reduce the spectral
weight
Z
of the electronic states on the Fermi surface—to
Z
≈
0
.
2forthe
d
xy
and
Z
≈
0
.
3forthe
d
xz
and
d
yz
bands [
48
]—and
cause a large broadening of the associated spectral functions.
These effects are a signature of strong electron correlations in
SRO and highlight the need to treat the electronic structure
beyond the band picture.
The phonon dispersion with a color map of the
e
-ph cou-
pling strength is shown in Fig.
1(c)
. The dispersions are
calculated from real space interpolation of DFPT forces [
65
]
and are in good agreement with inelastic neutron scattering
measurements [
66
]. We find that the
e
-ph interactions are
overall relatively weak in SRO, with coupling strength
|
g
|
<
100 meV for all phonon modes. These values are signifi-
cantly smaller than in insulating transition metal oxides—for
example, CoO and SrTiO
3
[
23
,
67
]—where the long-range
Fröhlich interaction with longitudinal optical (LO) modes
[
23
,
67
] reaches coupling strengths of order
|
g
|≈
1eV.Dueto
its metallic character, such polar LO phonons are screened out
in SRO, resulting in short-range
e
-ph interactions with weaker
coupling strengths.
B. Electron-phonon self-energy calculations
We describe the
e
-
e
and
e
-ph interactions using the
corresponding self-energies. When
e
-ph coupling is rela-
tively weak, the
e
-ph interactions are well described by the
093801-2
COMBINING ELECTRON-PHONON AND DYNAMICAL ...
PHYSICAL REVIEW MATERIALS
7
, 093801 (2023)
FIG. 1. Electronic structure and
e
-phcouplinginSRO.(a)DFT
band structure for the
t
2
g
d
bands included in the Wannierization.
(b) DMFT spectral function at 77 K, plotted in an enlargement of the
black rectangle in (a), showing significant renormalization relative to
the DFT bands near the Fermi energy (shown with a horizonal line).
(c) Phonon dispersion colored based on the
e
-ph coupling strength,
which is computed as
|
g
ν
(
q
)
|=
[
∑
mn
|
g
mn
ν
(
k
=
M
,
q
)
|
2
/
N
b
]
1
/
2
[
65
]
by averaging over
N
b
=
3 bands.
lowest-order (so-called Fan-Migdal) self-energy [
17
]
e
-ph
n
k
(
i
ω
n
)
=
∑
m
ν
q
∑
i
ν
n
|
g
mn
ν
(
k
,
q
)
|
2
G
m
k
+
q
(
i
ω
n
−
i
ν
n
)
D
ν
q
(
i
ν
n
)
,
(3)
written as a convolution of electron and phonon propaga-
tors,
G
n
k
(
i
ω
n
) and
D
ν
q
(
i
ν
n
), respectively, using Matsubara
frequencies
i
ω
n
for electrons and
i
ν
n
for phonons;
g
mn
ν
(
k
,
q
)
are
e
-ph coupling matrix elements [
65
].
In current first-principles calculations, this expression is
evaluated using noninteracting electron (and phonon) Green’s
functions, tacitly assuming that the electron spectral func-
tions consist of a sharp QP peak. In this approximation, the
e
-ph self-energy on the real-frequency axis
ω
, computed as
in Fig.
2(a)
with noninteracting electron Green’s functions
G
0
m
k
+
q
(
z
)
=
(
z
−
ε
m
k
+
q
)
−
1
, becomes [
17
,
20
]
e
-ph
n
k
(
ω,
T
)
=
∑
m
ν
q
|
g
mn
ν
(
k
,
q
)
|
2
[
N
ν
q
(
T
)
+
f
m
k
+
q
(
T
)
ω
−
ε
m
k
+
q
+
ω
ν
q
+
i
η
+
N
ν
q
(
T
)
+
1
−
f
m
k
+
q
(
T
)
ω
−
ε
m
k
+
q
−
ω
ν
q
+
i
η
]
,
(4)
FIG. 2. Feynman diagrams for the
e
-ph self-energy
e
-ph
n
k
, com-
puted with (a) the noninteracting electron Green’s function and
(b) the DMFT electron Green’s function. The vertices carry a factor
equal to the
e
-ph coupling,
g
mn
ν
(
k
,
q
).
where
ω
ν
q
are phonon energies, while
N
ν
q
(
T
) are equilibrium
occupation numbers for phonons and
f
n
k
(
T
) for electrons
at temperature
T
. When DFT is used to obtain the band
structure
ε
n
k
, we denote this self-energy approximation as
e
-ph@DFT.
In systems where DFT fails to describe the electronic
structure, several methods are used to correct the QP band
dispersion and
e
-ph coupling, including
GW
[
68
,
69
], DFT
+
U
[
23
], and DFT with hybrid functionals [
70
]. Therefore, as
previously shown in the literature, the
e
-ph self-energy in
Eq. (
4
) can be computed using the “best available” QP
band structure and
e
-ph couplings from one of these meth-
ods [
68
–
72
]. Here, for example, by fitting the QP peaks
of the DMFT spectral functions we obtain an improved
DMFT band structure and use it to compute the self-energy
in Eq. (
4
). Below we refer to this level of theory as
e
-ph@DMFT bands.
However, even with these improved schemes, the standard
e
-ph self-energy in Eq. (
4
) misses key features of the elec-
tronic structure in correlated materials. These include the QP
peak broadening, finite QP weight, and any satellite peaks,
background, or spectral weight redistribution outside the QP
peak, all of which are encoded in the electron spectral func-
tion. Improving the QP band structure or
e
-ph couplings in
Eq. (
4
) addresses only part of these renormalization effects
because it places the full spectral weight on the electronic
band states, neglecting spectral weight redistribution from
e
-
e
interactions. The inadequacy of this approximation is appar-
ent in correlated systems like SRO, where the QP weight
of the
d
bands is only
Z
≈
0
.
2–0
.
3. Going beyond these
limitations requires computing the
e
-ph self-energy directly
from the electronic spectral function dressed by electron
correlations.
To address this challenge, we develop a method to calcu-
late the
e
-ph self-energy from the DMFT electron Green’s
function,
G
DMFT
n
k
. Starting from the Lehmann representa-
tion [
17
], and using a band-diagonal DMFT self-energy,
we write
G
DMFT
n
k
(
z
)
=
∫
d
ω
A
DMFT
n
k
(
ω
)
z
−
ω
,
(5)
where
A
DMFT
n
k
(
ω
)
=−
Im[
G
DMFT
n
k
(
ω
)]
/π
is the DMFT spectral
function. We substitute this expression in Eq. (
3
) and fol-
low the usual derivation of the lowest-order
e
-ph self-energy
[
73
]. After analytic continuation to the real frequency axis,
093801-3
DAVID J. ABRAMOVITCH
et al.
PHYSICAL REVIEW MATERIALS
7
, 093801 (2023)
FIG. 3. Imaginary part of the
e
-ph and
e
-
e
self-energies in SRO, plotted on cuts of the Fermi surface at 77 K (left) and 310 K (right). We
plot the
e
-ph self-energy obtained using (a) the DFT electronic structure (
e
-ph@DFT), (b) the DMFT band dispersion (
e
-ph@DMFT bands),
and (c) the DMFT spectral function using Eq. (
6
)(
e
-ph@
G
DMFT
). (d) DMFT
e
-
e
self-energy, shown here for comparison. The corresponding
self-energies at 310 K are plotted in (e)–(h), respectively.
i
ω
n
→
ω
+
i
η
, we obtain
e
-ph
n
k
(
ω,
T
)
=
∑
m
,ν,
q
|
g
mn
ν
(
k
,
q
)
|
2
∫
d
ω
A
DMFT
m
,
k
+
q
(
ω
)
×
[
N
ν
q
(
T
)
+
f
(
ω
,
T
)
ω
−
ω
+
ω
ν
q
+
i
η
+
N
ν
q
(
T
)
+
1
−
f
(
ω
,
T
)
ω
−
ω
−
ω
ν
q
+
i
η
]
.
(6)
This
e
-ph self-energy, written as an integral of the DMFT
spectral function, captures on equal footing the key factors
mentioned above—band renormalization, finite QP weight
and broadening, and background or satellite contributions
caused by electron correlations—all of which are included
in the DMFT spectral function. This approximation for the
e
-ph self-energy, here referred to as
e
-ph@
G
DMFT
,isshown
diagrammatically in Fig.
2(b)
. Its numerical evaluation is dis-
cussed in the Appendix. [Note that in this work we do not
renormalize the
e
-ph coupling,
g
mn
ν
(
k
,
q
), using DMFT; the
role of that renormalization is discussed in Sec.
IV
.]
C. Electron-phonon and DMFT self-energies
We analyze the
e
-ph self-energy obtained with these dif-
ferent approximations and compare it with the DMFT
e
-
e
self-energy. Figure
3
shows these quantities on a cut of the
Fermi surface in the
xy
plane. (The real and imaginary fre-
quency dependent self-energy at select
k
points is plotted
in the Supplemental Material [
74
].) In each plot, the middle
band with stronger
e
-ph and
e
-
e
coupling has
d
xy
character,
while the other two bands have
d
xz
and
d
yz
characters. The
e
-ph self-energy, which depends on both electronic orbital and
momentum
k
, varies by a factor of
∼
1
.
5 on the Fermi surface
at 77 K and 310 K. This
k
dependence in the self-energy
also changes as a function of temperature in some parts of the
Brillouin zone. For example, in the
d
xy
band the self-energy is
greater in magnitude near the
-
M
(
-
X
) axis at low (high)
temperature, due to a change of available
e
-ph inter- and
intraband scattering processes. Our DMFT self-energy also
depends on orbital character, but it is local and thus
k
in-
dependent by construction; it can accurately capture electron
correlations in SRO [
48
].
Comparing our different
e
-ph self-energy approximations
sheds light on the physics they capture. In the picture of
renormalized QP bands [
73
], the Fermi velocity decreases
by a factor of 1
/
Z
(in SRO, 1
/
Z
is
∼
3for
d
xz
and
d
yz
and
∼
5for
d
xy
bands [
48
]) and the QP weight also decreases
by the same factor, leaving the density of states (DOS) at
the Fermi energy unchanged. This renormalized QP picture
holds reasonably well in SRO. The
e
-ph self-energy from DFT
bands (
e
-ph@DFT), shown in Fig.
3(a)
at 77 K and in Fig.
3(e)
at 310 K, misses all these renormalization effects and treats
the material as weakly correlated. Computing the
e
-ph self-
energy in Eq. (
4
) with the renormalized DMFT band structure
(
e
-ph@DMFT bands), which is obtained by fitting the QP
peaks of DMFT spectral functions, artificially enhances the
e
-ph self-energy by a factor of 3–5, as shown in Fig.
3(b)
at
77 K and in Fig.
3(f)
at 310 K. This artifact is a consequence
of using a band structure with Fermi velocity decreased by
a factor of 1
/
Z
≈
3–5, which increases the DOS at the Fermi
energy and thus also increases Im
e
−
ph
n
k
in Eq. (
4
)bythesame
factor.
093801-4
COMBINING ELECTRON-PHONON AND DYNAMICAL ...
PHYSICAL REVIEW MATERIALS
7
, 093801 (2023)
However, the DOS at the Fermi energy is nearly unchanged
in the renormalized electronic structure because the decrease
in Fermi velocity is compensated by a corresponding decrease
in QP weight. This physics is correctly described by Eq. (
6
),
where the imaginary part of the
e
-ph self-energy is roughly
proportional to the DOS at Fermi energy written as
D
(
E
F
)
∝
∑
n
k
∫
d
ω
A
n
k
(
ω
)
δ
(
E
F
−
ω
), which captures changes in the
QP weights. Therefore, as we show in Fig.
3(c)
at 77 K
and in Fig.
3(g)
at 310 K, the more accurate
e
-ph self-
energy computed from the DMFT spectral functions using
Eq. (
6
)(
e
-ph@
G
DMFT
method) removes the artificial enhance-
ment introduced by using the “best-available band structure”
approach.
Overall, the
e
-ph self-energy obtained from DFT bands in
Fig.
3(a)
and DMFT Green’s functions in Fig.
3(c)
shows
similar magnitude and trends at 77 K mainly because the
DOS at Fermi energy is nearly unchanged in DFT and DMFT.
However, at higher temperatures the effects of broadening
in the DMFT spectral functions become more pronounced;
for example, at 310 K we find a decrease in
k
dependence
in the
e
-ph self-energy from DFMT Green’s function, as
shown by comparing Figs.
3(e)
and
3(g)
. We attribute this
difference to smearing of sharp features in the electronic
structure by the spectral width, which is not captured by the
DFT-based calculation; this effect is more pronounced in the
strongly correlated
d
xy
band. Our results show the importance
of computing the
e
-ph self-energy from the electron spectral
functions in correlated materials to capture the subtle interplay
of
e
-ph and
e
-
e
interactions.
D. Spectral functions
We obtain the spectral function including both
e
-
e
and
e
-ph
interactions using the Green’s function in Eq. (
1
):
A
n
k
(
ω,
T
)
=−
(1
/π
)Im
G
n
k
(
ω,
T
)
.
(7)
To evaluate this expression, our most accurate approximation
consists of first computing the DMFT
e
-
e
self-energy starting
from DFT and then obtaining the
e
-ph self-energy from the
DMFT spectral function. This
e
-ph@
G
DMFT
approach is jus-
tified by the adiabatic approximation: the fast
e
-
e
interactions
renormalize the electronic states and the slow nuclear motions
governing
e
-ph coupling occur in this renormalized ground
state.
Figures
4(a)
and
4(b)
show the electron spectral functions
computed in SRO with this approach and plotted in the
→
M
direction at 77 K and 310 K. The main features are consistent
with photoemission and transport measurements [
38
,
41
,
48
]—
in particular, the spectral functions remain fairly sharp near
the Fermi energy below
∼
100 K, indicating well-defined QP
excitations at low temperature [
6
]. The spectral broadening
increases at higher temperatures, further demonstrating the
importance of computing
e
-ph interactions beyond the band
picture. Figures
4(c)
and
4(d)
compare the spectral func-
tions and their QP peak broadening at a fixed
k
point (
k
=
0
.
75 M) with and without the inclusion of
e
-ph interactions.
We find that the
e
-ph interactions broaden the QP peaks only
slightly, consistent with the overall weak
e
-ph coupling in
SRO. Increasing the temperature, rather than including
e
-ph
interactions, is the main factor responsible for broadening. We
FIG. 4. Electronic spectral functions in the
→
M
direction
computed using the DMFT
e
-
e
plus
e
-ph@
G
DMFT
self-energies at
(a) 77 K and (b) 310 K. (c) Spectral functions at
k
=
0
.
75M showing
DMFT quasiparticle peaks (dashed lines) broadened by the inclusion
of
e
-ph interactions (solid lines) at two temperatures. (d) Calculated
full width at half maximum for the spectral functions in (c), showing
quantitatively the small
e
-ph broadening effect.
find similar trends when analyzing spectral functions in the
→
X
direction [
74
]. These results point to a dominant role
of
e
-
e
interactions in SRO.
E. Transport
We study electrical transport in SRO in the characteristic
bad metallic regime [
34
], focusing on understanding the roles
of
e
-
e
and
e
-ph interactions. We compute the optical conduc-
tivity from our combined DMFT plus
e
-ph spectral function
in Eq. (
7
), using Green-Kubo theory without current-vertex
corrections [
17
]:
σ
αβ
(
ω,
T
)
=
π
̄
he
2
V
uc
∫
d
ω
f
(
ω
,
T
)
−
f
(
ω
+
ω,
T
)
ω
×
∑
nk
v
α
n
k
v
β
n
k
A
n
k
(
ω
,
T
)
A
n
k
(
ω
+
ω,
T
)
,
(8)
where
v
n
k
are band velocities,
α
and
β
are Cartesian direc-
tions, and
V
uc
is the unit cell volume; the dc resistivity tensor
is obtained as
ρ
dc
(
T
)
=
σ
−
1
(
ω
→
0
,
T
). This approximation
has been used (separately) to study
e
-ph limited transport in
oxides and organic crystals [
67
,
69
] and
e
-
e
limited transport
093801-5
DAVID J. ABRAMOVITCH
et al.
PHYSICAL REVIEW MATERIALS
7
, 093801 (2023)
FIG. 5. Transport properties as a function of temperature in SRO. (a) In-plane resistivity, comparing DMFT
+
e
-ph, DMFT-only, and
e
-ph-
only calculations to experimental data from Ref. [
40
]. (b) Same as (a), but plotted as a fraction of the experimental resistivity. (c) Effective
scattering rate and (d) effective plasma frequency. In the legend, DMFT only and
e
-ph only refer to using, respectively, only the DMFT or
e
-ph
self-energies in the Green’s function, spectral function, and Green-Kubo formula.
in correlated metals [
37
,
75
–
77
]; different from these previous
studies, here we focus on combining the
e
-
e
and
e
-ph interac-
tions and studying their interplay.
Figure
5(a)
shows the resistivity in the
xy
plane as a
function of temperature. We compare the resistivity limited
by
e
-
e
interactions alone, computed from the Green’s func-
tion including only the DMFT self-energy, with calculations
including both
e
-
e
and
e
-ph interactions in the Green’s func-
tion. When both interactions are included, we compare results
from the more accurate
e
-ph@
G
DMFT
approach with calcu-
lations using Eq. (
4
) with the best-available band structure
(
e
-ph@DMFT bands method). Experimental values are also
shown for comparison [
40
]. For convenience, Fig.
5(b)
shows
the same results expressed as a fraction of the experimental
resistivity.
The calculation including only DMFT
e
-
e
interactions cor-
rectly predicts the order of magnitude of the experimental
resistivity, providing a resistivity smaller than experiment by
a factor of 2 in the entire temperature range studied here
(50–310 K). This calculation is comparable with results from
Deng
et al.
[
37
], who used a different scheme to construct
the correlated subspace in the DMFT calculation and obtained
somewhat larger values for the
e
-
e
limited resistivity due to
stronger interaction parameters
U
and
J
. In contrast, the re-
sistivity limited by the
e
-ph interactions alone (computed with
the
e
-ph@
G
DMFT
approach) is only
∼
10% of the experimental
value.
When combining
e
-
e
and
e
-ph interactions through the
e
-
ph@
G
DMFT
approach, the resulting resistivity is the sum of the
individual
e
-
e
and
e
-ph limited resistivities, a behavior known
as Matthiessen’s rule [
16
]. Therefore, adding
e
-ph interactions
improves the agreement with experiment and predicts a re-
sistivity equal to
∼
60% of the experimental value between
50 and 310 K. In contrast, using only an improved QP band
dispersion (
e
-ph@DMFT bands) artificially enhances the
e
-
ph interactions, leading to an incorrect prediction that the
e
-ph contribution is 30% of the experimental resistivity [see
Fig.
5(b)
]. Note that our most accurate calculation still under-
estimates the experimental resistivity by
∼
40%. The possible
origin of this “missing resistivity” is discussed below.
To better understand the contributions to the resistivity, we
analyze our transport results using an effective Drude model
[
6
], writing the resistivity as
ρ
dc
=
4
π/
[
τ
∗
tr
(
ω
∗
p
)
2
], where 1
/τ
∗
tr
is an effective scattering rate and
ω
∗
p
is an effective plasma
frequency. We extract these quantities from our computed
optical conductivity
σ
(
ω
)using[
6
]
τ
∗
tr
=−
2
πσ
dc
∫
∞
0
1
ω
∂
Re[
σ
(
ω
)]
∂ω
d
ω
(9)
and
(
ω
∗
p
)
2
=
−
2
π
2
σ
2
dc
∫
∞
0
1
ω
∂
Re[
σ
(
ω
)]
∂ω
d
ω
.
(10)
Figure
5(c)
shows the effective scattering rate 1
/τ
∗
tr
and
Fig.
5(d)
the plasma frequency (
ω
∗
p
)
2
obtained from this
analysis. These results confirm that
e
-
e
interactions dominate
electron scattering and lead to a decreased Fermi velocity (and
thus plasma frequency) by renormalizing the band structure.
The effective
e
-ph scattering rate is significantly smaller (and
the plasma frequency greater) than for
e
-
e
interactions, con-
sistent with the small
e
-ph contribution to the resistivity and
negligible band renormalization (relative to DFT) from
e
-ph
interactions. In addition, most of the temperature dependence
of the resistivity comes from the effective scattering rates,
while the effective plasma frequency depends weakly on tem-
perature.
Figure
5(c)
additionally compares the effective scattering
rates with the Planckian limit
p
=
k
B
T
[
78
]. Interestingly,
the
e
-ph scattering rate is lower than
p
and approaches it near
310 K, whereas the scattering from
e
-
e
interactions exceeds
p
above
∼
100 K, reaching
∼
2
k
B
T
at 310 K. The weaker
e
-ph
scattering in SRO contrasts the cases of insulating oxides such
as SrTiO
3
and CoO [
23
,
67
], where pronounced polaron effects
are present—both materials exhibit polaron satellites, and in
093801-6
COMBINING ELECTRON-PHONON AND DYNAMICAL ...
PHYSICAL REVIEW MATERIALS
7
, 093801 (2023)
SrTiO
3
the effective
e
-ph scattering rate exceeds the Planckian
limit [
67
].
IV. DISCUSSION
Our most accurate transport calculation underestimates the
in-plane resistivity in SRO by
∼
40% relative to experiments.
The origin of this discrepancy deserves a detailed discussion.
First, we verify that our lowest-order (Fan-Migdal) treatment
of
e
-ph interactions is sufficient in SRO by recomputing the
resistivity with an
e
-ph cumulant method that can describe
higher-order
e
-ph interactions and transport in the presence
of polarons [
67
,
69
]. Consistent with the effective screening
of polar phonons in metals, we find that the
e
-ph limited
transport is nearly identical in the lowest-order and cumulant
calculations [
74
].
Second, our Green-Kubo calculations neglect current-
vertex corrections, which typically play a small role in
e
-ph
limited transport in metals. While vertex corrections are dif-
ficult to compute in Green-Kubo theory [
79
,
80
], they can
be quantified in the semiclassical limit using the Boltzmann
transport equation (BTE). In particular, including vertex cor-
rections corresponds to a full solution of the BTE, obtained
here with an iterative approach (ITA) [
65
], while neglecting
vertex corrections is equivalent to the relaxation time approx-
imation (RTA), to which the Green-Kubo formula reduces in
the weak-coupling limit [
67
]. Therefore, we can estimate the
effect of vertex corrections by comparing our
e
-ph limited
resistivity computed with Green-Kubo to BTE calculations
using the ITA and RTA, which respectively include and ne-
glect vertex corrections [
80
]. From low temperature up to
310 K, the ITA resistivity is
∼
20% greater than the RTA
value, while the RTA and Green-Kubo calculations agree to
within 2% at 310 K [
74
]. These results indicate that vertex
corrections have a modest effect on
e
-ph limited transport.
Third, most DMFT studies of transport neglect vertex cor-
rections from
e
-
e
interactions, which is strictly correct only
in the limit of infinite dimensions [
75
]. However, their role
is difficult to quantify and often non-negligible [
81
]. Fourth,
although our DMFT calculations produce band dispersions
in excellent agreement with photoemission data [
48
], DMFT
results can in some cases be sensitive to the method used to
construct the local site [
82
], and neglecting nonlocal interac-
tions may remove relevant
e
-
e
scattering mechanisms which
affect the calculated spectral width. Studying these effects is
an active area of DMFT research and is beyond the scope of
this work.
Finally, recent work has shown that DFPT based on semilo-
cal functionals can lead to underestimated
e
-ph coupling in
correlated materials [
24
,
26
]. Yet much of that work has fo-
cused on materials with nonlocal correlations, so it is difficult
to estimate the size of the effect in SRO, where correlations
are dominantly local [
48
]. It is possible that the
e
-ph coupling
and its role in transport are somewhat stronger than captured
by our DFPT calculations. However, an enhancement of the
e
-ph coupling consistent with those reported to date would
not change our main conclusion that the
e
-ph contribution to
the resistivity is relatively small—for example, assuming the
limit case of a doubling of
e
-ph coupling strength
|
g
|
2
would
still give only an
∼
20%
e
-ph resistivity contribution.
A qualitative comparison between
e
-
e
and
e
-ph interactions
is also interesting. The
k
dependence of the
e
-ph interactions
clearly contrasts the local (
k
-independent)
e
-
e
interactions.
Extending this comparison to other correlated materials may
highlight key differences between materials with dominant
e
-
e
or
e
-ph interactions. We also observe that our
e
-ph@
G
DMFT
self-energy generally has a weaker
k
dependence than pre-
dicted by the
e
-ph@DFT method, suggesting that electron
correlations suppress nonlocal
e
-ph interactions. This effect
may have interesting implications for materials with strong
or long-range
e
-ph interactions, including cuprates and corre-
lated insulators.
Lastly, our development of the
e
-ph@
G
DMFT
method fits
within efforts in computational many-body physics to obtain
accurate components of Feynman diagrams. For
e
-ph inter-
actions, this includes improving the accuracy of the electron
propagator
G
, phonon propagator
D
, and
e
-ph coupling
g
.
When viewed this way, there is a clear analogy with the
use of different levels of theory in the
GW
method, where
the accuracy can be improved by using the “best
G
” and
“best
W
.” In
e
-ph calculations, methods for Hubbard- [
23
]
or DMFT-corrected phonons [
83
,
84
], as well as anharmonic
lattice dynamics [
67
,
85
], address the phonon propagator
D
,
while Hubbard-corrected DFPT [
23
],
GW
perturbation the-
ory (GWPT) [
26
], and DFT
+
DMFT deformation potentials
[
86
] aim to improve the
e
-ph coupling
g
. These effects
can be treated at a suitable level of theory for each ma-
terial; for example, if the lattice is strongly anharmonic,
the phonon propagator can be computed using renormalized
phonon frequencies or one can use a full frequency dependent
phonon propagator analogous to our use of the DMFT Green’s
function.
Our work improves the accuracy of the electron propagator
G
entering the
e
-ph self-energy diagram by dressing it with the
DMFT self-energy to capture dynamical electron correlations.
This provides a scheme where the
e
-ph self-energy is com-
puted from the DMFT spectral functions. Our results highlight
the importance of using the spectral functions to compute
e
-ph
interactions in correlated materials and caution against using
just the best available QP band structure—if the dispersion
is renormalized but the QP weight is not adjusted, the
e
-ph
self-energy becomes inaccurate as we have shown for SRO.
V. CONCLUSION
We demonstrated a method to combine strong dynamical
correlations described by DMFT with first-principles
e
-ph
calculations. This advance enables a quantitative treatment of
both
e
-
e
and
e
-ph interactions and their effect on transport in
correlated materials. Our approach computes
e
-ph interactions
from the DMFT Green’s function, which captures band struc-
ture and spectral weight renormalization from strong electron
correlations. In SRO, where
e
-ph interactions are relatively
weak, we have shown that transport is governed by
e
-
e
inter-
actions, with
e
-ph interactions contributing only
∼
10% of the
experimental resistivity in a wide temperature range.
Our work expands the reach of first principles
e
-ph calcula-
tions to strongly correlated materials by treating the electronic
structure at the level of the spectral function rather than nonin-
teracting bands. Note that our calculations can also use more
093801-7