Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published July 10, 2018 | Published + Submitted
Journal Article Open

Observational implications of lowering the LIGO-Virgo alert threshold


The recent detection of the binary-neutron-star merger associated with GW170817 by both the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) and Virgo and the network of electromagnetic-spectrum observing facilities around the world has made the multi-messenger detection of gravitational-wave (GW) events a reality. These joint detections allow us to probe GW sources in greater detail and provide us with the possibility of confidently establishing events that would not have been detected in GW data alone. In this Letter, we explore the prospects of using the electromagnetic (EM) follow-up of low-significance GW event candidates to increase the sample of confident detections with EM counterparts. We find that the GW-alert threshold change that would roughly double the number of detectable astrophysical events would increase the false-alarm rate (FAR) by more than five orders of magnitude from 1 per 100 years to more than 1000 per year. We find that the localization costs of following up low-significance candidates are marginal, as the same changes to FAR only increase distance/area localizations by less than a factor of 2 and increase volume localization by less than a factor of 4. We argue that EM follow-up thresholds for low-significance candidates should be set on the basis of alert purity (P_(astro)) and not FAR. Ideally, such estimates of P_(astro) would be provided by LIGO-Virgo, but in their absence we provide estimates of the average purity of the GW candidate alerts issued by LIGO-Virgo as a function of FAR for various LIGO-Virgo observing epochs.

Additional Information

© 2018 The American Astronomical Society. Received 2018 March 12; revised 2018 June 22; accepted 2018 June 26; published 2018 July 13. The authors acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation and the LIGO Laboratory. LIGO was constructed by the California Institute of Technology and Massachusetts Institute of Technology with funding from the National Science Foundation and operates under cooperative agreement PHY-0757058. M.C. is supported by the David and Ellen Lee Postdoctoral Fellowship at the California Institute of Technology. We would also like to thank Hsin-Yu Chen, Kwan Yeung Ng, Yiwen Huang, Robert Eisenstein, Satya Mohapatra, Steve Drasco, Peter Shawhan, Alex Nitz, Tito Dal Canton, Christopher Berry, Thomas Dent, Reed Essick, and the LIGO-Virgo EM follow-up working group for useful comments and discussion. C.W.S. is grateful to Harvard University and to the US Department of Energy (through grant DE-SC000788) for their support of this effort. This is LIGO document number P1800042.

Attached Files

Submitted - 1803.02880

Published - Lynch_2018_ApJL_861_L24.pdf


Files (1.3 MB)
Name Size Download all
591.5 kB Download
667.7 kB Preview Download

Additional details

August 19, 2023
August 19, 2023