Published March 1984 | Version Published
Working Paper Open

Moral obligations and social expectations: a humean reduction

Abstract

In this paper I shall argue that an account can be given of the sense of duty without reference to such specifically philosophical notions as "moral law," "moral rule," "moral principle," and "moral intuition." By shifting out of this vocabulary into talk about social roles, role expectations, and role modulations, attention is directed away from an attempt to justify people's moral judgments by demonstrating their consistency with those principles--an attempt that is likely, in view of the immense diversity of these judgments, to be unsuccessful and to have, at best, only an intellectual interest -- and turned in a direction that, more modestly, concentrates on the kind of small-scale theory that helps us understand a little better how moral attitudes, moral judgments and moral changes occur.

Additional Information

I am much indebted to the following friends and colleagues for comments on earlier drafts of this paper: Burton H. Klein, Bruce E. Cain, Edward Green, James McGilvray, Alan Schwartz, Robert M. Stewart, Peter Westen, and Charles Young.

Attached Files

Published - HumsWP-0100.pdf

Files

HumsWP-0100.pdf

Files (1.3 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:9b814e983adf5e43c56bae8086216ece
1.3 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

Eprint ID
17065
Resolver ID
CaltechAUTHORS:20100105-135034898

Dates

Created
2010-01-06
Created from EPrint's datestamp field
Updated
2019-10-03
Created from EPrint's last_modified field

Caltech Custom Metadata

Caltech groups
Humanities Working Papers
Series Name
Humanities Working Paper
Series Volume or Issue Number
100