of 19
Concise Synthesis of Tunicamycin V and Discovery of a
Cytostatic DPAGT1 Inhibitor
Katsuhiko Mitachi
[a]
,
David Mingle
[a]
,
Wendy Effah
[b]
,
Antonio Sánchez-Ruiz
[c]
,
Kirk E.
Hevener
[a]
,
Ramesh Narayanan
[b]
,
William M. Clemons Jr.
[d]
,
Francisco Sarabia
[e]
,
Michio
Kurosu
[a]
[a]
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Tennessee Health
Science Center, 881 Madison Avenue, Memphis, Tennessee 38163, United State
[b]
Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 19 S. Manassas,
Room 120, Memphis, 38103, United State
[c]
Faculty of Pharmacy, Campus de Albacete, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Avda. Dr. José
María Sánchez Ibáñez S/N 02008, Albacete, Spain
[d]
Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, 1200 E.
California Blvd., Pasadena, California 91125, United State
[e]
Department of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences, Universidad de Málaga, Campus de
Teatinos 29071 Málaga, Spain
Abstract
A short total synthesis of tunicamycin V (
1
), a nonselective phosphotransferase inhibitor, is
achieved via a Büchner-Curtius-Schlotterbeck type reaction. Tunicamycin V can be synthesized
in 15 chemical steps from D-galactal with 21% overall yield. The established synthetic
scheme is operationally very simple and flexible to introduce building blocks of interest. The
inhibitory activity of one of the designed analogues
28
against human dolichyl-phosphate
N
-acetylglucosaminephosphotransferase 1 (DPAGT1) shows 12.5-times greater than
1
. While
tunicamycins are cytotoxic molecules with a low selectivity, the novel analogue
28
displays
selective cytostatic activity against breast cancer cell lines including a triple-negative breast cancer.
Graphical Abstract
A Büchner–Curtius–Schlotterbeck-type reaction enabled the total synthesis of tunicamycin V
(TN-V), a nonselective phosphotransferase inhibitor, in just 15 steps from D-galactal in 21%
overall yield. The short and high-yielding synthetic route was also adapted for the synthesis of
mkurosu@uthsc.edu .
Supporting information for this article is given via a link at the end of the document.
HHS Public Access
Author manuscript
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 August 01.
Published in final edited form as:
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl
. 2022 August 01; 61(31): e202203225. doi:10.1002/anie.202203225.
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
analogues, thus leading to the discovery of a novel cytostatic tunicamycin analogue, TN-TMPA,
with high DPAGT1 selectivity.
Keywords
Tunicamycins; Total synthesis; DPAGT1 inhibitors; Antimigration effect; Cytostatic activity
Introduction
The tunicamycins inhibit dolichyl-phosphate
N
-acetylglucosamine-phosphotransferase 1
(DPAGT1), which is the integral membrane enzyme responsible for the committed step
of
N
-linked glycosylation.
[
1
]
Since their discovery in 1971,
[
2
]
tunicamycins have been
broadly applied in research of
N
-linked glycosylation and protein misfolding fields.
The tunicamycins inhibit 1)
N
-linked glycosylation of cancer cells at relatively low
concentrations, resulting in ER stress-mediated apoptosis, and 2) growth of a wide
range of mammalian cell lines in a nonselective fashion with narrow therapeutic index.
[
3
]
Due to their low selectivity against DPAGT1, the tunicamycins have remained as a
research tool.
[
4
]
To advance tunicamycins into clinically useful drugs, their promiscuous
cytotoxicities need to be attenuated to be selective cytotoxic or cytostatic agents. The general
structure of tunicamycins is less complicated than the other nucleoside antibiotics (
e.g
.,
muraymycin, caprazamycin, and mureidomycin). Thus, tunicamycin is the potential scaffold
for identifying selective DPAGT1 inhibitors that can be synthesized without sophisticated
synthetic protocols.
[
5
]
Total synthesis of the tunicamycins has received much attention in
the context of development of the unique synthetic strategy.
[
6
]
To date, only four groups
have reported the total synthesis of tunicamycin V (Suami et al. 1984,
[
6a
]
Myers et al.
1994,
[
6k
]
Li et al. 2015,
[
6r
]
and Yamamoto et al. 2018
[
6s
]
). Each synthesis is unique in the
C-C bond connection at the C5’-position. However, their syntheses require 21–35 chemical
steps with 0.037–3.5% overall yields in the longest linear sequences. Considering the facts
that 1) selective deacylation of tunicamycins to modify the disaccharide core structure is an
extremely low yielding approach
[
7
]
and 2) an efficient purification method of tunicamycins
from a
Streptomyces lysosuperficus
culture medium has not yet been established,
[
8
]
we have
developed a practical synthetic route to tunicamycin V via a Büchner-Curtius-Schlotterbeck
type reaction (Figure 1).
[
9
]
The proposed synthetic route enables to synthesize the designed
analogues in a systematic manner with fewer number of chemical steps. A structure-based
design using a co-crystal structure with tunicamycin V is applied to discover a selective
DPAGT1 inhibitor.
[
7
,
10
]
Here, we report a concise total synthesis of tunicamycin V and the
discovery of a cytostatic selective DPAGT1 inhibitor of anti-cancer tunicamycin analogue.
Results and Discussion
Büchner-Curtius-Schlotterbeck (BCS) reaction has been used to synthesize
β
-keto esters
from the condensation between aldehydes and diazo esters.
[
11
]
Simple diazoalkanes (non-
stabilized diazo compounds) have also been applied to react with aldehydes and ketones
in carbon-chain elongation reactions.
[
12
]
However, prediction of the ratio of the reaction
products (
e.g
., carbonyls and epoxides) including 1,2-rearrangement remains difficult in
Mitachi et al.
Page 2
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 August 01.
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
application for complex molecules.
[
13
]
Synthetic studies towards the tunicamycins using the
diazo chemistry have been explored by Sarabia et al.
[6o-q]
Accordingly, if the diazoalkyl-
disaccharide
3
is stable in solution and reacts with aldehyde
4
, producing ketone
2
exclusively through a 1,2-hydride shift, an unprecedently-short chemical synthesis of the
tunicamycins will be achieved (Figure 1). In addition, theoretical studies to obtain insights
into the prediction and rationale of the BCS products have not been reported. Therefore,
we reinvestigated the stereochemical course of a model diazo coupling between
9
and
10
(Scheme 1) which may represent a useful model study for
3
and
4
in Figure 1. The
unstablized diazo intermediate
9
was generated in situ from the
N
-nitrosoacetamido
8
with
40% KOH (20 equiv) in a mixture of Et
2
O and MeOH (10/1) and into the reaction mixture
the aldehyde
10
was added. Careful analysis of the isolated product(s) revealed that this
model BCS reaction afforded exclusively the desired ketone
11
, without generation of
cis
-
or
trans
-epoxides (
12
or
13
). Conformational analysis of the aldehyde
10
was performed
to obtain insight into the observed stereochemical course (Figure 2). The result of the
theoretical calculation of
10
suggested that there is one preferred conformation with the
minimum energy (conformer
A
) as depicted in Figure 2 (see Supporting Information).
According to the Felkin-Ahn model,
[
14
]
the electronegative atom adopts a 90° angle relative
to the carbonyl group. The energy barriers for the interconversion between the minimum
energy conformer (
A
) and the two possible Felkin-Ahn conformers (
FA-1
and
FA-2
) were
calculated. We determined that the rotational barriers between
FA-1
or
FA-2
and
A
have
5.03 or 7.57 Kcal/mol. Such an insignificant difference between these two energy levels
allows free rotation around the C(1)-C(2) bond of the aldehyde
10
. The
FA-2
conformer has
lower steric demand in nucleophilic attacks than the conformer
FA-1
, leading to addition of
9
from the less hindered face of the aldehyde
10
as per the trajectory illustrated for
FA-2
in
Figure 2. The experimental results may support that the
FA-2
conformer is the predominant
specie in this model BCS reaction.
The reaction in Scheme 1 will proceed through the transition state [
A’
]
ǂ
where the
re
-face
of the nucleophilic diazo carbon of
9
approaches the
re
-face of the carbonyl group of
10
to deliver the
pro
-5’
R
,6’
S
zwitterionic intermediate
A’
. BCS reactions are believed
to proceed via a two-step mechanism instead of a [2+2] cycloaddition-type reaction.
[
15
]
Furthermore, it is widely accepted that, in 1,2-addition reactions to carbonyls with ylids,
the zwitterionic moieties on adjacent atoms are oriented in an eclipsed conformation (
cisoid
arrangement).
[
16
]
According to this scenario, the kinetically favored intermediate
A’
has an
antiperiplanar arrangement to minimize van der Waals repulsions and smoothly undergoes
the 1,2-hydride shift to form the C5’-ketone
11
. In contrast, the epoxide formation requires
a high-energy conformer [
A”
], whose alkoxy and diazonium groups are oriented in an
antiperiplanar arrangement and where the bulkiest substituents are in a synclinal disposition.
Indeed, the (5’
R
, 6’
S
)-
cis
-epoxide
12b
was not isolated in the reaction examined in Scheme
1. On the other hand, the formation of the
trans
-epoxides, such as
13b
, requires the
si-re
approach of the diazo specie and aldehyde through the intermediate [
B”
]. However, the
kinetically controlled (initial) transition state [
B’
]
ǂ
could have a very high potential energy.
Thus, its formation is disfavored. If the R
1
and R
2
groups do not have stereochemical
disadvantage in the transition state [
B’
]
ǂ
, a lower energy conformer [
B”
] with
pro
-5’
R
, 6’
R
configuration would lead the epoxide. This pathway represents the general mechanism of
Mitachi et al.
Page 3
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 August 01.
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
epoxide formations in BCS reactions with simple substrates.
[
17
]
In Scheme 1, the epoxides
13
were not isolated, indicating that BCS reaction between
9
and
10
provides the kinetic
intermediate
A’
exclusively.
To achieve an efficient convergent synthesis, it is essential to establish BCS reaction
with diazoalkyl-disaccharide
3
(
20
2
in Scheme 2); complex diazonium species of
disaccharides have not previously been applied in carbonyl addition reactions.
[
17
]
Moreover,
the following chemical transformations are required to investigate: 1) selective 11’-
β
-”-
α
-trehalose-type linkage with a convenient thioglycoside (
e.g
.,
6
), 2) selective mono
N
-nitrosylation of the diacetamide (
19
20
), 3) stereoselective reduction of the C5’-
carbonyl (
2
21
), and 4) acid-catalyzed deprotections without cleavage of the 11’-
β
-1”-
α
-glycoside linkage. We have an extensive knowledge of mild acid-cleavable protecting
groups of the uridine ureido nitrogen.
[
5a
,
18
]
The proposed protecting group strategy
illustrated in Figure 1, 4,4’-(bisfluorophenyl)methoxymethyl (BFPM) was selected as this
group displays an excellent relative stability in chemical transformations for advancing
nucleosides, but can be cleaved with 80% AcOH.
[
19
]
An optimized synthetic route for the
tunicamycin core structure
21
is illustrated in Scheme 2. The dinitrobenzenesulfonamide
derivative
14
was synthesized from D-galactal (
7
) in three steps including tosylation,
acetonide formation and 2,4-dinitrobenzenesulfonamide formation in 70% overall yield.
Azidonitration of the galactal derivative
14
was performed with excess ceric ammonium
nitrate and sodium azide in acetonitrile at −20
°
C, producing an
α
,
β
-mixture of 2-azide-2-
deoxy-D-galactosamine derivative
15
in 75% yield.
[
20
]
The anomeric nitrate ester and
azide groups of
15
was hydrolyzed with NH
2
NH
2
•AcOH and hydrogenated with 10%
Pd-C to furnish the 2-amino-2-deoxy-D-galactosamine intermediate, whose free-amine was
protected as the corresponding phthalimide by use of the phthaloylating agent, ethyl 1,3-
dioxoisoindoline-2-carboxylate.
[
21
]
Overall, the glycosyl acceptor
5
was synthesized in 7
steps from D-galactal in 45% yield. The glycosyl donor
6
was synthesized by acetylation
of azido-tolylthioglycoside
17
, which was converted from D-glucosamine (
16
) in 5 steps
according to the reported procedures (Supporting Information).
[
22
]
Thioglycosides have
several advantages over other types of glycosyl donors in context from stability for storage
and easy synthesis.
[
23
]
However, their applications to the synthesis of 11’-
β
-1”-
α
-glycoside
linkage have not been reported. The thioglycoside
6
(2 equiv) could be activated with NIS
in the presence of either TfOH, BF
3
•OEt
2
, or AgOTf and reacted with
5
. However, the
α
/
β
-
selectivity was 1/1–5/1.
[6k,6s]
A combination of NIS and AgBF
4
in CH
2
Cl
2
at 0
°
C furnished
the desired 11’-
β
-1”-
α
-glycoside
18
in 85% yield with over 15/1
α
/
β
-selectivity.
[
24
]
The
isolation yield of
18
was improved (from 85% to 92% yield) by increasing the amount of the
donor
6
(3 equiv). The stereochemistry of the 11’-
β
-1”-
α
-glycoside linkage was determined
by the coupling constants for H1”: 4.70 (
d
,
J
= 5.6 Hz) and H11’: 5.35 (
d
,
J
=8.9 Hz) in
1
H-NMR. The stereochemistries of the synthetic intermediates generated in Scheme 2 were
unequivocally determined by comparison of physical data of the synthetic TN-V (
1
) with
those of natural tunicamycin V. Reduction of the azide group and cleavage of the DNs group
of
18
, followed by acetylations were simultaneously conducted with AcSH in pyridine,
yielding the diacetamide
19
in 90%.
1
H-NMR analysis of
19
revealed that the chemical
shift of C6’-NAc (2.11 ppm) is separated from that of C2”-NAc (1.95 ppm); this difference
indicates that the C6’-acetamide nitrogen is less nucleophilic than the other acetamide
Mitachi et al.
Page 4
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 August 01.
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
nitrogen. Interestingly, nitrosylation of
19
with NaNO
2
-Ac
2
O in AcOH at 0
°
C provided
the mono-
N
-nitrosoacetamide
20
in 91% yield. The structure of
20
was confirmed by the
downfield shift of C6’-NAc (C6’-N(NO)Ac: 2.83 ppm) in
1
H-NMR and LC-MS analysis
(+NO). The observed selectivity could be attributable to a steric reason; the less hindered
C6’-NAc nitrogen was nitrosylated under a kinetically controlled condition. Gratifyingly,
diazomethyl-disaccharide
3
generated from
20
with 40% KOH in Et
2
O/MeOH could be
extracted with Et
2
O and was stable in solution for over 6 h. Removal of excess KOH was
essential to attain a high-yielding coupling reaction with the base-labile
4
. BCS reaction
between
3
and
4
provided the desired ketone
2
in 90% yield from
20
. As demonstrated
in Scheme 1, formation of the potential by-products, the corresponding epoxides, were not
observed. Similar to the studies in Figure 2, the stereochemical outcome of BCS reaction
between
3
and
4
is illustrated in the Supporting Information.
In order to generate the desired 5’
R
-alcohol
21
, several reducing agents were examined
(Table 1). NaBH
4
reduction of
2
in MeOH provided a 2.5/1 ratio of 5’
R
- and 5’
S
-alcohols
(
21
and
22
). Reduction under Luche’s condition (NaBH
4
, CeCl
3
•7H
2
O)
[
25
]
improved
the isolation yield but the 5’
R
/5’
S
selectivity was not much increased. Reduction of
2
with Zn(BH
4
)
2
in Et
2
O changed the stereochemical course; the 5’
R
/5’
S
selectivity was
1/5.
[
26
]
In our attempt to isolate only the desired
21
, two chiral reducing agents (
B
-Me
CBS and RuCl[Ts-DPEN] (
p
-cymene)) were explored. (
S
)-
B
-Me-CBS-catalyzed BH
3
•SMe
2
reduction
[
27
]
of
2
at −20
°
C furnished the desired
21
in 96% yield. Alternatively, (
R
)-
B
-
Me-CBS-BH
3
•SMe
2
reduction provided
22
in 95% yield. Asymmetric Meerwein-Ponndorf-
Verley reduction of
2
with RuCl[(
R,R
)-Ts-DPEN] (
p
-cymene)
[
28
]
in
i
PrOH-HCO
2
H-Et
3
N
at rt furnished
21
exclusively in quantitative yield. The same reduction with RuCl[(
S,S
)-Ts-
DPEN](
p
-cymene) gave
22
without contamination of
21
. Due to the operational convenience
of conducting the reaction at room temperature, enough
21
and
22
towards tunicamycin
V and its 5’
S
-diastereomer were synthesized separately with the chiral RuCl[Ts-DPEN](
p
-
cymene).
Introduction of the fatty acid and global deprotections towards tunicamycin V (TN-V,
1
) are
illustrated in Scheme 3. The C10’-phthaloyl group and C3”-OAc of
21
were simultaneously
removed by ethylenediamine in EtOH, yielding the amino-alcohol
23
in 91% yield. Amide-
formation of
23
with (
E
)-13-methyltetradec-2-enoic acid (
24
) was performed using EDCI,
NMM, and NHS in DMF to provide
25
in 87% yield. The ketals and BFPM group of
25
were deprotected with 80% AcOH at 60
°
C; these conditions do not affect the 11’-
β
-1”-
α
-glycosidic bond, furnishing
1
in 89% yield after reverse-phase HPLC purification.
1
H- and
13
C-NMRs and [
α
]
D
data for
1
showed good agreement with those for natural
tunicamycin V. To understand influence of the stereochemistry of the C5’-position in
DPAGT1 enzyme and cytotoxic effects, TN-5’
S
epimer
26
was synthesized from
22
.
[6k]
We performed docking studies using the human DPAGT1 with bound tunicamycin (PDB:
6BW6) (Supporting Information, Table S1).
[
10
,
29
]
The tunicamycins and related congeners
have poor water-solubility that hamper the drug formulation for biological studies
in vivo
.
We have demonstrated that ((((trifluoromethoxy)phenoxy)piperidin-1-yl)phenyl)methoxy
methyl or its related group (
27
in Scheme 3) is a water-soluble hydrophobic mimetic
that binds to the putative hydrophobic tunnel created by the transmembrane segments of
Mitachi et al.
Page 5
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 August 01.
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
DPAGT1.
[
4
]
One of good docking scored molecules (Glide score: −15.85)
[29c]
corresponded
to TN-TMPA (
28
), which was synthesized from
23
by the same procedure for
1
with the
glycolyl ether
27
(Scheme 3).
In reference to the natural tunicamycin V, TN-V (
1
), TN-5’S (
26
), and TN-TMPA (
28
)
synthesized in Scheme 3 were evaluated in enzyme inhibitory assays against bacterial
phosphotransferases, MraY and WecA, and archaeal and human dolichyl-phosphate
GlcNAc-1-phosphotransferases, AglH and DPAGT1 (Table 2).
[
30
]
Synthetic TN-V (
1
)
displayed equal phosphotransferase inhibitory activity compared to a natural sample of
TN-V. The 5’
S
-epimer of TN-V did not show any phosphotransferase inhibitory activity
even at 50 μM concentration (Table 2). Water-solubility of TN-TMPA (
28
) was significantly
improved to 12.5 mg/mL (for neutral form) and 35.0 mg/mL (for HCl salt), whereas TN-V
has a poor solubility of <0.2 mg/mL (water).
[
31
]
Thus, TN-TMPA could conveniently be
formulated with saline. TN-TMPA did not bind to bacterial phosphotransferases, MraY
and WecA, but increased more than 10-times the DPAGT1 and AglH inhibitory activity
compared to those of TN-V. The selectivity observed in the enzyme inhibitory assays
were correlated with the antibacterial activity;
26
and
28
did not inhibit growth of
TN-V susceptible strains [
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
(H37Rv, MIC 6.3 μg/mL (for TN-
V)),
Mycobacterium smegmatis
(ATCC607, MIC 6.3 μg/mL ),
Streptococcus salivarius
(ATCC7752, MIC 25.0 μg/mL), and
Bacillus cereus
(ATCC1479, MIC 0.4 μg/mL) even
at 50.0 μg/mL (Supporting Information). TN-V displays rapid cytotoxic activity against
healthy (normal) and cancer cell lines at IC
50
between 0.5–2.5 μM within 24 h.
[4a]
In
this article, we evaluated cell viability of tunicamycin analogues against normal kidney
and breast cells (Vero and MCF10A) and breast cancer cell lines (MCF7, SKBR3, and
MDA-MB-231 (an established model of triple-negative breast cancer)). TN-V showed
cytotoxic activity against all breast cancer cell lines with the selectivity index of 1.2–1.8
(IC
50
MCF10A / IC
50
cancer cells). All cells lost their viability at 2 × IC
50
concentrations
(TN-V) in 24 h. TN-5’
S
(
26
) exhibited neither antibacterial (Supporting Information, Table
S3) nor cytotoxic activities at the concentrations examined in Table 3. TN-TMPA (
28
) did
not show cytotoxic effect against all (normal and cancer) cell lines in Table 3. However,
28
exhibited “cytostatic” effect only against the cancer cell lines; growth of the monolayers of
these cancer cells were suppressed at 1.25–4.50 μM concentrations.
TN-TMPA induced early apoptosis in MDA-MB-231 in 24 h determined by image-based
cell death assays (Figure 3) and the flow cytometry experiment (Supporting Information).
Image-based assays using fluorescent dye-stains (deep red anthraquinone 5 (DRAQ5):
a DNA dye, 10-nonyl acridine orange (NAO): a cardiolipin binder in mitochondria,
annexin V-FITC: a selective phosphatidylserine binding protein in plasma membrane to
identify apoptotic cells) revealed that treatment of
28
changed the lipid components of
the mitochondrial inner membrane and plasma membrane.
[
32
]
Although a majority of MDA-
MB-231 cells retained their viability at 48 h post-treatment (determined by MTT), the cells
treated with
28
showed significant difference in staining with NAO (a1 Vs. a4 in Figure 3A)
and were stained positively for annexin V-FITC (a2 Vs.a5 in Figure 3). The monolayer of
the untreated cells formed a multiple-layered structure in 120 h (a3). The
28
-treated cells
remained as a monolayer with negative to the NAO-staining (a6); the cells in a6 (Figure
Mitachi et al.
Page 6
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 August 01.
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
3A) completely lost their viability in the MTT assay. In an endpoint migration assays via
Boyden chambers,
[
33
]
the cell migrations of MDA-MB-231 treated with
28
were inhibited in
a concentration dependent manner; less than 50% of the migrated cells were counted even
at 0.2 μM (~IC
50
against DPAGT1) of
28
. At 3.5 and 10.0 μM concentrations, compared
to the control 82% and 96% of the cell migrations were supressed (Figure 3B). Thus, a
non-cytotoxic antimetastatic tunicamycin analogue was identified for the first time.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we established a short synthetic scheme for tunicamycin V and its congeners.
It could be achieved by exploring a highly efficient Büchner-Curtius-Schlotterbeck (BCS)
reaction that enables to couple between the complex disaccharide and uridine segments
in a wet solvent. In our convergent synthesis, no protecting group exchange process
(deprotection followed by reprotection) is required. Through this synthetic study, several
unprecedented selectivities were observed in scheme 2; 1) nitrosylation took place only
at the C6’-NHAc nitrogen, and 2) the 11’-
β
-1”-
α
-glycoside linkage of the disaccharide
could be constructed in high yield with >15:1 selectivity with a convenient thioglycoside.
The BFPM group introduced for the uridine ureido nitrogen could be deprotected with
under mild acidic conditions (80% AcOH) in which all protecting groups were cleaved
simultaneously at the last step. The tunicamycin V synthesis summarized here demonstrated
a 15-chemical step synthesis in the longest linear sequence with 21% overall yield from
D-galactal. The synthetic flexibility was demonstrated by synthesizing the TN-V epimer,
TN-5’
S
(
26
) and a designed analogue TN-TMPA (
28
) via
in-silico
method. The bioassays of
these analogues in reference to the synthetic TN-V revealed that the C5’-stereochemistry
has to be the natural configuration of
R
to display the phosphotransferase inhibitory
activity (Table 2). Replacing the C15-fatty acid with a water-soluble fatty acid mimetic,
((((trifluoromethoxy)phenoxy)piperidin-1-yl)phenyl)methoxy methyl (TMPA) group in TN-
V led to the loss of its bacterial phosphotransferase (MraY and WecA) inhibitory activity,
but
28
improved 12- and 52-fold increase in human DPAGT1 and archaeal AglH inhibitory
activity. It was demonstrated that
28
does not possess the cytotoxic effect observed for TN-
V, but has selective cytostatic activity against the breast cancer cells over the normal cells.
Tunicamycin V treated MDA-MB-231 cells are arrested in the cell cycle at G
0
/G
1
, whereas,
TN-TMPA induces G
2
arrests (Supporting Information, Figure S13). These differences
in cell cycle arrests by tunicamycins and our DPAGT1 inhibitors have been observed in
pancreatic cancer cell lines.
[4a]
The DPAGT1 inhibitor
28
serves as a strong antimetastatic
agent that induces apoptosis in a triple-negative breast cancer (MDA-MB-231) cell line.
TN-TMPA is a cell-permeable molecule, which was demonstrated in Figure 3B; the
antimigration activity was observed at the IC
50
(DPAGT1 enzyme) concentration level.
These data could imply that TN-V’s rapid cytotoxic activity is not due to its DPAGT1
inhibitory activity. We are currently performing a structure-based design and synthesis
to improve the lead
28
to be a low nM DPAGT1 inhibitor. A short chemical synthesis
of TN-V and its analogues summarized in scheme 2 and 3 enables us to perform SAR
studies. We have reported that DPAGT1 crosstalks to Snail (a transcription factor that
promotes the repression of the adhesion molecule E-cadherin) in intracellular signaling of
pancreatic cancers.
[4a]
Triple-negative breast cancers are among the most aggressive and
Mitachi et al.
Page 7
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 August 01.
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
potentially metastatic malignancies. MDA-MB-231 cells are known to reduce the E-cadherin
expression level and increase mesenchymal markers, providing the cell’s mobility and
invasive characteristics.
[
34
]
Thus, we are very interested in understanding the molecular
mechanisms of antimetastatic effect of DPAGT1 inhibitors in MDA-MB-231 cells. We will
report SAR and comparative glycoproteomic data to understand antimetastatic activity of
a cytostatic DPAGT1 inhibitor of tunicamycin analogue in triple-negative breast cancers
elsewhere.
Supplementary Material
Refer to Web version on PubMed Central for supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
Research reported in this publication was partially supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences
of the National Institutes of Health under award number R01GM114611. M.K. thanks UTRF (University of
Tennessee Health Science Center) for generous financial support (Innovation award R079700292). F. S. thanks
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (Spain) for financial support (RTI2018-098296-B-I00). R.N.
thanks NCI for financial support (R01 CA229164). NMR data were obtained on instruments supported by the
NIH Shared Instrumentation Grant. M.K. would like to thank Dr. Michael McNeil (Colorado State University) for
providing
E. coli
B21 WecA strain. The authors gratefully acknowledge Drs. Seok-Yong Lee (Duke) and Gustavo
Miranda-Carboni (University of Tennessee Health Science Center) for providing purified DPAGT1 and the breast
cancer cell lines, respectively.
References
[1]. a)Kurosu M, Future Med. Chem 2019, 11, 927–933; [PubMed: 30907628] b)Kurosu M, J. Mol.
Pharm. Org. Process Res 2018, 6, 1.
[2]. a)Takatsuki A, Arima K, Tamura G, J. Antibiot 1971, 24, 215–223;b)Takatsuki A, Tamura G, J.
Antibiot 1971, 24, 224–231;c)Takatsuki A, Tamura G, J. Antibiot 1971, 24, 232–238;d)Takatsuki
A, Tamura G, J. Antibiot 1971, 24, 785–794;e)Ito T, Takatsuki A, Kawamura K, Sato K, Tamura
G, Agric. Biol. Chem 1980, 44, 695–698;f)Kamogashira T, Takegawa S, Sugiura K, Agric. Biol.
Chem 1988, 52, 859–861.
[3]. a)Huang S, Wang D, Zhang S, Huang X, Wang D, Ijaz M, Shi Y, Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol
2017, 80, 685–696; [PubMed: 28779263] b)Banerjee A, Martinez JA, Longas MO, Zhang
Z, Santiago J, Baksi K, Banerjee DK, Adv. Exp. Med. Biol 2015, 842, 355–374; [PubMed:
25408354] c)Nami B, Donmez H, Kocak N, Exp. Toxicol. Pathol 2016, 68, 419–426; [PubMed:
27350212] d)Hou H, Sun H, Lu P, Ge C, Zhang L, Li H, Zhao F, Tian H, Zhang L, Chen T,
Yao M, Li J, Mol. Cancer Ther 2013, 12, 2874–2884; [PubMed: 24130050] e)Price NP, Hartman
TM, Li J, Velpula KK, Naumann TA, Guda MR, Yu B, Bischoff KM, J. Antibiot 2017, 70,
1070–1077;f)Morin MJ, Bernacki RJ, Cancer Res 1983, 43, 1669–1674; [PubMed: 6339042]
g)Lim EJ, Heo J, Kim YH, Apoptosis 2015, 20, 1087–1098. [PubMed: 26022098]
[4]. a)Mitachi K, Kansal RG, Hevener KE, Gillman CD, Hussain SM, Yun HG, Miranda-Carboni
GA, Glazer ES, Clemons WM Jr, Kurosu M, J. Med. Chem 2020, 63. 10855–10878; [PubMed:
32886511] b)Elbein AD, Trends Biochem. Sci 1981, 6, 219–221.
[5]. a)Mitachi K, Aleiwi BA, Schneider CM, Siricilla S, Kurosu M, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2016, 138,
12975–12980; [PubMed: 27617631] b)Mitachi K, Kurosu SM, Eslamimehr S, Lemieux MR,
Ishizaki Y, Clemons WM Jr, Kurosu M, Org. Lett 2019, 21, 876–879. [PubMed: 30698984]
[6]. a)Suami T, Sasai H, Matsuno K, Chem. Lett 1983, 12, 819–822;b)Suami T, Sasai H, Matsuno
K, Suzuki N, Fukuda Y, Sakanaka O, Tetrahedron Lett 1984, 25, 4533–4536;c)Suami T, Sasai
H, Matsuno K, Suzuki N, Carbohydr. Res 1985, 143, 85–96;d)Danishefsky SJ, Barbachyn M,
J. Am. Chem. Soc 1985, 107, 7761–7762;e)Sasai H, Matsuno K, Suami T, J. Carbohydr. Chem
1985, 4, 99–112;f)Suami T, Bioact. Mol 1986, 1, 265–276;g)Danishefsky SJ, DeNinno SL, Chen
SH, Boisvert L, Barbachyn M, J. Am. Chem. Soc 1989, 111, 5810–5818;h)Myers AG, Gin DY,
Mitachi et al.
Page 8
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 August 01.
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Widdowson KL, J. Am. Chem. Soc 1991, 113, 9661–9663;i)Ramza J, Zamojski A, Tetrahedron
1992, 48, 6123–6134;j)Myers AG, Gin DY, Rogers DH, J. Am. Chem. Soc 1993, 115, 2036–
2038;k)Myers AG, Gin DY, Rogers DH, J. Am. Chem. Soc 1994, 116, 4697–4718;l)Karpiesiuk
W, Banaszek A, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett 1994, 4, 879–882;m)Karpiesiuk W, Banaszek A,
Carbohydr. Res 1994, 261, 243–253; [PubMed: 7954514] n)Zamojski A, Banaszek A, Wiadom.
Chemi 1995, 49, 683–702;o)Sarabia-García F, López-Herrera FJ, González MSP, Tetrahedron
1995, 51, 5491–5500;p)Sarabia-García F, López-Herrera FJ, Tetrahedron 1996, 52, 4757–
4768;q)Sarabia F, Martín-Ortiz L, López-Herrera FJ, Org. Biomol. Chem 2003, 1, 3716–3725;
[PubMed: 14649903] r)Li J, Yu B, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2015, 54, 6618–6621;s)Yamamoto
K, Yakushiji F, Matsumuru T, Ichikawa S, Org. Lett 2018, 20, 256–259; [PubMed: 29256622]
t)Karpiesiuk W, Banaszek A, Carbohydr. Res 1997, 299, 245–252. [PubMed: 9175272]
[7]. Dong YY, Wang H, Pike ACW, Cochrane SA, Hamedzadeh S, Wyszyński FJ, Bushell SR, Royer
SF, Widdick DA, Sajid A, Boshoff HI, Park Y, Lucas R, Liu WM, Lee SS, Machida T, Minall
L, Mehmood S, Belaya K, Liu WW, Chu A, Shrestha L, Mukhopadhyay SMM, Strain-Damerell
C, Chalk R, Burgess-Brown NA, Bibb MJ, Barry Iii CE, Robinson CV, Beeson D, Davis BG,
Carpenter EP, Cell 2018, 175, 1045–1058. [PubMed: 30388443]
[8]. Hayakawa M, Kajiura T, Nonomura H, J. Ferment. Bioeng 1991, 72, 327–333.
[9]. a)Buchner E, Curtius T, Chem. Ber 1885, 18, 2371–2377;b)Schlotterbeck F: Chem. Ber 1907, 40,
1826–1827.
[10]. Yoo J, Mashalidis EH, Kuk ACY, Yamamoto K, Kaeser B, Ichikawa S, Lee SY, Nat. Struct. Mol.
Biol 2018, 25, 217–224. [PubMed: 29459785]
[11]. Ford A, Miel H, Ring A, Slattery CN, Maguire AR, McKervey MA, Chem. Rev 2015, 115,
9981–10080. [PubMed: 26284754]
[12]. Candeias NR, Paterna R, Gois PMP, Chem. Rev 2016, 116, 2937–2981. [PubMed: 26854865]
[13]. Hagen S, Anthonsen T, Kilaas L, Tetrahedron 1979, 35, 2583–2589.
[14]. a)Chérest M, Felkin H, Prudent N, Tetrahedron Lett. 1968, 9, 2199–2204;b)Ahn NT, Eisenstein
O, Tetrahedron Lett. 1976, 17, 155–158.
[15]. Aggarwal VK, Charmant JPH, Fuentes D, Harvey JN, Hynd G, Ohara D, Picoul W, Robiette R,
Smith C, Vasse JL, Winn CL, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2006, 128, 2105–2114. [PubMed: 16464113]
[16]. Aggarwal VK, Harvey JN, Richardson J, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2002, 124, 5747–5756. [PubMed:
12010049]
[17]. Büchner-Curtius-Schlotterbeck (BCS) reaction of the
β
-methyl 2,3-O-isopropylidene-
β
-D-ribo-
pentonodialdo-1,4-furanoside provided a 1 : 1 mixture of the ketone and epoxide. Its selectivity
outcome is summarised in the Supporting Information.Few examples are found in the literature
about the synthesis and applications of unstabilized diazo compounds in the context of
the carbohydrates: a)Farkaš J, Šorm F, Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun 1972, 37, 2798–
2803;b)Alexander MS, Horton D, Carbohydr. Res 2007, 342, 31–43; [PubMed: 17125754]
c)Buda S, Crich D, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2016, 138, 1084–1092. [PubMed: 26731511]
[18]. Wang Y, Kurosu M, Tetrahedron 2012, 68, 4797–4804. [PubMed: 22711936]
[19]. Mitachi K, Mingle D, Kurosu M, Synthesis 2021, 53, 2643–2650. [PubMed: 35431351]
[20]. a)Lemieux RU, Ratcliffe RM, Can. J. Chem 1979, 57, 1244–1251;b)Seeberger PH, Roehrig S,
Schell P, Wang Y, Christ WJ, Carbohydr. Res 2000, 328, 61–69. [PubMed: 11005576]
[21]. McArthur CR, Worster PM, Okon AU, Synth. Commun 1983, 13, 311–318.
[22]. a)Yan RB, Yang F, Wu Y, Zhang LH, Ye XS, Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 8993–8995;b)Singh
L, Lam A, Premraj R, Seifert J, Tetrahedron Lett. 2008, 49, 4854–4856;c)Glibstrup E, Pedersen
CM. Org Lett. 2016. 18, 4424–4427. [PubMed: 27552399]
[23]. a)Fügedi P, Garegg PJ, Lönn H, Norberg T, Glycoconj. J 1987, 4, 97–108;b)Garegg PJ, Adv.
Carbohydr. Chem. Biochem 1997, 52, 179–205; [PubMed: 9218334] c)Codée JDC, Litjens
REJN, van den Bos LJ, Overkleeft HS, van der Marel GA, Chem. Soc. Rev 2005, 34, 769–782.
[PubMed: 16100617]
[24]. Kurosu M, Li K, Crick DC, Org. Lett 2009, 11, 2393–2396. [PubMed: 19405507]
[25]. Gemal AL, Luche JL, J. Am. Chem. Soc 1981, 103, 5454–5459.
[26]. Kurosu M, Marcin LR, Grinsteiner TJ, Kishi Y, J. Am. Chem. Soc 1998, 120, 6627–6628.
Mitachi et al.
Page 9
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 August 01.
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
[27]. a)Corey EJ, Bakshi RK, Shibata S, J. Am. Chem. Soc 1987, 109, 5551–5553;b)Kurosu M, Kishi
Y, J. Org. Chem 1998, 63, 6100–6101. [PubMed: 11672234]
[28]. a)Hashiguchi S, Fujii A, Takehara J, Ikariya T, Noyori R, J. Am. Chem. Soc 1995, 117, 7562–
7563;b)Fujii A, Hashiguchi S, Uematsu N, Ikariya T, Noyori R, J. Am. Chem. Soc 1996, 118,
2521–2522.
[29]. a)Schrödinger Release 2021–4: Glide, Schrödinger, LLC, New York, NY, 2021;b)Friesner RA,
Murphy RB, Repasky MP, Frye LL, Greenwood JR, Halgren TA, Sanschagrin PC, Mainz DT,
J. Med. Chem 2006, 49, 6177–6196; [PubMed: 17034125] c)Halgren TA, Murphy RB, Friesner
RA, Beard HS, Frye LL, Pollard WT, Banks JL, J. Med. Chem 2004, 47, 1750–1759; [PubMed:
15027866] d)Friesner RA, Banks JL, Murphy RB, Halgren TA, Klicic JJ, Mainz DT, Repasky
MP, Knoll EH, Shelley M, Perry JK, Shaw DE, Francis P, Shenkin PS, J. Med. Chem 2004, 47,
1739–1749. [PubMed: 15027865]
[30]. a)Siricilla S, Mitachi K, Skorupinska-Tudek K, Swiezewska E, Kurosu M, Anal. Biochem 2014,
461, 36–45; [PubMed: 24939461] b)Mitachi K, Siricilla S, Yang D, Kong Y, Skorupinska-Tudek
K, Swiezewska E, Franzblau SG, Kurosu M, Anal. Biochem 2016, 512, 78–90; [PubMed:
27530653] c)Mitachi K, Yun HG, Kurosu SM, Eslamimehr S, Lemieux MR, Klaicć L, Clemons
WM Jr, Kurosu M, ACS Omega 2018, 3, 1726–1739. [PubMed: 29503973]
[31]. Lipinski C, Methods Principles Med. Chem 2008, 37, 257–282.
[32]. Collins TJ, Ylanko J, Geng F, Andrews DW, Assay Drug Dev. Technol 2015, 13, 547–557.
[PubMed: 26422066]
[33]. a)Gomez-Lopez N, Vadillo-Ortega F, Estrada-Gutierrez G, PLoS One 2011, 6, e28771; [PubMed:
22174892] b)Doerr ME, Jones JI, J. Biol. Chem 1996, 271, 2443–2447. [PubMed: 8576205]
[34]. a)Saatci O, Kaymak A, Raza U, Ersan PG, Akbulut O, Banister CE, Sikirzhytski V, Tokat UM,
Aykut G, Ansari SA, Dogan HT, Dogan M, Jandaghi P, Isik A, Gundogdu F, Kosemehmetoglu K,
Dizdar O, Aksoy S, Akyol A, Uner A, Buckhaults PJ, Riazalhosseini Y, Sahin O, Nat. Commun
2020, 11, 2416; [PubMed: 32415208] b)Noyan S, Andac Ozketen A, Gurdal H, Gur Dedeoglu B,
Cell. Signal 2021, 83, 109996. [PubMed: 33798630]
Mitachi et al.
Page 10
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 August 01.
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Figure 1.
A proposed high-yielding chemical synthesis of tunicamycin V from D-galactal -
Retrosynthetic analysis.
BFPM: (4,4’-bisfluorophenyl)methoxymethyl, DNs: 2,4-dinitrobenzenesulfonyl
Mitachi et al.
Page 11
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 August 01.
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Figure 2.
Conformational analysis of the aldehyde
10
and rationale of BCS reaction with
9
.
Mitachi et al.
Page 12
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 August 01.
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Figure 3.
Growth and migration inhibition of a triple-negative breast cancer MDA-MB-231 by TN-
TMPA (
28
).
[a] All assay protocols are summarized in SI. Purple (a1–6): DNA stained with DRAQ5
(CY5 filter: Ex: 635/18, Em: 692/40), Green (a1, a3, a4, and a6): mitochondria stained with
NAO (GFP filter: NAO Ex: 482/25, Em: 524/24), Green (a2 and a5): plasma membrane and
mitochondria stained with annexin V-FITC (GFP filter: NAO Ex: 482/25, Em: 524/24). [b]
Cell migration assays using the Boyden Chamber. Data represent the mean ±SD (
p
< 0.01).
Mitachi et al.
Page 13
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 August 01.
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Scheme 1.
A model Büchner-Curtius-Schlotterbeck (BCS) reaction towards tunicamycins.
PMB:
p
-methoxybenzyl, Phth: phthaloyl
Mitachi et al.
Page 14
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 August 01.
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Scheme 2.
Synthesis of the core structure
21
for tunicamycins.
Mitachi et al.
Page 15
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 August 01.
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Scheme 3.
Synthesis of tunicamycin V (TN-V,
1
), its 5’
S
-diastereomer (TN-5’
S
,
26
), a water-soluble
hydrophobic mimetic analogue (TN-TMPA,
28
). NMM:
N
-Methylmorpholine, EDCI: 1-
Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide, N
HS:
N
-hydroxysuccinimide
Mitachi et al.
Page 16
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 August 01.
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Mitachi et al.
Page 17
Table 1.
Stereoselective reduction of
2
.
Reagent and conditions
21 (5’
R
)
[c]
/ 22 (5’
S
)
Yield (%)
NaBH
4
/ MeOH (0
°
C)
2.5 / 1
80
NaBH
4
, CeCl
3
•7H
2
O / MeOH (0
°
C)
3 / 1
89
Zn(BH
4
)
2
/ Et
2
O (−20
°
C)
1/5
65
(
S
)-
B
-Me CBS,
[a]
BH
3
•SMe
2
/ THF (−20
°
C)
1 / 0
96
(
R
)-
B
-Me CBS, BH
3
•SMe
2
/ THF (−20
°
C)
0 / 1
95
RuCl[(
R,R
)-Ts-DPEN] (
p
-cymene)
[b]
/
i
PrOH-HCO
2
H-Et
3
N (rt)
1 / 0
>99
RuCl[(
S,S
)-Ts-DPEN] (
p
-cymene)/
i
PrOH-HCO
2
H-Et
3
N (rt)
0/1
>99
[a]
Oxazaborolidine-catalyzed reduction (widely known as the CBS reduction).
[b]
RuCl[(
R,R
)-Ts-DPEN] (
p
-cymene): Chloro(
p
-cymene)[(
R,R
)-
N
-(
p
-toluenesulfonyl)-1,2-diphenylethylenediamine]ruthenium(II).
[c]
The natural form. Ts:
p
-Toluenesulfonyl, DPEN: 1,2-Diphenylethylenediamine
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 August 01.
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Mitachi et al.
Page 18
Table 2.
Phosphotransferase enzyme inhibitory activities of tunicamycin analogues.
[a]
Compound
IC
50
(μM)
DPAGT1
[d]
AglH
[e]
WecA
[f]
MraY
[g]
TN-V
(natural)
[b]
1.5
13.2
0.15
2.9
TN-V
(
1
, synthetic)
[c]
1.5
13.0
0.15
2.5
TN-5’
S
(
26
)
[c]
>50
>50
>50
>50
TN-TMPA
(
28
)
[c]
0.12
0.25
>50
>50
[a]
All assay protocols are summarized in SI.
[b]
60–70% purity of crude natural product was purified by HPLC.
[c]
Synthesized in Scheme 3.
[d]
Human.
[e]
Methanococcus jannaschii
.
[f]
Escherichia coli
.
[g]
Hydrogenivirga
sp.
p
< 0.01 (
n
= 3).
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 August 01.