To be submitted to Astrophysical Journal Letters
Preprint typeset using L
A
T
E
X style emulateapj v. 5/2/11
GAMMA RAYS FROM THE QUASAR PKS 1441+25: STORY OF AN ESCAPE
A. U. Abeysekara
1
, S. Archambault
2
, A. Archer
3
, T. Aune
4
, A. Barnacka
5
, W. Benbow
6
, R. Bird
7
,
J. Biteau
8,9,44
, J. H. Buckley
3
, V. Bugaev
3
, J. V Cardenzana
10
, M. Cerruti
6,45
, X. Chen
11,12
, J. L. Christiansen
13
,
L. Ciupik
14
, M. P. Connolly
15
, P. Coppi
16
, W. Cui
17
, H. J. Dickinson
10
, J. Dumm
18
, J. D. Eisch
10
, M. Errando
3,19,46
,
A. Falcone
20
, Q. Feng
17
, J. P. Finley
17
, H. Fleischhack
12
, A. Flinders
1
, P. Fortin
6
, L. Fortson
18
, A. Furniss
8,21
,
G. H. Gillanders
15
, S. Griffin
2
, J. Grube
14
, G. Gyuk
14
, M. H
̈
utten
12
, N. H
̊
akansson
11
, D. Hanna
2
, J. Holder
22
,
T. B. Humensky
23
, C. A. Johnson
8,47
, P. Kaaret
24
, P. Kar
1
, N. Kelley-Hoskins
12
, Y. Khassen
7
, D. Kieda
1
,
M. Krause
12
, F. Krennrich
10
, S. Kumar
22
, M. J. Lang
15,48
, G. Maier
12
, S. McArthur
17
, A. McCann
2
,
K. Meagher
25
, P. Moriarty
15
, R. Mukherjee
19
, D. Nieto
23
, A. O’Faol
́
ain de Bhr
́
oithe
12
, R. A. Ong
4
,
A. N. Otte
25
, N. Park
26
, J. S. Perkins
27
, A. Petrashyk
23
, M. Pohl
11,12
, A. Popkow
4
, E. Pueschel
7
, J. Quinn
7
,
K. Ragan
2
, G. Ratliff
14
, P. T. Reynolds
28
, G. T. Richards
25
, E. Roache
6
, J. Rousselle
4
, M. Santander
19
,
G. H. Sembroski
17
, K. Shahinyan
18
, A. W. Smith
29
, D. Staszak
2
, I. Telezhinsky
11,12
, N. W. Todd
3
, J. V. Tucci
17
,
J. Tyler
2
, V. V. Vassiliev
4
, S. Vincent
12
, S. P. Wakely
26
, O. M. Weiner
23
, A. Weinstein
10
, A. Wilhelm
11,12
,
D. A. Williams
8
, B. Zitzer
30
(VERITAS) & P. S. Smith
31
(SPOL) & T. W.-S. Holoien
32,35
, J. L. Prieto
33,34
,
C. S. Kochanek
32,35
, K. Z. Stanek
32,35
, B. Shappee
36,37
(ASAS-SN) & T. Hovatta
38
, W. Max-Moerbeck
39
,
T. J. Pearson
40
, R. A. Reeves
41
, J. L. Richards
17
, A. C. S. Readhead
40
(OVRO) & G. M. Madejski
42
(NuSTAR) &
S. G. Djorgovski
43
, A. J. Drake
43
, M. J. Graham
43
, A. Mahabal
43
(CRTS)
To be submitted to Astrophysical Journal Letters
ABSTRACT
Outbursts from gamma-ray quasars provide insights on the relativistic jets of active galactic nuclei
and constraints on the diffuse radiation fields that fill the Universe. The detection of significant
emission above 100 GeV from a distant quasar would show that some of the radiated gamma rays
escape pair-production interactions with low-energy photons, be it the extragalactic background light
(EBL), or the radiation near the supermassive black hole lying at the jet’s base. VERITAS detected
gamma-ray emission up to
∼
200 GeV from PKS 1441+25 (
z
= 0
.
939) during April 2015, a period
of high activity across all wavelengths. This observation of PKS 1441+25 suggests that the emission
region is located thousands of Schwarzschild radii away from the black hole. The gamma-ray detection
also sets a stringent upper limit on the near-ultraviolet to near-infrared EBL intensity, suggesting that
galaxy surveys have resolved most, if not all, of the sources of the EBL at these wavelengths.
Subject headings:
cosmology: observations — diffuse radiation — gamma rays: galaxies — quasars: in-
dividual (PKS 1441+25 = VER J1443+250) — radiation mechanisms: non-thermal
1
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Utah,
Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
2
Physics Department, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A
2T8, Canada
3
Department of Physics, Washington University, St. Louis,
MO 63130, USA
4
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of
California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
5
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden
Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
6
Fred Lawrence Whipple Observatory, Harvard-Smithsonian
Center for Astrophysics, Amado, AZ 85645, USA
7
School of Physics, University College Dublin, Belfield,
Dublin 4, Ireland
8
Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics and Department of
Physics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
9
now at Insititut de Physique Nucl ́eaire d’Orsay (IPNO),
CNRS-INP3, Univ. Paris-Sud, Universit ́e Paris-Saclay, 91400
Orsay, France
10
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State Univer-
sity, Ames, IA 50011, USA
11
Institute of Physics and Astronomy, University of Potsdam,
14476 Potsdam-Golm, Germany
12
DESY, Platanenallee 6, 15738 Zeuthen, Germany
13
Physics Department, California Polytechnic State Univer-
sity, San Luis Obispo, CA 94307, USA
14
Astronomy Department, Adler Planetarium and Astron-
omy Museum, Chicago, IL 60605, USA
15
School of Physics, National University of Ireland Galway,
University Road, Galway, Ireland
16
Department of Astronomy, Yale University, New Haven,
CT 06520-8101, USA
17
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Purdue University,
West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
18
School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota,
Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
19
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Barnard College,
Columbia University, NY 10027, USA
20
Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 525 Davey
Lab, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802,
USA
21
now at California State University - East Bay, Hayward,
CA 94542, USA
22
Department of Physics and Astronomy and the Bartol
Research Institute, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716,
USA
23
Physics Department, Columbia University, New York, NY
10027, USA
24
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Iowa,
Van Allen Hall, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
25
School of Physics and Center for Relativistic Astrophysics,
Georgia Institute of Technology, 837 State Street NW, Atlanta,
GA 30332-0430
26
Enrico Fermi Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
60637, USA
27
N.A.S.A./Goddard Space-Flight Center, Code 661, Green-
belt, MD 20771, USA
28
Department of Applied Science, Cork Institute of Technol-
ogy, Bishopstown, Cork, Ireland
29
University of Maryland, College Park / NASA GSFC,
College Park, MD 20742, USA
30
Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S. Cass Avenue,
Argonne, IL 60439, USA
arXiv:1512.04434v1 [astro-ph.HE] 14 Dec 2015
2
The VERITAS Collaboration
et al.
1.
A NEW VERY-HIGH-ENERGY QUASAR
The extragalactic gamma-ray sky is dominated by the
emission of blazars, active galactic nuclei whose jets are
pointed within a few degrees of Earth. About sixty
blazars have been detected at very high energy (VHE;
E >
100 GeV),
49
with only four belonging to the class
of flat-spectrum radio quasars (FSRQs): 3C 279 (
z
=
0
.
536, MAGIC Collaboration et al. 2008), PKS 1510-
089 (
z
= 0
.
361, H.E.S.S. Collaboration et al. 2013a),
PKS 1222+216 (
z
= 0
.
432, Aleksi ́c et al. 2011), and
S3 0218+35 (
z
= 0
.
944, Sitarek et al. 2015).
FSRQs are believed to host radiatively-efficient disks
that enrich the environment of the supermassive black
hole with ultraviolet-to-optical photons. This photon
field, the reprocessed emission from the clouds of the
broad line region (BLR), and the infrared radiation from
the “dusty torus” can all interact with gamma rays
through pair production, preventing the escape of VHE
radiation from the base of the jet (Donea & Protheroe
2003).
VHE gamma rays that do escape will face pair pro-
duction on the extragalactic background light (EBL),
which encompasses the ultraviolet-to-infrared emission
of all stars and galaxies since the epoch of reionization
(
z
.
10).
50
Direct measurements of the EBL are prone to
contamination from the bright local environment, while
strict lower limits are derived from galaxy surveys, mea-
suring the light emitted by known populations of sources
(Madau & Pozzetti 2000).
VHE detections of high-redshift FSRQs constrain both
the EBL and the gamma-ray emission regions in blazars.
This letter reports the detection of VHE gamma rays
from the FSRQ PKS 1441+25 (
z
= 0
.
939, Shaw et al.
2012) by VERITAS. This source was observed in April
31
Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 N. Cherry
Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
32
Department of Astronomy, The Ohio State University, 140
West 18th Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
33
Nucleo de Astronomia de la Facultad de Ingenieria, Uni-
versidad Diego Portales, Av. Ejercito 441, Santiago, Chile
34
Millennium Institute of Astrophysics, Santiago, Chile
35
Center for Cosmology and AstroParticle Physics, The Ohio
State University, 191 W. Woodruff Ave., Columbus, OH 43210,
USA
36
Carnegie Observatories,
813 Santa Barbara Street,
Pasadena, CA 91101, USA
37
Hubble, Carnegie-Princeton Fellow
38
Aalto
University,
Mets ̈ahovi
Radio
Observatory,
Mets ̈ahovintie 114, 02540, Kylm ̈al ̈a, Finland
39
National Radio Astronomy Observatory, P.O. Box 0,
Socorro, NM 87801, USA
40
Cahill Center for Astronomy and Astrophysics, California
Institute of Technology, Pasadena CA, 91125, USA
41
CePIA, Departamento de Astronom ́ıa, Universidad de
Concepci ́on, Casilla 160-C, Concepci ́on, Chile
42
W. W. Hansen Experimental Physics Laboratory, Kavli
Institute for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology, Department
of Physics and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford
University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
43
California Institute of Technology, 1200 E. California Blvd,
Pasdena CA, 91125, USA
44
jbiteau@ucsc.edu, biteau@ipno.in2p3.fr
45
matteo.cerruti@cfa.harvard.edu
46
errando@astro.columbia.edu
47
caajohns@ucsc.edu
48
mark.lang@nuigalway.ie
49
http://tevcat.uchicago.edu/
50
We adopt the concordance ΛCDM model (
h
0
= 0
.
7, Ω
M
=
0
.
3, Ω
Λ
= 0
.
7).
and May 2015 following the VHE discovery by MAGIC
(Mirzoyan 2015), triggered by multiwavelength activity
(Pacciani 2015) and a spectral hardening at high energies
(HE, 100 MeV
< E <
100 GeV; Thompson 2015).
2.
OBSERVATIONS OF PKS 1441+25
PKS 1441+25 was detected from 2015 April 21
(MJD 57133) to April 28 (MJD 57140) with VERITAS,
an array of four imaging atmospheric Cherenkov tele-
scopes located in southern Arizona (Holder 2011). VERI-
TAS imaged gamma-ray induced showers from the source
above 80 GeV, enabling the detection of PKS 1441+25
(VER J1443+250) at a position consistent with its ra-
dio location and at a significance of 7.7 standard devi-
ations (
σ
) during the 15
.
0 h exposure (2710 ON-source
events, 13780 OFF-source events, OFF normalization
of 1/6).
Using a standard analysis with cuts opti-
mized for low-energy showers (Archambault et al. 2014,
and references therein), we measure an average flux of
Φ(
>
80 GeV) = (5
.
0
±
0
.
7)
×
10
−
11
cm
−
2
s
−
1
with a
photon index Γ
VHE
= 5
.
3
±
0
.
5 up to 200 GeV,
51
cor-
responding to an intrinsic index of 3
.
4
±
0
.
5 after cor-
rection for the EBL (Gilmore et al. 2012, “fixed”). The
day-by-day lightcurve is compatible with constant emis-
sion in that period (
χ
2
/ndf
= 7
.
4
/
6), and fractional
variability
F
var
<
110 % at the 95 % confidence level
(Vaughan et al. 2003).
52
Subsequent observations in May
(MJD 57155-57166, 3
.
8 h exposure) showed no significant
excess (660 ON-source events, 3770 OFF-source events,
OFF normalization of 1/6), resulting in an upper limit
of Φ(
>
80 GeV)
<
4
.
3
×
10
−
11
cm
−
2
s
−
1
at the 99 % con-
fidence level. These results have been cross checked with
an independent calibration and analysis. Monte-Carlo
simulations indicate systematic uncertainties on the VHE
energy scale and photon index of 20 % and 0
.
2, respec-
tively. The systematic uncertainty on the flux of this
source is estimated to be 60 %, including the energy-scale
uncertainty discussed in Archambault et al. (2014).
The LAT pair-conversion telescope onboard the
Fermi
satellite has surveyed the whole sky in the HE band
since August 2008 (Atwood et al. 2009). We analyzed
the LAT data using the public science tools
v10r0p5
(Pass-8) leaving free the parameters of sources from
the 3FGL (Acero et al. 2015) within a region of inter-
est of 10
◦
radius and fixing them for sources 10
−
20
◦
away. We reconstruct the spectrum of PKS 1441+25 be-
tween 100 MeV and 100 GeV in four-week (MJD 54705-
57169, top panel in Fig. 1) and two-week (MJD 57001-
57169, middle panel) bins assuming a power-law model
with a free normalization and photon index (purple
points), as well as in one-day bins (pink points) fix-
ing the photon index to its best-fit average value in
MJD 57001-57169, Γ
HE
= 1
.
97
±
0
.
02, slightly harder
than in the 3FGL, 2
.
13
±
0
.
07. The source was in a
high state during MJD 57001-57169, with an integrated
100 MeV
−
100 GeV flux that is one to two orders of mag-
nitude above the 3FGL value, (1
.
3
±
0
.
1)
×
10
−
8
cm
−
2
s
−
1
.
During the period contemporaneous with the VERITAS
51
The last spectral points at 140 and 180 GeV are significant at
the 2
.
4 and 3
.
0
σ
level, respectively
52
All flux estimates are used for variability constraints but we
also show 99 %-confidence-level upper limits for points below 3
σ
in Fig. 1
Gamma rays from PKS 1441+25
3
detection (MJD 57133-57140), the source shows a flux of
(34
±
4)
×
10
−
8
cm
−
2
s
−
1
and a hard index of 1
.
75
±
0
.
08.
Although a power-law model is used for robustness in
the lightcurve determination, the spectrum shows a hint
of curvature, with a log parabola preferred over a power
law by 3
.
2
σ
(see Fig. 2). The curvature is resilient to
changes in the analysis and the temporal window, and
fits in smaller energy ranges confirm the hint.
X-ray observations with
NuSTAR
and
Swift
were trig-
gered following the VHE detection.
NuSTAR
, a hard-
X-ray instrument sensitive to 3
−
79 keV photons (Har-
rison et al. 2013), observed the source on MJD 57137
for an exposure of 38
.
2 ks. The data were reduced us-
ing the
NuSTARDAS
software v1.3.1.
Swift
-XRT (Gehrels
et al. 2004) observed PKS 1441+25 between 0
.
3 and
10 keV in June 2010 (MJD 55359), in January 2015
(MJD 57028 & 57050), in April 2015 (MJD 57127-57138),
and in May 2015 (MJD 57155 & 57160). Data taken in
photon-counting mode were calibrated and cleaned with
xrtpipeline
using CALDB 20140120 v.014. ON-source
and background events were selected within regions of
20-pixel (
∼
46 arcsec) and 40-pixel radius, respectively.
The XRT and
NuSTAR
spectral analyses were performed
with
XPSEC
v12.8.2, requiring at least 20 counts per bin.
The
NuSTAR
spectrum is matched by a power law with
a photon index of 2
.
30
±
0
.
10 and an integrated 3
−
30 keV
flux of (1
.
25
±
0
.
09)
×
10
−
12
erg cm
−
2
s
−
1
. No intranight
variability is detected.
Swift
-XRT did not significantly
detect the source in June 2010, but the 2015 observa-
tions reveal a power-law spectrum with no detectable
spectral variability and an average 0
.
3
−
10 keV photon
index of 2
.
35
±
0
.
24, using an absorbed model with a
hydrogen column density of 3
.
19
×
10
20
cm
−
2
(Kalberla
et al. 2005). Significant flux variations are detected in
the period contemporaneous with VERITAS observa-
tions (
χ
2
/ndf
= 25
.
9
/
3,
F
var
= 22
.
6
±
0
.
9 %), with a flux-
halving time of 13
.
9
±
1
.
4 days based on an exponential
fit to the data in MJD 57127-57155 (
χ
2
/ndf
= 8
.
6
/
6).
Simultaneously with the XRT observations,
Swift
-
UVOT (Roming et al. 2005) took photometric snapshots
of PKS 1441+25 in six optical-to-ultraviolet filters. Flux
densities were extracted using
uvotmaghist
and circu-
lar ON-source and background regions of 5 arcsec and
15 arcsec radius, respectively. PKS 1441+25 has been
observed in the V-band since January 2012 within the
All-Sky Automated Survey for Supernovae (ASAS-SN;
Shappee et al. 2014), using the quadruple 14-cm “Bru-
tus” telescope in Hawaii. The fluxes from both experi-
ments in Fig. 2 are dereddenned using
E
(
B
−
V
) = 0
.
043,
consistent with the column density used for the XRT
analysis (Jenkins & Savage 1974). The 0.68-m Catalina
Schmidt Telescope (AZ) has also performed long-term
unfiltered optical observations of PKS 1441+25 since
2005 within the Catalina Real-Time Transient Survey
(CRTS, Drake et al. 2009). Observed magnitudes were
converted into the V-band using the empirical method
described in Drake et al. (2013). The SPOL spectropo-
larimeter (Schmidt et al. 1992) has monitored the linear
optical polarization of PKS 1441+25 in 5000
−
7000
̊
A,
with observations at the 1.54-m Kuiper Telescope, at
the 6.5-m MMT, and at the Steward Observatory 2.3-
m Bok Telescope (AZ). The source shows a high degree
of polarization, with values ranging from 37
.
7
±
0
.
1 % to
57120
57130
57140
57150
57160
deg
angle
Polarization
95
100
105
110
115
120
SPOL
57120
57130
57140
57150
57160
%
fraction
Polarization
20
25
30
35
40
SPOL
57120
57130
57140
57150
57160
-1
Å
-1
s
-2
erg cm
-15
x10
(O-UV)
Φ
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
V
B
U
W1
M2
W2
V - ASAS-SN
V - Catalina
-UVOT / ASAS-SN / Catalina
Swift
57120
57130
57140
57150
57160
-1
s
-2
erg cm
-12
10
(2-10 keV)
Φ
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
-XRT
Swift
57120
57130
57140
57150
57160
0.1-100 GeV
Index
1.7
1.8
1.9
2
2.1
2.2
-LAT
Fermi
57120
57130
57140
57150
57160
-1
s
-2
cm
-8
10
(0.1-100 GeV)
Φ
0
20
40
60
80
-LAT
Fermi
57120
57130
57140
57150
57160
-1
s
-2
cm
-11
10
(> 80 GeV)
Φ
-5
0
5
10
15
VERITAS
57020
57040
57060
57080
57100
57120
57140
57160
0.1-100 GeV
Index
1.7
1.8
1.9
2
2.1
2.2
2.3
-LAT
Fermi
57020
57040
57060
57080
57100
57120
57140
57160
-1
s
-2
cm
-8
10
(0.1-100 GeV)
Φ
0
50
100
150
200
-LAT
Fermi
55000
55500
56000
56500
57000
-1
s
-2
cm
-8
10
(0.1-100 GeV)
Φ
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
-LAT
Fermi
55000
55500
56000
56500
57000
-1
Å
-1
s
-2
erg cm
-15
x10
(V)
Φ
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
Catalina
55000
55500
56000
56500
57000
Jy
(15 GHz)
Φ
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
OVRO
MM/YY
12/08
12/09
12/10
12/11
12/12
12/13
12/14
DD/MM
08/04
15/04
22/04
29/04
06/05
13/05
20/05
MM/YY
12/14
01/15
02/15
03/15
04/15
05/15
MJD
55000
55500
56000
56500
57000
MJD
57020
57040
57060
57080
57100
57120
57140
57160
MJD
57120
57130
57140
57150
57160
Fig. 1.—
Top:
observations of PKS 1441+25 from 2008 to 2015.
Middle:
observations from December 2014 to May 2015.
Bottom:
observations in April and May. The gray dashed lines mark the
period considered for the analyses in Sec. 3 and 4.
4
The VERITAS Collaboration
et al.
[ MeV ]
Energy
-10
10
-8
10
-6
10
-4
10
-2
10
1
2
10
4
10
6
10
]
-1
s
-2
[ erg cm
ν
F
ν
Energy flux
-14
10
-13
10
-12
10
-11
10
-10
10
April 2015
VERITAS
-LAT
Fermi
NuSTAR
Swift
ASAS-SN
Other observations
- May 2015
Swift
- January 2015
Swift
- June 2010
Swift
Archival (ASDC)
Broad-band modeling
Synchrotron
Self Compton
External Compton
(torus)
[ Hz ]
Frequency
11
10
13
10
15
10
17
10
19
10
21
10
23
10
25
10
27
10
]
-1
[ erg s
ν
L
ν
Luminosity
44
10
45
10
46
10
47
10
[ MeV ]
Energy
4
10
×
4
5
10
5
10
×
2
5
10
×
3
]
-1
s
-2
[ erg cm
ν
F
ν
Energy flux
-12
10
-11
10
-10
10
VERITAS
-LAT
Fermi
Corrected for EBL
Observed
[ MeV ]
Energy
-3
10
-2
10
]
-1
s
-2
[ erg cm
ν
F
ν
Energy flux
-13
10
×
4
-13
10
×
5
-13
10
×
6
-13
10
×
7
-13
10
×
8
-12
10
-12
10
×
2
NuSTAR
-XRT
Swift
Fig. 2.—
Multiwavelength emission of PKS 1441+25. Side panels show the X-ray (top) and gamma-ray emission (bottom) in April 2015
(MJD 57133-57140). The various exposures and the model are discussed in Sec. 2 and 3, respectively.
36
.
2
±
0
.
1 % between MJD 57133 and MJD 57140.
The OVRO 40-m telescope (Richards et al. 2011) has
monitored PKS 1441+25 at 15 GHz since late 2009. A
15 GHz VLBA image obtained by the MOJAVE program
(Lister et al. 2009) on 2014 March 30 (MJD 56381) shows
a compact core and a bright, linearly polarized jet fea-
ture located 1
.
2 milliarcsec downstream, at position angle
−
68
◦
. Both features have relatively high fractional po-
larization (
∼
10 %), and electric vectors aligned with the
jet direction, at an angle of 102
◦
similar to that measured
by SPOL, indicating a well-ordered transverse magnetic
field. The fractional polarization level of the core fea-
ture is among the highest seen in the MOJAVE program
(Lister et al. 2011).
The 2008-2015 observations of PKS 1441+25 shown in
Fig. 1 reveal a brightening of the source in the radio,
optical, and HE bands starting around MJD 56900. A
simple Pearson test (see caveats in Max-Moerbeck et al.
2014a) applied to the radio and HE long-term lightcurves
shows a correlation coefficient
r
= 0
.
75
±
0
.
02, differing
from zero by 5
.
4
σ
based on the
r
-distribution of shuffled
lightcurve points. Similarly, the analysis of the optical
and HE lightcurves yields
r
= 0
.
89
±
0
.
02, differing from
zero by 4
.
8
σ
. The discrete correlation functions display
broad, zero-centered peaks with widths of
∼
100 days, in-
dicating no significant time lags beyond this time scale.
During the period marked by gray dashed lines in Fig. 1,
observations on daily timescales from optical wavelengths
to X-rays reveal fractional flux variations smaller than
25 %, compatible with the upper limits set by
Fermi
-LAT
and VERITAS (30 % and 110 % at the 95 % confidence
level, respectively). Such flux variations are small with
respect to the four orders of magnitude spanned in
νF
ν
,
enabling the construction of a quasi-contemporaneous
spectral energy distribution in Sec. 3.
3.
EMISSION SCENARIO
The spectral energy distribution, with the X-ray-to-
VHE data averaged over the active phase in April 2015
(MJD 57133-57140), is shown in Fig 2. The optical-to-
X-ray spectrum is well described by a power law with
photon index Γ = 2
.
29
±
0
.
01 from 2 eV to 30 keV, in-
cluding a 10 % intrinsic scatter in the fit procedure that
accounts for the small-amplitude optical-to-UV variabil-
ity. This spectrum suggests a single synchrotron compo-
nent peaking below 2 eV
∼
5
×
10
14
Hz, created by an
electron population of index
p
= 2Γ
−
1
∼
3
.
58
±
0
.
02.
As expected in FSRQs (Fossati et al. 1998), the emission
of PKS 1441+25 is dominated by the gamma-ray com-
ponent, well-described by a single component peaking at
3
.
3
+1
.
8
−
1
.
1
GeV.
The detection of gamma rays up to 200 GeV, about
400 GeV in the galaxy’s frame, suggests that the emit-
ting region is located beyond the BLR, or else pair pro-
duction would suppress any VHE flux even for a flat
BLR geometry (Tavecchio & Ghisellini 2012). The el-
evated radio state, correlated with the optical and HE
brightening, also suggests synchrotron emission outside
of the BLR where synchrotron self-absorption is smaller.
The hypothesis of large-scale emission is strengthened by
the week-long duration of the optical-to-gamma-ray flare.
This behavior contrasts with other observations of bright
FSRQs, displaying different flux variations at different
wavelengths (e.g. Abdo et al. 2010), more in line with
multi-component scenarios. The flare of PKS 1441+25
appears to be one of the few events whose detailed tem-
poral and spectral multiwavelength features are consis-
tent with the emission of a single component beyond the
BLR.
The BLR size can be derived using the estimated black-
hole mass,
M
BH
= 10
7
.
83
±
0
.
13
M
(Shaw et al. 2012),
assuming
r
BLR
'
10
17
cm
×
√
L
disk
/
10
45
erg s
−
1
(Kaspi
et al. 2007) and an accretion disk luminosity that is a
fraction
η
= 10 % of the Eddington luminosity. Alterna-
tively,
L
disk
can be estimated from the BLR luminosity as
L
disk
'
10
×
L
BLR
, with
L
BLR
= 10
44
.
3
erg s
−
1
(Xiong
& Zhang 2014). Both estimates yield
r
BLR
'
0
.
03 pc,
Gamma rays from PKS 1441+25
5
setting a lower limit on the distance between the black
hole and the emitting region of
r
&
5
,
000 Schwarzschild
radii.
We show in Fig. 2 that a stationary model can re-
produce the data, using the numerical code of Cerruti
et al. (2013) and the EBL model of Gilmore et al. (2012).
Non-stationary Klein-Nishina effects on electron cooling
could be important for this source (Moderski et al. 2005).
Nonetheless, the straight power law observed from opti-
cal to X-rays suggests that the upscattering electrons see
photon energies that are low enough to stay out of the
Klein-Nishina regime. This again indicates that the emis-
sion is outside of the BLR. We parametrize the electron-
positron population by a fixed broken power law with in-
dices
p
1
= 2 and
p
2
= 3
.
58 between
γ
min
= 1 and
γ
max
=
7
×
10
5
, with a break at
γ
break
= 1
.
2
×
10
4
(jet frame). The
particle energy density is on the order of the magnetic
energy density,
u
e
/u
B
= 1
.
5, with a total luminosity of
6
×
10
45
erg s
−
1
, and an infrared photon energy density of
1
.
4
×
10
−
5
erg cm
−
3
at
T
= 10
3
K (galaxy frame), char-
acteristic of thermal radiation from the torus. We broke
the degeneracies among the parameters of the model by
requiring that the minimum variability timescale in the
observer frame,
t
var
= (1 +
z
)
/δ
×
R/c
, be comparable to
the flux-halving timescale of about two weeks observed
in X rays, where we have the best statistics to probe
variability. The data are then modeled with an emitting
region of radius
R
= 4
×
10
17
cm
∼
0
.
1 pc and Doppler
factor
δ
∼
18. The magnetic field,
B
∼
80 mG, is tan-
gled within the emitting frame, but compressed trans-
versely to the motion within the observer’s frame, which
would explain the high optical-polarization degree,
PD
.
Following Sasada et al. (2014), the ratio of
PD
over the
maximum theoretical polarization Π
S
= (
p
+1)
/
(
p
+7
/
3)
constrains the angle
θ
at which the emitting region is
viewed. We find that the Doppler factor and the geom-
etry of the system are well reproduced by a jet Lorentz
factor Γ
jet
∼
12 and
θ
∼
2
.
6
◦
, which is within the jet
opening angle,
θ
jet
= 1
/
Γ
jet
∼
4
.
8
◦
.
The location of the emission can be roughly estimated
assuming that the whole cross-section of the jet con-
tributes to the radiation (Tavecchio et al. 2010), as
r
∼
R/
tan
θ
jet
∼
1
.
5 pc, or 200,000 Schwarzschild radii.
The region is not expected to be much more compact
than in this model, as no fast large-amplitude variabil-
ity is seen from optical to X-ray wavelengths, despite the
statistics being sufficient to detect doubling timescales
as short as days. The region could still be further away
from the black hole if its size was only fraction of the jet
cross-section.
The model parameters are similar to those obtained
by MAGIC Collaboration et al. (2008), B ̈ottcher (2008),
Tavecchio et al. (2011), and Barnacka et al. (2014) for
other FSRQs, but a remarkably high break energy in the
electron spectrum is needed to explain the optical-to-
X-ray synchrotron emission. The break in the electron
distribution is consistent with radiative cooling, but is
pushed to higher energies due to the magnetic field being
two to ten times lower than that inferred for other VHE
FSRQs. The magnetic field is also in equipartition with
the particle population, minimizing the energy budget
required to produce the synchrotron emission. Finally,
the jet Lorentz factor is two to four times smaller than
that required for other VHE FSRQs, highlighting again
the reasonable energetics of this scenario.
4.
EXTRAGALACTIC BACKGROUND LIGHT
The redshift of PKS 1441+25,
z
= 0
.
939, and its detec-
tion up to 200 GeV provide an exceptional opportunity
to study the EBL.
Gamma rays interact with EBL photons through pair
production, yielding an observed spectrum that is softer
than the intrinsic spectrum. Imposing a maximum in-
trinsic VHE hardness can then constrain the EBL inten-
sity (Aharonian et al. 2006). In a scenario where the HE
and VHE energy photons originate from the same compo-
nent (but see Stern & Poutanen 2014, for emission within
the BLR), the unattenuated HE observations set an up-
per limit on the intrinsic hardness. Based on Sec. 3, we
neglect any additional emission component and fit, as in
Biteau & Williams (2015), an absorbed power law with
free EBL normalization,
α
, to the VERITAS spectrum.
We minimize
χ
2
=
∑
i
=1
..n
(
φ
i
−
φ
0
×
e
−
Γ log(
E
i
/E
0
)
−
ατ
(
E
i
)
)
2
σ
2
φ
i
+ Θ(Γ
LAT
−
Γ)
×
(Γ
LAT
−
Γ)
2
σ
2
Γ
,
(1)
where
α
,
φ
0
, and Γ are free parameters,
E
0
is fixed to
120 GeV,
{
φ
i
}
i
=1
..n
are the fluxes measured by VERI-
TAS at energies
{
E
i
}
i
=1
..n
, and Θ is the Heaviside func-
tion. The
Fermi
-LAT log-parabolic spectrum in Fig. 2
shows a photon index Γ
LAT
= 2
.
76
±
0
.
43 at 30 GeV,
where the absorption by the EBL is smaller than 5 %
(Franceschini et al. 2008; Dom ́ınguez et al. 2011; Gilmore
et al. 2012). We account for the systematic uncertainty
on the VERITAS photon index, 0
.
20, by imposing a max-
imum hardness with uncertainty
σ
Γ
= 0
.
43
⊕
0
.
20 = 0
.
47,
where
⊕
indicates a quadratic sum. We finally marginal-
ize the equivalent likelihood, exp(
−
χ
2
/
2), over the VER-
ITAS energy scale. The logarithm of the latter is as-
sumed to be Gaussian, with zero mean and width 0
.
2,
corresponding to a 20 % systematic uncertainty. Equa-
tion 1 allows for an intrinsic VHE spectrum that is softer,
but not harder, than the HE spectrum. This yields an
EBL normalization that is consistent with
α
= 0 and
constrained to
α <
1
.
5 at the 95 % confidence level for
the model of Gilmore et al. (2012). This result is almost
independent of the choice of model (Franceschini et al.
2008; Dom ́ınguez et al. 2011).
Considering both the peak and full width at half max-
imum (FWHM) of the cross section integrated along the
line-of-sight (as in Biteau & Williams 2015, with various
evolutions tested), the VERITAS observations constrain
the near-ultraviolet to near-infrared EBL. Our constraint
shown in Fig. 3 is compatible and competitive below
1
μ
m with other state-of-the-art gamma-ray measure-
ments from Ackermann et al. (2012), H.E.S.S. Collabo-
ration et al. (2013b), and Biteau & Williams (2015). Al-
though
α
is compatible with zero, there is no significant
tension with local constraints (see Biteau & Williams
2015, brown and orange arrows in Fig. 3), since the dif-
ferences are only 1
.
5
σ
and 1
.
7
σ
in the peak and FWHM
regions, respectively.
6
The VERITAS Collaboration
et al.
m ]
μ
[
Wavelength
-1
10
-1
10
×
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
]
-1
sr
-2
[ nW m
EBL intensity
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
20
Biteau & Williams (2015) - 68% c.l.
H.E.S.S. (2013) - 68% c.l.
-LAT (2012) - 68% c.l.
Fermi
VERITAS - 95% c.l. upper limit
PKS 1441-25 - cross section peak
PKS 1441-25 - cross section FWHM
Lower limits
galaxy counts
Upper limits
direct observations
Fig. 3.—
Near-ultraviolet to near-infrared spectrum of the EBL.
The upper limit from this work is shown in blue, in regions corre-
sponding to the peak and FWHM of the cross section (1
< τ <
2).
5.
DISCUSSION
The low energy threshold of VERITAS enabled the de-
tection above 80 GeV of one of the most distant VHE
gamma-ray sources (
z
= 0
.
939), in a redshift range pre-
viously accessible only to space-borne gamma-ray obser-
vatories. We obtain stringent constraints on the EBL
intensity below 1
μ
m and conclude that galaxy surveys
have resolved most, if not all, of the sources of the EBL in
this region. This provides an excellent baseline for stud-
ies above 1
μ
m where the redshifted ultraviolet emission
of primordial stars could be detected (Dwek et al. 2005;
Biteau & Williams 2015).
The VHE detection of the highly-polarized source
PKS 1441+25 is contemporaneous with a period of
hard HE emission and of enhanced flux at all wave-
lengths.
The correlation between the radio, optical,
and HE lightcurves, unusual for this class of sources
(Max-Moerbeck et al. 2014b), together with slow multi-
wavelength variability, suggest that the multi-band flare
was produced by a single region located
∼
10
4
−
10
5
Schwarzschild radii away from the black hole, which is
consistent with the VHE-gamma-ray escape condition.
PKS 1441+25 is by far the dimmest HE emitter of all
VHE-detected FSRQs listed in the 3FGL catalog. While
HE activity remains a prime trigger of VHE observa-
tions, searches for new VHE-emitting quasars could also
factor in radio-to-optical brightening and synchrotron-
dominated X-ray emission, as reported for PKS 1441+25.
These criteria will be of particular interest if applied
to distant FSRQs, possibly opening a new observational
window on the jets of blazars and on the transformation
of the Universe’s light content with cosmic time.
This research is supported by grants from the U.S.
Department of Energy Office of Science, the U.S. Na-
tional Science Foundation and the Smithsonian Institu-
tion, and by NSERC in Canada, with additional support
from NASA Swift GI grant NNX15AR38G. We acknowl-
edge the excellent work of the technical support staff at
the Fred Lawrence Whipple Observatory and at the col-
laborating institutions in the construction and operation
of the instrument. The VERITAS Collaboration is grate-
ful to Trevor Weekes for his seminal contributions and
leadership in the field of VHE gamma-ray astrophysics,
which made this study possible.
ASAS-SN thanks LCOGT, NSF, Mt. Cuba Astronom-
ical Foundation, OSU/CCAPP and MAS/Chile for their
support.
The observations at Steward Observatory are funded
through NASA Fermi GI grant NNX12AO93G.
CRTS is supported by the NSF grants AST-1313422
and AST-1413600.
The OVRO 40-m monitoring program is sup-
ported in part by NASA grants NNX08AW31G and
NNX11A043G, and NSF grants AST-0808050 and AST-
1109911.
The National Radio Astronomy Observatory is a fa-
cility of NSF operated under cooperative agreement by
Associated Universities, Inc.
This research has made use of data from the MOJAVE
database that is maintained by the MOJAVE team (Lis-
ter et al. 2009).
REFERENCES
Abdo, A. A., et al. 2010, Nature, 463, 919
Acero, F., et al. 2015, ApJS, 218, 23
Ackermann, M., et al. 2012, Science, 338, 1190
Aharonian, F., et al. 2006, Nature, 440, 1018
Aleksi ́c, J., et al. 2011, ApJ, 730, L8
Archambault, S., et al. 2014, ApJ, 785, L16
Atwood, W. B., et al. 2009, ApJ, 697, 1071
Barnacka, A., et al. 2014, A&A, 567, A113
Biteau, J., & Williams, D. A. 2015, accepted in ApJ,
arXiv:1502.04166
B ̈ottcher, M. 2008, in American Institute of Physics Conference
Series, ed. F. A. Aharonian, W. Hofmann, & F. Rieger, Vol.
1085, 427–430
Cerruti, M., et al. 2013, ApJ, 771, L4
Dom ́ınguez, A., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 410, 2556
Donea, A.-C., & Protheroe, R. J. 2003, Astroparticle Physics, 18,
377
Drake, A. J., et al. 2009, ApJ, 696, 870
—. 2013, ApJ, 763, 32
Dwek, E., Arendt, R. G., & Krennrich, F. 2005, ApJ, 635, 784
Fossati, G., et al. 1998, MNRAS, 299, 433
Franceschini, A., Rodighiero, G., & Vaccari, M. 2008, A&A, 487,
837
Gehrels, N., et al. 2004, ApJ, 611, 1005
Gilmore, R. C., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 3189
Harrison, F. A., et al. 2013, ApJ, 770, 103
H.E.S.S. Collaboration et al. 2013a, A&A, 554, A107
H.E.S.S. Collaboration, et al. 2013b, A&A, 550, A4
Holder, J. 2011, International Cosmic Ray Conference, 12, 137
Jenkins, E. B., & Savage, B. D. 1974, ApJ, 187, 243
Kalberla, P. M. W., et al. 2005, A&A, 440, 775
Kaspi, S., et al. 2007, ApJ, 659, 997
Lister, M. L., et al. 2009, AJ, 138, 1874
—. 2011, ApJ, 742, 27
Madau, P., & Pozzetti, L. 2000, MNRAS, 312, L9
MAGIC Collaboration et al. 2008, Science, 320, 1752
Max-Moerbeck, W., Richards, J. L., Hovatta, T., Pavlidou, V.,
Pearson, T. J., & Readhead, A. C. S. 2014a, MNRAS, 445, 437
Max-Moerbeck, W., et al. 2014b, MNRAS, 445, 428
Mirzoyan, R. 2015, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 7416, 1
Moderski, R., et al. 2005, MNRAS, 363, 954
Pacciani, L. 2015, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 7402, 1
Richards, J. L., et al. 2011, ApJS, 194, 29
Roming, P. W. A., et al. 2005, Space Sci. Rev., 120, 95
Sasada, M., et al. 2014, ApJ, 784, 141
Schmidt, G. D., Stockman, H. S., & Smith, P. S. 1992, ApJ, 398,
L57
Shappee, B. J., et al. 2014, ApJ, 788, 48
Gamma rays from PKS 1441+25
7
Shaw, M. S., et al. 2012, ApJ, 748, 49
Sitarek, J., et al. 2015, arXiv:1508.04580
Stern, B. E., & Poutanen, J. 2014, ApJ, 794, 8
Tavecchio, F., & Ghisellini, G. 2012, arXiv:1209.2291
Tavecchio, F., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 405, L94
—. 2011, A&A, 534, A86
Thompson, D. 2015, private communication on behalf of the
Fermi
-LAT team
Vaughan, S., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 345, 1271
Xiong, D. R., & Zhang, X. 2014, MNRAS, 441, 3375