Published September 1, 2025 | Version Published
Journal Article Open

Examining the Effect of Heat from the Yellowstone Plume on the Release of Helium from the Crust

  • 1. ROR icon University of Oxford
  • 2. ROR icon California Institute of Technology
  • 3. Snowfox Discovery, Oxford OX2 6HT, UK
  • 4. ROR icon Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
  • 5. ROR icon University of Manchester
  • 6. ROR icon Montana State University
  • 7. ROR icon University of Lorraine
  • 8. ROR icon Williams College
  • 9. ROR icon University of Southern California
  • 10. Servicio Geologico Ambiental, Heredia, Costa Rica

Abstract

Helium (He), which is an irreplaceable resource in low-carbon technologies, medical applications, and various science and engineering sectors, is currently being explored as a primary resource. The correlation between crustal helium (He) release and heat flow in certain geologic environments (e.g., mid-ocean ridge and continental hydrothermal systems) is well established, but few studies have evaluated how past igneous processes influence current gas release/storage from crustal rocks. Here, we report bulk gas and noble gas geochemistry data (n = 43) gathered from thermal springs in and around the Yellowstone National Park (YNP), USA. Samples outside the YNP (near the plume track) are dominantly N2-rich, while most samples collected within the active caldera area are CO2-rich. Samples outside the YNP typically have much lower 3He/4He than those within the caldera (i.e., near the current plume head). We explore the relationship between thermal aureoles and He isotopic signatures using heat flow data coupled with bulk gas and noble gas geochemistry data. Data are used to determine gas origins, to understand fluid flow in a regional context, and to assess how different environments impact He release from crustal minerals. Models indicate that advection is the dominant process controlling heat and volatile loss from mantle to crustal systems from the Yellowstone Caldera. In contrast, the influence of conduction/boiling of crustal hydrothermal fluids is more substantial for samples outside of the Yellowstone Caldera. Helium-4 is enriched in the samples which are frontal and near the eruptive center, likely due to recent crustal degassing of 4He accumulated over long periods in the underlying craton. Ultimately, He and other volatiles are released due to tectonic activity and/or they are enriched as other gases partition out of groundwater (i.e., gas stripping from groundwater). However, elevated heat flow zones likely constitute poor He retention zones. We propose a twofold approach to help identify preferential zones of He release: 1) focusing on areas that are distal from active igneous zones (i.e., areas that have not been fully degassed) with localized moderate heat flow to release trapped crustal He, and 2) utilizing isotope models to constrain groundwater interactions (i.e., migration and accumulation potential).

Copyright and License

© 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by a University College Oxford-Radcliffe Scholarship and a California Institute of Technology Presidential Fellowship to DTH and NSF awards (2151120 and 2321494) to PHB, AMS, MWB and DVB. PHB also acknowledges NSF awards 2121637 (together with KGL), 2152551, and 2319897. RLT would like to thank her Weston Howland Jr. and Dame Kathleen Ollerenshaw Fellowships. Additional resources and funding were provided by University of Oxford Noble Lab. Many thanks to those that helped collect samples in the field and research assistants involved in this manuscript. We greatly thank Carolina Dantas Cardoso and two anonymous reviewers for their comments that improved the quality of the paper. This work benefited from discussions with Thomas Darrah, Colin Whyte, David Pyle, Stuart Gilfillan, Andrew Hunt, Matthew Merrill, and Bill Craddock, as well as conversations with Fahad Souid, Kris Peterson, Ruolin Deng, Jonathan Treffkorn, and Ken Farley.

Contributions

The project was conceived by DTH, RK, PHB, and CJB. DTH managed the project and prepared the first draft of the manuscript. DTH, RK, PHB, EOA, DVB, CJR, AMS, RLT, MWB, KGL, MRH, BM, CJB collected thermal springs samples in the field. DTH, RK, DJH, and RLT analyzed thermal springs samples in the lab; RK analyzed thermal spring samples in the field. Noble gas models were constructed by DTH, RK, and CJB. Geospatial analysis was conducted by DTH and RK. All authors contributed to the final manuscript.

Data Availability

Data are available through Mendeley Data at: https://doi.org/10.17632/299np2xmnt.1.

Supplemental Material

Supplementary Data 1 (DOCX)

Files

1-s2.0-S001670372500328X-main.pdf

Files (9.9 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:3347ff3d78d6040c248a604e6ca8c744
8.8 MB Preview Download
md5:02975d42317c46a9e019099d17a9dc84
1.1 MB Download

Additional details

Related works

Funding

University of Oxford
California Institute of Technology
National Science Foundation
EAR-2151120
National Science Foundation
EAR-2321494
National Science Foundation
EAR-2121637
National Science Foundation
OCE-2152551
National Science Foundation
EAR-2319897
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
University of Manchester

Dates

Accepted
2025-06-17
Available
2025-06-19
Available online
Available
2025-08-23
Version of record

Caltech Custom Metadata

Caltech groups
Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences (GPS)
Publication Status
Published