Published April 1995 | Version Submitted
Working Paper Open

First Best Bayesian Privatization Mechanisms

Abstract

A planner is interested in designing an ex-post efficient, individually rational, Bayesian mechanism for allocating a single indivisible object to one of the agents who knows his own valuation and only the distribution of other agents' valuations of the object. In this paper, we show that it is impossible to design such a mechanism without any transfers among agents and the planner. However, we discover and describe an ex-post efficient, ex-post individually rational, Bayesian mechanism which balances transfers among agents without any payment to (or from) the planner. Our result that an ex-post efficient, ex-post individually rational, transfer balanced, Bayesian mechanism exists, is in stark contrast to two well-known impossibility results in the literature; the nonexistence of a Bayesian public good mechanism satisfying expost efficiency, individual rationality and budget balance (Laffont and Maskin (1979)) and the impossibility of an ex-post efficient, individually rational, Bayesian bilateral trading mechanism between a seller and a buyer without an outside subsidy (Myerson and Satterthwaite (1983)).

Additional Information

Revised version. Original dated to August 1994. We are grateful to Kim Border, Leo Hurwicz, Mathew Jackson, Herve Moulin and Tom Palfrey for their comments on an early version. We have also benefited greatly from the many valuable suggestions of two anonymous referees.

Attached Files

Submitted - sswp896_-_revised.pdf

Files

sswp896_-_revised.pdf

Files (758.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:aa796ce33d7af48c2d11607dea3ddd5b
758.0 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

Eprint ID
80684
Resolver ID
CaltechAUTHORS:20170822-135920548

Dates

Created
2017-08-23
Created from EPrint's datestamp field
Updated
2019-10-03
Created from EPrint's last_modified field

Caltech Custom Metadata

Caltech groups
Social Science Working Papers
Series Name
Social Science Working Paper
Series Volume or Issue Number
986