of 46
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Hypoxia inducible factor-2
α
importance for migration,
proliferation, and self-renewal of trunk neural crest cells
Camilla U. Niklasson
1
| Elina Fredlund
1,2
| Emanuela Monni
3,4
|
Jessica M. Lindvall
5
| Zaal Kokaia
3,4
| Emma U. Hammarlund
1
|
Marianne E. Bronner
6
| Sofie Mohlin
1,2,6
1
Translational Cancer Research, Lund
University Cancer Center at Medicon
Village, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
2
Division of Pediatrics, Department of
Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund,
Sweden
3
Laboratory of Stem Cells and Restorative
Neurology, University Hospital, Lund,
Sweden
4
Lund Stem Cell Center, Lund University,
Lund, Sweden
5
National Bioinformatics Infrastructure
Sweden (NBIS), Science for Life
Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry
and Biophysics, Stockholm University,
Stockholm, Sweden
6
Division of Biology and Biological
Engineering, California Institute of
Technology, Pasadena, California
Correspondence
Sofie Mohlin, Translational Cancer
Research, Lund University Cancer Center
at Medicon Village, Lund University,
Lund 223 63, Sweden.
Email: sofie.mohlin@med.lu.se
Funding information
Barncancerfonden; Cancerfonden;
Gunnar Nilssons Cancerstiftelse;
Gyllenstierna Krapperup's Foundation;
Royal Physiographic Society of Lund;
Hans von Kantzow's Foundation; Thelma
Zoéga Foundation; Magnus Bergvall's
Foundation; Mary Bevé Foundation; NIH:
R01HL14058; NIH: DE027568; Ollie and
Elof Ericsson's Foundation; Jeansson
Foundations; Crafoord Foundation
Abstract
Background:
The neural crest is a transient embryonic stem cell population.
Hypoxia inducible factor (HIF)-2
α
is associated with neural crest stem cell
appearance and aggressiveness in tumors. However, little is known about its
role in normal neural crest development.
Results:
Here, we show that HIF-2
α
is expressed in trunk neural crest cells of
human, murine, and avian embryos. Knockdown as well as overexpression of
HIF-2
α
in vivo causes developmental delays, induces proliferation, and self-
renewal capacity of neural crest cells while decreasing the proportion of neural
crest cells that migrate ventrally to sympathoadrenal sites. Reflecting the
in vivo phenotype, transcriptome changes after loss of HIF-2
α
reveal enrich-
ment of genes associated with cancer, invasion, epithelial-to-mesenchymal
transition, and growth arrest.
Conclusions:
Taken together, these results suggest that expression levels of
HIF-2
α
must be strictly controlled during normal trunk neural crest develop-
ment and that dysregulated levels affects several important features connected
to stemness, migration, and development.
KEYWORDS
embryogenesis, HIF-2
α
, migration, neural crest, stem cells, trunk neural crest
Camilla U. Niklasson and Elina Fredlund contributed equally to this work.
Received: 29 July 2020
Revised: 2 September 2020
Accepted: 11 September 2020
DOI: 10.1002/dvdy.253
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any me
dium, provided
the original work is properly cited.
© 2020 The Authors.
Developmental Dynamics
published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Anatomists.
Developmental Dynamics.
2021;250:191
236.
wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/dvdy
191
1
|
INTRODUCTION
The neural crest is a multipotent stem cell population that
is unique to vertebrate embryos. Originating from the ecto-
dermal germ layer, premigratory neural crest cells arise in
the dorsal neural tube during neurulation and are charac-
terized by expression of transcription factors like
FOXD3
,
TFAP2
,and
SOXE
.
1
Neural crest cells subsequently
undergo an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) to
delaminate from the neuroepithelium, then migrate exten-
sively throughout the embryo, populating distant sites.
Upon reaching their final destinations, neural crest cells
form a large variety of cell types, as diverse as elements of
the craniofacial skeleton, melanocytes of the skin, adrenal
chromaffin cells, and sympathetic neurons and glia.
2-5
Under normal conditions, hypoxia inducible factor
(HIF)-2
α
is stabilized at low oxygen levels and responds
to hypoxia by initiating a transcriptional program for cel-
lular adaptation to changes in energy demand. Tumor
cells that express high levels of HIF-2
α
together with
numerous neural crest markers have been detected in
perivascular niches despite the access to oxygen in these
areas.
6-8
Accordingly, HIF-2
α
can become abnormally
stabilized at physiological oxygen tensions (

5% O
2
)
in vitro.
6,9
Previous studies in chick, quail and Xenopus embryos
have shown that related
HIF1A
(encoding HIF-1
α
) and
ARNT
(encoding HIF-1
β
, transcriptional binding partner
of both HIF-
α
isoforms) genes co-localize and are ubiqui-
tously expressed within the developing embryo, as investi-
gated at time points up to HH14 (HH stages in chick
embryos).
10-14
EPAS1
(encoding HIF-2
α
) is however
expressed in a more distinct pattern and in tissues not
expressing
HIF1A
(extraembryonic and endothelial
cells).
12
Embryos experience a milieu with low oxygena-
tion (

5% O
2
), particularly before the blood circulation is
fully functional, which starts at stage HH14.
11
Despite
this, HIF-2
α
is not ubiquitously expressed. In addition,
trunk neural crest cells form mainly after commencement
of vasculogenesis and hence are not affected by high
(20%-40%) oxygen.
11
This is in concordance with data
from Barriga et al, suggesting that HIF-
α
stability in neu-
ral crest cells can be controlled by both oxygen-dependent
as well as oxygen-independent mechanisms
14
as suggested
in other systems, including neuroblastoma.
9
Here, we explore the role of HIF-2
α
during normal
development up to the time point when trunk neural
crest cells have completed emigration and begin to
populate sympathetic ganglia. We show that HIF-2
α
is
expressed in migrating trunk neural crest and sympa-
thetic neuroblasts in human, murine, and avian embryos.
RNA sequencing of trunk neural crest cells with dys-
regulated HIF-2
α
levels demonstrates a shift in the global
transcriptional program, resulting in enrichment of genes
associated with tumor morphology, invasion, EMT, and
arrested embryo growth. Knockdown and overexpression
experiments in chick embryos in vivo result in a delay in
embryonic growth, altered expression of trunk neural
crest genes, increased proliferation and disrupted trunk
neural crest cell migration. Consistent with this, in vitro
HIF-2
α
knockout crestospheres display increased self-
renewal capacity. The results suggest that expression
levels of HIF-2
α
must be strictly controlled for proper
neural crest development. These findings enhance our
understanding of how genes dysregulated in normal
development and tumor cells connect, and how oxygen
sensing HIF-2
α
plays noncanonical roles during trunk
neural crest development.
2
|
RESULTS
2.1
|
HIF-2
α
is expressed in migratory
trunk neural crest cells in chick embryos
The presence of neuroblastoma cells expressing HIF-2
α
in perivascular tumor niches indicates poor prognosis.
That these cells express stem cell- and neural crest associ-
ated proteins raises the intriguing possibility that they
may constitute a tumor-initiating subpopulation resem-
bling embryonic neural crest cells. As a first step in
exploring the role of HIF-2
α
in the embryo, we examined
its spatiotemporal expression during normal trunk neural
crest development. To this end, we performed immuno-
cytochemistry in transverse sections through the trunk
axial level of stage HH11, HH13, and HH18 embryos. We
detected low levels of HIF-2
α
protein in neural crest cells
within the neural tube of HH11 and HH13 embryos
(Figure 1A,B, respectively), as well as other sites in the
embryo. This contrasts with previous reports on HIF-2
α
reporting expression exclusively in extraembryonic tissue
at these stages.
13
Indeed, we also detect HIF-2
α
staining
in extraembryonic tissue of HH11 and HH13 embryos
(Figure 1A,B). Differences in results may be due to differ-
ent detection methods (eg, in situ hybridization in previ-
ous reports vs antibody staining here), staging, or species
differences. At these stages, trunk neural crest cells are
still premigratory, and although not all cells within
the neural tube will emigrate, a large fraction of these
cells will generate progeny that become
bona fide
neural
crest cells. We further detected HIF-2
α
in cells that
had delaminated from the neural tube and initiated
migration in older embryos (HH18; Figure 1C), in line
with data from Nanka et al.
12
To identify these cells as
trunk neural crest cells, we co-stained with HNK-1 anti-
body (Figure 1D). Secondary antibody alone confirmed
192
NIKLASSON
ET AL
.
that there was no nonspecific binding (Figure 1E), and
we ruled out that the primary antibody (ab199, rabbit
anti-HIF-2
α
; Abcam) also detected related protein HIF-
1
α
by knocking down both HIF-
α
isoforms and blotting
for HIF-2
α
. The antibody did not detect any protein in
the HIF-2
α
siRNA lane, ensuring specificity (Figure 1F).
Along the same line, we used immunohistochemistry to
stain cells cultured at normoxia (21%) or hypoxia (1% O
2
)
with the NB100-132 primary antibody (mouse anti-HIF-
2
α
; Novus Biologicals) and as expected only observed
FIGURE 1
Hypoxia inducible factor (HIF)-2
α
is
expressed in trunk neural crest cells. A,C,
Immunostaining of HIF-2
α
in sections from trunk
axial level of wild-type chick embryos at HH11, A,
HH13, B, and HH18, C. Arrow denotes ventrally
migrating HIF-2
α
positive cells. D, Co-
immunostaining of HIF-2
α
and HNK1 (marker of
migrating neural crest) in sections from trunk axial
level of wild-type HH18 chick embryos. Arrows
denote migrating cells double positive for the two
proteins. E, Sections of HH13 wild-type embryo
immunostained with DAPI for visualization of nuclei
and secondary antibody only (donkey anti-rabbit
Alexa Fluor-546). F, Western blot analysis for
detection of HIF-2
α
protein at 21% and 1% O
2
following siRNA mediated knockdown of HIF-1
α
or
HIF-2
α
. DIP treated cells were used as a positive
control and SDHA as loading control. Lanes between
21% and 1% siCTRL were removed from this figure,
indicated by the black line. G, Immunohistochemical
staining for HIF-2
α
in sections of SK-N-BE(2)c
neuroblastoma cells cultured at 21% or 1% O
2
.H,
Schematic of where oxygen measurements were
performed. I, Oxygen saturation in the trunk of chick
embryos during development measured ex ovo using
microsensor technique. Error bars represent SEM,
n
3 biologically independent replicates for each
time point
NIKLASSON
ET AL
.
193
HIF-2
α
expression at lowered oxygen concentrations
(Figure1G).Togetherwithpreviousdataonthese
antibodies,
6,9,15,16
these results ensure antibody specificity.
2.2
|
Development from environmental
to physiological oxygen
In adult vertebrate animals, HIF-2
α
is canonically induced
at low oxygen levels. To unde
rstand variations in oxygen
consumption during the developmental stages of interest,
we measured O
2
saturation in real time in the developing
chick embryo utilizing STOX microsensors. Oxygen avail-
ability is referred to as changes of full saturation, meaning
that anything below 100% sat
uration reflects a reduction
from what liquid would hold if in equilibrium with air,
which is to be expected when organisms develop into 3D
structures. Embryos were removed from the egg at desired
developmental time points (minimum three embryos per
time point) and oxygen saturat
ion was measured specifically
within the neural tube at the trunk axial level (Figure 1H).
The handling of embryos outside the egg did not change
intratissue oxygen saturatio
n over the first 4 hours. Since
our measurements were performed within 30 minutes, we
believe that these numbers reflect near-endogenous levels.
Within the trunk neural tube, oxygen saturation starts out
high (up to 85% ± 5 SEM O
2
saturation) at trunk specific
premigratory to migratory st
ages of neural crest develop-
ment (HH10-HH16) and gradually decreases (Figure 1I). At
the time when the majority of trunk neural crest cells have
delaminated from the tube (HH18), oxygen saturation is
low (23% ± 10 SEM O
2
saturation), only to rise and fall
again at later time points (Figure 1I).
2.3
|
HIF-2
α
is expressed in sympathetic
neuroblasts in human and mouse embryos
EPAS1
knockout mice have severe abnormalities in the
sympathetic nervous system (SNS)
17
; consistent with this,
there is some, albeit limited, data suggesting that HIF-2
α
is expressed in sympathetic chain ganglia up to murine
day E11.5 (corresponding to human embryonic week 5).
Moreover, mice lacking
PHD3
(HIF prolyl hydroxylase),
a gene critical for regulation of HIF-2
α
, display reduced
SNS function that is rescued by crossing these mutants
with EPAS1
+/
mice.
18
We have previously shown that HIF-2
α
is expressed
in sympathetic ganglia of human embryos at embryonic
week 6.5 (

E12.5 in mice) but that expression is lost
in these cells at later stages (fetal week 8).
19
Here, we
detected expression of HIF-2
α
positive cells in the dorsal
neural tube, as well as in migrating cells in sections
through the trunk region of a human embryo of embry-
onic week ew5 (Carnegie stage 13; Figure 2A). In con-
trast, there were virtually no HIF-2
α
positive cells left
within the neural tube at embryonic week ew6 (Carnegie
stage 16; Figure 2B). Rather, positive cells could be
detected migrating along the ventral pathway followed by
sympathoadrenal precursors (Figure 2B). To confirm that
that these HIF-2
α
positive cells were trunk neural crest
cells in human embryos, we co-stained with HNK-1 anti-
body, which is expressed on migrating neural crest cells
of human embryos similar to expression in the chick
(Figure 2C, cf Figure 1D). This resembled the staining
pattern found in chick embryos, but also highlights some
differences in the number of positive cells as well as tis-
sues positive for HIF-2
α
(compare Figures 1 and 2). These
differences likely reflect variation between species as well
as the fact that it is difficult to assess exact corresponding
developmental stages between them. We further detected
HIF-2
α
in sympathetic ganglia in mouse embryos at
E12.5 by staining adjacent sections for HIF-2
α
and TH
antibodies, with the latter indicating the location of sym-
pathetic ganglia (Figure 2D). HIF-2
α
is a transcription
factor that localizes to the nucleus but it has lately also
been shown to be expressed in the cytoplasm,
6,9,19
though
its role in the cytoplasm remains unknown. Consistent
with this dual localization, we noted HIF-2
α
expression
in both the nucleus and cytoplasm (Figure 2E), similar to
what has been observed in perivascular oxygenated neu-
roblastoma and glioblastoma cells.
6,20
2.4
|
Knockdown of HIF-2
α
delays
embryogenesis and alters gene expression
To examine the role of HIF-2
α
in vivo, we performed
loss-of-function experiments in chick embryos using a
morpholino-mediated knockdown approach. Functioning
as a surrogate marker, successful electroporation was
confirmed by
EGFP
expression (Figure 3A). Experimen-
tally, to ensure that we specifically affected the neural
crest and not surrounding tissue such as mesoderm, we
injected from the posterior end of the embryo and elec-
troporated the constructs into the lumen of the neural
tube. We then let the embryos develop for an additional
24 or 44 to 48 hours (for gene expression and staging/
migration assessment, respectively) and analyzed several
potentially affected biological processes. Surprisingly, we
noticed that HIF-2
α
knockdown embryos were develop-
mentally delayed compared with their control counter-
parts (Figure 3B,C). The stages of embryos following
loss of HIF-2
α
were determined by their Hamburger
and Hamilton developmental stage in ovo (Figure 3B)
and by counting somites ex ovo (Figure 3C) 44 hours
194
NIKLASSON
ET AL
.
postinjection. The number of somites was equal on both
sides and effects observed were embryo wide.
Knockdown of HIF-2
α
further led to decreased
expression levels of genes representative of early and
migrating neural crest as well as trunk neural crest cells
in particular
21,22
(Figure 3D). The cranial neural crest
associated gene
HOXA2
was also slightly downregulated
(Figure 3E), though not consistently.
FIGURE 2
Hypoxia inducible factor
(HIF)-2
α
is expressed in human and
mouse trunk neural crest cells. A,B,
Immunostaining of HIF-2
α
in sections
from trunk axial level of human embryos
at embryonic week 5, A, and embryonic
week 6, B. Asterisks denote magnified
area in the two right panels. ew,
embryonic week. DAPI was used to
counterstain nuclei. C, Co-
immunostaining of HIF-2
α
and HNK1
(marker of migrating neural crest) in
sections from trunk axial level of human
embryos at embryonic week 6. Arrows
denote areas staining positive for both
proteins. Right panel: open arrowheads
denote double positive individual cells;
closed arrowheads denote cells positive for
HNK1 alone. D, Immunohistochemical
staining of HIF-2
α
and TH in adjacent
sections from a mouse embryo at
embryonic day E12.5. TH is used to locate
sympathetic ganglia. Asterisks in left
panels indicate magnified area in middle
panels and dashed square indicates
magnification area in right panels. E,
Magnification of an embryo
immunostained for HIF-2
α
in a
section from trunk axial level of a human
embryo at embryonic week 6. Closed
arrowheads denote nuclear HIF-2
α
staining; open arrowheads denote
cytoplasmic HIF-2
α
staining
NIKLASSON
ET AL
.
195
2.5
|
CRISPR/Cas9 mediated knockout
of HIF-2
α
recapitulates the morpholino
phenotype
Our
EPAS1
morpholino is a splice targeting morpholino,
predicted to confer either nonsense-mediated decay of
mRNA or a mutant dysfunctional protein. We could not
convincingly detect any changes in HIF-2
α
protein expres-
sion following morpholino treatment, nor a shift in protein
size. This could be explained b
y other mechanisms-of-action
for decrease in protein activity or the mosaicism that arises
with morpholino treatments in chick embryos. To ensure
that the observed biological phenotypes were not due to off-
target effects of our morpholino, we used CRISPR/Cas9 as a
second approach to knock out HIF-2
α
by designing three
different gRNAs targeting
EPAS1
at three different sites.
Functional CRISPR mediated knockout of the HIF-2
α
pro-
tein was demonstrated by immunofluorescence (Figure 4A).
The fact that both morpholino and several CRISPR/Cas9
constructs with in total four different target sites within the
gene produced the same biological phenotype nicely vali-
dates our results and serves as important controls.
After ensuring electroporation efficiency by
EGFP
expression (Figure 4B), we determined the age of the
embryos following CRISPR/C
as9 mediated knockout of the
protein using head- and tail morphology (converted into
HH stage; Figure 4C) or by counting somites (Figure 4D)
36 hours postinjection.
FIGURE 3
Morpholino mediated knockdown of hypoxia inducible factor (HIF)-2
α
delays embryogenesis. A, Relative mRNA
expression as measured by qRT-PCR. WT, wild-type HH18 embryos. Error bars represent SEM, n = 2 biologically independent replicates.
B,C, Determination of developmental age 44 hours postelectroporation with 5
0
-mispair or
EPAS1
targeting morpholinos as assessed by head-
and tail morphology, B, (converted to Hamburger Hamilton (HH) stages. Number of embryos analyzed were n = 20 [5
0
-mispair], n = 16
[EPAS1]) or counting somites ex ovo, C, (number of embryos analyzed were n = 17 (5
0
-mispair), n = 15 [EPAS1]). Statistical significance was
determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). D,E, Relative mRNA expression of trunk, D, and cranial, E, neural crest associated
genes in dissected neural tube tissue derived from the trunk axial level of embryos electroporated with 5
0
-mispair or
EPAS1
morpholinos,
measured by qRT-PCR 24 hours postelectroporation. Data presented as mean of n = 2 biologically independent repeats, error bars denote
SEM. Statistical significance was determined by two-sided student's
t
test
196
NIKLASSON
ET AL
.
FIGURE 4
Legend on next page.
NIKLASSON
ET AL
.
197
2.6
|
Knockdown of HIF-2
α
affects cell
numbers along the ventral neural crest
migratory pathway
One of the most important features of neural crest cells
is their migratory ability. Trunk neural crest cells des-
tined to form the sympathetic chain ganglia migrate ven-
trally. Following HIF-2
α
loss of function using either
morpholino or CRISPR/Cas9, HNK1 positive migratory
trunk neural crest cells were detected on the control side
in all embryos (right panel, left side; Figure 5A-E) as well
as on the side electroporated with nontargeting gRNA
CTRL and control 5
0
-mismatch morpholino (right panel,
left side; Figure 5A,D, respectively). In contrast, loss
of HIF-2
α
profoundly reduced the number of HNK1 posi-
tive cells migrating to ventral regions of the embryo
(CRISPR/Cas9, Figure 5B,C; morpholino, Figure 5E,F).
2.7
|
Overexpression of HIF-2
α
presents
similar effects as loss-of-function
Similar to the loss-of-function experiments, over-
expression of HIF-2
α
led to delayed embryonic develop-
ment (Figure 6A) and perturbed migration as visualized
by HNK1 staining (Figure 6B,C). To investigate spatially
whether affected genes (Figures 3D and 4E,F) were
indeed downregulated in neural crest cells (as indicated
by qPCR analyses of gene expression in dissected neural
tubes of electroporated embryos), we performed
in situ
hybridization for
TFAP2B
on whole HIF-2
α
wild-type
and overexpression embryos. We could detect down-
regulated levels of
TFAP2B
in delaminated cells on the
electroporated side of embryos after overexpression of
HIF-2
α
, visualized by whole embryo imaging (Figure 6D)
and transverse sections (Figure 6E) at trunk axial level.
We also performed qPCR to extend our panel of investi-
gated genes and observed slightly suppressed expression
of neural crest- and trunk specific genes (Figure 7A,B)
whereas expression of cranial neural crest gene
HOXA2
was instead slightly induced (Figure 7C). The less profound
effects on neural crest genes from overexpression as com-
pared to knockdown may be attributed HIF-2
α
expression
level dependent efficiency of the constructs. Overexpression
of
EPAS1
was confirmed by qRT-PCR (Figure 7D).
2.8
|
HIF-2
α
knockout does not affect
SOX9 distribution
SOX9, a member of the SoxE family of transcription fac-
tors, is important for neural crest fate. It is expressed in
premigratory neural crest cells at all axial levels and pro-
motes their lineage progression. Importantly, transverse
sections through the trunk of embryos electroporated
with control (Figure 8A) or two different
EPAS1
targeting
gRNA constructs (EPAS1.1 and EPAS1.3, Figure 8B,C,
respectively) showed no differences in SOX9 expression.
These results suggest that neural crest lineage specifica-
tion, at least as assessed by SOX9, was unaffected by loss
of HIF-2
α
.
2.9
|
Trunk neural crest cells proliferate
extensively in response to dysregulated
HIF-2
α
We next examined cell prolif
eration in premigratory and
early migrating trunk neural crest cells after loss of HIF-2
α
using real-time EdU pulse ch
ase labeling optimized for
avian embryos.
23
Quantifying the proportion of electro-
porated premigratory and early migrating trunk neural crest
cells that had incorporated EdU (by counting RFP
+
only
and RFP
+
/GFP
+
cells above and outside of the dotted line;
Figure 9A) demonstrated a signif
icant increase in proliferat-
ing cells with an average propor
tion of double positive cells
of 22% and 70% in the 5
0
-mismatch vs EPAS1 morpholino
targeted embryos, respectively (
P
.029; Figure 9A,B).
FIGURE 4
CRISPR/Cas9 mediated knockout of hypoxia inducible factor (HIF)-2
α
delays embryogenesis. A, Immunofluorescent
staining for HIF-2
α
in embryos electroporated with control (CTRL) or HIF-2
α
(EPAS1.2) targeting gRNAs. Arrowheads denote GFP+ cells
lacking HIF-2
α
in knockout embryos. Sections from trunk. B, Relative mRNA expression measured by qRT-PCR. WT, wild-type HH18
embryos. C,D, Determination of developmental age 36 hours postelectroporation with a nontargeting (CTRL) gRNA compared to three
different gRNAs targeting
EPAS1
(EPAS1.1, EPAS1.2, EPAS1.3) as assessed by head- and tail morphology (converted to Hamburger
Hamilton [HH] stages, C. Number of embryos analyzed were n = 14 [CTRL], n = 10 [EPAS1.1], n = 14 [EPAS1.2], and n = 14 [EPAS1.3]) or
by counting somites ex ovo. (D, Number of embryos analyzed were n = 8 [CTRL], n = 13 [EPAS1.1], and n = 14 [EPAS1.3].) Statistical
significance was determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), comparing nontargeting CTRL to each individual
EPAS1
gRNA.
E-G, Relative mRNA expression of trunk neural crest, E, neural crest, F, and cranial neural crest, G, associated genes in dissected trunk axial
level derived neural tube tissue, measured by qRT-PCR 36 hours postelectroporation. Data presented as mean of n = 2 biologically
independent repeats, error bars denote SEM, B,E-G. Statistical significance was determined by two-sided student's
t
test, comparing
nontargeting CTRL with each individual
EPAS1
gRNA
198
NIKLASSON
ET AL
.
After overexpression of HIF-2
α
, real-time EdU incor-
poration demonstrated that cells with increased expres-
sion of HIF-2
α
, similar to HIF-2
α
knockdown cells,
became highly proliferative with an average proportion
of double positive cells of 11% and 52% in the control
and HIF-2
α
overexpressing embryos, respectively (
P
.011;
Figure 9C,D). We conclude that neural crest prolifera-
tion, embryonic development and migration is highly
sensitive to dysregulated expression of HIF-2
α
suggesting
that levels must be strictly controlled for proper develop-
ment (Figures 3B-E, 4C-G, 5A-F, 6A-E, and 7A-C).
2.10
|
HIF-2
α
downregulation enhances
self-renewal capacity of trunk NC cells
Neural crest-derived crestosphere cultures
24,25
enable
studies on stemness properties of neural crest cells
in vitro. Therefore, we examined
EPAS1
expression in
crestosphere cultures, in which multipotent neural crest
cells can be maintained in a stem cell-like state
in vitro.
25,26
Comparing crestosphere cultures derived
from trunk vs cranial axial levels (respective axial identi-
ties have been extensively characterized in References 25
FIGURE 5
Dysregulation of hypoxia inducible factor (HIF)-2
α
expression affects migration of trunk neural crest cells. A-E,
Immunostaining of HNK1 (red) marking migrating crest cells in one-sided electroporated embryos (right side). Electroporated cells
(nontargeting CTRL gRNA, A, gRNA #2 targeting
EPAS1
(EPAS1.2; B), 5
0
-mispair morpholino, D, or
EPAS1
morpholino, E) are seen in
green. DAPI was used to counterstain nuclei. Embryo sections from trunk axial level are from 36 hours, A,B, or 44 hours, D,E,
postelectroporation. Arrowheads highlight the difference in HNK1+ area in control vs electroporated side. C,F, Quantification of area
positive for HNK1. Area on electroporated side in EPAS1.2, B, or EPAS1 morpholino, E, embryos was normalized to that of respective
control side. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was calculated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
NIKLASSON
ET AL
.
199
and 26), showed that
EPAS1
was enriched in trunk
crestospheres (Figure 9E).
We further established trunk crestospheres from
embryos previously electroporated with a control gRNA
construct or two different gRNAs targeting
EPAS1
(EPAS1.1 and EPAS1.2). Primary sphere assays demon-
strated that cells with dysregulated HIF-2
α
levels had an
increased ability to form new spheres when seeded as single
cells (1 cell/well; Figure 9F-G). In addition, crestosphere
cultures derived from embryos electroporated with the
EPAS1.2 construct formed larger spheres compared to their
control counterparts (Figure 9H).
2.11
|
RNA sequencing after loss of HIF-
2
α
identifies downstream genes associated
with invasion, growth arrest, and
developmental regulation
To investigate global gene expression changes in cells
with dysregulated levels of HIF-2
α
, we performed loss
of function experiments at premigratory stages of
trunk neural crest development (HH10
+
/HH11 in avian
embryos) using the splice targeting morpholino as
above. Neural tubes from trunk region were dissected
24 hours postelectroporation (at stage

HH16, when
trunk neural crest cells are in the premigratory to early
delaminating phase) and subsequently analyzed these
by RNA sequencing. Correlation plot of all genes
from the dataset demonstrated that HIF-2
α
knockdown
cells indeed differ from those injected with control scram-
bled morpholino (spearman
P
> .96; Figure 10A).
Setting a cut-off at
P
< .005 and removing all hits that
were not annotated (NA), identified 97 genes of interest
(Figure 10B). The top 10 genes downregulated and
upregulated (assessed by log2 fold differences in expres-
sion) by knockdown of HIF-2
α
are summarized in
Figure 10C, while the complete list of these 97 genes can
be found in Table 1. RNA sequencing results were vali-
dated by analyzing selected genes from the top list by
qPCR using the samples assessed for neural crest specific
gene expression (Figure 3D,E). Genes analyzed by qPCR
FIGURE 6
Overexpression of hypoxia inducible factor (HIF)-2
α
reflects the knockdown phenotype. A, Hamburger Hamilton
(HH) staging of embryos 24 hours postelectroporation with a control (pCI-CTRL) or
EPAS1
overexpression construct (pCI-EPAS1),
determined by head- and tail morphology. Number of embryos analyzed were n = 16 (CTRL), n = 20 (EPAS1). Statistical significance was
determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). B, Immunostaining of HNK1 (green) marking migrating crest cells in one-sided
electroporated embryos (right side). Electroporated cells (CTRL or EPAS1) are seen in red. DAPI was used to counterstain nuclei. Embryo
sections from trunk axial level are taken 48 hours postelectroporation. C, Quantification of area positive for HNK1. Area on electroporated
side in pCI-EPAS1 embryos was normalized to that of respective control side. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was
calculated using one-way ANOVA. D, In situ hybridization for
TFAP2B
in whole embryos postelectroporation with pCI-CTRL vs pCI-EPAS1
constructs. E, Sections at trunk axial level of embryos in, D
200
NIKLASSON
ET AL
.