IOP P
UBLISHING
C
LASSICAL AND
Q
UANTUM
G
RAVITY
Class. Quantum Grav.
25
(2008) 114030 (8pp)
doi:10.1088/0264-9381/25/11/114030
dc readout experiment at the Caltech 40m prototype
interferometer
R L Ward
1
, R Adhikari
1
, B Abbott
1
, R Abbott
1
, D Barron
4
, R Bork
1
,
T Fricke
1
,VFrolov
2
, J Heefner
1
, A Ivanov
1
, O Miyakawa
1
, K McKenzie
3
,
B Slagmolen
3
,MSmith
1
, R Taylor
1
,SVass
1
,SWaldman
1
and A Weinstein
1
1
LIGO Caltech 18-34, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
2
LIGO Livingston Observatory, Livingston, LA 70754, USA
3
Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
4
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
E-mail:
rward@ligo.caltech.edu
Received 31 October 2007, in final form 17 December 2007
Published 15 May 2008
Online at
stacks.iop.org/CQG/25/114030
Abstract
The Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory (LIGO) operates
a 40m prototype interferometer on the Caltech campus. The primary
mission of the prototype is to serve as an experimental testbed for upgrades
to the LIGO interferometers and for gaining experience with advanced
interferometric techniques, including detuned resonant sideband extraction
(i.e. signal recycling) and dc readout (optical homodyne detection). The former
technique will be employed in Advanced LIGO, and the latter in both Enhanced
and Advanced LIGO. Using dc readout for gravitational wave signal extraction
has several technical advantages, including reduced laser and oscillator noise
couplings as well as reduced shot noise, when compared to the traditional rf
readout technique (optical heterodyne detection) currently in use in large-scale
ground-based interferometric gravitational wave detectors. The Caltech 40m
laboratory is currently prototyping a dc readout system for a fully suspended
interferometric gravitational wave detector. The system includes an optical
filter cavity at the interferometer’s output port, and the associated controls and
optics to ensure that the filter cavity is optimally coupled to the interferometer.
We present the results of measurements to characterize noise couplings in rf
and dc readout using this system.
PACS number: 04.80.Nn
(Some figures in this article are in colour only in the electronic version)
0264-9381/08/114030+08$30.00 © 2008 IOP Publishing Ltd Printed in the UK
1
Class. Quantum Grav.
25
(2008) 114030
R L Ward
et al
1. Introduction
There is now underway a worldwide effort to detect gravitational waves, ripples in spacetime
which carry information about astrophysical events. The currently running kilometer-scale
interferometric gravitational wave detectors (LIGO [
1
], VIRGO [
2
], GEO [
3
] and TAMA
[
4
]) have demonstrated an unprecedented sensitivity to strain (the squeezing and stretching
of space which is the local effect of a gravitational wave), reaching
≈
10
−
22
at 100 Hz in
the case of LIGO. Achieving such a sensitivity has been the result of significant effort to
reduce, mitigate, and avoid, the multitudinous sources of noise which can mask the effect
of gravitational waves. Future detectors, including Enhanced LIGO [
5
] (online in 2009) and
Advanced LIGO [
6
] (online in 2014) plan to use a technique known as
dc readout
which is
expected to provide technical advantages in avoiding several sources of noise.
We have undertaken an experiment to characterize a dc readout scheme using the Caltech
40m prototype interferometric gravitational wave detector, which is used to test systems
integration and advanced interferometric techniques for future LIGO detectors. It is a fully
instrumented prototype, with sensing and control systems (including optical and electronic
hardware) as similar as possible to those used in LIGO. It is equipped with a LIGO-style
pre-stabilized laser (PSL) [
7
], the core optics of the interferometer are suspended from
single pendulums, and most of the many control loops
(
≈
65
)
are implemented in a highly
flexible and integrated digital system [
8
]. This digital control system allows us to operate the
interferometer in multiple configurations (i.e., rf and dc readout) with a minimal switching
overhead, and provides the ability to measure multiple transfer functions (e.g. noise couplings)
simultaneously. We have measured noise couplings for an interferometer topology similar to
that of LIGO and Enhanced LIGO: a Michelson interferometer, operated on a dark fringe,
whose end mirrors have been replaced by Fabry–Perot cavities, and which has a partially
reflecting mirror between the laser and the input port (a power recycling mirror). See figure
1
for a diagram of such a power-recycled Fabry–Perot Michelson interferometer.
2. Gravitational wave signal readout
2.1. rf readout
A common technique in precision laser interferometry involves frontal phase modulation of
laser light prior to its injection into the interferometer, followed by coherent demodulation at
various ports (including the output port) of the interferometer. The frontal modulation of the
input laser light produces modulation sidebands (typically at radio frequencies) around the
main carrier frequency of the laser light. The carrier and modulation sidebands experience
different resonant conditions in the interferometer. With the proper choice of cavity lengths and
modulation frequencies, optically heterodyning these light fields permits the extraction of non-
degenerate signals containing information about the state of an interferometer, in particular the
various length degrees of freedom [
9
]. In this paper, the term
rf readout
will refer to the use of
this technique for sensing length changes of the differential arm (DARM) degree of freedom,
which is the degree of freedom sensitive to gravitational wave strain. For audio frequency
gravitational waves incident on the interferometer, the gravitational wave signal takes the form
of audio sidebands around the laser carrier light at the output port. At the photodetector, these
sidebands then beat against the rf modulation sidebands, which serve as a local oscillator. The
gravitational wave signal sidebands are then present in the photocurrent as audio frequency
sidebands around the rf modulation frequency. This rf photocurrent is electronically mixed
2
Class. Quantum Grav.
25
(2008) 114030
R L Ward
et al
LASER
RF
DC
Power
Recycling
Mirror
Output
Mode
Cleaner
40m
40 m
modulator
Input
Test Mass
End
Test
Mass
End
Test Mass
Input
Test Mass
Signal
Recycling
Mirror
Figure 1.
Schematic representation of the interferometer configuration. The 40m interferometer
is currently configured as a detuned resonant sideband extraction interferometer similar to the
projected configuration for Advanced LIGO, and is thus equipped with a signal recycling mirror
(SRM) at the asymmetric port. For the results in this paper, we purposely misaligned the SRM
in such a way that it behaves as a large loss without otherwise affecting the dynamics of the
interferometer; the results thus apply to power-recycled Fabry–Perot Michelson interferometers,
such as LIGO and Enhanced LIGO. In this figure, the red beam represents the laser carrier field
and the green beam the rf sideband field.
down to baseband before being acquired digitally. A more detailed discussion of this control
scheme can be found in [
10
], and an analysis of the effects of laser and rf oscillator noise in
power-recycled Fabry–Perot Michelson interferometers in [
11
].
2.2. dc readout
A complementary technique for gravitational wave signal readout is to arrange the optics of
the interferometer in such a way that the power present at the output port of the interferometer
is directly proportional to gravitational wave strain. This technique is a form of optical
homodyne detection known as
dc readout
, in which laser carrier light that has circulated in the
interferometer serves as a local oscillator, rather than rf modulation sidebands. In the case of
kilometer-scale gravitational wave detectors, dc readout can provide a significant advantage in
terms of reducing susceptibility to two sources of technical noise: laser noise and rf oscillator
noise. The reason for this advantage is the different behavior of the rf modulation sidebands
and the laser carrier light in the interferometer: the carrier light enters the kilometer-scale arm
cavities and thus undergoes a stage of passive low-pass filtering by the interferometer, while
the modulation sidebands do not experience any significant filtering [
12
]. Any noise on the
modulation sidebands (whether from the laser itself or the modulator) thus passes essentially
unchanged to the detection port of the interferometer, where it can pollute the signal when the
modulation sidebands are used as a local oscillator (in rf readout). Additionally, in dc readout,
as both the local oscillator and the signal are coming from the same place (i.e., the arm cavities
of the interferometer), they are in the same transverse spatial mode and thus have perfect
spatial overlap at the photodetector. In its simplest form, dc readout involves intentionally
causing a small offset in the DARM degree of freedom, which slightly spoils the destructive
interference at the output port of the interferometer, allowing a small amount of light to leak
3
Class. Quantum Grav.
25
(2008) 114030
R L Ward
et al
out for use as a local oscillator. For small deviations from the controlled setpoint of DARM,
the power at the output port is linearly proportional to deviations from resonance, and is thus
sensitive to tiny changes in the lengths of the arm cavities. An analytical comparison of
susceptibility to laser noise in rf
/
dc readout schemes was carried out in [
13
].
3. dc readout experiment
3.1. Methods and equipment
dc readout removes the need for the rf sidebands used as local oscillators for rf readout. We
take advantage of this fact by inserting an output mode cleaner (OMC) in the optical sensing
chain at the output port of the interferometer, before the dc photodetector. This output mode
cleaner (OMC) serves to reject the rf modulation sidebands and ‘junk light’ (light that does
not share the same spatial or polarization mode as the signal mode) exiting the output port
of the interferometer, both of which contribute noise but not signal. We have constructed an
OMC composed of a monolithic, four-mirror bowtie shaped resonant cavity with a finesse
of 210. The OMC is kept on resonance with the interferometer carrier light via PZT length
actuation; the OMC length is dithered at a frequency outside of the gravitational wave band
for sensing this length degree of freedom. The bandwidth of the control loop is 100 Hz. The
angular degrees of freedom of the OMC (beam tilt and displacement relative to the mode of
interferometer) are controlled by a pair of PZT actuated steering mirrors situated between
the output port of the interferometer and the OMC; sensing of these degrees of freedom
is also via dithering. Limitations on the actuators require that this dithering remain in the
detection band. There is a fixed mode-matching telescope between the interferometer and the
OMC, which brings the mode matching to approximately 93%. Light transmitted through
the OMC is directed to a pair of photodetectors; the photodetectors are each wired in series
with transimpedance resistors, and the voltage across the resistors is amplified and whitened
by a low-noise circuit. All of the equipment described above is enclosed in the same vacuum
envelope as the main interferometer, and mounted on optical tables atop seismic isolation
stacks (see figure
2
). The amplified photodetector signal is acquired digitally for use in the
digital control system and measurement of transfer functions. The dc readout sensing chain
receives 60% of the light exiting the output port of the interferometer; the remaining 40% is
sent to a traditional rf readout sensing chain to be used for lock acquisition, signal extraction of
auxiliary degrees of freedom, and dc
/
rf comparisons. The digital control system used for the
dc readout chain (consisting primarily of OMC length and alignment controls) is of the type
projected for use in Advanced LIGO. The successful integration of this system with the rest
of our LIGO-style electronic infrastructure represents a significant milestone for Enhanced
LIGO, which will employ a similar mixture.
3.2. Results and modeling
We model the interferometer response using a frequency-domain interferometer simulation
tool [
14
] which includes the effects of radiation pressure, and compare the results from this
model for laser frequency and intensity noise with the measured transfer functions from the
interferometer in both a dc readout configuration and an rf readout configuration. The design
parameters for the input test mass and power recycling mirror power transmissivities, which
affect the interferometer dynamics most, are
T
ITM
=
0
.
005 and
T
PRM
=
0
.
07. For modeling
laser noise couplings, of greatest interest are the mismatches between the two arm cavities.
The round trip loss mismatch has been independently measured to be 20 ppm (from an average
4
Class. Quantum Grav.
25
(2008) 114030
R L Ward
et al
Figure 2.
The dc readout sensing chain. Visible on the table are one PZT steering mirror, the
mode-matching telescope, the output mode cleaner (made of copper to damp vibrational modes),
the dc photodetectors and other optics.
of 160 ppm) and the ITM transmissivity mismatch been determined to be 9% by a fit to the
data. The static differential arm length offset for dc readout was
≈
25 pm, chosen to minimize
the effect of electronics and ADC noise. We also present the results of measurements of
oscillator phase and amplitude noise couplings, but we do not yet have modeling tools for
these.
3.2.1. Laser frequency noise.
The 40m interferometer is equipped with a common mode
servo, which alters the frequency of the primary laser light in order to match the length
of the common mode arm length (CARM). The coupling of laser frequency noise to the
gravitational wave signal is minimized by the designed symmetries of the interferometer;
however, imbalances in the two arms of the interferometer can allow laser noise to leak
through from the input port to the output port. The noise coupling was measured in this
case by injecting a signal at the error point of the common mode servo, inducing a frequency
mismatch between the laser light and the CARM degree of freedom; the signal was then
coherently demodulated in the gravitational wave channel to determine the transfer function.
The measured results (figure
3
(
a
)) agree with the model above
≈
1 kHz, but there remains a
significant unexplained discrepancy at lower frequencies. The asymptotic behavior appears
well modeled, however, and implies that dc readout will provide a real advantage within the
gravitational wave detection band when employed in large-scale detectors (which have much
larger time constants than the 40m interferometer, and should thus asymptote at much lower
frequencies).
3.2.2. Laser intensity noise.
The PSL includes an intensity stabilization servo which
stabilizes intensity fluctuations of the laser light prior to its injection into the interferometer.
5
Class. Quantum Grav.
25
(2008) 114030
R L Ward
et al
10
2
10
3
10
4
10
10
10
10
f (Hz)
m/Hz
DC Readout
RF Readout
DC Model
RF Model
(
a
) Frequency noise coupling
10
2
10
3
10
4
10
10
10
f (Hz)
m/RIN
DC Readout
RF Readout
DC Model
RF Model
(
b
) Intensity noise coupling
Figure 3.
Laser noise coupling for the 40m Fabry–Perot Michelson interferometer with power
recycling. The dots indicate experimental data while the dashed lines indicate the results of
numerical simulation.
By injecting a signal into the error point of this servo, we can introduce controlled levels
of intensity fluctuations and measure the transfer function from laser intensity noise to the
gravitational wave readout channel. These measurements (figure
3
(
b
)) agree well with the
modeled results; as predicted for the 40m interferometer, the coupling of intensity noise is
much larger in the dc readout scheme. For kilometer-scale interferometers, this coupling will
be greatly reduced by the increased light storage time of the system, while the coupling for
the rf readout scheme will be largely unchanged.
3.2.3. Oscillator phase noise.
A IFR2023A signal generator is used as the source signal
for the rf modulation sidebands on the laser light, and the same oscillator signal is then
used in demodulating the signal. This model is equipped with a external modulation port,
which allows external modulation of the phase and amplitude of the oscillator signal. We
use this feature to measure the transfer functions described in this section and in section
3.2.4
. As the rf modulation sidebands are not filtered by the interferometer, any phase noise
on the oscillator should appear in both the rf photocurrent which is the product of optical
heterodyning and the electronic local oscillator with which the rf photocurrent is further
heterodyned to baseband. In this final stage of mixing, oscillator phase noise should cancel
and disappear from the signal; in practice, for reasons which are not wholly understood,
it does not. For LIGO this was a limiting noise source above
∼
1 kHz during 2004. It is
not known whether the solution currently in use (lower noise oscillators) will be feasible for
Advanced LIGO. In the dc readout scheme, the rf sidebands are not used for gravitational wave
signal extraction, and thus have a much reduced opportunity to pollute the signal; potential
coupling routes include (1) noise impressed onto auxiliary degrees of freedom (e.g., CARM
or the Michelson degree of freedom) which can then couple to the DARM signal and (2)
direct sideband leakage through the OMC (which should nominally reject them). Refer to
figure
4
(
a
) for the results of measurements showing a significant improvement for dc readout.
3.2.4. Oscillator amplitude noise.
In the rf readout scheme, any amplitude noise on the
oscillator used to generate the rf modulation sidebands will appear after optical heterodyning
as a gain modulation. If there is a residual, static offset in the signal, then this amplitude noise
can appear directly; otherwise it appears bilinearly with the DARM signal. In the dc readout
scheme, the rf modulation sidebands are used for sensing and control of auxiliary degrees of
freedom, and so noise on these sidebands can couple indirectly to DARM. Additionally, as
6
Class. Quantum Grav.
25
(2008) 114030
R L Ward
et al
10
2
10
3
10
4
10
10
10
10
10
f (Hz)
m/rad
DC Readout
RF Readout
(
a
) Oscillator phase noise coupling
10
2
10
3
10
4
10
10
10
10
f (Hz)
m/RIN
DC Readout
RF Readout
(
b
) Oscillator amplitude noise coupling
Figure 4.
Oscillator noise coupling for the 40m Fabry–Perot Michelson interferometer with power
recycling. The dots indicate experimental data.
the rf modulation sidebands extract power from the carrier, any amplitude fluctuations on the
sidebands correspond to amplitude fluctuations on the carrier, which can manifest as intensity
noise. Direct rf sideband leakage through the OMC can also contribute. Refer to figure
4
(
b
)
for the results of measurements showing a significant improvement for dc readout.
3.2.5. Displacement noise.
Although the Caltech 40m interferometer is not intended as a low-
noise prototype, it is nonetheless interesting to compare the achieved displacement sensitivities
in rf and dc readout configurations. The total displacement noise is broadly similar for both rf
and dc readout, with both configurations achieving the same noise minimum of 2
×
10
−
18
m
√
Hz
near 1 kHz. Above
∼
1 kHz, rf readout shows a greater susceptibility to laser frequency noise,
which conforms to expectations from the measured transfer functions (figure
3
(
a
)). The dc
readout noise spectrum has shown a small excess over that of rf readout between 100–400 Hz.
The source of this noise is currently unknown, but as of this writing we have not carried out
exhaustive efforts to identify it. The noise in dc readout has also been shown to be sensitive
to the static alignment of the beam entering the OMC, although we have not seen evidence of
input beam jitter noise when there is not a significant static misalignment.
4. Conclusions
We have carried out an experiment to characterize a dc readout scheme on a suspended-mass
power-recycled Fabry–Perot Michelson interferometer, using a seismically isolated in-vacuum
output mode cleaning cavity along with an in-vacuum photodetector. We have demonstrated
that the laser noise couplings in rf
/
dc readout schemes behave as expected and that oscillator
noise couplings are significantly reduced in the dc readout scheme. These results represent an
important test of the dc readout system planned for Enhanced LIGO and Advanced LIGO.
Acknowledgments
LIGO was constructed by the California Institute of Technology and Massachusetts Institute of
Technology with funding from the National Science Foundation and operates under cooperative
agreement PHY-0107417. This paper has LIGO document number LIGO-P070125-00-Z.
7
Class. Quantum Grav.
25
(2008) 114030
R L Ward
et al
References
[1] Abramovici A
et al
1992
Science
256
325–33
[2] Acernese F
et al
2002
Class. Quantum Grav.
19
1421
[3] Willke B
et al
2002
Class. Quantum Grav.
19
1377
[4] Ando M and (The TAMA Collaboration) 2002
Class. Quantum Grav.
19
1409
[5] Adhikari R, Fritschel P and Waldman S 2006
LIGO Report no LIGO-T060156-01
[6] Fritschel P 2003
Proc. SPIE-Int. Soc. Opt. Eng.
4856
282
[7] Savage R, King P and Seel S 1998
Laser Phys.
8
679–85
[8] Bork R, Abbott R, Barker D and Heefner J 2001
Proc. ICALEPCS (San Jos
́
e, CA, 27–30 November, 2001)
19–23 (eConf C011127)
[9] Regehr M 1994
LIGO Report no LIGO-P940002-00-I
[10] Fritschel P
et al
2001
Appl. Opt.
40
4988–98
[11] Camp J
et al
2000
J. Opt. Soc. Am.
A
17
120
[12] Sigg D and (The ISC Group) 1997
LIGO Report no LIGO-T970084-00 D
[13] Somiya K
et al
2006
Phys. Rev.
D
73
122005
[14] Evans M 2007
LIGO Report no LIGO-T070260-00
8