Characterization of Aerosol Hygroscopicity Over the
Northeast Paci
fi
c Ocean: Impacts on Prediction
of CCN and Stratocumulus Cloud Droplet
Number Concentrations
B. C. Schulze
1
, S. M. Charan
2
, C. M. Kenseth
2
, W. Kong
2
, K. H. Bates
3
, W. Williams
4
,
A. R. Metcalf
4
, H. H. Jonsson
5
, R. Woods
5
, A. Sorooshian
6,7
, R. C. Flagan
8,2
, and
J. H. Seinfeld
8,2
1
Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA,
2
Division of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA,
3
Center for the
Environment, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA,
4
Department of Environmental Engineering and Earth
Sciences, Clemson University, Anderson, SC, USA,
5
Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, CA, USA,
6
Department of
Chemical and Environmental Engineering, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA,
7
Department of Hydrology and
Atmospheric Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA,
8
Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California
Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
Abstract
During the Marine Aerosol Cloud and Wild
fi
re Study (MACAWS) in June and July of 2018,
aerosol composition and cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) properties were measured over the N.E.
Paci
fi
c to characterize the in
fl
uence of aerosol hygroscopicity on predictions of ambient CCN and
stratocumulus cloud droplet number concentrations (CDNC). Three vertical regions were characterized,
corresponding to the marine boundary layer (MBL), an above
‐
cloud organic aerosol layer (AC
‐
OAL), and
the free troposphere (FT) above the AC
‐
OAL. The aerosol hygroscopicity parameter (
κ
) was calculated
from CCN measurements (
κ
CCN
) and bulk aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS) measurements (
κ
AMS
).
Within the MBL, measured hygroscopicities varied between values typical of both continental environments
(~0.2) and remote marine locations (~0.7). For most
fl
ights, CCN closure was achieved within 20% in the
MBL. For
fi
ve of the seven
fl
ights, assuming a constant aerosol size distribution produced similar or
better CCN closure than assuming a constant
“
marine
”
hygroscopicity (
κ
= 0.72). An aerosol
‐
cloud parcel
model was used to characterize the sensitivity of predicted stratocumulus CDNC to aerosol hygroscopicity,
size distribution properties, and updraft velocity. Average CDNC sensitivity to accumulation mode
aerosol hygroscopicity is 39% as large as the sensitivity to the geometric median diameter in this
environment. Simulations suggest CDNC sensitivity to hygroscopicity is largest in marine stratocumulus
with low updraft velocities (<0.2 m s
−
1
), where accumulation mode particles are most relevant to CDNC,
and in marine stratocumulus or cumulus with large updraft velocities (>0.6 m s
−
1
), where hygroscopic
properties of the Aitken mode dominate hygroscopicity sensitivity.
1. Introduction
Marine stratocumulus (MSc) clouds, commonly observed off the Western coasts of North America, South
America, Africa, and Australia, cover nearly one
fi
fth of the Earth's surface and exert a large impact on its
radiative balance (Wood, 2012). These cloud decks are particularly relevant to global climate due to their
high albedo contrast with the underlying ocean and relatively low altitude, resulting in stronger shortwave
re
fl
ectance than longwave absorption (Brenguier et al., 2000; Randall et al., 1984; Wood, 2012). Previous esti-
mates suggest that a ~12% increase in the albedo of these clouds would produce a negative radiative forcing
equivalent in magnitude to that of doubling atmospheric CO
2
concentrations (Latham et al., 2008; Stevens &
Brenguier, 2009). Remote sensing, parcel modeling, and large eddy simulation (LES) studies have all estab-
lished that MSc exhibit substantial albedo susceptibility to variations in cloud droplet number concentra-
tions (CDNC) (Berner et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2011; Oreopoulos & Platnick, 2008; Platnick &
Twomey, 1994; Sanchez et al., 2016). Understanding the sensitivity of MSc CDNC to aerosols acting as
©2020. The Authors.
This is an open access article under the
terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution
‐
NonCommercial
‐
NoDerivs
License, which permits use and distri-
bution in any medium, provided the
original work is properly cited, the use
is non
‐
commercial and no modi
fi
ca-
tions or adaptations are made.
RESEARCH ARTICLE
10.1029/2020EA001098
Key Points:
•
Aerosol hygroscopicity exhibited
substantial temporal variability in
the MBL
•
Errors in predicted MBL CCN
concentrations produced by
assuming a constant aerosol size
distribution or hygroscopicity are
discussed
•
Sensitivity of simulated CDNC to
hygroscopicity is maximized in
marine clouds with either very weak
or relatively strong updraft velocities
Supporting Information:
•
Supporting Information S1
Correspondence to:
J. H. Seinfeld,
seinfeld@caltech.edu
Citation:
Schulze, B. C., Charan, S. M., Kenseth,
C. M., Kong, W., Bates, K. H., Williams,
W., et al. (2020). Characterization of
aerosol hygroscopicity over the
Northeast Paci
fi
c Ocean: Impacts on
prediction of CCN and stratocumulus
cloud droplet number concentrations.
Earth and Space Science
,
7
,
e2020EA001098. https://doi.org/
10.1029/2020EA001098
Received 10 FEB 2020
Accepted 23 MAY 2020
Accepted article online 3 JUN 2020
SCHULZE ET AL.
1of26
cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) is therefore a critical aspect of reducing uncertainty in climate change pre-
dictions (Seinfeld et al., 2016).
The CDNC and albedo of MSc are substantially in
fl
uenced by the abundance of below
‐
cloud CCN. A recent
satellite analysis suggested that variability in below
‐
cloud CCN concentration may be responsible for ~45%
of the variability in the radiative effect of marine boundary layer clouds (Rosenfeld et al., 2019). This in
fl
u-
ence results from the fact that increased CCN abundance enhances cloud re
fl
ectivity at constant liquid water
path (Twomey, 1977) and has the potential to reduce MSc precipitation rates, increasing cloud lifetime
(Ackerman et al., 1993; Albrecht, 1989; Goren & Rosenfeld, 2012; Rosenfeld, 2006). As a result, a major com-
ponent of the uncertainty in the estimated indirect aerosol forcing has been attributed to the prediction of
below
‐
cloud CCN concentrations (Rosenfeld et al., 2014; Sotiropoulou et al., 2007). While the aerosol size
distribution is generally thought to be the most important determinant of CCN activity (e.g., Dusek
et al., 2006; Ervens et al., 2007; McFiggans et al., 2006; Reutter et al., 2009), particle composition has also
been shown to exert a substantial in
fl
uence (Jimenez et al., 2009; Liu & Wang, 2010; Mei et al., 2013;
Quinn et al., 2008; Sanchez et al., 2016).
The propensity of a given aerosol particle to act as a CCN can be described using Köhler theory
(Köhler, 1936; Seinfeld et al., 2016), provided suf
fi
cient information is known regarding particle size and
solute properties (e.g., molecular weight, solubility, density, and activity). A novel framework,
κ
‐
Köhler the-
ory, condenses these solute characteristics into a single parameter
κ
(the aerosol hygroscopicity) that can be
easily incorporated into large
‐
scale models (Petters & Kreidenweis, 2007). Substantial effort has, therefore,
been devoted to quantifying
κ
values in a multitude of environments (Ervens et al., 2010; Gunthe et al., 2009;
Pringle et al., 2010; Rose et al., 2010; Thalman et al., 2017). While
κ
values characteristic of inorganic aerosol
components are relatively well
‐
established, atmospheric organic aerosol is composed of numerous, highly
diverse organic compounds, complicating representation of organic hygroscopicity using a single parameter
(Kanakidou et al., 2005). Experimental studies have characterized
κ
values of secondary organic aerosol
(SOA) (e.g., Asa
‐
Awuku et al., 2010; Duplissy et al., 2008, 2011; Frosch et al., 2013; Lambe et al., 2011;
Massoli et al., 2010; Zhao et al., 2015), and
fi
eld studies have characterized the typical range of organic
κ
values (
κ
org
) observed in the atmosphere (Chang et al., 2010; Gunthe et al., 2009; Levin et al., 2014; Mei
et al., 2013; Thalman et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2008). Generally, ambient
κ
org
values are found to be 0.1
–
0.2 for aged aerosol and primary marine organics and ~0 for freshly emitted combustion aerosol (e.g., soot)
(Kreidenweis & Asa
‐
Awuku, 2014). A linear relationship has been noted between observed
κ
org
values and
organic aerosol oxygen
‐
to
‐
carbon (O:C) ratios in both the laboratory and the
fi
eld (Chang et al., 2010; Lambe
et al., 2011; Mei et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2019).
Ambient particle hygroscopicity data have been combined with aerosol size distribution measurements in CCN
closure studies to assess the extent to which Köhler theory can be used to predict ambient CCN concentrations
(e.g., Almeida et al., 2014; Asa
‐
Awuku et al., 2011; Cubison et al., 2008; Medina et al., 2007; McFiggans
et al., 2006; Moore et al., 2012; Ren et al., 2018; VanReken et al., 2003). Analyzing the accuracy of predicted
CCN concentrations can provide insight into the in
fl
uence of speci
fi
c aerosol characteristics on CCN activity
(Bougiatioti et al., 2011; Cubison et al., 2008; Medina et al., 2007; VanReken et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2010).
For instance, size
‐
resolved compositional (i.e., hygroscopicity) data are often required to accurately reproduce
observed CCN concentrations in locations dominated by organic aerosol (Bhattu & Tripathi, 2015; Medina
et al., 2007; Ren et al., 2018), while aerosol mixing state has been shown to strongly impact total CCN concen-
trations in urban environments (Cubison et al., 2008; Ervens et al., 2010; Quinn et al., 2008). By analyzing data
from
fi
ve ambient measurement campaigns, Ervens et al. (2010) found that for aerosol measured farther than a
few tens of kilometers from the emission source, CCN activity could be predicted within a factor of two inde-
pendent of either aerosol mixing state (i.e., internal or external) or organic solubility (i.e., insoluble or slightly
soluble). Wang et al. (2010) further demonstrated that CCN concentrations can often be reproduced within 20%
assuming internal mixing of aerosol components if the overall
κ
of the aerosol population is >0.1. The direct
impact of variability in aerosol hygroscopicity on CCN concentrations is often assessed by assuming an invar-
iant chemical composition, represented as a
fi
xed
κ
, in CCN closure analyses. Field campaigns in continental
environments ranging from polluted megacities to the pristine tropical rainforest have shown that CCN con-
centrations could be reproduced within 20% and 50%, respectively, assuming a constant
κ
= 0.3 (Gunthe
et al., 2009; Rose et al., 2010), a value representative of average continental conditions (Andreae &
Rosenfeld, 2008; Pringle et al., 2010). However, in coastal regions, MBL aerosol can result from a mixture of
10.1029/2020EA001098
Earth and Space Science
SCHULZE ET AL.
2of26
distinct marine and continental emissions (e.g., Coggon et al., 2014; Mardi et al., 2018; Modini et al., 2015;
Sorooshian et al., 2009), which complicates aerosol representation using regional or global models. CCN closure
analysis can provide insight into the uncertainties in CCN concentrations that may result from inaccurate
model representation of aerosol composition in these environments.
Due to the importance of the persistent stratocumulus cloud decks over the N.E. Paci
fi
c to global climate,
aerosol characteristics in this region have received considerable attention. However, the diverse range of par-
ticle sources, including shipping exhaust (Coggon et al., 2012; Murphy et al., 2009; Prabhakar et al., 2014;
Wonaschütz et al., 2013), primary and secondary natural marine emissions (Modini et al., 2015;
Prabhakar et al., 2014; Sorooshian et al., 2009), anthropogenic and biogenic continental emissions
(Coggon et al., 2014; Hegg et al., 2010; Moore et al., 2012), wild
fi
re plumes (Brioude et al., 2009; Mardi
et al., 2018), and aged aerosol from the Asian continent (Roberts et al., 2006, 2010), combined with strong
temporal and spatial variability due to variable meteorological conditions, has hindered determination of
general characteristics of the marine atmosphere in this location. This complexity is re
fl
ected in the diversity
of hygroscopicity measurements previously reported in the marine boundary layer (MBL) and free tropo-
sphere (FT). For instance, average
κ
values reported from MBL measurements have varied from ~0.2
–
0.3
(Moore et al., 2012; Roberts et al., 2010) to ~0.5
–
0.7 (Royalty et al., 2017; Yakobi
‐
Hancock et al., 2014).
Measurements in the FT, while sparse, have been even more variable (
κ
~0.05
–
1.0) (Roberts et al., 2006,
2010). While these measurements could largely be reconciled assuming various mixtures of continental
(0.27 ± 0.2) and marine (0.72 ± 0.2) aerosol, determining the major emissions sources and meteorological
patterns dictating these changes is important for improving model representation of the region (Pringle
et al., 2010). CCN
‐
based measurements of aerosol hygroscopicity and the resulting information about small
particle composition can be especially useful in this regard, as knowledge of small particle composition can
provide substantial insight into particle sources.
While hygroscopicity and mixing state characterization are important components of understanding the
CCN activity of ambient aerosol, the dynamic processes controlling supersaturation, droplet nucleation,
and droplet growth within clouds lead to nonlinear relationships between aerosol properties and CDNC.
As a result, aerosol
‐
cloud parcel modeling is instrumental to fully understand the role of aerosol hygrosco-
picity and mixing state on CDNC. Reutter et al. (2009) used such a model to distinguish three regimes of
aerosol activation, de
fi
ned as the aerosol
‐
limited, updraft
‐
limited, and transitional regimes, based on the
ratio of updraft velocity to aerosol number concentration at the cloud base. The dependence of CDNC on
aerosol hygroscopicity, while limited relative to other parameters such as particle number concentration
and updraft velocity, was found to vary substantially between regimes. Additional modeling revealed that
CDNC sensitivity to aerosol hygroscopicity is highly dependent on the below
‐
cloud aerosol size distribu-
tion, with sensitivity increasing substantially with smaller median radii (Ward et al., 2010). Sanchez
et al. (2016) concluded that modeled stratocumulus albedo is insensitive to the assumed hygroscopicity
of the organic aerosol fraction; however, the sensitivity of CDNC to bulk hygroscopicity has yet to be fully
evaluated in this environment.
The present study uses measurements of aerosol composition and CCN activity collected during the Marine
Aerosol Cloud and Wild
fi
re Study (MACAWS), combined with an aerosol
‐
cloud parcel model, to gain
insight into near
‐
coastal aerosol hygroscopicity and its in
fl
uence on prediction of CCN and MSc CDNC.
Hygroscopicity measurements are combined with airmass backward trajectories and meteorological para-
meters to attribute observed particle characteristics to distinct sources when possible. CCN closure analyses
are performed to investigate the impact of compositional and mixing state assumptions on CCN predictions.
Finally, aerosol
‐
cloud parcel model simulations constrained with MSc microphysical measurements are
used to directly investigate the sensitivity of stratocumulus CDNC to aerosol hygroscopicity, mixing state,
and size distribution properties.
2. Methodology
2.1. MACAWS Field Mission
The 2018 Marine Aerosol Cloud and Wild
fi
re Study (MACAWS) consisted of 16 research
fl
ights operated out
of the Center for Interdisciplinary Remotely
‐
Piloted Aircraft Studies (CIRPAS) in Marina, California,
during June and July. Measurements were performed on
‐
board the CIRPAS Navy Twin Otter aircraft
10.1029/2020EA001098
Earth and Space Science
SCHULZE ET AL.
3of26
(Coggon et al., 2012, 2014; Russell et al., 2013; Sorooshian et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2016). The scienti
fi
c
objectives of individual
fl
ights included characterization of marine aerosols and clouds, sampling of
shipping vessel exhaust plumes, and investigation of nearby wild
fi
re emissions. The present study focuses
on seven research
fl
ights primarily aimed at characterization of the relationship between marine aerosol
and the overlying stratocumulus cloud deck. Paths of these seven
fl
ights are depicted in Figure 1. Flight
strategies typically involved a series of level legs at varying altitudes within the MBL and overlying FT.
Slant or spiral soundings were generally performed before and after a series of level legs.
2.2. Twin Otter Instrumentation
The navigational and meteorological instrumentation utilized by the Twin Otter aircraft is described in
detail by Sorooshian et al. (2018). Ambient aerosol was sampled using a forward
‐
facing sub
‐
isokinetic inlet
(Hegg et al., 2005). Aerosol and cloud droplet number concentrations were characterized using a variety of
instruments, including multiple condensation particle counters (CPC, TSI 3010,
D
p
> 10 nm; ultra
fi
ne CPC,
TSI UFCPC,
D
p
> 3 nm), a passive cavity aerosol spectrometer probe (PCASP,
D
p
~0.11
–
3.4
μ
m), and forward
scattering spectrometer probe (FSSP, Particle Measuring Systems [PMS],
D
p
~1.6
–
45
μ
m). Cloud liquid water
content was measured using a PVM
‐
100A probe (Gerber et al., 1994), and a threshold value of 0.02 g m
−
3
was
used to distinguish in
‐
cloud sampling (Dadashazar et al., 2018; MacDonald et al., 2018).
Cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) number concentrations were measured at four supersaturations (SS)
(0.1%, 0.3%, 0.43%, and 0.57%) using a Droplet Measurement Technologies (DMT) dual
‐
column streamwise
thermal
‐
gradient cloud condensation nuclei counter (CCNC) (Lance et al., 2006; Roberts & Nenes, 2005).
The CCNC operates by applying a linear temperature gradient to a cylindrical sampling tube with continu-
ously wetted walls. As the thermal diffusivity of water vapor exceeds the diffusivity of air, supersaturated
conditions are produced along the sampling column centerline. For this study, activated droplets grown to
sizes larger than 0.75
‐
μ
m diameter were counted and sized by an optical particle counter. The sheath and
sample
fl
ows of each column were maintained at 0.45 and 0.05 L min
−
1
, respectively. Instrument pressure
was maintained at 750 mb using a
fl
ow ori
fi
ce and active pressure control system at the instrument inlet.
Each column of the CCNC was calibrated using ammonium sulfate particles following standard methods
as described in Rose et al. (2008). Calibrations were performed before and after the campaign, and observed
Figure 1.
(a) Trajectories of the seven MACAWS research
fl
ights analyzed in this study. (b) Relative vertical locations of the marine boundary layer, the
above
‐
cloud organic
‐
aerosol layer (AC
‐
OAL), and the free troposphere.
10.1029/2020EA001098
Earth and Space Science
SCHULZE ET AL.
4of26
deviations in applied SS for a given temperature gradient imply uncertainties of ~6%, similar to the 5% value
typical of
fi
eld campaigns, as reported by Rose et al. (2008).
Aerosol size distributions and number concentrations for
D
p
between ~15 and 800 nm were measured with a
custom
‐
built scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS) consisting of a differential mobility analyzer (DMA,
TSI 3081) coupled to a condensation particle counter (TSI 3010). The DMA is operated in a closed
‐
system
con
fi
guration with a recirculating sheath and excess
fl
ow of 2.67 L min
−
1
and an aerosol
fl
ow of
0.515 L min
−
1
. The column voltage was scanned from 15 to 9,850 V over a ~2
‐
min interval.
Aerosol chemical composition was measured using a high
‐
resolution time
‐
of
‐
fl
ight aerosol mass spectro-
meter (HR
‐
ToF
‐
AMS, Aerodyne Research Inc., hereafter referred to AMS) (DeCarlo et al., 2006).
Incoming air enters the AMS through a 100
‐
μ
m critical ori
fi
ce, after which an aerodynamic lens pro-
duces a particle beam that is accelerated under high vacuum. The particle beam is
fl
ash
‐
vaporized on
a resistively heated surface (600°C), and the resulting gases are ionized by electron impaction
(70 eV). Individual ion identity is determined using a high
‐
resolution time
‐
of
‐
fl
ight mass spectrometer.
Due to the limited amount of aerosol mass present over the MBL, data were collected in high
‐
sensitivity
V
‐
mode. The ionization ef
fi
ciency (IE) of the AMS was calibrated using dry, 350
‐
nm ammonium nitrate
particles before each
fl
ight. Data were averaged over 1
‐
min intervals, and all data were analyzed using
standard AMS software (SQUIRREL v1.57 and PIKA v1.16l) within Igor Pro 6.37. The collection ef
fi
-
ciency (CE) was determined using the composition
‐
dependent calculator within the SQUIRREL and
PIKA software packages (Middlebrook et al., 2012). Elemental H:C and O:C ratios were calculated using
the
“
Improved
‐
Ambient
”
elemental analysis method for AMS mass spectra (Canagaratna et al., 2015).
Positive matrix factorization (PMF) analysis (Paatero & Tapper, 1994) was performed on the
high
‐
resolution AMS mass spectra in order to distinguish major classes and transformation processes
of measured OA. Three factors were extracted, two of which factors correspond to OA subtypes charac-
teristic of the MBL and above
‐
cloud organic aerosol layer (AC
‐
OAL), respectively, and resemble
low
‐
volatility oxygenated organic aerosol (LV
‐
OOA). The third factor, which was rarely observed, is
likely a result of primary anthropogenic emissions and resembles hydrocarbon
‐
like organic aerosol
(HOA). Further discussion of PMF data preparation and factor interpretation is included in the support-
ing information.
2.3. Determination of Aerosol Hygroscopicity
Aerosol hygroscopicity was calculated using two distinct methods based on measurements with the CCNC
and AMS, respectively. Assuming a particle population is internally mixed, the critical activation diameter
(
D
p,c
) (the diameter at which all larger particles will activate into cloud droplets) produced by a given SS
can be determined by integrating the particle size distribution until the total CN concentration is equivalent
to the measured CCN concentration:
N
CCN
¼
∫
∞
D
p
;
c
n
CN
dD
p
(1)
Knowledge of the critical diameter can then be used to calculate a single parameter representation of aerosol
hygroscopicity from Köhler theory (Petters & Kreidenweis, 2007):
s
¼
D
3
wet
−
D
3
p
;
c
D
3
wet
−
D
3
p
;
c
1
−
κ
CCN
ðÞ
exp
4
σ
M
w
RT
ρ
w
D
wet
(2)
where
s
is the equilibrium supersaturation,
D
p,c
is the critical activation diameter,
D
wet
is the droplet dia-
meter,
R
is the universal gas constant,
T
is the absolute temperature,
ρ
w
is the molar density of water,
M
w
is the molecular weight of water, and
σ
is the surface tension of the droplet at the point of activation.
Following Rose et al. (2010),
κ
was determined by applying the observed activation diameter and varying
both
D
wet
and
κ
until
s
is equivalent to the applied supersaturation of the CCNC and the maximum of a
Köhler curve of CCN activation. The droplet surface tension is assumed equal to that of water for compar-
ison with other studies (Collins et al., 2013; Petters & Kreidenweis, 2007; Roberts et al., 2010;
Yakobi
‐
Hancock et al., 2014). Hygroscopicity values calculated using this method are referred to as
“
CCN
‐
derived.
”
Since the likelihood of particle activation at a given SS tends to be a stronger function
10.1029/2020EA001098
Earth and Space Science
SCHULZE ET AL.
5of26
of size than composition (Dusek et al., 2006),
κ
CCN
values correspond to particles with diameters near the
calculated critical diameter.
A Monte Carlo approach was used to estimate the uncertainty in CCN
‐
derived kappa values (Wang
et al., 2019). A detailed description is provided in the supporting information. For a given measurement
of the aerosol size distribution and CCN number concentration, the distribution of possible
κ
CCN
values
calculated by varying these input parameters (i.e., CCN number concentration and size distribution)
within their respective uncertainties is lognormally distributed. As a result, uncertainties attributed to
κ
CCN
are not symmetric about the geometric mean values. In general, we estimate 1
σ
uncertainties of
+55%/
−
40% for
κ
CCN
calculated at SS = 0.3%, ~+75%/
−
45% at SS = 0.43%, and +100%/
−
50% to values
calculated at SS = 0.57%. Due to the low CCN number concentrations observed at SS = 0.1%
(<100 cm
−
3
) and possibility of counting unactivated particles (expected to only be a few per cm
−
3
),
κ
CCN
at SS = 0.1% are not reported, as small absolute deviations in particle number concentration mea-
sured by the CCNC and DMA due to differential inlet losses could strongly in
fl
uence the resulting
κ
CCN
estimates.
Hygroscopicity estimates can also be made using component volume fractions measured by the HR
‐
ToF
‐
AMS using the following equation (Petters & Kreidenweis, 2007):
κ
AMS
¼
∑
N
i
ε
i
κ
i
(3)
where
ε
i
and
κ
i
represent the volume fraction and hygroscopicity of the
i
th NR
‐
PM
1
component, respec-
tively. While this calculation cannot capture the contribution of refractory components (sea salt, mineral
dust, etc.), further analysis suggests their contribution is minor, as discussed in the supporting informa-
tion. Organic aerosol density was assumed to be 1.4 g cm
−
3
for volume fraction calculations given the
remote nature of the environments sampled and the oxidized character of the measured organic aerosol
(e.g., O:C ratios of MBL and AC
‐
OAL PMF factors were 0.91 and 0.76, respectively) (Hallquist
et al., 2009; Roberts et al., 2010). The hygroscopicity of individual inorganic components is calculated
using
κ
i
¼
M
w
ρ
w
ρ
i
M
i
v
i
(4)
where
M
w
and
ρ
w
are the molar mass and density of water, respectively, and
M
i
,
ρ
i
, and
v
i
are the molar
mass, density, and van't Hoff factor of the inorganic component. Inorganic aerosol was dominated by sul-
fate and ammonium. The relative abundances of ammonium sulfate, ammonium bisulfate, and sulfuric
acid were calculated using the molar ratio of ammonium to sulfate (Asa
‐
Awuku et al., 2011; Nenes
et al., 1998). Ammonium sulfate and bisulfate were assigned van't Hoff factors of 2.5, while sulfuric acid
was assigned
κ
= 0.9 to align with previous measurements (Petters & Kreidenweis, 2007). Modifying the
van't Hoff factors of ammonium sulfate and ammonium bisulfate and assumed
κ
of sulfuric acid within
reasonable limits had a negligible in
fl
uence on the presented results. Chloride measured by the AMS
was assumed to represent sodium chloride and was assigned a hygroscopicity of 1.28 (Petters &
Kreidenweis, 2007). AMS
‐
measured nitrate aerosol was assumed to be ammonium nitrate with a hygrosco-
picity of 0.67 (Petters & Kreidenweis, 2007). The hygroscopicity of the organic component (
κ
org
) was
assumed to be either 0 (non
‐
hygroscopic), 0.1 (slightly
‐
hygroscopic), or a function OA composition using
a parameterization based on bulk O:C ratios developed in the literature (Lambe et al., 2011). Comparisons
of
κ
CCN
and
κ
AMS
values, analysis of PMF factor composition, and evaluation of CCN
‐
closure calculations
are used to evaluate these different
κ
org
estimates.
An uncertainty analysis similar to that described for
κ
CCN
values was performed for
κ
AMS
values and is
described in detail in the supporting information. For median conditions in the MBL and FT, the relative
uncertainty in
κ
AMS
is estimated to be ~10
–
20%, due primarily to uncertainty in the estimated hygroscopicity
of the organic component (
κ
org
). In the AC
‐
OAL, the dominant contribution of organic aerosol increases the
relative uncertainty to ~50%; however, due to the low absolute
κ
AMS
values observed in the AC
‐
OAL, the
absolute uncertainty is only ~0.1 or less.
10.1029/2020EA001098
Earth and Space Science
SCHULZE ET AL.
6of26
2.4. Aerosol
‐
Cloud Parcel Model
The aerosol
‐
cloud parcel model used in this study employs a user
‐
speci
fi
ed updraft velocity to induce adia-
batic cooling of an air parcel, leading to water vapor supersaturation. The predicted parcel supersaturation at
each time step is determined by the relative rates of production through adiabatic cooling and loss through
condensation of water vapor onto activated cloud droplets (Pruppacher & Klett, 1997; Seinfeld et al., 2016).
In the present study, meteorological parameters such as ambient pressure, temperature, and lapse rate are
obtained from MACAWS aircraft measurements and are speci
fi
ed before model execution. The
below
‐
cloud dry size distribution is assumed to contain Aitken and accumulation modes, the characteristics
of which (i.e., number concentration, geometric mean diameter, hygroscopicity) are set by the user. Particles
within each mode can be speci
fi
ed as either internally or externally mixed. Each compositional class, 1
per size mode if internally mixed or 2 per size mode if externally mixed, contains 300 lognormally
spaced bins ranging from 1 nm to 3
μ
m. Droplet activation is assumed to occur when the ambient
supersaturation of the parcel exceeds the critical supersaturation of the particles in a given size bin,
as determined from
κ
‐
Kohler theory (Petters & Kreidenweis, 2007). Following activation, the growth
of individual cloud droplet bins due to water vapor diffusion is explicitly represented. Additional physi-
cal processes such as droplet coagulation, coalescence, and deposition are not included, as previous par-
cel model studies have demonstrated that these processes have little in
fl
uence on model predictions for
typical marine stratocumulus conditions (Sanchez et al., 2016). Model execution proceeds until a
user
‐
speci
fi
ed liquid water content (0.4 g m
−
3
in this study) has been reached. Activated particle size
bins larger than 1
μ
m are considered cloud droplets; however, using an alternative size threshold of
2
μ
m or 0.75
μ
m has a negligible in
fl
uence on the results.
2.5. Air Mass Backward Trajectories
Air mass backward trajectories (120 hr) were calculated in the MBL for each
fl
ight using the NOAA
HYSPLIT v4.2 model with the global data assimilation system (GDAS) 1° × 1° meteorological data set
(Draxler & Hess, 1997, 1998; Stein et al., 2015). The higher spatial resolution EDAS 40 km × 40 km meteor-
ological data set was not used due to its limited spatial range over the Paci
fi
c Ocean. The ending altitude of
each trajectory was the approximate midpoint of the MBL during each
fl
ight.
Figure 2.
Vertical pro
fi
les of (a) RH and LWC, (b) CCN and CN concentrations, and (c) non
‐
refractory (NR) PM
1
component mass loadings for the seven RFs in
Figure 1. Markers represent median values, while horizontal bars span the interquartile range. (d) Vertical contour plot of median size distributio
ns measured
during the seven RFs. The dark grey region in panels a
–
c represents the average stratocumulus cloud depth (avg. cloud top height
≈
570 m; avg. cloud bottom
height
≈
300 m). The lighter grey region represents the standard deviation of cloud top and bottom heights (e.g., avg. cloud top + cloud top height S.D.
≈
680 m).
10.1029/2020EA001098
Earth and Space Science
SCHULZE ET AL.
7of26
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Aerosol Characteristics Over the N.E. Paci
fi
c
Results from the seven
fl
ights analyzed in this study are summarized in Figure 2 and Tables 1
–
3. In the sub-
sequent analyses,
“
all
fl
ights
”
refers to these seven. Typical
fl
ight patterns included sampling within the
MBL, FT, and, when present, the above
‐
cloud organic aerosol layer (AC
‐
OAL). The AC
‐
OAL is operationally
de
fi
ned as the narrow altitude band (generally <200 m) directly above the marine stratocumulus cloud decks
where OA mass loadings were relatively large (>1.5
μ
gm
−
3
) and a distinct AC
‐
OAL PMF factor contributed
>80% of total OA mass (Figure S6). This region occupies a similar location as the commonly referenced
entrainment interface layer (EIL) above cloud decks (Dadashazar et al., 2018; Wood, 2012), but is de
fi
ned
by the aerosol characteristics described above rather than by turbulence and buoyancy characteristics, as
is common for the EIL (Carman et al., 2012). Median aerosol properties are reported in Tables 1
–
3 for each
of these three regions, while Figure 2 displays vertical pro
fi
les of aerosol and meteorological properties.
Distinct differences in particle properties were observed within each vertical region. Median aerosol number
concentrations observed in the MBL (754 cm
−
3
) exceeded those in the FT (333 cm
−
3
), as expected. Observed
particle concentrations were maximized within the AC
‐
OAL (1,662 cm
−
3
), where intense actinic
fl
uxes and
elevated concentrations of the hydroxyl radical may drive new particle formation (Dadashazar et al., 2018;
Mauldin et al., 1999). For all measured SS > 0.1%, observed CCN concentrations were also largest within
the AC
‐
OAL, rather than the MBL or FT, underscoring the importance of understanding the hygroscopicity
of above
‐
cloud CCN
‐
active particles (Coggon et al., 2014; Sorooshian, Lu, et al., 2007; Sorooshian et al., 2007;
Wang et al., 2008).
Observed aerosol composition in the MBL was relatively evenly divided between organic aerosol (OA) (43%)
and sulfate (SO
4
) (48%), with a minor contribution from ammonium (NH
4
) (~10%) and negligible nitrate
(NO
3
)(
≤
1%). Prabhakar et al. (2014) have demonstrated that nitrate is preferentially distributed in
super
‐
micron particles in this marine environment, in agreement with the minor contribution observed with
the AMS in this study. Using the
“
clean
”
versus
“
perturbed
”
threshold introduced by Coggon et al. (2012) for
this region (where
“
clean
”
is de
fi
ned by aerosol mass concentrations <1
μ
gm
−
3
), average MBL conditions
were
“
perturbed
”
by shipping vessel emissions or other anthropogenic sources such as continental out
fl
ow.
A distinct, highly oxidized MBL PMF factor was extracted from the data set (Figure S6). The oxidized nature
of the MBL factor (O:C = 0.91) precludes the use of marker ions to distinguish individual sources; however,
potential sources include shipping and biogenic emissions, as well as oxidized continental out
fl
ow
aerosol (Coggon et al., 2012; Hegg et al., 2010; Sorooshian et al., 2009). In the AC
‐
OAL, observed aerosol
composition was dominated by organics (80%), as has been previously reported (Coggon et al., 2014;
Table 1
Median Aerosol Number (N) and Cloud Condensation Nuclei (CCN) Concentrations Measured in the Marine Boundary Layer (MBL), Above
‐
Cloud Organic Aerosol
Layer (AC
‐
OAL), and Free Troposphere (FT)
Location
N (cm
−
3
)
CCN: 0.1% (cm
−
3
)
CCN: 0.3% (cm
−
3
)
CCN: 0.43% (cm
−
3
)
CCN: 0.57% (cm
−
3
)
MBL
754 (509
–
978)
75 (33
–
106)
194 (146
–
285)
302 (187
–
410)
410 (229
–
522)
AC
‐
OAL
1,662 (1,303
–
1,959)
58 (41
–
84)
363 (260
–
537)
574 (403
–
876)
781 (539
–
1,051)
FT
333 (296
–
555)
21 (14
–
35)
115 (89
–
145)
144 (102
–
194)
162 (118
–
240)
Note
. Values in parentheses represent the interquartile range. CCN concentrations are provided as a function of the instrument supersaturation (%).
Table 2
Median Mass Loadings of Total Non
‐
Refractory PM1 (NR
‐
PM
1
), and Organic (Org.), Sulfate (SO
4
), Ammonium (NH
4
), and Nitrate (NO
3
) Aerosol Components in
the Marine Boundary Layer (MBL), Above
‐
Cloud Organic Aerosol Layer (AC
‐
OAL), and Free Troposphere (FT)
Location
NR
‐
PM
1
(
μ
gm
−
3
)
Org. (
μ
gm
−
3
)SO
4
(
μ
gm
−
3
)NH
4
(
μ
gm
−
3
)NO
3
(
μ
gm
−
3
)
MBL
2.8 (2.3
–
2.5)
1.1 (0.8
–
1.4)
1.5 (0.9
–
2.0)
0.2 (0.2
–
0.3)
0.0 (0.0
–
0.1)
AC
‐
OAL
5.5 (4.5
–
7.5)
4.4 (3.2
–
6.1)
0.7 (0.6
–
1.1)
0.2 (0.2
–
0.3)
0.1 (0.0
–
0.1)
FT
1.5 (1.2
–
2.1)
0.7 (0.5
–
1.0)
0.6 (0.4
–
0.7)
0.1 (0.1
–
0.2)
0.0 (0.0
–
0.0)
Note
. Values in parentheses represent the interquartile range.
10.1029/2020EA001098
Earth and Space Science
SCHULZE ET AL.
8of26