Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published March 17, 2020 | Published + Supplemental Material
Journal Article Open

Text mining meets community curation: a newly designed curation platform to improve author experience and participation at WormBase


Biological knowledgebases rely on expert biocuration of the research literature to maintain up-to-date collections of data organized in machine-readable form. To enter information into knowledgebases, curators need to follow three steps: (i) identify papers containing relevant data, a process called triaging; (ii) recognize named entities; and (iii) extract and curate data in accordance with the underlying data models. WormBase (WB), the authoritative repository for research data on Caenorhabditis elegans and other nematodes, uses text mining (TM) to semi-automate its curation pipeline. In addition, WB engages its community, via an Author First Pass (AFP) system, to help recognize entities and classify data types in their recently published papers. In this paper, we present a new WB AFP system that combines TM and AFP into a single application to enhance community curation. The system employs string-searching algorithms and statistical methods (e.g. support vector machines (SVMs)) to extract biological entities and classify data types, and it presents the results to authors in a web form where they validate the extracted information, rather than enter it de novo as the previous form required. With this new system, we lessen the burden for authors, while at the same time receive valuable feedback on the performance of our TM tools. The new user interface also links out to specific structured data submission forms, e.g. for phenotype or expression pattern data, giving the authors the opportunity to contribute a more detailed curation that can be incorporated into WB with minimal curator review. Our approach is generalizable and could be applied to additional knowledgebases that would like to engage their user community in assisting with the curation. In the five months succeeding the launch of the new system, the response rate has been comparable with that of the previous AFP version, but the quality and quantity of the data received has greatly improved.

Additional Information

© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Received 29 October 2019; Revised 8 January 2020; Accepted 14 January 2020. Published: 17 March 2020. We would particularly like to thank all authors who participated in testing and all WB curators who helped validate author submissions. We also thank Gary Ruvkun for the permission to use his name in Figure 3. Funding: National Institutes of Health/National Human Genome Research Institute grants [U24HG002223 (WormBase) and U24HG010859 (Alliance Central)]. Author Notes: Valerio Arnaboldi, Daniela Raciti and Kimberly Van Auken contributed equally. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Attached Files

Published - baaa006.pdf

Supplemental Material - s1_baaa006.jpeg


Files (2.5 MB)
Name Size Download all
836.5 kB Preview Download
1.7 MB Preview Download

Additional details

August 19, 2023
December 22, 2023