Published March 2005 | Version Submitted
Working Paper Open

An axiomatic theory of political representation

Abstract

We discuss the theory of voting rules which are immune to gerrymandering. Our approach is axiomatic. We show that any rule that is unanimous, anonymous, and representative consistent must decide a social alternative as a function of the proportions of agents voting for each alternative, and must either be independent of this proportion, or be in one-to-one correspondence with the proportions. In an extended model in which voters can vote over elements of the unit interval, we introduce and characterize the quasi-proportional rules based on unanimity, anonymity, representative consistency, strict monotonicity, and continuity. We show that we can always (pointwise) approximate a single-member district quota rule with a quasi-proportional rule. We also establish that upon weakening strict monotonicity, the generalized target rules emerge.

Additional Information

I would like to thank participants of the 2004 Meeting of the Society of Economic Design, and from the joint Harvard/MIT Economic Theory seminar.

Attached Files

Submitted - sswp1218.pdf

Files

sswp1218.pdf

Files (412.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:49868fea08c45cd3f818cff97c2327ea
412.5 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

Eprint ID
80002
Resolver ID
CaltechAUTHORS:20170809-092845210

Dates

Created
2017-08-09
Created from EPrint's datestamp field
Updated
2020-03-09
Created from EPrint's last_modified field

Caltech Custom Metadata

Caltech groups
Social Science Working Papers
Series Name
Social Science Working Paper
Series Volume or Issue Number
1218