Rigorous verification, validation, uncertainty quantification and certification through concentration-of-measure inequalities
We apply concentration-of-measure inequalities to the quantification of uncertainties in the performance of engineering systems. Specifically, we envision uncertainty quantification in the context of certification, i.e., as a tool for deciding whether a system is likely to perform safely and reliably within design specifications. We show that concentration-of-measure inequalities rigorously bound probabilities of failure and thus supply conservative certification criteria. In addition, they supply unambiguous quantitative definitions of terms such as margins, epistemic and aleatoric uncertainties, verification and validation measures, confidence factors, and others, as well as providing clear procedures for computing these quantities by means of concerted simulation and experimental campaigns. We also investigate numerically the tightness of concentration-of-measure inequalities with the aid of an imploding ring example. Our numerical tests establish the robustness and viability of concentration-of-measure inequalities as a basis for certification in that particular example of application.
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier. Received 11 August 2007; revised 27 May 2008; accepted 4 June 2008. Available online 1 July 2008. The authors gratefully acknowledge the support received from NSF through an ITR grant on Multiscale Modeling and Simulation and Caltech's Center for Integrative Multiscale Modeling and Simulation.
The files for this record are restricted to users on the Caltech campus network: