Published July 1984 | Version Submitted
Working Paper Open

Speculation and Price Stability Under Uncertainty: A Generalization

Abstract

Since Friedman maintained that profitable speculation necessarily stabilizes prices, the necessary and sufficient conditions for his conjecture to hold have been derived following ex post analyses. However, within these frameworks, no uncertainty is involved. In this paper we assume the nonspeculative excess demand functions are always linear but with random slopes and intercepts (i. i. d. across time). Employing dynamic programming approaches, the optimal complete speculation sequence for a monopolistic speculator (which maximizes his long-run expected profits) can be characterized. Furthermore, Friedman's conjecture holds under this sequence. As for competitive speculation cases, we consider three variants arising from deviations of the monopolistic case. Of these, two models establish the property that Friedman's conjecture holds for optimal speculation sequences. However, since this conjecture might be falsified for the other model, a necessary condition is derived. Also, an example is given which shows that, if uncertainties are involved, a destabilizing optimal speculation sequence exists even with linear nonspeculative excess demand functions.

Additional Information

I am indebted to James Quirk for helpful comments and editings, also to Richard McKelvey for helpful comments. In preparing Section IV, I benefited from useful discussions with David Grether and Quang Vuong. All errors, of course, remain mine.

Attached Files

Submitted - sswp536.pdf

Files

sswp536.pdf

Files (186.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:96a63a2720049aea664ac830d78c6002
186.8 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

Eprint ID
81577
Resolver ID
CaltechAUTHORS:20170919-141552441

Dates

Created
2017-09-19
Created from EPrint's datestamp field
Updated
2019-10-03
Created from EPrint's last_modified field

Caltech Custom Metadata

Caltech groups
Social Science Working Papers
Series Name
Social Science Working Paper
Series Volume or Issue Number
536