of 11
Quantifying the Dynamics of Bacterial Secondary Metabolites by
Spectral Multi-Photon Microscopy
Nora L. Sullivan
1,2,3
,
Dimitrios S. Tzeranis
3,4
,
Yun Wang
1,5
,
Peter T.C. So
4,6
, and
Dianne
Newman
1,7,*
1
Department of Biology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Massachusetts Institute of
Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
4
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA,
USA
6
Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA,
USA
Abstract
Phenazines, a group of fluorescent small molecules produced by the bacterium
Pseudomonas
aeruginosa
, play a role in maintaining cellular redox homeostasis. Phenazines have been
challenging to study
in vivo
due to their redox activity, presence both intra- and extracellularly,
and their diverse chemical properties. Here, we describe a non-invasive
in vivo
optical technique
to monitor phenazine concentrations within bacterial cells using time-lapsed spectral multi-photon
fluorescence microscopy. This technique enables simultaneous monitoring of multiple weakly-
fluorescent molecules (phenazines, siderophores, NAD(P)H) expressed by bacteria in culture. This
work provides the first
in vivo
measurements of reduced phenazine concentration as well as the
first description of the temporal dynamics of the phenazine-NAD(P)H redox system in
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
, illuminating an unanticipated role for 1-hydroxyphenazine. Similar
approaches could be used to study the abundance and redox dynamics of a wide range of small
molecules within bacteria, both as single cells and in communities.
Small molecules play a variety of roles for microorganisms, including serving as cofactors
within proteins, acting as antibiotics, functioning as inter- and intra-cellular signals, and
facilitating iron uptake (1). Given their widespread importance (2), the development of
novel methods to measure them
in vivo
has been recognized as a research priority (3). Due
to their small size and varied structures, studying the physiological functions of small
molecules is quite challenging. Standard biochemical techniques quantify the amount of
small molecules released by a bacterial population by purifying individual components from
cultures (4) or measuring small molecule activity (5). Such techniques have limited time
resolution and often cannot identify modifications including changes in redox state. These
limitations can be circumvented when studying fluorescent small molecules because their
spatio-temporal expression can be quantified by fluorescence microscopy and spectroscopy.
As proof of principle, we utilized spectral multi-photon microscopy to study several
fluorescent small molecules (phenazines, NAD(P)H) in the opportunistic pathogen
*
dkn@caltech.edu.
2
current address: Molecular and Cellular Biology Department, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
3
These authors contributed equally to this work.
5
current address: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL USA
7
current address: Division of Biology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
Supporting Information Available
: This material is available free of charge
via
the Internet.
Published as:
ACS Chem Biol
. 2011 September 16; 6(9): 893–899.
HHMI Author Manuscript
HHMI Author Manuscript
HHMI Author Manuscript
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
. While biochemical studies usually focus on one or a few time-
points, fluorescence microscopy provides the ability to quantify multiple fluorescent
components over long periods of time with fast temporal sampling, and acquire information
about the underlying molecular circuitry based on the temporal response of each component
when the circuitry is manipulated. Here, we describe a sensitive imaging technique to
measure the impact of phenazines on the redox state of
P. aeruginosa
under O
2
-limited
conditions.
The wild type
P. aeruginosa
strain PA14 produces several fluorescent small molecules: the
two redox-active co-factors NAD(P)H and FAD, which are fluorescent in their reduced and
oxidized states, respectively (6); the two iron siderophores pyoverdine (PVD) and pyochelin
(PCH) (7); and finally phenazines, a group of redox-active secondary metabolites.
P.
aeruginosa
produces several kinds of phenazines: the precursor phenazine-1-carboxylic acid
(PCA), 1-hydroxyphenazine (1OHP), pyocyanin (PYO), 5-methyl-phenazine-1-carboxylic
acid (5MPCA), and phenazine 1-carboxamide (PCN) (Figure 1a,b; Figure 2b) (8).
Phenazines are produced and reduced by bacterial cells and are oxidized extracellularly by
terminal electron acceptors including Fe(III) and O
2
(9); their intracellular reduction has
been implicated in facilitating redox homeostasis (4) and survival (10) when cells are
oxidant-limited.
Each phenazine can exist in two stable redox states. The oxidized phenazines PCA
ox
,
PYO
ox
, 1OHP
ox
are non-fluorescent. Reduction of these phenazines by the addition of two
electrons and two hydrogen ions changes their color and converts them into the fluorescent
molecules PCA
red
, PYO
red
, 1OHP
red
(Figure 1a). PCN, on the other hand, is fluorescent in
both its oxidized and reduced form, while 5MPCA is only fluorescent when oxidized. We
neglected the fluorescence emission of FAD
ox
and PCN
red
because these fluorophores are
excited inefficiently by our system. Experimentally observed concentrations of phenazines
released by
P. aeruginosa
in culture depend on the bacterial strain and the culture conditions.
The maximal published measurement of extracellular concentration of PYO in stationary
cultures is 275
μ
M (4).
The ability of reduced phenazines to fluoresce makes it possible to monitor their
concentration
in vivo
by fluorescence microscopy directly without end-point extraction.
Because reduced phenazines are weak fluorophores, accurate quantification requires
sensitive instrumentation in order to minimize cell damage. We imaged several
P.
aeruginosa
strains in suspension by two-photon excitation microscopy (TPEM) and took
advantage of TPEM’s high sensitivity, low noise levels, and low level of cellular photo-
damage (11). TPEM imaging of intrinsic fluorophores (most commonly NAD(P)H and
FAD) has been applied to mammalian cells to quantify their metabolic state (12), and has
found several applications that range from an analysis of blood flow and oxygen diffusion in
the mouse brain (13) to identification of precancerous cells (14). While mammalian cell
metabolism has been studied extensively, a similar fluorescence-based approach has not
previously been applied to study bacterial metabolism. The presence of several fluorescent
small molecules related to
P. aeruginosa
redox state (phenazines, siderophores, cofactors)
provides an opportunity to probe the molecular circuitry that regulates the redox state of
P.
aeruginosa
. At the same time, the presence of multiple weak fluorophores of similar
emission spectra (see Figure 1) makes the separation of the emissions of the individual
components challenging.
To distinguish the emissions of the fluorescent components in our samples, we imaged P.
aeruginosa using a 16-channel spectral multi-photon microscope. Specifically, the
microscope was equipped with a spectrally resolved detector comprising a spectrograph and
a 16-channel photomultiplier tube (PMT). Each channel of the PMT detects the emission
Sullivan et al.
Page 2
ACS Chem Biol
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 September 16.
HHMI Author Manuscript
HHMI Author Manuscript
HHMI Author Manuscript
spectrum within a 13 nm band. The acquired 16-channel spectrum of each pixel was
subsequently analyzed using a maximum-likelihood calculation to estimate the contribution
of each fluorophore to the detected signal. Initially, we characterized the excitation and
emission fluorescence spectra of the fluorescent small molecules found in
P. aeruginosa
using both single-photon and two-photon excitation (Figure 1c,d,e,f). The single-photon
excitation and emission spectra (Figure 1c,d) of each phenazine was measured using a
spectrophotometer inside an anaerobic chamber. The two-photon action cross-section and
emission spectrum (Figure 1e,f) of each compound were measured from aqueous solutions
anaerobically sealed inside well slides using the spectral multi-photon microscope.
Phenazines’ two-photon cross sections are similar and approximately 40 times smaller than
PVD and 400 times smaller than fluorescein (Figure 1e). Although the single-photon and
two-photon measurements have different sampling intervals (1 nm and 13 nm respectively),
data show that the emission spectra of PYO
red
, 1OHP
red
, PVD, and NAD(P)H do not
depend on the method of excitation (single photon or two-photon) similar to the vast
majority of fluorophores (Figure 1d,f). However, the two-photon emission spectrum of
PCA
red
is approximately 20 nm blue-shifted compared to its single-photon emission
spectrum. This observed shift is not fully elucidated but may be attributed to PCA
red
having
heterogeneous ground states, with different one- and two-photon absorption cross sections,
coupled to excited states with different emission spectra.
To quantify the concentration of reduced phenazines in
P. aeruginosa
and also to quantify
the effect of different phenazines on the redox state of NAD(P)H, we imaged several
P.
aeruginosa
strains over a period of 90 minutes after transferring the cells from an O
2
-rich
stationary phase culture to an O
2
-limited environment (see Methods). Each strain produces a
unique assortment of the fluorescent small fluorescent molecules (Figure 2a). The wild-type
PA14 strain can produce all the endogenous fluorophores considered in this study. The
mutant strains contained clean deletions in the pyocyanin biosynthesis gene (
Δ
phzM
), or
phenazine (
Δ
phz1/2
) or siderophore (
Δ
pvdA
Δ
pchE
, referred to as
Δ
sid
) biosynthesis genes,
or both (
Δ
phz1/2
Δ
sid
), resulting in no production of the respective fluorescent molecules
(Figure 2a,b).
As expected, the fluorescence emission of the phenazine-producing strains (PA14,
Δ
phzM
,
Δ
sid
) had a larger magnitude than the phenazine-null strains (
Δ
phz1/2
,
Δ
phz1/2
Δ
sid
)
(Figure 2c). The largest part of the detected signal in the wild-type (PA14) strain and the
siderophore mutant (
Δ
sid
) strain appeared to be emitted by PYO
red
, and, to a lesser extent,
by PCA
red
and NAD(P)H (Figure 2c). The primary contributor to the emission of the
phenazine-null strains (
Δ
phz1/2
,
Δ
phz1/2
Δ
sid
) was NAD(P)H (Figure 2b). The PVD
fluorescence was indistinguishable from background in all strains likely due to the low
concentrations of PVD produced by the cells in the iron-rich growth medium and to iron-
mediated quenching of any PVD present. We initially considered only the major known
endogenous fluorophores in our analysis (PCA
red
, PYO
red
, NAD(P)H, PVD), and found that
although the fitting error in all phenazine-producing strains was on the order of 10-15%
RMS, the fitting error in the
Δ
phzM
strain was substantially larger (≥25% RMS). Our data
revealed that although this strain cannot produce PYO
red
, there was significant fluorescence
emission (above background) around the PYO
red
emission peak and the fitting error was
significantly reduced by including a component with PYO
red
–like emission (Figure 2d).
Furthermore, the estimated contribution of this PYO
red
–like emission starts at the
background noise level and increases in an exponential-like manner with time dynamics
similar to the ones observed for PYO
red
in PYO-producing strains (Figure 3a,b). Because
the
Δ
phzM
strain produces the precursor PCA and can convert PCA to other phenazines
(except PYO) (Figure 2b), it is likely that the PYO
red
-like emission could originate from
another phenazine. Although the red phenazine (5MPCA) has been shown to accumulate in
the
Δ
phzM
strain (15), 5MPCA is fluorescent in its oxidized form and its emission peak is
Sullivan et al.
Page 3
ACS Chem Biol
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 September 16.
HHMI Author Manuscript
HHMI Author Manuscript
HHMI Author Manuscript
quite different from our unknown component (620 nm vs 490 nm). It is unlikely, therefore
that the unknown detected compound is 5MPCA. However, the unknown detected
compound could be the less-studied 1OHP
red
, which has an emission spectrum very similar
to PYO
red
(Figure 1d,f). In this case, due to the similarity of the emission spectra of PYO
red
and 1OHP
red
, it is not possible to resolve the signal emitted by these two fluorophores. After
background correction, the total PYO
red
-like emission of the
Δ
phzM
strain (which can
express 1OHP
red
but not PYO
red
) starts at the noise level and reaches a steady state
fluorescence emission of approximately 200
μ
M 1OHP
red
, which is equivalent to the
emission emitted by 100
μ
M PYO
red
. Additionally, although it is possible that
P. aeruginosa
produces fluorescent molecules that are not considered in this study, we believe that any
possible contribution by these components is negligible for the following reasons. 1) We
have characterized (Figure 1) or discussed (FAD, PCN, PCH, and 5MPCA) all the known
fluorescent molecules produced by each
P. aeruginosa
strain. 2) In all strains, the detected
emission can be consistently well approximated as a sum of the emission of the fluorophores
known to be produced by each strain (Figure 2a). 3) Furthermore, no region of the spectrum
contains a consistently large fitting error which would suggest the presence of an additional
fluorophore (as was the case when 1OHPhz emission was omitted in the
Δ
phzM
strain
(Figure 2d)). Therefore, while it is possible that a small fraction of the overall fluorescent
signal could come from compounds not considered in this analysis, their presence would not
affect significantly our calculations and would not impact our conclusions.
The detected fluorescent emission of most fluorophores shows significant variation over the
time course of the experiment (90 minutes). This change cannot be attributed to photo-
bleaching: at each time point the fluorophore emission of each strain was determined by
imaging four different random cell populations briefly (125
μ
sec per pixel) at conditions
that did not cause photo-bleaching in solutions of pure fluorophores
in vitro
(see methods).
The time response of the estimated fluorescent component concentration (with the exception
of NAD(P)H in phenazine-null strains) show a similar temporal pattern, increasing from its
initial concentration to a different steady-state concentration in a way that fit well to single-
order exponential functions, whose time constant lies between 16 and 25 min (Figure 3a,b).
In all phenazine-producing bacteria (PA14,
Δ
phzM
, and
Δ
sid
) the concentration of PCA
red
increased at least two-fold from its initial concentration to a steady-state concentration. In
both PYO-producing bacteria (PA14 and
Δ
sid
) the intracellular concentration of PYO
red
increased at least 10-fold from a similar initial low concentration to a steady-state
concentration. The observed increase of PCA
red
and PYO
red
concentration in strains PA14,
Δ
phzM
, and
Δ
sid
is consistent with the low availability of O
2
in the imaging environment.
Concomitantly, the concentration of NAD(P)H in all phenazine-producing strains
exponentially decreased from a high initial concentration to a lower steady state
concentration. In the
Δ
phz1/2
and
Δ
phz1/2
Δ
sid
mutants, the concentration of NAD(P)H
remained constant, consistent with phenazines being electron carriers and redox state
modulators (1, 4, 15, 16). This is further supported by the observation that the two strains
that produce PYO (the phenazine that reacts most readily with O
2
) (9), showed similar
NAD(P)H responses. Finally, while the lack of phenazines dramatically altered the time
response of NAD(P)H, the absence of PVD had negligible effects (PA14 vs
Δ
sid
or
Δ
phz1/2
vs
Δ
phz1/2
Δ
sid
). This is logical given that PVD is not redox active and the
medium is iron rich (which would disfavor PVD production).
Interestingly, the concentrations of PCA
red
and PYO
red
at all time points were positively
linearly correlated for all three phenazine-producing strains, suggesting that PCA
red
and
PYO
red
interact by some mechanism whose dynamics are much faster than the sampling
period of our experiments. The PCA
red
vs PYO
red
plot (Figure 3c) shows that the linear
correlation between PCA
red
and PYO
red
is very similar in strains PA14 and
Δ
sid
but the
slope is different in strain
phzM
where the PYO
red
-like signal is likely contributed by the
Sullivan et al.
Page 4
ACS Chem Biol
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 September 16.
HHMI Author Manuscript
HHMI Author Manuscript
HHMI Author Manuscript
phenazine 1OHP
red
. We therefore believe that the interactions between these phenazines are
specific for the particular molecules and might be due to inter-conversion between the two
chemical species and/or a redox interaction. The strong inverse linear correlation between
PCA
red
(and/or PYO
red
) and NAD(P)H indicates that these two redox active molecules
interact directly or indirectly. Previous studies have demonstrated that as
P. aeruginosa
enters stationary phase, O
2
in the medium becomes undetectable and the bulk intracellular
NADH/NAD
+
ratio increases (4). While the NADH level remains high in the
Δ
phz1/2
strain, the production of phenazines by the wild type or the addition of exogenous
phenazines to the mutant result in a decrease in the NADH/NAD
+
ratio (4). The analysis of
our imaging data confirmed this, and provides direct evidence for the role of phenazines in
redox homeostasis. However, the growth and assay conditions used in the two studies were
substantially different, precluding a direct comparison. Because NAD(P)H is capable of
phenazine reduction
in vitro
(17), the inverse linear relationship seen here is likely a result
of the redox reaction between these two species. However, because NADH is also required
for phenazine biosynthesis (8), the decline in the NAD(P)H pool could correlate with an
increase in the total phenazine population rather than just the reduced fraction.
To our knowledge, these measurements provide the first estimation of the intracellular
concentration of reduced phenazines, and the first description of phenazine redox dynamics
in vivo
. Encouragingly, the reduced phenazine concentrations estimated through
fluorescence microscopy were similar to those obtained in parallel using standard
biochemical extraction methods: for strains PA14,
Δ
phzM
, and
Δ
sid
the initial cell-
associated PCA
total
was 17.6 ± 14.6
μ
M, 92.4 ± 4.9
μ
M, and 7.7 ± 0.8
μ
M, respectively,
and the concentration of cell-associated PYO
total
was 79.6 ± 0
μ
M and 61.9 ± 5.9
μ
M,
respectively. Both estimations of phenazine concentrations (optical measurements and
biochemical extractions) are approximations of the true cellular concentrations because
sample preparation steps (including centrifugation, cell resuspension) and O
2
exposure
during the manipulations impact the values determined by either technique.
In summary, the spectral multi-photon microscopy imaging method described here has
broad application for the
in vivo
imaging of multiple fluorescent metabolites within living
microbial cells. In the case of phenazines and
P. aeruginosa
, controlled perturbation of the
phenazine concentration in the cellular environment coupled to monitoring the response
would enhance our understanding of how phenazines control the behaviors of microbial
communities in time and space. Looking beyond
P. aeruginosa
, we anticipate that this
approach could also be applied to quantify the redox dynamics of multiple endogenous or
induced fluorescent molecules in bacteria and other organisms.
METHODS
All bacterial strains and culture conditions, methods for phenazine extraction and
quantification, and the custom two-photon microscope set-up are described in Supporting
Information.
Imaging Conditions for Standards
The single-photon emission spectrum of phenazines was measured using a
spectrophotometer inside an anaerobic chamber at 1 nm intervals. The two-photon excitation
spectrum was measured inside anaerobically sealed well slides using the two-photon
microscope described in Supporting Information. Sealed well slides were made using well
slides (Aquatic Eco-Systems) with a pair of 1 mm holes drilled in the well (Ferro Ceramics).
The open surface was then covered by a coverslip (VWR) and sealed with heat-sealing film
(Solaronix) using a soldering iron. Slides were incubated for at least 3 days in an anaerobic
chamber prior to use. At time of use, the chamber in the slide was filled with ~40
μ
l of the
Sullivan et al.
Page 5
ACS Chem Biol
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 September 16.
HHMI Author Manuscript
HHMI Author Manuscript
HHMI Author Manuscript
standard using the holes and then covered and sealed with another coverslip and sealing
film. To minimize any oxygen leakage in these compartments, the samples were imaged as
quickly as possible following removal from the anaerobic chamber.
Single-photon and two-photon emission spectra measurements took place under the same
buffer conditions (50 mM MOPS pH 7.2 for phenazines, PBS pH 7.4 for PVD and NADH).
The single-photon and two-photon emission spectra measurements are slightly different due
to the different sampling methods used by the two instruments. For two-photon emission
spectrum measurements, the emission is resolved optically in a diffraction grating and then
detected by a 16-channel photomultiplier tube. Therefore, the measurement of each channel
integrates the emission spectrum within a 13 nm region of the spectrum. For single-photon
emission spectrum measurements, a monochromator is used to sample the emission around a
particular wavelength. The calculation of the two-photon cross sections was done according
to the method described in (18). Briefly, the two-photon cross-section - quantum yield
product of each compound was calculated indirectly by imaging and comparing with the
known two-photon cross-section - quantum yield product of fluorescein.
We observed a difference in the emission spectra of PCA after one-photon and two-photon
excitation. This difference cannot be attributed to the differential sensitivity of the sensors
used for the single-photon and two-photon measurements: although PCA and orange
fluorescent beads (Invitrogen F8820) have similar single-photon emission spectra peaks,
their two-photon emission spectra differ (Supplementary Figure 1).
Bacteria Two-Photon Imaging
Each bacterial strain was grown to stationary phase overnight. 1 ml of culture was
concentrated 20× in PBS (to remove background fluoresence emitted by the growth
medium), and mounted in a 40
μ
l-well covered by a sealed coverslip (as described above,
but without the second coverslip). These conditions result in an oxygen limited environment
for the bacteria trapped inside the sealed well. Four spatially resolved images of each sample
were taken at approximately 4, 12, 20, 25, 40, and 90 minutes after transferring the bacteria
into the sealed coverslip.
Data Analysis
Since the mean number of detected photons per bacterial pixel was quite low (approximately
5-10), the estimation of the average concentration of each fluorescent component in each
bacterial strain was accomplished in three steps: 1) Pixel classification: image pixels were
classified as “bacteria” or “medium” based on the known background noise emission,
(Supplementary Figure 2). 2) Signal decomposition: The 16-channel photon counts of all
“bacterial” pixels were summed into one “super-pixel”. The photon contribution of each
fluorescent component (reduced phenazines, PVD, and NADH) to the total photon count
y
of this super-pixel is estimated by a maximum-likelihood calculation based on the distinct
emission spectra of the fluorophores. 3) Convert into equivalent fluorophore concentration:
The mean photon emission per bacterium pixel for each component is converted into
equivalent fluorophore concentration via a concentration-emission standard curve.
The objective of the signal decomposition step was given the photon emission of bacterial
pixels
y
to calculate the maximum-likelihood estimate (MLE) of the poisson emission rate
of each compound
λ
i
. The MLE of the rate vector
λ
= [
λ
1
...
λ
N
]
T
was found by
maximizing the observation likelihood:
Sullivan et al.
Page 6
ACS Chem Biol
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 September 16.
HHMI Author Manuscript
HHMI Author Manuscript
HHMI Author Manuscript
where
y
j
is the detected photon count in channel j,
t
T
j
is the j-th row of the spectral matrix
S
(the matrix whose columns correspond to the normalized (sum of elements equal 1)
emission spectra of the fluorescent components). The fluorescent spectra
s
i
of the
compounds were determined by imaging pure compounds. It was assumed that the emission
spectra
s
i
of phenazines and PVD
in vivo
are identical to the ones of the pure compounds.
For simplicity, it was also assumed that 80% NADH is bound to proteins (based on previous
in vivo
findings (6)). As initial guess of the MLE calculation was chosen the non-negative
least-squares solution (19) of the linearized problem (where the emission is assumed to be a
linear sum of the signals emitted by each fluorophore (Figure 2b)
y
=
S
·
λ
. To avoid
overfitting, for each bacteria strain data decomposition considered only the fluorophores
known to be expressed in this strain plus one extra component that describes the channel-
dependent background noise (includes dark current noise and stray light noise). The average
signal per bacterial pixel for each compound was then estimated by dividing the total photon
contribution of each compound by the number of bacterial pixels. All images were found to
contain similar level of background noise (about 0.2 photons per pixel) which agrees with
instrument calibration data taken on blank (PBS) samples. As an additional control, when all
fluorophores are considered in the signal decomposition calculation, the photon emission
assigned to fluorophores not present in the strain was equal or less to background noise
level.
In order to convert the MLE of the emission rate
λ
i
of each fluorescent compound into an
equivalent compound concentration, it was assumed that the emission rate
λ
i
of each
fluorophore is analogous to its concentration
c
i
through a proportionality constant called
brightness
b
i
=
λ
i
/c
i
(photon counts per pixel per time per unit concentration per laser
power). The brightness of each fluorescent compound was determined experimentally, by
measuring three solutions of known concentrations (50, 100, 500
μ
M) under acquisition
conditions (laser power, sampling time) identical to the conditions of the bacteria imaging
experiment. The brightness corresponds to the slope of the resulting fluorophore
concentration versus the detected emission curve. For all components, results suggested that
the experimental conditions did not result in fluorophore saturation or fluorophore
photobleaching (the detected photon count was analogous to the fluorophore concentration
and analogous to the square power of the laser power; repeated measurements on the same
sample over a period of half an hour provided consistent results). Because the brightness of
a fluorophore is analogous to its two-photon cross section, our calculations assume that the
two-photon cross section of the fluorophores
in vivo
are identical to the ones of the pure
compounds
Imaging and estimation of fluorophore concentration
c
(
t
) took place between t=4 min and
t=90 min after transferring the bacteria into the oxygen-limiting environment of the sealed
coverslip. The time response
c
(
t
) of each fluorophore’s intracellular concentration was then
fitted to the exponential curve
c
(
t
)=
c
ss
+
(c
0
c
ss
)·exp(−
t/
τ
), by nonlinear least square.
c
0
is
the initial value of the fluorophore concentration at t=0,
c
ss
is the steady state fluorophore
concentration, and
τ
is the time constant of the fluorophore concentration response. The
initial value
c
0
approximates the fluorophore concentration in the stationary culture because
our results show that reduced phenazine/NADH dynamics are much slower than 4 minutes
(the time constant
τ
of intracellular reduced phenazine/NADH was found to be larger than
15 minutes, Figure 3b).
Sullivan et al.
Page 7
ACS Chem Biol
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 September 16.
HHMI Author Manuscript
HHMI Author Manuscript
HHMI Author Manuscript
Supplementary Material
Refer to Web version on PubMed Central for supplementary material.
Acknowledgments
We thank L. Dietrich for the gift of the
Δ
phzM
strain, and A. Price-Whelan and L. Dietrich for helpful advice and
discussions. DKN is a Howard Hughes Medical Institute Investigator, and this work was supported by the HHMI.
DST and PTCS were supported by NIH, NSF, SMA2, and SMART.
References
1. Price-Whelan A, Dietrich LE, Newman DK. Nat Chem Biol. 2006; 2:71–8. [PubMed: 16421586]
2. Straight PD, Kolter R. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2009; 63:99–118. [PubMed: 19566421]
3. Council, NR. Research at the Intersection of the Physical and Life Sciences. National Academies
Press; Washington DC: 2010.
4. Price-Whelan A, Dietrich LE, Newman DK. J Bacteriol. 2007; 189:6372–81. [PubMed: 17526704]
5. Xavier KB, Bassler BL. J Bacteriol. 2005; 187:238–48. [PubMed: 15601708]
6. Chance B. Science. 1954; 120:767–75. [PubMed: 13216168]
7. Elliott RP. Appl Microbiol. 1958; 6:241–6. [PubMed: 13559972]
8. Mavrodi DV, Bonsall RF, Delaney SM, Soule MJ, Phillips G, Thomashow LS. J Bacteriol. 2001;
183:6454–65. [PubMed: 11591691]
9. Wang Y, Newman DK. Environ Sci Technol. 2008; 42:2380–6. [PubMed: 18504969]
10. Baron SS, Rowe JJ. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1981; 20:814–20. [PubMed: 6798928]
11. Dietrich LE, Teal TK, Price-Whelan A, Newman DK. Science. 2008; 321:1203–6. [PubMed:
18755976]
12. Schwarzer C, Fischer H, Kim EJ, Barber KJ, Mills AD, Kurth MJ, Gruenert DC, Suh JH, Machen
TE, Illek B. Free Radic Biol Med. 2008; 45:1653–62. [PubMed: 18845244]
13. Denk W, Strickler JH, Webb WW. Science. 1990; 248:73–6. [PubMed: 2321027]
14. Skala MC, Riching KM, Gendron-Fitzpatrick A, Eickhoff J, Eliceiri KW, White JG, Ramanujam
N. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104:19494–9. [PubMed: 18042710]
15. Kasischke KA, Lambert EM, Panepento B, Sun A, Gelbard HA, Burgess RW, Foster TH,
Nedergaard M. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2011; 31:68–81. [PubMed: 20859293]
16. Bird DK, Yan L, Vrotsos KM, Eliceiri KW, Vaughan EM, Keely PJ, White JG, Ramanujam N.
Cancer Res. 2005; 65:8766–73. [PubMed: 16204046]
17. Dietrich LE, Price-Whelan A, Petersen A, Whiteley M, Newman DK. Mol Microbiol. 2006;
61:1308–21. [PubMed: 16879411]
18. Kito N, Ohnishi Y, Kagami M, Ohno A. Chemistry Letters. 1974:353–356.
19. Albota MA, Xu C, Webb WW. Appl Opt. 1998; 37:7352–6. [PubMed: 18301569]
20. Lawson, CL.; H. R. J.. Solving least squares problems. Prentice-Hall; Englewood Cliffs, N.J.:
1974.
21. Buehler C, Kim KH, Greuter U, Schlumpf N, So PT. J Fluoresc. 2005; 15:41–51. [PubMed:
15711876]
22. Rahme LG, Stevens EJ, Wolfort SF, Shao J, Tompkins RG, Ausubel FM. Science. 1995;
268:1899–902. [PubMed: 7604262]
Sullivan et al.
Page 8
ACS Chem Biol
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 September 16.
HHMI Author Manuscript
HHMI Author Manuscript
HHMI Author Manuscript
Figure 1.
Characterization of one- and two-photon excitation fluorescence spectroscopic properties of
phenazines. a) Images of oxidized and reduced phenazine samples under normal (top) and
UV illumination (bottom). b) Chemical structures of oxidized and reduced phenazines. c)
Single-photon excitation spectra of phenazines (PCA
red
, PYO
red
, 1OHP
red
), NADH and
PVD. d) Emission spectra of phenazines, NADH and PVD after single-photon excitation,
taken at 1nm spacing. e) Two-photon cross-sections of phenazines, NADH and PVD. f)
Emission spectra of phenazines, NADH and PVD after two-photon excitation, as detected
by a 16-channel sensor that integrated spectra over 13 nm intervals.
Sullivan et al.
Page 9
ACS Chem Biol
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 September 16.
HHMI Author Manuscript
HHMI Author Manuscript
HHMI Author Manuscript
Figure 2.
Characterizing the endogenous fluorescent molecules present in
P. aeruginosa
. a) Identity of
the fluorescent components produced by each strain used in the study. b) Biosynthesis
pathway of the phenazines produced by
P. aeruginosa
. Genes and gene products responsible
for each conversion are listed above the arrows (8). c) Representative examples of the
measured 16-channel fluorescent spectra from the five bacterial strains at t=90 min (solid
line) and non-negative least square estimations of the contributions of each strain’s
fluorescent components (dashed lines)
Sullivan et al.
Page 10
ACS Chem Biol
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 September 16.
HHMI Author Manuscript
HHMI Author Manuscript
HHMI Author Manuscript
Figure 3.
Monitoring the
in vivo
response of
P. aeruginosa
to a sudden change in the available oxygen
(t=0 min) by two-photon imaging of intracellular reduced phenazines and NADH. a) Time
response (0 to 90 min) of the estimated concentration of the fluorescent components of each
strain and fits to exponential curves. b) 95% regions of confidence for the parameters of the
first order exponentials
c
(
t
) =
c
ss
+ (
c
0
c
ss
) · exp(−
t/
τ
) used to approximate the dynamics
of fluorescent components. c) Plots of the estimated PCA
red
, PYO
red
and NADH in the three
phenazine-producing
P. aeruginosa
strains. Each point corresponds to the estimated
concentration of the fluorescent components at one time instant.
Sullivan et al.
Page 11
ACS Chem Biol
. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2012 September 16.
HHMI Author Manuscript
HHMI Author Manuscript
HHMI Author Manuscript