Published February 10, 2022 | Version Submitted + Published
Journal Article Open

The CGM–GRB Study. II. Outflow–Galaxy Connection at z ∼ 2–6

  • 1. ROR icon California Institute of Technology
  • 2. ROR icon University of Maryland, College Park
  • 3. ROR icon Joint Space Science Institute
  • 4. ROR icon Liverpool John Moores University

Abstract

We use a sample of 27 gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) at redshift z = 2–6 to probe the outflows in their respective host galaxies (log(M_*/M_⊙) ∼ 9–11) and search for possible relations between the outflow properties and those of the host galaxies, such as M*, the star formation rate (SFR), and the specific SFR (sSFR). First, we consider three outflow properties: outflow column density (N_(out)), maximum outflow velocity (Vmax), and normalized maximum velocity (V_(norm) = V_(max)/V_(circ,halo), where V_(circ,halo) is the halo circular velocity). We observe clear trends of N_(out) and V_(max) with increasing SFR in high-ion-traced outflows, with a stronger (>3σ) V_(max)–SFR correlation. We find that the estimated mass outflow rate and momentum flux of the high-ion outflows scale with SFR and can be supported by the momentum imparted by star formation (supernovae and stellar winds). The kinematic correlations of high-ion-traced outflows with SFR are similar to those observed for star-forming galaxies at low redshifts. The correlations with SFR are weaker in low-ion outflows. This, along with the lower detection fraction in low-ion outflows, indicates that the outflow is primarily high-ion dominated. We also observe a strong (>3σ) trend of normalized velocity (V_(norm)) decreasing with halo mass and increasing with sSFR, suggesting that outflows from low-mass halos and high-sSFR galaxies are most likely to escape and enrich the outer circumgalactic medium (CGM) and intergalactic medium with metals. By comparing the CGM–GRB stacks with those of starbursts at z ∼ 2 and z ∼ 0.1, we find that over a broad redshift range, the outflow strength strongly depends on the main-sequence offset at the respective redshifts, rather than simply the SFR.

Additional Information

© 2022. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society. Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI. Received 2020 October 21; revised 2021 November 23; accepted 2021 November 30; published 2022 February 11. The authors are grateful to Drs. A. Cucchiara and V. Toy for their useful comments in the early stages of this paper. P.G. was supported by a NASA Earth and Space Science Fellowship (ASTRO18F-0085), a NASA Hubble Fellowship (HST-HF2-51478.001-A), and a David & Ellen Lee Fellowship at Caltech for this research. S.V. acknowledges partial support from the National Science Foundation under grant 1711377 and National Aeronautics and Space Administration under grants 16-APRA 16-0064 and ADAP NNX16AF24G. These results made use of the Lowell Discovery Telescope (LDT) at Lowell Observatory. Lowell is a private, nonprofit institution dedicated to astrophysical research and public appreciation of astronomy, and it operates the LDT in partnership with Boston University, the University of Maryland, the University of Toledo, Northern Arizona University, and Yale University. The Large Monolithic Imager was built by Lowell Observatory using funds provided by the National Science Foundation (AST-1005313). Based on observations made with ESO Telescopes at the La Silla Paranal Observatory under program IDs 177.A-3016, 177.A-3017, 177.A-3018, and 179.A-2004, and on data products produced by the KiDS consortium. The KiDS production team acknowledges support from: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, ERC, NOVA, and NWO-M grants; Target; the University of Padova; and the University Federico II (Naples). Facilities: Very Large Telescopes - , Lowell Discovery Telescope - , Spitzer Space Telescope - , Hubble Space Telescope - , Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory. - Software: galfit (Peng et al. 2002), astropy (Robitaille et al. 2013), ESOreflex (Freudling et al. 2013), lifelines (Davidson-Pilon 2019).

Attached Files

Published - Gatkine_2022_ApJ_926_63.pdf

Submitted - 2010.10540.pdf

Files

2010.10540.pdf

Files (9.8 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:86bc1075c0ae605d730a01cccfc8a8be
2.0 MB Preview Download
md5:610f679097c749f89f0046a3e008f950
7.8 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

Eprint ID
113468
Resolver ID
CaltechAUTHORS:20220216-71192973

Related works

Funding

NASA Earth and Space Science Fellowship
ASTRO18F-0085
NASA Hubble Fellowship
HST-HF2-51478.001-A
David and Ellen Lee Postdoctoral Scholarship
NSF
AST-1711377
NASA
16-APRA 16-0064
NASA
NNX16AF24G
NSF
AST-1005313
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
European Research Council (ERC)
Nederlandse Onderzoekschool voor de Astronomie (NOVA)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO)
Target
University of Padova
University Federico II

Dates

Created
2022-02-16
Created from EPrint's datestamp field
Updated
2022-02-16
Created from EPrint's last_modified field