Differentiation and magmatic history of Vesta: Constraints from HED meteorites and Dawn spacecraft data
Abstract
Quantifying the amounts of various igneous lithologies in Vesta's crust allows the estimation of petrologic ratios that describe the asteroid's global differentiation and subsequent magmatic history. The eucrite:diogenite (Euc:Diog) ratio measures the relative proportions of mafic and ultramafic components. The intrusive:extrusive (I:E) ratio assesses the effectiveness of magma ascent and eruption. We estimate these ratios by counting numbers and masses of eucrites, cumulate eucrites, and diogenites in the world's meteorite collections, and by calculating their proportions as components of crustal polymict breccias (howardites) using chemical mixing diagrams and petrologic mapping of multiple thin sections. The latter two methods yield a Euc:Diog ratio of ∼2:1, although meteorite numbers and masses give slightly higher ratios. Surface lithologic maps compiled from spectra of Dawn spacecraft instruments (VIR and GRaND) yield Euc:Diog ratios that bracket estimates of Euc:Diog from the meteorites. The I:E ratios from HEDs lie between 0.5–2.1:1, due to uncertainties in identifying cumulate eucrite. Gravity mapping of Vesta by the Dawn spacecraft supports the existence of diogenite plutons in the crust. Quantifying the proportion of high-density diogenitic crust in the gravity map yields I:E ratios of 0.8-1:2:1, values which are bracketed by calculations based on HEDs. The I:E ratio for Vesta is lower than for Earth and Mars, consistent with physical modeling of asteroid-size bodies. Nevertheless, it indicates a significant role for pluton emplacement during the formation of Vesta's crust. These results are inconsistent with simple differentiation models that produce the crust by crystallization of a global magma ocean, unless residual melts are extracted into crustal magma chambers.
Additional Information
© 2019 Elsevier GmbH. Received 31 May 2019, Accepted 26 July 2019, Available online 14 September 2019. A portion of this research was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with NASA. We acknowledge J. E. C. Scully for help in producing area estimates, and Jeff Taylor and Patrick Donohue for critical reviews.Additional details
- Eprint ID
- 100390
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.chemer.2019.07.008
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20191220-102538469
- NASA/JPL/Caltech
- Created
-
2019-12-20Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2022-11-23Created from EPrint's last_modified field
- Caltech groups
- Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences