The dumortierite supergroup. II. Three new minerals from the Szklary pegmatite, SW Poland: Nioboholtite, (Nb_(0.6)〈_(0.4))Al_6Bsi_3O_(18), titanoholtite, (Ti_(0.75)〈_(0.25))Al_6Bsi_3O_(18), and szklaryite 〈Al_6Bas^(3+)_ 3O_(15)
Abstract
Three new minerals in the dumortierite supergroup were discovered in the Szklary pegmatite, Lower Silesia, Poland. Nioboholtite, endmember (Nb_(0.6)〈_(0.4))Al_6B_3Si_3O_(18), and titanoholtite, endmember (Ti_(0.75)〈_(0.25))Al_6B_3Si_3O_(18), are new members of the holtite group, whereas szklaryite, endmember 〈Al_6Bas^(3+)_ 3O_(15), is the first representative of a potential new group. Nioboholtite occurs mostly as overgrowths not exceeding 10 μm in thickness on cores of holtite. Titanoholtite forms patches up to 10 μm across in the holtite cores and streaks up to 5 μm wide along boundaries between holtite cores and the nioboholtite rims. Szklaryite is found as a patch ∼2 μm in size in As- and Sb- bearing dumortierite enclosed in quartz. Titanoholtite crystallized almost simultaneously with holtite and other Ta-dominant minerals such as tantalite-(Mn) and stibiotantalite and before nioboholtite, which crystallized simultaneously with stibiocolumbite during decreasing Ta activity in the pegmatite melt. Szklaryite crystallized after nioboholtite during the final stage of the Szklary pegmatite formation. Optical properties could be obtained only from nioboholtite, which is creamy-white to brownish yellow or grey-yellow in hand specimen, translucent, with a white streak, biaxial (–), n_α = 1.740 – 1.747, n_β ∼ 1.76, n_γ ∼ 1.76, and Δ < 0.020. Electron microprobe analyses of nioboholtite, titanoholtite and szklaryite give, respectively, in wt.%: P_2O_5 0.26, 0.01, 0.68; Nb_2O_55.21, 0.67, 0.17; Ta_2O_5 0.66, 1.18, 0.00; SiO_2 18.68, 21.92, 12.78; TiO_2 0.11, 4.00, 0.30; B_2O_3 4.91, 4.64, 5.44; Al_2O_3 49.74, 50.02, 50.74; As_2O_3 5.92, 2.26, 16.02; Sb_2O_3 10.81, 11.48, 10.31; FeO 0.51, 0.13, 0.19; H_2O (calc.) 0.05, –, –, Sum 96.86, 96.34, 97.07, corresponding on the basis of O = 18–As–Sb to {(Nb_(0.26)Ta_(0.02)〈_(0.18)) (Al_(0.27)Fe_(0.05)Ti_(0.01))〈_(0.21)}_(Σ1.00)Al_6B_(0.92){Si_(2.03)P_(0.02)(Sb_(0.48)As_(0.39)Al_(0.07)}_(Σ3.00)(O_(17.09)OH_(0.04)〈_(0.87))_(Σ18.00), {(Ti_(0.32) Nb_(0.03)Ta_(0.03)〈_(0.10) )(Al_(0.3 5) Ti_(0.01) Fe_(0.01))〈_(0.15)}_(Σ1.00) Al_6 B_(0.86) {Si_(2.36) (Sb_(0.51) As_(0.14) )}_(Σ3.01)(O_(17.35)〈_(0.65))_(Σ18.00) and {〈_(0.53) (Al_(0.41) Ti_(0.02) Fe_(0.02))(Nb_(0.01)〈_(0.01) )}_(Σ1.00)Al_6 B_(1.01) {(As_(1.07) Sb_(0.47) Al_(0.03)) Si_(1.37) P_(0.06)}_(Σ3.00)(O_(16.46)〈_(1.54))_(Σ18.00). Electron backscattered diffraction indicates that the three minerals are presumably isostructural with dumortierite, that is, orthorhombic symmetry, space group Pnma (no. 62), and unit-cell parameters close to a = 4.7001, b = 11.828, c = 20.243 Å, with V = 1125.36 Å^3 and Z = 4; micro-Raman spectroscopy provided further confirmation of the structural relationship for nioboholtite and titanoholtite. The calculated density is 3.72 g/cm^3 for nioboholtite, 3.66 g/cm^3 for titanoholtite and 3.71 g/cm^3 for szklaryite. The strongest lines in X-ray powder diffraction patterns calculated from the cell parameters of dumortierite of Moore and Araki (1978) and the empirical formulae of nioboholtite, titanoholtite and szklaryite are [d, Å, I (hkl)]: 10.2125, 67, 46, 19 (011); 5.9140, 40, 47, 57 (020); 5.8610, 66, 78, 100 (013); 3.4582, 63, 63, 60 (122); 3.4439, 36, 36, 34 (104); 3.2305, 100, 100, 95 (123); 3.0675, 53, 53, 50 (105); 2.9305, 65, 59, 51 (026); 2.8945, 64, 65, 59 (132), respectively. The three minerals have been approved by the IMA CNMNC (IMA 2012-068, 069, 070) and were named for their relationship to holtite and occurrence in the Szklary pegmatite, respectively.
Additional Information
© 2013 The Mineralogical Society. Received 26 December 2013; Accepted 11 July 2013; Associate Editor: A. Christy. The authors thank Diederik Visser for unpublished analyses of dumortierite and Nancy Price for performing preliminary EBSD analyses of szklaryite at the University of Maine. Members of the IMA CNMNC, Andrew Christy and an anonymous reviewer are thanked for their comments on the new-mineral proposals and an earlier version of this manuscript. ESG is supported by U.S. National Science Foundation grant EAR 0837980 to the University of Maine; AP is supported by AGH UST grant no 11.11.140.319; RJE and LAG by an NSERC Discovery grant to LAG; GRR by NSF grant EAR-0947956. SEM, EBSD, and EPMA analyses at Caltech were carried out at the GPS Division Analytical Facility, which is supported, in part, by NSF Grants EAR-0318518 and DMR-0080065.Attached Files
Published - s10.pdf
Files
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:ba01d695252e1a400ef96510eb35433a
|
1.9 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
- Eprint ID
- 41877
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20131010-143604840
- NSF
- EAR 0837980
- AGH UST
- 11.11.140.319
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
- NSF
- EAR-0947956
- NSF
- EAR-0318518
- NSF
- DMR-0080065
- Created
-
2013-10-10Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2021-11-10Created from EPrint's last_modified field
- Caltech groups
- Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences