Machine learning-assisted directed protein evolution with combinatorial libraries
Abstract
To reduce experimental effort associated with directed protein evolution and to explore the sequence space encoded by mutating multiple positions simultaneously, we incorporate machine learning into the directed evolution workflow. Combinatorial sequence space can be quite expensive to sample experimentally, but machine-learning models trained on tested variants provide a fast method for testing sequence space computationally. We validated this approach on a large published empirical fitness landscape for human GB1 binding protein, demonstrating that machine learning-guided directed evolution finds variants with higher fitness than those found by other directed evolution approaches. We then provide an example application in evolving an enzyme to produce each of the two possible product enantiomers (i.e., stereodivergence) of a new-to-nature carbene Si–H insertion reaction. The approach predicted libraries enriched in functional enzymes and fixed seven mutations in two rounds of evolution to identify variants for selective catalysis with 93% and 79% ee (enantiomeric excess). By greatly increasing throughput with in silico modeling, machine learning enhances the quality and diversity of sequence solutions for a protein engineering problem.
Additional Information
© 2019 National Academy of Sciences. Published under the PNAS license. Contributed by Frances H. Arnold, March 18, 2019 (sent for review February 4, 2019; reviewed by Marc Ostermeier and Justin B. Siegel). The authors thank Yisong Yue for initial guidance and Scott Virgil (Caltech Center for Catalysis and Chemical Synthesis) for providing critical instrument support; and Kevin Yang, Anders Knight, Oliver Brandenburg, and Ruijie Kelly Zhang for helpful discussions. This work is supported by National Science Foundation Grant GRF2017227007 (to Z.W.), the Rothenberg Innovation Initiative Program (S.B.J.K. and F.H.A.), and the Jacobs Institute for Molecular Engineering for Medicine at Caltech (S.B.J.K. and F.H.A.). Author contributions: Z.W., S.B.J.K., R.D.L., and F.H.A. designed research; Z.W. and B.J.W. performed research; Z.W. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; Z.W., S.B.J.K., R.D.L., and B.J.W. analyzed data; and Z.W., S.B.J.K., R.D.L., B.J.W., and F.H.A. wrote the paper. Reviewers: M.O., Johns Hopkins University; and J.B.S., UC Davis Health System. The authors declare no conflict of interest. Data deposition: The data reported in this paper have been deposited in the ProtaBank database, https://www.protabank.org, at https://www.protabank.org/study_analysis/mnqBQFjF3/. This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1073/pnas.1901979116/-/DCSupplemental.Attached Files
Published - 8852.full.pdf
Submitted - 1902.07231.pdf
Supplemental Material - pnas.1901979116.sapp.pdf
Files
Additional details
- PMCID
- PMC6500146
- Eprint ID
- 94697
- DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1901979116
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20190415-082330973
- NSF Graduate Research Fellowship
- GRF2017227007
- Rothenberg Innovation Initiative (RI2)
- Jacobs Institute for Molecular Engineering for Medicine
- Created
-
2019-04-16Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2021-11-16Created from EPrint's last_modified field
- Caltech groups
- Jacobs Institute for Molecular Engineering for Medicine