Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published July 2019 | Accepted Version + Published
Journal Article Open

Simulations of radiative turbulent mixing layers

Abstract

Radiative turbulent mixing layers should be ubiquitous in multi-phase gas with shear flow. They are a potentially attractive explanation for the high ions such as O VI seen in high-velocity clouds and the circumgalactic medium (CGM) of galaxies. We perform 3D magnetohydrohynamics (MHD) simulations with non-equilibrium (NEI) and photoionization modelling, with an eye towards testing simple analytic models. Even purely hydrodynamic collisional ionization equilibrium (CIE) calculations have column densities much lower than observations. Characteristic inflow and turbulent velocities are much less than the shear velocity, and the layer width h∝t^(1/2)_(cool) rather than h ∝ t_(coo)l. Column densities are not independent of density or metallicity as analytic scalings predict, and show surprisingly weak dependence on shear velocity and density contrast. Radiative cooling, rather than Kelvin–Helmholtz instability, appears paramount in determining the saturated state. Low pressure due to fast cooling both seeds turbulence and sets the entrainment rate of hot gas, whose enthalpy flux, along with turbulent dissipation, energizes the layer. Regardless of initial geometry, magnetic fields are amplified and stabilize the mixing layer via magnetic tension, producing almost laminar flow and depressing column densities. NEI effects can boost column densities by factors of a few. Suppression of cooling by NEI or photoionization can, in principle, also increase O VI column densities, but, in practice, is unimportant for CGM conditions. To explain observations, sightlines must pierce hundreds or thousands of mixing layers, which may be plausible if the CGM exists as a 'fog' of tiny cloudlets.

Additional Information

© 2019 The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society. This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model (https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model) Accepted 2019 May 2. Received 2019 May 1; in original form 2018 September 23. We thank Max Gronke and Jim Stone for helpful conversations, and the referee Michael Shull for a constructive and helpful report which improved our paper. We acknowledge NASA grants NNX17AK58G and HST-AR-15039.003-A for support. This research has used the Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment (XSEDE allocations TG-AST140086). We have made use of NASA's Astrophysics Data System and the yt astrophysics analysis software suite (Turk et al. 2010). SPO thanks the law offices of May Oh & Wee for hospitality. PM acknowledges a College of Creative Studies Summer Undergraduate Research Fellowship.

Attached Files

Published - stz1248.pdf

Accepted Version - 1809.09101.pdf

Files

stz1248.pdf
Files (6.0 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:456576a39a19be2d2c8e82b92b10dfed
3.7 MB Preview Download
md5:05ffae7d0cb40ae7f9a19cb3f26f0986
2.3 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
August 19, 2023
Modified:
October 20, 2023