Harnessing human and machine intelligence for planetary-level climate action
Abstract
The ongoing global race for bigger and better artificial intelligence (AI) systems is expected to have a profound societal and environmental impact by altering job markets, disrupting business models, and enabling new governance and societal welfare structures that can affect global consensus for climate action pathways. However, the current AI systems are trained on biased datasets that could destabilize political agencies impacting climate change mitigation and adaptation decisions and compromise social stability, potentially leading to societal tipping events. Thus, the appropriate design of a less biased AI system that reflects both direct and indirect effects on societies and planetary challenges is a question of paramount importance. In this paper, we tackle the question of data-centric knowledge generation for climate action in ways that minimize biased AI. We argue for the need to co-align a less biased AI with an epistemic web on planetary health challenges for more trustworthy decision-making. A human-in-the-loop AI can be designed to align with three goals. First, it can contribute to a planetary epistemic web that supports climate action. Second, it can directly enable mitigation and adaptation interventions through knowledge of social tipping elements. Finally, it can reduce the data injustices associated with AI pretraining datasets.
Copyright and License
© The Author(s) 2023. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Acknowledgement
R.D. acknowledges the support from the Quadrature Climate Foundation (01-21-000149), Keynes Fund (JHVH) and Google Cloud Climate Innovation Challenge (2022). BKS gratefully acknowledges support from UK Research and Innovation as well as the JPI SOLSTICE 2020 scheme through the "Responsive Organizing for Low Emission Societies (ROLES)" Project, Grant Agreement No. ES/V01403X/1.The authors are also thankful to Professor Adrian Smith and Dr. Max Lacey-Barnacle from the University of Sussex for inspiring the analysis on data justice.
Funding
Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
Contributions
R.D. and F.C. conceptualized the study. All authors contributed to the drafting and editing of the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Files
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:47942157a84b395324938a7dee737f89
|
864.7 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
- PMCID
- PMC11062317
- University of Cambridge
- UK Research and Innovation
- Google (United States)
- Economic and Social Research Council
- ES/V01403X/1
- German Rectors' Conference
- Projekt DEAL