Published September 20, 2024 | Version Accepted
Journal Article Open

Dehydration of goethite during vacuum step-heating and implications for he retentivity characterization

  • 1. ROR icon California Institute of Technology
  • 2. ROR icon University of Queensland

Abstract

Uncertainty exists over what environmental conditions and mineralogical/chemical properties are required to ensure retention of helium such that (UTh)/He dates record the time of goethite crystallization. We undertook vacuum step heating experiments to determine He diffusion parameters for extrapolation to Earth surface conditions on 10 goethite specimens in which we had created a uniform distribution of 3He. Arrhenius plots of apparent diffusion coefficients on all samples follow the same pattern. At temperatures <200 °C the data define arrays consistent with progressive degassing of increasingly large crystallites. However, above 200 °C the computed diffusivities increase dramatically until about 80% of the helium is extracted, after which they suddenly decline. The sudden increase in diffusivity at 200 °C coincides with the onset of dehydration of the goethite structure, a process which continues throughout the remainder of the step heat. There is a strong correlation between evolved water and 3He amounts. These observations likely reflect previously reported processes of formation, growth, and coalescence of pores as the phase transition to hematite proceeds. While significantly higher dehydration temperatures of ∼270 °C are observed using techniques such as thermogravimetric analysis in air, the long step durations, and vacuum conditions of our experiments destabilize goethite. Orders of magnitude differences in the computed diffusivities among our samples may reflect crystallite-size-distribution control on dehydration kinetics, and the qualitative size distributions we infer from the step heats are consistent with SEM observations of crystallite lengths. Vacuum step-heating experiments in which goethite is decomposing cannot be used to determine He diffusion behavior in nature, but the inferred crystallite size distribution provides some useful indirect evidence. A strong relationship exists between metrics of the crystallite size distribution from step heating results and the degree of He retention in nature inferred from the 4He/3He method. This observation provides evidence supporting the validity of the 4He/3He technique for estimating retention, and further suggests that the dominant control on He retention in nature is the crystallite size distribution. Experiments under hydrothermal conditions in which goethite remains stable may be an alternative approach to address the question of He diffusion behavior in nature.

Copyright and License

© 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.

Acknowledgement

Supported by NSF grant EAR 1945974 to KAF and ARC Discovery Grant DP160104988 to PV. We thank Alexis Ault, Cecile Gautheron, and an anonymous reviewer for their thoughtful comments and suggestions.

Contributions

K.A. Farley: Writing – original draft, Investigation, Funding acquisition. H.B. Monteiro: Methodology, Investigation, Writing – review & editing. P.M. Vasconcelos: Methodology, Investigation, Writing – review & editing, Funding acquisition. K. Waltenberg: Investigation.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Farley reports financial support was provided by National Science Foundation. Vasconcelos reports financial support was provided by Australian Research Council. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Data Availability

All data are permanently available here: doi:10.22002/vaf15-m6q45

Supplemental Material

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX)

Files

1-s2.0-S0009254124003346-main.pdf

Files (10.2 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:fce3e3a24c448284cb5a9aa68f0ba8da
2.1 MB Preview Download
md5:b289848e7d037d6fe7afff5c56a49c7d
7.8 MB Download
md5:7e1bea753b4bed08873b682822e42fb8
256.4 kB Download

Additional details

Related works

Is supplemented by
Dataset: 10.22002/vaf15-m6q45 (DOI)

Funding

National Science Foundation
EAR-1945974
Australian Research Council
DP160104988

Dates

Accepted
2024-06-24
Available
2024-06-25
Available online
Available
2024-07-05
Version of record

Caltech Custom Metadata

Caltech groups
Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences (GPS)
Publication Status
Published