Published April 1983 | Version Submitted
Working Paper Open

The Polarization of American Politics

Abstract

Elected officials in the United States appear to represent relatively extreme support coalitions rather than the interests of middle-of-the-road voters. This contention is supported by analysis of variance of liberal-conservative positions in the United States Senate from 1959 to 1980. Within both the Democratic and the Republican parties, there is considerable variation in liberal-conservative positions, but two senators from the same state and party tend to be very similar. In contrast, two senators from the same state but from different parties are highly dissimilar, suggesting that each party represents an extreme support coalition in the state. Moreover, the distribution of senators is now consistent with the hypothesis that, in the long run, both parties are equally likely to win any seat in the Senate. This result suggests that there is now competition between equally balanced but extreme support coalitions throughout most of the United States.

Additional Information

The work reported here would not have been undertaken had our interest in constituency representation not been stimulated by conversations with Rod Kiewiet and Thomas Romer. We also thank Bruce Cain for comments. Errors remain our responsibility. Published as Poole, Keith T. and Rosenthal, Howard (1984) The Polarization of American Politics. Journal of Politics, 46 (4). pp. 1061-1079.

Attached Files

Submitted - sswp476.pdf

Files

sswp476.pdf

Files (1.8 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:7d6c0f187a928e2bb25c664e7d3cd2dd
1.8 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

Eprint ID
83240
Resolver ID
CaltechAUTHORS:20171115-154009616

Dates

Created
2017-11-15
Created from EPrint's datestamp field
Updated
2019-10-03
Created from EPrint's last_modified field

Caltech Custom Metadata

Caltech groups
Social Science Working Papers
Series Name
Social Science Working Paper
Series Volume or Issue Number
476