Hexa-Fe(III) Carboxylate Complexes Facilitate Aerobic Hydrocarbon Oxidative Functionalization: Rh Catalyzed Oxidative Coupling of Benzene and Ethylene to Form Styrene
Abstract
Fe(II) carboxylates react with dioxygen and carboxylic acid to form Fe6(μ–OH)2(μ3–O)2(μ–X)12(HX)2 (X = acetate or pivalate), which is an active oxidant for Rh-catalyzed arene alkenylation. Heating (150–200 °C) the catalyst precursor [(η2–C2H4)2Rh(μ–OAc)]2 with ethylene, benzene, Fe(II) carboxylate, and dioxygen yields styrene >30-fold faster than the reaction with dioxygen in the absence of the Fe(II) carboxylate additive. It is also demonstrated that Fe6(μ–OH)2(μ3–O)2(μ–X)12(HX)2 is an active oxidant under anaerobic conditions, and the reduced material can be reoxidized to Fe6(μ–OH)2(μ3–O)2(μ–X)12(HX)2 by dioxygen. At optimized conditions, a turnover frequency of ∼0.2 s–1 is achieved. Unlike analogous reactions with Cu(II) carboxylate oxidants, which undergo stoichiometric Cu(II)-mediated production of phenyl esters (e.g., phenyl acetate) as side products at temperatures ≥150 °C, no phenyl ester side product is observed when Fe carboxylate additives are used. Kinetic isotope effect experiments using C6H6 and C6D6 give kH/kD = 3.5(3), while the use of protio or monodeutero pivalic acid reveals a small KIE with kH/kD = 1.19(2). First-order dependencies on Fe(II) carboxylate and dioxygen concentration are observed in addition to complicated kinetic dependencies on the concentration of carboxylic acid and ethylene, both of which inhibit the reaction rate at a high concentration. Mechanistic studies are consistent with irreversible benzene C–H activation, ethylene insertion into the formed Rh–Ph bond, β–hydride elimination, and reaction of Rh–H with Fe6(μ–OH)2(μ3–O)2(μ–X)12(HX)2 to regenerate a Rh-carboxylate complex.
Copyright and License
© 2024 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY 4.0.
Acknowledgement
Experimental studies were supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division (DE-SC0000776) through the Catalysis Science Program. C.B.M., J.W.B., and W.A.G. were supported by NSF (CBET-2311117). We thank Professor Sen Zhang for allowing us to use his laboratory’s UV–visible spectrometer, and Dr. Yulu Zhang for her assistance in obtaining spectra. We thank Hannah Ketcham and Dr. Fanji Kong for their assistance in quantifying butadiene production.
Data Availability
-
Additional experimental details including detailed experimental procedures and data used to generate kinetic plots (PDF)
CCDC 2336484–2336485 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Files
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:b91358c21f98c67dae965108d8fe7bb8
|
18.3 MB | Preview Download |
md5:f0006e711c8ecb5a1c2e61acd80ee7cb
|
7.3 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
- ISSN
- 2155-5435
- PMCID
- PMC11232027
- DOI
- 10.1021/acscatal.4c02355
- United States Department of Energy
- DE-SC0000776
- National Science Foundation
- CBET-2311117