Published February 1, 2024 | Supplemental material
Journal Article Open

Shallow carbonate geochemistry in the Bahamas since the last interglacial period

  • 1. ROR icon Princeton University
  • 2. ROR icon University of Victoria
  • 3. ROR icon University of California, Berkeley
  • 4. ROR icon California Institute of Technology
  • 5. ROR icon Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Abstract

The carbon isotope composition (δ¹³C) of ancient shallow-water carbonates frequently is used to reconstruct changes to Earth's global carbon cycle and to perform chemostratigraphic correlation. However, previous work demonstrates that local banktop processes also exert an important control on shallow carbonate δ¹³C as well as other isotope systems like δ¹⁸O. To effectively interpret ancient δ¹³C records, we must understand how both global carbon cycle perturbations and changes to local conditions are translated to the stratigraphic record. Modern environments, while imperfect analogues, can serve as a guide for interpreting physical and geochemical records of more ancient environments. Shallow carbonate strata from the most recent Pleistocene glacial cycles, which drove high-amplitude perturbations to sea level, temperature, and pCO2 without significantly altering the δ¹³C of global-mean seawater DIC, present an opportunity to begin untangling signals of global and local processes. However, the geochemistry of Pleistocene platform carbonates largely was overprinted by dissolution and meteoric diagenesis during glacial sea level lowstands. To understand how shallow carbonate geochemistry has changed during the Pleistocene, we instead look to the periplatformal slope and proximal basins. These deep environments serve as a refuge for carbonate produced on the shelf and exported to the slope, and contain a record of shallow carbonate geochemistry that persists across glacial cycles. We study 21 short piston cores from around Bahamian platforms to quantify differences in banktop production and geochemistry between the Holocene interglacial, the last glacial period, and the last interglacial (LIG) period. We show that mud production persists on the periplatformal slopes during the last glacial period, but differences in geochemistry between glacial and interglacial carbonates are a complex function of surface conditions and diagenesis. In contrast, Holocene and LIG carbonates show no evidence of post-depositional alteration, and offer the chance to study differences in δ¹³C and δ¹⁸O between interglacials. We find that while the δ¹³C of aragonite mud is the same during the Holocene and LIG, the LIG carbonate factory may have delivered more aragonite mud to the periplatform. In addition, the mean δ¹⁸O of this mud is elevated compared to the Holocene. We posit that these differences are caused by changes to regional climate and LIG surface conditions.

Copyright and License

© 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Nichole Anest and Mallory Mintz at the Lamont-Doherty Core Repository of Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory for their hospitality and assistance while collecting the samples used in this study, and Maureen Raymo for opening the core repository to us. Thank you to Kathryn Elder and the laboratory staff at NOSAMS for performing radiocarbon analyses. Additionally, we thank Ryan Manzuk, Sarah Ward, Stefania Gili, Daniel Gregory, John Schreiber, and Nan Yao for assistance with laboratory work. We acknowledge the use of Princeton's Imaging and Analysis Center (IAC), which is partially supported through the Princeton Center for Complex Materials (PCCM), a National Science Foundation (NSF)-MRSEC program (DMR-2011750). S.E. acknowledges support from the Princeton Geosciences Department, the Princeton Department of Undergraduate Research, and the Evolving Earth Foundation. D.A.S. acknowledges support from the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division, under Award Number DE-AC02-05CH11231.

Supplemental Material

MMC 1. Supplementary material containing extended information on 1) analytical methods, 2) age model construction, 3) geochemical and petrographic data for both interglacial and glacial periplatform core samples, 4) our interpretation of these data, including assessment for diagenetic alteration, 5) extended discussion of our endmember d13C inference results, and 6) implications for ancient shallow-water carbonate stratigraphy.

MMC 2. README.txt for supplementary data for Edmonsond et al. (2024): “Shallow carbonate geochemistry in the Bahamas since the last interglacial period”.

MMC 3. Latitude, longitude, water depth, and collection year for each sediment core.

MMC 4. Summary of geochemical data (d13C, d18O, mineralogy, d44Ca, and elemental concentrations relative to Ca and Mg), radiocarbon ages, and MCMC age estimates for each sample. Data for each sediment core is provided in a separate sheet.

MMC 5. Summary clumped isotope (D47) data are reported in the 'Clumped - Sample Averages' sheet, along with associated d13C and d18O data. Data for individual analyses of samples are in 'Clumped - Samples', while data for individual analyses of standards are in 'Clumped - Standards'.

MMC 6. U-series data and calculated U-Th ages for 4 periplatform core samples.

MMC 7. Summary of XRD mineralogy, d13C, and d18O data for shallow-water banktop sediments plotted in Fig. 3B of the main text. The UTM coordinates for each sample also are provided. Mineralogy data for periplatform core samples is provided in core_geochemistry_summary.xlsx. d13C and d18O data for banktop sediments previously were published in: Geyman, E.C. & Maloof, A.C. 2021. Facies control on d13C on the Great Bahama Bank, Geology 49(9): 1049-1054, https://doi.org/10.1130/G48862.1.

Data Availability

All data and code required to reproduce our analysis are available on GitHub (https://github.com/sedmonsond/bahamas-periplatform-epsl) and Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10211822).

Files

ScienceDirect_files_10Apr2025_20-55-45.105.zip
Files (33.8 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:6bdadec7ae3f8cf29aa3b4a129b5aed0
33.8 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
April 10, 2025
Modified:
July 3, 2025