Welcome to the new version of CaltechAUTHORS. Login is currently restricted to library staff. If you notice any issues, please email coda@library.caltech.edu
Published August 28, 2012 | Published
Journal Article Open

The role of velocity-neutral creep on the modulation of tectonic tremor activity by periodic loading


Slow slip events and associated non-volcanic tremors are sensitive to oscillatory stress perturbations, such as those induced by tides or seismic surface waves. Slow slip events and tremors are thought to occur near the seismic-aseismic transition regions of active faults, where the difference a − b = ∂μ/∂lnV between the sensitivity of friction to slip rate and fault state, which characterizes the stability of slip, can be arbitrarily small. We investigate the response of a velocity-strengthening fault region to oscillatory loads through analytical approximations and spring-slider simulations. We find that fault areas that are near velocity-neutral at steady-state, i.e., ∂μ / ∂lnV ≈ 0, are highly sensitive to cyclic loads: oscillatory stress perturbations in a certain range of periods induce large transient slip velocities. These aseismic transients can in turn trigger tremor activity with enhanced oscillatory modulation. In this sensitive regime, a harmonic Coulomb stress perturbation of amplitude ΔS causes a slip rate perturbation varying as e^(ΔS/(a−b)σ), where σ is the effective normal stress. This result is in agreement with observations of the relationship between tremor rate and amplitude of stress perturbations for tremors triggered by passing seismic waves. Our model of tremor modulation mediated by transient creep does not require extremely high pore fluid pressure and provides a framework to interpret the sensitivity and phase of tidally modulated tremors observed in Parkfield and Shikoku in terms of spatial variations of friction parameters and background slip rate.

Additional Information

© 2012 American Geophysical Union. Received 9 May 2012; revised 27 July 2012; accepted 1 August 2012; published 31 August 2012. This research was supported by NSF grants EAR-1015698 and EAR-0838495, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation and the Southern California Earthquake Center (funded by NSF Cooperative Agreement EAR-0106924 and USGS Cooperative Agreement EAR-0106924, NSF grant EAR0838495 and USGS Cooperative Agreement 02HQAG0008). We thank Paul Segall and another anonymous reviewer for useful comments. This paper is Caltech Tectonics Observatory contribution 206, Caltech Seismolab contribution 10081 and SCEC contribution 1647. The Editor thanks Paul Segall and an anonymous reviewer for assisting in the evaluation of this paper.

Attached Files

Published - 2012GL052326.pdf


Files (266.9 kB)
Name Size Download all
266.9 kB Preview Download

Additional details

August 22, 2023
October 19, 2023