An Experimental Study of Jury Decision Rules
Abstract
We present experimental results on individual decisions in juries. We consider the effect of three treatment variables: the size of the jury (three or six), the number of votes needed for conviction (majority or unanimity), and jury deliberation. We find evidence of strategic voting under the unanimity rule, where the form of strategic behavior involves a bias to vote guilty to compensate for the unanimity requirement. A large fraction of jurors vote to convict even when their private information indicates the defendant is more likely to be innocent than guilty. This is roughly consistent with the game theoretic predictions of Feddersen and Pesendorfer (FP) [1998]. While individual behavior is explained well by the game theoretic model, at the level of the jury decision, there are numerous discrepancies. In particular, contrary to the FP prediction, we find that in our experiments juries convict fewer innocent defendants under unanimity rule than under majority rule. We are able to simultaneously account for the individual and group data by using Quantal Response Equilibrium to model the error.
Additional Information
Revised version. Original version dated to October 1997. Support of the National Science Foundation (Grant #SBR-9617854) is gratefully acknowledged. We thank Tara Butterfield for research assistance, John Patty for help in running the experiments, and Tim Reed and Charles Smith for writing the computer program for the experiments. We also thank Tim Feddersen, Susanne Lohmann, Krishna Ladha, the audiences at several academic conferences and seminars, and three referees for their comments. Published as Guarnaschelli, S., McKelvey, R.D., & Palfrey, T.R. (2000). An experimental study of jury decision rules. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 407-423.Attached Files
Submitted - sswp1034.pdf
Files
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:d22514fe9e72218218daaaa281ce3a92
|
904.0 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
- Eprint ID
- 80321
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20170811-153843207
- NSF
- SBR-9617854
- Created
-
2017-08-11Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2019-11-22Created from EPrint's last_modified field
- Caltech groups
- Social Science Working Papers
- Series Name
- Social Science Working Paper
- Series Volume or Issue Number
- 1034