Published April 1, 2025 | Published
Journal Article Open

Experimental determination of hydrogen isotopic equilibrium in the system H₂O(l)-H₂(g) from 3 to 90 °C

  • 1. ROR icon University of California, Berkeley
  • 2. ROR icon United States Geological Survey
  • 3. ROR icon California Institute of Technology
  • 4. ROR icon Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
An error occurred while generating the citation.

Abstract

Molecular hydrogen (H2) is found in a variety of settings on and in the Earth from low-temperature sediments to hydrothermal vents, and is actively being considered as an energy resource for the transition to a green energy future. The hydrogen isotopic composition of H2, given as D/H ratios or δD, varies in nature by hundreds of per mil from ∼−800 ‰ in hydrothermal and sedimentary systems to ∼+450 ‰ in the stratosphere. This range reflects a variety of processes, including kinetic isotope effects associated with formation and destruction and equilibration with water, the latter proceeding at fast (order year) timescales at low temperatures (<100 °C). At isotopic equilibrium, the D/H fractionation factor between liquid water and hydrogen (DαH2O(l)-H2(g)) is a function of temperature and can thus be used as a geothermometer for H2 formation or re-equilibration temperatures. Multiple studies have produced theoretical calculations for hydrogen isotopic equilibrium between H2 and water vapor. However, only three published experimental calibrations used in geochemistry exist for the H2O-H2 system: two between 51 and 742 °C for H2O(g)-H2(g) (Suess, 1949Cerrai et al., 1954), and one in the H2O(l)-H2(g) system for temperatures <100 °C (Rolston et al., 1976). Despite these calibrations existing, there is uncertainty on their accuracy at low temperatures (<100 °C; e.g., Horibe and Craig, 1995).

Copyright and License

© 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.

Acknowledgement

This material is based upon work supported by U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division, under Award Numbers DE-AC02-05CH11231 and DE-SC0022949. We thank Nina Golombek (UC Berkeley) for help translating Suess (1949). We also acknowledge and thank John Eiler (Caltech) for valuable discussion and access to the laboratory in the Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences at Caltech for δDH2 measurements on the 253 Ultra. We also thank Matthieu Clog and two anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful comments.

Contributions

Flora Hochscheid: Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Conceptualization. Andrew C. Turner: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Methodology, Formal analysis. Noam Lotem: Investigation. Markus Bill: Writing – review & editing, Methodology, Investigation. Daniel A. Stolper: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Supervision, Methodology, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis, Conceptualization.

Data Availability

Data are available through Mendeley Data at https://doi.org/10.17632/63bmz2z8v9.1.

Supplemental Material

Supplementary Data 1 (ZIP)

Files

1-s2.0-S0016703725001073-mmc1.zip
Files (234.0 kB)
Name Size Download all
md5:5eb21056aa654a4055ec599f0bbd225f
234.0 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
April 1, 2025
Modified:
April 1, 2025