Published August 2025 | Supplemental material
Journal Article Open

Localization of inelastic strain with fault maturity and effects on earthquake characteristics

  • 1. ROR icon California Institute of Technology
  • 2. ROR icon University of Southern California
  • 3. ROR icon Grenoble Alpes University

Abstract

Coseismic ruptures release stored elastic strain through a combination of shear displacement along localized, principal faults and distributed bulk inelastic failure of the surrounding material. How inelastic strain localizes as fault systems mature and structurally develop is less well understood owing to the difficulty of measuring the complex, near-field and high-strain regions of coseismic surface ruptures. Here we use radar and optical images to measure the near-field surface displacement field and magnitude of off-fault inelastic strain from 16 historic strike-slip earthquakes that occurred on faults with cumulative displacements and fault slip rates that span almost three orders of magnitude. We show that inelastic shear deformation does localize as fault systems mature: the magnitude of off-fault inelastic strain is largest (34–67%) for fault systems with the lowest cumulative displacements (<3 km) and then rapidly decays to values that saturate around 13–19% for the most ‘mature’ fault systems with cumulative displacements exceeding ~20 km. We find that more localized coseismic ruptures host faster ruptures, generate fewer aftershocks and occur along geometrically simpler fault networks.

Copyright and License

© 2025 Springer Nature Limited. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the NASA Earth Surface and Interior focus area and performed at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology (grant 80NM0018D0004). We thank NASA/JPL-Caltech for providing the raw single-look complexes for the UAVSAR images (https://uavsar.jpl.nasa.gov/). We also thank the numerous colleagues who shared their field observations, slip models, remote-sensing datasets and surface mapping, including Y. Li, M. Mai, S. Barbot, W. Xu, K. Chen, D. Yuan, J. Liu-Zeng, Z. Liu, Y. Liu, Y. Klinger, C. Glennie and A. Sarmiento. We acknowledge the use of the open-source Generic Mapping Tools software for all map illustrations.

Data Availability

The surface displacement maps, fault slip, rupture traces and strain maps can be found at Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11663566 (ref. 71). The fault slip data measured by us in this study using geodetic imaging that were used to estimate OFD are available via Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12713891 (ref. 79). Field observations of the fault slip and all the fault traces used are available from the UCLA Fault displacement hazard initiative (https://dataverse.ucla.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.25346/S6/Y4F9LJ)80. Landsat and high-resolution aerial images are available from the USGS EarthExplorer (https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/). Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 imagery is available at https://dataspace.copernicus.eu/browser/. Archival SPOT imagery is available at https://regards.cnes.fr/user/swh/modules/60. The raw single-look complex data acquired by the UAVSAR platform can be downloaded from NASA/JPL at https://uavsar.jpl.nasa.gov/Source data are provided with this paper.

Code Availability

The 2D horizontal displacement maps produced using optical images were processed using COSI-Corr (http://www.tectonics.caltech.edu/slip_history/spot_coseis/download_software.html) and 3D displacement maps using COSI-Corr+ (https://github.com/SaifAati/Geospatial-COSICorr3D). The radar data were processed using ISCE2 (https://github.com/isce-framework/isce2).

Supplemental Material

Supplementary Information:

Supplementary Figs. 1–12 and Tables 1 and 2.

Source Data Fig. 1:

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 2:

Statistical source data (the zip file contains a series of.txt files containing data for each of the earthquakes plotted in Fig. 2).

Source Data Fig. 3:

Statistical source data.

Source Data Fig. 4:

Statistical source data.

Extended Data Fig. 1: Surface displacement maps

Extended Data Fig. 2: Maps of OFD

Extended Data Fig. 3: Along-fault slip profiles

Extended Data Fig. 4: Unclipped correlation plots

Extended Data Fig. 5: Regressions of OFD without clipping

Extended Data Fig. 6: Estimates of surface rupture roughness

Extended Data Fig. 7: Sensitivity of slip deficit regressions for events with prominent surface rupture

Files

41561_2025_1752_MOESM1_ESM.pdf
Files (3.3 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:22e001967188e0416533ced5c41fd666
10.7 kB Download
md5:3792da2cc0277766bc3ed404d09d0fb6
3.2 MB Preview Download
md5:a3525dae834b304c8db8d0993cd605be
11.0 kB Download
md5:516bd69bf9ba6ae2bfafc9b5c43f4df3
1.0 kB Preview Download
md5:03b91f566f4081e18b0bc4cfd4749e4d
25.2 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
September 20, 2025
Modified:
September 23, 2025