Published March 28, 2012 | Version Submitted
Discussion Paper Open

Protean Free Will

Creators

Abstract

This paper argues that free will is a purely theological issue, and offers an error theory for the free will debates in analytic philosophy in terms of evolutionary naturalism. I introduce 'protean free will' (PFW) as the ability to play mixed strategies effectively in noncooperative interactions. Thence, I argue that traditional worries about divine foreknowledge, Frankfurt controllers, moral responsibility, and determinism are side effects of selective pressures for unpredictability in our evolutionary past. Finally, I interpret the Libet experiments as showing an adaptive response to such pressures. I conclude that PFW does most things most philosophers want free will to do, conditional on the nonexistence of God.

Additional Information

Special thanks to Daniel Dennett and the participants in his Free Will seminar at Tufts University. Thanks also to Kenyon Bradt, Tristan Chambers, Simon Reid, and Margaret Smith for helpful feedback on earlier drafts.

Attached Files

Submitted - Protean_Free_Will.pdf

Files

Protean_Free_Will.pdf

Files (227.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:5ac5edef1c4138cf2f46bed89a52cf23
227.6 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

Eprint ID
29887
Resolver ID
CaltechAUTHORS:20120328-152031480

Dates

Created
2012-03-28
Created from EPrint's datestamp field
Updated
2019-10-03
Created from EPrint's last_modified field