Published August 31, 2023 | Published
Journal Article Open

Direct observations of NOx emissions over the San Joaquin Valley using airborne flux measurements during RECAP-CA 2021 field campaign

  • 1. ROR icon University of California, Berkeley
  • 2. ROR icon Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • 3. ROR icon Environmental Protection Agency
  • 4. ROR icon University of Iowa
  • 5. ROR icon Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology
  • 6. ROR icon Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
  • 7. ROR icon California Institute of Technology
  • 8. ROR icon Naval Postgraduate School

Abstract

Nitrogen oxides (NOx) are principle components of air pollution and serve as important ozone precursors. As the San Joaquin Valley (SJV) experiences some of the worst air quality in the United States, reducing NOx emissions is a pressing need, yet quantifying current emissions is complicated due to a mixture of mobile and agriculture sources. We performed airborne eddy covariance flux measurements during the Re-Evaluating the Chemistry of Air Pollutants in California (RECAP-CA) field campaign in June 2021. Combining footprint calculations and land cover statistics, we disaggregate the observed fluxes into component fluxes characterized by three different land cover types. On average, we find emissions of 0.95 mg N m−2 h−1 over highways, 0.43 mg N m−2 h−1 over urban areas, and 0.30 mg N m−2 h−1 over croplands. The calculated NOx emissions using flux observations are utilized to evaluate anthropogenic emissions inventories and soil NOx emissions schemes. We show that two anthropogenic inventories for mobile sources, EMFAC (EMission FACtors) and FIVE (Fuel-based Inventory for Vehicle Emissions), yield strong agreement with emissions derived from measured fluxes over urban regions. Three soil NOx schemes, including the MEGAN v3 (Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature), BEIS v3.14 (Biogenic Emission Inventory System), and BDISNP (Berkeley–Dalhousie–Iowa Soil NO Parameterization), show substantial underestimates over the study domain. Compared to the cultivated soil NOx emissions derived from measured fluxes, MEGAN and BEIS are lower by more than 1 order of magnitude, and BDISNP is lower by a factor of 2.2. Despite the low bias, observed soil NOx emissions and BDISNP present a similar spatial pattern and temperature dependence. We conclude that soil NOx is a key feature of the NOx emissions in the SJV and that a biogeochemical-process-based model of these emissions is needed to simulate emissions for modeling air quality in the region.

Copyright and License

© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union.

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge the financial support of the California Air Resources Board and the Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE; from Brian McDonald) for the RECAP-CA field campaign. Qindan Zhu has been supported by the NOAA Climate and Global Change Postdoc Fellowship, and Eva Y. Pfannerstill has been supported by a Feodor Lynen Fellowship from the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation. Jun Wang and Huanxin Zhang acknowledge the support of NASA Atmospheric Composition and Modeling Program. We thank Dennis Baldocchi, Glenn Wolfe, and Erin Delaria for their help in calculating vertical divergence. We extend our gratitude to Brian McDonald, Rebecca Schwantes, and Siyuan Wang for engaging in discussions at project meetings. We appreciate use of the emissions inventories provided by Modeling and Meteorology Branch at CARB and NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory. We acknowledge the help from pilots, Bryce Kujat and George Loudakis, during the RECAP-CA field campaign.

Funding

The RECAP-CA field campaign has been supported by the California Air Resources Board (grant nos. 20AQP012 and 20RD003) and PECASE. Jun Wang and Huanxin Zhang have been supported by ACMAP (grant no. 80NSSC19K0950).

Contributions

RCC and AHG supervised the research. BP, EYP, BCS, PW CA, AB, JHS, RCC, and AHG participated in the field campaign. BP and PW conducted the NOx measurements. ST, HZ, and JW provided model-simulated BDISNP soil NOx emissions. QZ performed the analysis, with contributions from BP, EYP, and CMN. QZ prepared the paper. All authors have reviewed and edited the paper.

Conflict of Interest

At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor, and the authors also have no other competing interests to declare.

Data Availability

The measurement data from the RECAP-CA field champaign are available at https://csl.noaa.gov/groups/csl7/measurements/2021sunvex/TwinOtter/DataDownload/ (Chemical Sciences Laboratory2023), and the password is available upon request to the corresponding authors. The analysis codes for this study are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8279595 (Zhu et al.2023).

Supplemental Material

The supplement related to this article is available online at: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9669-2023-supplement.

Additional Information

This paper was edited by Thomas Karl and reviewed by two anonymous referees.

Files

acp-23-9669-2023.pdf
Files (8.6 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:c7a35c3aeeeec51fc420cf3adeab64d8
4.6 MB Preview Download
md5:440a99914f895899de1c250e3c7e141a
4.0 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Created:
February 4, 2025
Modified:
February 4, 2025