Direct observations of NOx emissions over the San Joaquin Valley using airborne flux measurements during RECAP-CA 2021 field campaign
-
1.
University of California, Berkeley
-
2.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
-
3.
Environmental Protection Agency
-
4.
University of Iowa
-
5.
Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology
-
6.
Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
-
7.
California Institute of Technology
-
8.
Naval Postgraduate School
Abstract
Nitrogen oxides (NOx) are principle components of air pollution and serve as important ozone precursors. As the San Joaquin Valley (SJV) experiences some of the worst air quality in the United States, reducing NOx emissions is a pressing need, yet quantifying current emissions is complicated due to a mixture of mobile and agriculture sources. We performed airborne eddy covariance flux measurements during the Re-Evaluating the Chemistry of Air Pollutants in California (RECAP-CA) field campaign in June 2021. Combining footprint calculations and land cover statistics, we disaggregate the observed fluxes into component fluxes characterized by three different land cover types. On average, we find emissions of 0.95 mg N m−2 h−1 over highways, 0.43 mg N m−2 h−1 over urban areas, and 0.30 mg N m−2 h−1 over croplands. The calculated NOx emissions using flux observations are utilized to evaluate anthropogenic emissions inventories and soil NOx emissions schemes. We show that two anthropogenic inventories for mobile sources, EMFAC (EMission FACtors) and FIVE (Fuel-based Inventory for Vehicle Emissions), yield strong agreement with emissions derived from measured fluxes over urban regions. Three soil NOx schemes, including the MEGAN v3 (Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature), BEIS v3.14 (Biogenic Emission Inventory System), and BDISNP (Berkeley–Dalhousie–Iowa Soil NO Parameterization), show substantial underestimates over the study domain. Compared to the cultivated soil NOx emissions derived from measured fluxes, MEGAN and BEIS are lower by more than 1 order of magnitude, and BDISNP is lower by a factor of 2.2. Despite the low bias, observed soil NOx emissions and BDISNP present a similar spatial pattern and temperature dependence. We conclude that soil NOx is a key feature of the NOx emissions in the SJV and that a biogeochemical-process-based model of these emissions is needed to simulate emissions for modeling air quality in the region.
Copyright and License
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union.
Acknowledgement
Funding
The RECAP-CA field campaign has been supported by the California Air Resources Board (grant nos. 20AQP012 and 20RD003) and PECASE. Jun Wang and Huanxin Zhang have been supported by ACMAP (grant no. 80NSSC19K0950).
Contributions
RCC and AHG supervised the research. BP, EYP, BCS, PW CA, AB, JHS, RCC, and AHG participated in the field campaign. BP and PW conducted the NOx measurements. ST, HZ, and JW provided model-simulated BDISNP soil NOx emissions. QZ performed the analysis, with contributions from BP, EYP, and CMN. QZ prepared the paper. All authors have reviewed and edited the paper.
Conflict of Interest
At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor, and the authors also have no other competing interests to declare.
Data Availability
The measurement data from the RECAP-CA field champaign are available at https://csl.noaa.gov/groups/csl7/measurements/2021sunvex/TwinOtter/DataDownload/ (Chemical Sciences Laboratory, 2023), and the password is available upon request to the corresponding authors. The analysis codes for this study are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8279595 (Zhu et al., 2023).
Supplemental Material
The supplement related to this article is available online at: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-9669-2023-supplement.
Additional Information
This paper was edited by Thomas Karl and reviewed by two anonymous referees.
Files
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:c7a35c3aeeeec51fc420cf3adeab64d8
|
4.6 MB | Preview Download |
md5:440a99914f895899de1c250e3c7e141a
|
4.0 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
- Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
- California Air Resources Board
- 20AQP012
- California Air Resources Board
- 20RD003
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- 80NSSC19K0950
- Accepted
-
2023-07-12Accepted
- Publication Status
- Published