A guide to troubleshooting metal sacrificial anodes for organic electrosynthesis
Abstract
The development of reductive electrosynthetic reactions is often enabled by the oxidation of a sacrificial metal anode, which charge-balances the reductive reaction of interest occurring at the cathode. The metal oxidation is frequently assumed to be straightforward and innocent relative to the chemistry of interest, but several processes can interfere with ideal sacrificial anode behavior, thereby limiting the success of reductive electrosynthetic reactions. These issues are compounded by a lack of reported observations and characterization of the anodes themselves, even when a failure at the anode is observed. Here, we weave lessons from electrochemistry, interfacial characterization, and organic synthesis to share strategies for overcoming issues related to sacrificial anodes in electrosynthesis. We highlight common but underexplored challenges with sacrificial anodes that cause reactions to fail, including detrimental side reactions between the anode or its cations and the components of the organic reaction, passivation of the anode surface by an insulating native surface film, accumulation of insulating byproducts at the anode surface during the reaction, and competitive reduction of sacrificial metal cations at the cathode. For each case, we propose experiments to diagnose and characterize the anode and explore troubleshooting strategies to overcome the challenge. We conclude by highlighting open questions in the field of sacrificial-anode-driven electrosynthesis and by indicating alternatives to traditional sacrificial anodes that could streamline reaction optimization.
Copyright and License
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence. All publication charges for this article have been paid for by the Royal Society of Chemistry
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation Center for Synthetic Organic Electrochemistry (CHE-2002158). K. A. S. acknowledges support from the David and Lucile Packard Foundation, Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, and Camille and Henry Dreyfus Foundation. The authors thank Nicholas V. Dulock for graphic design assistance.
Contributions
S. D. W., W. Z., and K. A. S. conceptualized the perspective. S. D. W., W. Z., and W. G. performed the literature review. S. D. W. wrote the manuscript. W. G. and S. L. provided critical insights into synthetic reactions. K. A. S. provided guidance on content and organization. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript.
Acknowledgement
There are no conflicts to declare.
Files
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:80aed69d6f1f196407a24923aca7c9a9
|
1.9 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
- ISSN
- 2041-6539
- PMCID
- PMC11041367
- National Science Foundation
- CHE-2002158
- David and Lucile Packard Foundation
- Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
- Camille and Henry Dreyfus Foundation
- Royal Society of Chemistry