Published May 1, 2025 | Supplemental material
Journal Article Open

Stable isotope equilibria in the dihydrogen-water-methane-ethane-propane system. Part 1: Path-integral calculations with CCSD(T) quality potentials

  • 1. ROR icon California Institute of Technology
  • 2. ROR icon University of Rochester
  • 3. ROR icon University of California, Berkeley
  • 4. ROR icon Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  • 5. ROR icon United States Geological Survey
  • 6. ROR icon Emory University
  • 7. ROR icon University of Luxembourg

Abstract

Isotopic compositions of alkanes are typically assumed to be kinetically controlled, but recently it has been proposed that alkanes can isotopically equilibrate for both C and H isotopes during natural gas generation. Evaluation of this requires knowledge of the isotopic equilibrium between alkanes and other common hydrogen and carbon bearing species. Here we calculate isotopic equilibria within and between gaseous dihydrogen (H2), water (H2O), methane (CH4), ethane (C2H6) and propane (C3H8), including isotope fractionation among molecules, clumped isotope effects, as well as among sites of propane (i.e., the site-specific isotope effects) from 0°C to 500°C using a path-integral method paired with high-level descriptions of molecular potentials and the diagonal correction to the Born–Oppenheimer approximation. While path-integral calculations with high-level CCSD(T) potentials are available for the isotopic equilibria involving methane, the path-integral calculations for ethane and propane have only been performed based on lower-level descriptions of the molecular potentials. We analyze the relative importance of various approximations that are commonly employed when isotopic equilibria are evaluated. We find that clumped isotope effects can be calculated to the same accuracy using computationally inexpensive combination of the Bigeleisen-Mayer-Urey model with the molecular potential from density functional theory. In contrast, fractionation and site preferences of both deuterium and carbon-13 benefit from the use of the higher level CCSD(T) potentials and accounting for anharmonic effects. Additionally, for fractionation and site preference of deuterium, corrections to Born–Oppenheimer approximation can also be important.

Copyright and License

© 2025 Elsevier Ltd. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.

Acknowledgement

DAS acknowledges support from the US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Chemical Sciences, Geosciences, and Biosciences Division, under Award Numbers DE-AC02-05CH11231 and DE-SC0022949. WGIII acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation under award number CBET-2311117 The computations presented here were conducted in the Resnick High Performance Computing Center, a facility supported by Resnick Sustainability Institute at the California Institute of Technology. RK thanks Dr. Tomislav Begušić for helpful discussions.

Data Availability

Data are available through Mendeley Data at https://doi.org/10.17632/2kn87g7d46.1

Supplemental Material

Supplementary Data 1 (PDF)

Supplementary Data 2 (XLSX)

Files

1-s2.0-S0016703725001061-mmc1.pdf
Files (3.9 MB)
Name Size Download all
md5:5f0f073f0e56ee65742cb5d1aa03ddaa
3.0 MB Preview Download
md5:49800164bd5307312cb508e7dba4d628
980.1 kB Download

Additional details

Created:
April 16, 2025
Modified:
July 3, 2025