Polarization and Campaign Spending in Elections
- Creators
- Hirsch, Alexander V.
Abstract
We develop a Downsian model of electoral competition in which candidates with both policy and office-motivations use a mixture of platforms and campaign spending to gain the median voter's support. The unique equilibrium involves randomizing over both platforms and spending, and exhibits the following properties – (i) ex-ante uncertainty in platforms, spending, and the election winner, (ii) platform divergence, (iii) inefficiency in spending and outcomes, (iv) polarization, and (v) voter extremism. We also show that platform polarization and campaign spending move in tandem, since spending is used by candidates to gain support for extreme platforms. Factors that contribute to both phenomena include the candidates' desire for extreme platforms, and their ability to translate campaign spending into support for them. The latter insight generates new hypotheses about the potential causes of both rising polarization and spending.
Additional Information
For helpful comments I thank Ken Shotts, Adam Meirowitz, and Salvatore Nunnari.Attached Files
Accepted Version - elections_post.pdf
Files
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:16ff2a546e875da6dcefb9dd4bd8be67
|
1.9 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
- Eprint ID
- 95195
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20190502-161551269
- Created
-
2019-05-03Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2022-11-29Created from EPrint's last_modified field
- Caltech groups
- Social Science Working Papers
- Series Name
- Social Science Working Paper
- Series Volume or Issue Number
- 1452