⁵³Mn-⁵³Cr chronometry of ureilites: Implications for the timing of parent body accretion, differentiation and secondary reduction
Abstract
Establishing the temporal evolution of the ureilite parent body(ies) is crucial for understanding the quantitative timescale of planetesimal formation and evolution in the protoplanetary disk. In order to establish a timeline for these early processes, age constraints on the accretion, differentiation and secondary reduction were obtained with the short-lived 53Mn-53Cr chronometer to whole-rock and sequentially digested fractions of main group ureilites. A whole-rock isochron dates the reservoir-scale Mn-Cr fractionation in the ureilite parent body(ies), associated with magmatic differentiation, to 2.89_(-0.51)^(+0.56) Ma after CAI formation. This age implies that the ureilite parent body(ies) accreted no later than ∼1.5 Ma after CAI formation, at a time when the NC-CC dichotomy was already established. The 53Mn-53Cr systematics of fractions from chromite-bearing ureilites yield an age of 4.29_(-0.45)^(+0.49) Ma after CAI formation for a secondary reduction event on the parent body. This event is commonly associated with the catastrophic disruption of the ureilite parent body while still hot. The chromite model ages are consistent with the isochron ages obtained from chromite-bearing ureilites. Collectively these ages indicate that chemical differentiation processes were underway on the ureilite parent body(ies) during the time interval when undifferentiated meteorite parent bodies were forming, and may have paused at the peak of planetesimal formation when planetary collisions were common.
Copyright and License
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ).
Data Availability
Data are available through Mendeley Data at https://doi.org/10.17632/4m7kxt8hwv.1.
Funding
This study was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) grant no. 188592 “Turning Points in Earth History Part 2”. AA acknowledges funding via Swiss Government Excellence Scholarship no. 2018.0371.
Acknowledgement
We thank Lorenz Gfeller for his analytical support during the ICP-MS analyses at the Institute of Geography, University of Bern and Jan Hoffmann for fruitful discussions throughout this study. This study benefited from the constructive comments provided by three anonymous reviewers and editorial handling by Liping Qin. US Antarctic meteorite samples were recovered by the Antarctic Search for Meteorites (ANSMET) program which has been funded by the NSF and NASA, and characterized and curated by the Department of Mineral Sciences of the Smithsonian Institution and Astromaterials Acquisition and Curation Office at NASA Johnson Space Center. The Natural History Museum in Bern is thanked for providing the meteorite samples RaS 517 and RF 522 from the Omani-Swiss Meteorite Search Collection. We also thank the UCLA meteorite collection for allocating the sample material of NWA 12969.
Contributions
Pascal M. Kruttasch: Writing – original draft, Visualization, Validation, Methodology, Investigation, Formal analysis, Conceptualization. Aryavart Anand: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Methodology, Investigation, Conceptualization. Paul H. Warren: Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Validation, Resources, Investigation. Chi Ma: Visualization, Validation, Investigation. Klaus Mezger: Writing – review & editing, Validation, Supervision, Resources, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization.
Files
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:046929c8d6fd5275ecc10b4831a1e91f
|
3.0 MB | Preview Download |
md5:db6e9509643363c5acf3e817b20c0b6a
|
3.6 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
- Swiss National Science Foundation
- 188592
- Available
-
2024-08-13Available Online
- Accepted
-
2024-08-10Manuscript Accepted
- Caltech groups
- Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences
- Publication Status
- Published