Northern Hemisphere mid-winter vortex-displacement and vortex-split stratospheric sudden warmings: Influence of the Madden-Julian Oscillation and Quasi-Biennial Oscillation
Abstract
We investigate the connection between the equatorial Madden‐Julian Oscillation (MJO) and different types of the Northern Hemisphere mid‐winter major stratospheric sudden warmings (SSWs), i.e., vortex‐displacement and vortex‐split SSWs. The MJO‐SSW relationship for vortex‐split SSWs is stronger than that for vortex‐displacement SSWs, as a result of the stronger and more coherent eastward propagating MJOs before vortex‐split SSWs than those before vortex‐displacement SSWs. Composite analysis indicates that both the intensity and propagation features of MJO may influence the MJO‐related circulation pattern at high latitudes and the type of SSWs. A pronounced Quasi‐Biennial Oscillation (QBO) dependence is found for vortex‐displacement and vortex‐split SSWs, with vortex‐displacement (‐split) SSWs occurring preferentially in easterly (westerly) QBO phases. The lagged composites suggest that the MJO‐related anomalies in the Arctic are very likely initiated when the MJO‐related convection is active over the equatorial Indian Ocean (around the MJO phase 3). Further analysis suggests that the QBO may modulate the MJO‐related wave disturbances via its influence on the upper tropospheric subtropical jet. As a result, the MJO‐related circulation pattern in the Arctic tends to be wave number‐one/wave number‐two ~25–30 days following phase 3 (i.e., approximately phases 7–8, when the MJO‐related convection is active over the western Pacific) during easterly/westerly QBO phases, which resembles the circulation pattern associated with vortex‐displacement/vortex‐split SSWs.
Additional Information
© 2014. American Geophysical Union. Received 6 APR 2014. Accepted 10 OCT 2014. Accepted article online 13 OCT 2014. Published online 28 NOV 2014. This research was supported by the National Science Foundation award ATM‐0840755 to University of California, Los Angeles. Part of this research was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. KFL was supported by the Jack Eddy Fellowship, managed by the University Corporation for Atmospheric research. We thank George Kiladis and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. We thank Guang J. Zhang for helpful discussions. The NCEP‐NCAR reanalysis data were kindly provided by the NOAA/OAR/ESRL‐PSD, Boulder, Colorado, from their website (http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/psd/).Attached Files
Published - Liu_et_al-2014-Journal_of_Geophysical_Research_3A_Atmospheres.pdf
Files
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:48a6948c8ff73aa23ec355364dc2fe43
|
18.9 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
- Eprint ID
- 91254
- Resolver ID
- CaltechAUTHORS:20181127-155643583
- NSF
- ATM-0840755
- NASA/JPL/Caltech
- University Corporation for Atmospheric Research
- Created
-
2018-11-28Created from EPrint's datestamp field
- Updated
-
2021-11-16Created from EPrint's last_modified field
- Caltech groups
- Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences