Published June 19, 2024 | Version Published
Journal Article Open

Opinion: Optimizing climate models with process knowledge, resolution, and artificial intelligence

  • 1. ROR icon California Institute of Technology
  • 2. ROR icon Google (United States)
  • 3. ROR icon Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
  • 4. ROR icon ETH Zurich

Abstract

Accelerated progress in climate modeling is urgently needed for proactive and effective climate change adaptation. The central challenge lies in accurately representing processes that are small in scale yet climatically important, such as turbulence and cloud formation. These processes will not be explicitly resolvable for the foreseeable future, necessitating the use of parameterizations. We propose a balanced approach that leverages the strengths of traditional process-based parameterizations and contemporary artificial intelligence (AI)-based methods to model subgrid-scale processes. This strategy employs AI to derive data-driven closure functions from both observational and simulated data, integrated within parameterizations that encode system knowledge and conservation laws. In addition, increasing the resolution to resolve a larger fraction of small-scale processes can aid progress toward improved and interpretable climate predictions outside the observed climate distribution. However, currently feasible horizontal resolutions are limited to O(10 km) because higher resolutions would impede the creation of the ensembles that are needed for model calibration and uncertainty quantification, for sampling atmospheric and oceanic internal variability, and for broadly exploring and quantifying climate risks. By synergizing decades of scientific development with advanced AI techniques, our approach aims to significantly boost the accuracy, interpretability, and trustworthiness of climate predictions.

Copyright and License

© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union.

Acknowledgement

We thank Joern Callies and Ulrich Schumann for providing the data for Fig. 3 and for their valuable discussions; Peter Caldwell, Yi-Fan Chen, Raffaele Ferrari, Nadir Jeevanjee, Thomas Müller, Fei Sha, and R. Saravanan for insightful comments on drafts; and Duan-Heng Chang for identifying a critical typo in a previous version of the analysis script for Fig. 1.

Funding

The research on which this essay draws is supported by Schmidt Sciences, LLC, the US National Science Foundation (grant no. AGS-1835860), and the Swiss National Science Foundation (award no. PCEFP2_203376).

Data Availability

The data and code needed to produce Fig. 1 are available at https://doi.org/10.22002/z24s9-nqc90 (Wills and Schneider2024), and those needed to produce Fig. 3 are available at https://doi.org/10.22002/qemqk-rgq45 (Schneider2024).

Additional Information

This article is part of the special issue “20 years of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics”. It is not associated with a conference.

This paper was edited by Ken Carslaw and Peter Haynes and reviewed by Peter Caldwell and one anonymous referee.

Files

acp-24-7041-2024.pdf

Files (3.6 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:964972dce10364f73a76daa466a52020
3.6 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Additional titles

Alternative title
Opinion: Optimizing climate models with process-knowledge, resolution, and AI

Related works

Has part
Journal Issue: https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/special_issue1238.html (URL)
Is new version of
Discussion Paper: 10.5194/egusphere-2024-20 (DOI)
Is supplemented by
Dataset: 10.22002/z24s9-nqc90 (DOI)
Software: 10.22002/qemqk-rgq45 (DOI)

Funding

National Science Foundation
AGS-1835860
Swiss National Science Foundation
PCEFP2_203376

Dates

Accepted
2024-04-28

Caltech Custom Metadata

Caltech groups
Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences (GPS)
Publication Status
Published